logo
Former Jan. 6 prosecutor and ex-DOJ employees sue Trump administration over firings

Former Jan. 6 prosecutor and ex-DOJ employees sue Trump administration over firings

NBC News25-07-2025
WASHINGTON — It was late afternoon on the last Friday in June, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Mike Gordon was in his office in Tampa, Florida, interviewing a victim for an upcoming trial via Zoom.
Alongside a special agent, Gordon was preparing the victim to be a witness in a Justice Department case against a lawyer who the Justice Department alleged had been scamming clients.
There was a knock at the door, Gordon later told NBC News, and he didn't answer; at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida, there was a culture of not just popping in when the door is closed. But the door popped open, and there stood the office manager, ashen-faced.
The office manager is in charge of security, and Gordon thought for a moment that something might have happened to his family. Gordon muted the Zoom call, and the office manager handed him a piece of paper.
It was a one-page letter signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi. He'd been terminated from federal service.
"No explanation. No advance warning. No description of what the cause was," Gordon said in an interview. "Now, I knew why. I knew it had to be my Jan. 6 work."
Gordon had been senior trial counsel in the Capitol Siege Section of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, which prosecuted alleged rioters involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. His title reflected some of the high-profile cases he'd taken on during the Jan. 6 investigation and the role he played in helping other federal prosecutors.
At the time of his firing, Gordon had long been working on other cases back home in Florida. He had recently been assigned to co-lead a case against two people accused of stealing more than $100 million from a medical trust for people with disabilities, as well as injured workers and retirees. Just two days before he was fired, he'd received an "outstanding" rating on his performance review.
Now, along with two other recently fired Justice Department employees, Gordon is pushing back, suing the Trump administration late Thursday over their dismissals. The suit argues that the normal procedures federal employees are expected to go through to address their grievances — the Merit Systems Protection Board — are fundamentally broken because of the Trump administration's actions.
MSPB is a quasi-judicial body that is meant to settle disputes between employees and their agencies, but the suit argues it "cannot function as intended" because of President Donald Trump's firing of MSPB member Cathy Harris. A federal court issued a permanent injunction reinstating Harris, but the Supreme Court stayed the injunction, allowing Harris' removal. Now the MSPB lacks a quorum to vote on any petitions for review, while MSPB administrative judges are "overwhelmed" because of the government's termination of thousands of federal employees.
Gordon filed the lawsuit alongside Patricia Hartman, who was a top spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, and Joseph Tirrell, who was director of the Departmental Ethics Office, before the Trump administration dismissed them this year. Tirrell, an FBI and Navy veteran, had 19 years of federal civil service, along with six years of military service, when he was fired.
Hartman, who had worked for various Justice Department components for almost two decades, oversaw news releases and media responses related to the Jan. 6 prosecutions, which was the largest investigation in FBI history, involving more than 1,500 defendants.
'I was never given an explanation for my termination," Hartman told NBC News. "Based on my performance reviews, which have always been outstanding, I have to believe that something else was driving this. The bottom line is this, in my mind, amounts to psychological terrorism. You are removing people who were good or excellent at their jobs with no explanation.'
The lawyers on the lawsuit are Abbe Lowell, Norm Eisen, Heidi Burakiewicz and Mark Zaid, a whistleblower attorney who has been targeted by the Trump administration, which stripped his security clearance after Trump named him in an executive order. Zaid has since sued.
The new administration has fired roughly 200 Justice Department employees, according to Justice Connection, an organization that was set up to support Justice Department employees.
"The way in which these employees have been terminated seems like a pretty clear violation of the Civil Service Protection Act and general constitutional due process protections, and it's been destabilizing for the workforce, because nobody knows when they're going to be next," said Stacy Young, a former Justice Department employee. 'I hear from employees all the time who tell me they wake up in the morning terrified that today will be their day. It feels to a lot of them like psychological warfare.'
Gordon was fired the same day two other Jan. 6 prosecutors were fired last month. He'd started out as a state prosecutor in New York City and began his career as a federal prosecutor in January 2017, working in the violent crimes and narcotics section. When he saw what happened on Jan. 6 and the call go out within the Justice Department for assistance prosecuting those involved, he signed up, he told NBC News.
Jason Manning, a former federal prosecutor who worked on Jan. 6 cases, as well, said Gordon executed back-to-back trials "flawlessly" and played a critical role in supporting others in the unit.
"On a large team of excellent and hard-working people, Mike really stood out as a leader on the team, as somebody who prosecuted some of the most notorious defendants and some of the most highly watched and high-pressure and critical cases," Manning said.
Among them was the case against Ray Epps, who was the target of false conspiracy theories claiming he was a federal government plant, before he was eventually charged by federal prosecutors, who sought to send him to prison for six months. A judge ultimately sentenced Epps to probation, citing the impact the conspiracy theories had on his life.
After Trump became the Republican presidential nominee last year, federal prosecutors working the Jan. 6 cases knew there was a risk to their work, and they made dark jokes about what could happen to them if Trump returned to office, multiple sources close to the Justice Department have told NBC News. Now, those fears have become a reality.
When he returned to office, Trump quickly pardoned Jan. 6 defendants en masse, and probationary federal prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases were fired, as were people who worked on special counsel Jack Smith's investigation of Trump. Current FBI employees who worked on the Smith and Jan. 6 probes still wonder what could happen to them down the road after the Justice Department demanded a list of employees who worked on those investigations.
"The people who volunteered for that detail are some of the best, smartest, most talented lawyers in the country," Gordon said, referring to Jan. 6 prosecutors. "It's not that somehow the administration should just pat itself on the back and say, 'Great, like, these are all deep state Democrats that we're driving out.' That's not what's happening. They are either firing or pushing out some of the most talented people they have."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nation's capital awaits Trump's next move as federal takeover threat looms
Nation's capital awaits Trump's next move as federal takeover threat looms

Los Angeles Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Nation's capital awaits Trump's next move as federal takeover threat looms

WASHINGTON — Around 2 a.m., noisy revelers emerging from clubs and bars packed the sidewalks of U Street in Washington, many of them seeking a late-night slice or falafel. A robust but not unusual contingent of city police cruisers lingered around the edges of the crowds. At other late-night hot spots, nearly identical scenes unfolded. What wasn't apparent in Friday's earliest hours: any sort of security lockdown by a multiagency flood of uniformed federal law enforcement officers. That's what President Trump had promised Thursday, starting at midnight, in the administration's latest move to impose its will on the nation's capital. In short, that law enforcement surge to take control of the District of Columbia's streets did not appear to unfold on schedule. A two-hour city tour, starting around 1 a.m. Friday, revealed no overt or visible law enforcement presence other than members of the Metropolitan Police Department, the city's police force. That might change in the coming evenings as Trump puts into action his long-standing plans to 'take over' a capital city he has repeatedly slammed as unsafe, filthy and badly run. According to his declaration last week, the security lockdown will run for seven days, 'with the option to extend as needed.' In an online post Saturday, the Republican president said the Democratic-led city would soon be one of the country's safest and he announced a White House news conference for Monday, though he offered no details. On Friday night, a White House official said Thursday night's operations included arrests for possession of two stolen firearms, suspected fentanyl and marijuana. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The official said more than 120 members of various federal agencies — the Secret Service, the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service — were to be on duty Friday night, upping the complement of federal officers involved. 'This is the first step in stopping the violent crime that has been plaguing the streets of Washington, D.C.,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who publicly faced off against Trump in 2020 when he called in a massive federal law enforcement response to disperse crowds of protesters denouncing police brutality and racial profiling, has not said a public word since Trump's declaration. The Metropolitan Police Department has gone similarly silent. The catalyst for this latest round of takeover drama was an assault Aug. 3 during an attempted carjacking on a high-profile member of the White House's government-slashing team known as the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly headed by Elon Musk. Police arrested two 15-year-olds and were seeking others. Trump quickly renewed his calls for the federal government to seize control. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media site. He later told reporters he was considering a range of alternatives, including repealing Washington's limited 'home rule' autonomy and 'bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly,' as he did in Los Angeles in response to protests over his administration's immigration crackdown. The threats come at a time when Bowser's government can tout a reduction in the number of homicides and carjackings, both of which surged in 2023. The number of carjackings overall dropped significantly in 2024, from 957 to just under 500, and is on track to decline again this year, with fewer than 200 recorded so far. The proportion of juveniles arrested on suspicion of carjacking, though, has remained above 50%, and Bowser's government has taken steps to rein in a recent phenomenon of rowdy teenagers causing disarray and disturbances in public spaces. Emergency legislation passed by the D.C. Council this summer imposed tighter youth curfew restrictions and empowered Police Chief Pamela Smith to declare temporary juvenile curfew zones for four days at a time. In those areas, a gathering of nine or more people younger than 18 is unlawful after 8 p.m. Trump is within his powers in deploying federal law enforcement assets on D.C. streets. He could deploy the National Guard, although that is not one of the dozen participating agencies listed in his declaration. The first Trump administration called in the National Guard during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 and again on Jan. 6, 2021, when his supporters overran the Capitol in a failed attempt to overturn his election defeat. Further steps, including taking over the Police Department, would require a declaration of emergency. Legal experts believe that would most likely be challenged in court. Such an approach would fit the general pattern of Trump's second term in office, when he has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs. In many cases, he moved forward while the courts sorted it out. Imposing a full federal takeover of Washington would require a congressional repeal of the Home Rule Act of 1973. It's a step that Trump said his administration's lawyers are examining. That law was specific to Washington, not other communities in the United States that have their own home rule powers but generally retain representation in their state legislatures, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia. Signed into law by President Nixon, the measure allowed D.C. residents to elect their own mayor, council and local commissioners. The district had been previously run by federally appointed commissioners and members of Congress, some of whom balked at having to deal with potholes and other details of running a city of 700,000 residents. So far, Trump's criticisms of Washington can be felt most directly in the actions of the National Park Service, which controls large pieces of land throughout the capital. In Trump's current administration, the agency has stepped up its clearing of homeless encampments on Park Service land and recently carried out a series of arrests of people smoking marijuana in public parks. The agency said last week that a statue of a Confederate military leader that was toppled by protesters in 2020 would be restored and replaced, in line with an executive order. Khalil and Whitehurst write for the Associated Press. AP writers Mike Pesoli, Michael Kunzelman and Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.

Trump to send FBI on night patrols in DC: Reports
Trump to send FBI on night patrols in DC: Reports

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump to send FBI on night patrols in DC: Reports

The Trump administration will send the FBI on night patrols in the nation's capital in the wake of President Trump threatening to federalize the District of Columbia, according to multiple reports. The Washington Post has reported that close to 120 FBI agents are beginning to be deployed for nightlong shifts to assist D.C. law enforcement in halting Washington-based carjackings and violent crime, two sources with knowledge of the situation told the outlet. A spokesperson for the FBI told The New York Times that there was involvement 'in the increased federal law enforcement presence in Washington' by its agents and pointed the outlet to the White House. The post first reported on the FBI night shifts. A White House official told NewsNation's Kellie Meyer that around 450 federal officers would be 'in high traffic areas and other known hotspot across Washington, DC.' 'Everyone who lives in our Nation's capital knows homelessness and crime are plaguing this city,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement obtained by Meyer. 'You can thank President Trump for finally taking action to clean it up. Under President Trump's leadership, DC will be safe and beautiful again for its residents, lawmakers, and visitors from around the world,' the press secretary added. Last week, a young man was allegedly beaten via an attempted carjacking in Washington. The man turned out to be Edward Coristine, who gained attention earlier this year due to the combination of his position in tech billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency and the nickname of 'Big Balls.' On Tuesday, Trump posted a message on social media featuring a photo of a bloodied Coristine as well as his sentiments that crime in the nation's capital was 'totally out of control.' The president also said that 'if D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run.'

Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow
Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow

By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Saturday that a $1 billion settlement offer by President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA amounted to political extortion to which the state will not bow. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The University of California says it is reviewing a $1 billion settlement offer by the Trump administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze $584 million in funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. KEY QUOTES "Donald Trump has weaponized the DOJ (Department of Justice) to kneecap America's #1 public university system — freezing medical & science funding until @UCLA pays his $1 billion ransom," the office of Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post. "California won't bow to Trump's disgusting political extortion," it added. "This isn't about protecting Jewish students - it's a billion-dollar political shakedown from the pay-to-play president." CONTEXT The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests and in doing so violated Jewish and Israeli students' civil rights. The White House had no immediate comment beyond the offer. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Experts have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Republican president's threats. The University of California says paying such a large settlement would "completely devastate" the institution. UCLA PROTESTS AND ENVIRONMENT Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. RECENT SETTLEMENTS The government has settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both accepted certain government demands. Settlement talks with Harvard University are ongoing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store