
SC upholds GST exemption for electricity regulators, dismisses govt's plea
Delhi High Court
's ruling that fees collected by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (
CERC
) and the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (
DERC
) for the supply of electricity or grant of electricity distribution licences or as annual/other fees are exempt from Goods and Services Tax (GST).
The HC had in January also quashed the show cause notices (SCNs) issued by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence demanding an 18% tax on fees received by CERC and DERC for discharging their regulatory functions. It held that the demand notices were 'arbitrary and unsustainable.'
'We do not find any good grounds to entertain these special leave petitions (by Directorate General of GST Intelligence), a SC bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan said, while endorsing the HC's view that the GST department had clearly failed to grasp the "indubitable fact" that these regulatory functions were being discharged by a quasi-judicial body which had all the trappings of a tribunal.
The department had challenged the HC order alleging that the power regulators were not discharging their
GST liabilities
on amounts received as
tariff
and licence fees from various power utilities as these functions of the regulators fell under the category of "support services" to electricity transmission and distribution service providers.
The GST authorities in the SCN's had also alleged that CERC had even failed to carry out a correct self-assessment of its tax liability, thus failing to discharge its integrated GST of Rs 113 crore between April 2019 to March 2023. A similar notice was issued to the Delhi power regulator.
However, the HC had rejected the GST authorities' stand, saying it found 'unable to accept, affirm, or even fathom the conclusion that regulation of tariff, inter-state transmission of electricity, or the issuance of licence would be liable to be construed as activities undertaken or functions discharged in the furtherance of business."
According to HC, "the grant of a licence to transmit or distribute (electricity) is clearly not in furtherance of business or
trade
but in extension of the statutory obligation placed upon a commission to regulate those subjects," the high court had said. The Electricity Act, 2003, makes no distinction between the regulatory and adjudicatory functions vested in and conferred upon an electricity commission, it had added. Those functions are placed in the hands of a quasi-judicial body enjoined to regulate and administer electricity distribution, it had said. "Electricity, undoubtedly, is a natural resource which vests in the State. We have thus no hesitation in observing that the SCNs (show cause notices) infringe the borders of the incredible and inconceivable," the January order stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
ORERA imposes Rs 2cr fine on realtor for ‘illegal' plotting scheme
1 2 Bhubaneswar: The Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority (ORERA) has imposed a fine of Rs 2 crore on a city-based realtor for allegedly executing a plotting scheme without obtaining either layout approval from the planning authority or registration from ORERA. Sources said the plotting scheme at Haridamada on the outskirts of the city involves 2,500 plots of various sizes, valued at Rs 550 crore. The promoter was allegedly selling the plots after alluring potential buyers through social media promotions. Taking up the case suo motu, the three-member bench of ORERA, during the recent hearing, found that the promoter was executing a mega plotted project at Haridamada and started to sell the plots in Nov last year. ORERA's technical team, which inspected the project site, submitted before the bench that the project is spread over an area of 120 acres and has 2,500 plots. Construction of roads is in progress, and 30% of the plots have already been sold. "No project documents, detailed project reports, or layout plans are available at the site for perusal. The project has not been approved by Bhubaneswar Development Authority and ORERA," the submission of the technical team read. ORERA found that since the plotted project is not registered, there is a violation of Section 3 of the Odisha Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as per which the authority can take due action as mandated under the laws. "It is apparent from the report that the respondent has not only violated Section 3 of the Act but also violated Section 17 of the Act. The report of the technical team is based on facts. It is not challenged by the respondent," the ORERA order read. As per the Act, if any promoter contravenes the provisions of Section 3, he shall be liable to a penalty which may extend up to 10% of the cost of the real estate project as determined by the authority. Experts attributed the irregularity to fraudulent and unregulated social media promotions. "Buyers should check the legality of the project. The authority should also keep a check on such online promotions," real estate expert Bimalendu Pradhan said.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rajasthan hikes mineral royalties, construction costs set to surge
Jaipur: In a move that is expected to increase cost of construction in Rajasthan, the govt has revised royalty rates on minerals, resulting in higher levies and increase in prices of key raw materials including bajri (river sand), sandstonnee, marble, and other construction stonnees. Department of Mines and Geology notified an increase in royalty on bajri by Rs 15 per tonne, raising uniform rate to Rs 60 per tonne across all districts. Previously, royalty on bajri extracted from Bharatpur, Jhunjhunu, tonnek, Dholpur, Sawai Madhopur, Sikar, and Bhilwara was charged at Rs 50 per tonne, while in other districts, it was Rs 45 per tonne. An official source said, "The new rule brings uniformity in royalty rates across Rajasthan. This increase will push up the price of bajri by approximately Rs 600 per truck, considering that a single truck typically carries around 40 tonnes of material." Sandstone, particularly the widely used Chhajja stone, will also become more expensive. The royalty on processed sandstone was raised from Rs 240 to Rs 320 per tonne, marking an increase of Rs 80 per tonne. "Raw sandstone extracted from mines in Bharatpur and Dholpur will now attract a royalty of Rs 220 per tonne, up from Rs 155. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo In Kota, Bundi, and Karauli, the rate increased from Rs 130 to Rs 180 per tonne, while in other districts, it went up from Rs 100 to Rs 145 per tonne," said a mine owner. Marble sourced from Makrana and nearby areas also saw a price revision. The earlier rate of Rs 490 per tonne increased to Rs 550, bringing it in line with marble from other parts of the state, where the royalty was previously Rs 560 per tonne. In a similar move, the royalty on stone used in tile manufacturing went up from Rs 455 to Rs 500 per tonne. Additionally, stones used in concrete and chips—such as dolomite, limestone, and rhyolite—will now attract a royalty of Rs 130 per tonne, up from the earlier Rs 90. "These revisions, while aimed at increasing state revenue, are likely to raise the overall cost of construction, especially in the real estate and infrastructure sectors, where these materials form the foundation of building activity," said realtor Ankur Tiwari. eom


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Court dismisses PMLA case against Moser Baer, Ratul Puri & 11 others
NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has dismissed a money laundering case against industrialist Ratul Puri , Moser Baer India Ltd, and 11 others, holding that the predicate corruption offence registered by CBI had already collapsed. The money laundering case stemmed from alleged bank frauds worth Rs 1,101 crore involving Moser Baer Solar Ltd (Rs 747 crore) and Moser Baer India Ltd (Rs 354 crore), once a leading manufacturer of CDs and DVDs. CBI accused Puri and others of siphoning loans sanctioned by a consortium of banks, with the purported connivance of bank officials who failed to monitor the funds. Special Judge (CBI) Sushant Changotra ruled Thursday that no offence under Section 3 of PMLA survived in the absence of proceeds of crime, which is a sine qua non for prosecuting under the law. "Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed. The proceedings of this complaint case stand closed," the judge said, but left the door open for future action if a higher court overturns the May 24 discharge order. ED had said CBI discharge was not final until challenged and pointed to a pending Supreme Court review in a separate matter. But the court said such arguments had already been "exhaustively dealt with" by Delhi high court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find out: this is how you clean your yoga mat! Kingdom Of Men Undo Advocate Vijay Aggarwal, representing Puri, said once the predicate offence had been quashed, the laundering charge could not legally continue. "Under Section 3 of PMLA, the existence of proceeds of crime is an essential condition for prosecuting a money laundering offence," he said in court.