‘It's gutting.' A local artist says a thief in a ski mask stole his painting from a Somerville gallery.
Union Square, was one of two lifted in an apparent heist earlier this month at Somerville's Prospect Union Square building.
'I want people to have my artwork. To have somebody just be so brazen in taking it, that's the real violation,' he said in an interview.
The theft is still unsolved. Somerville Police Captain Jeffrey DiGregorio said he couldn't comment on an active investigation but confirmed the department received a report that two pieces of artwork had been stolen just before 3 a.m. on Jan. 7 at that address. Jenn Libby, the building's general manager, said she couldn't comment on the investigation but was 'deeply disheartened by the recent theft of artwork.'
The painting, called 'Nissenbaum, midday,' had been part of
Advertisement
The exhibit, called Visions of Somerville, featured a roster of more than a dozen Somerville artists and was set to run from Jan. 6 to April 1.
When it launched, one painting from each artist was strung up from the ceiling by wires in a publicly accessible hallway near the building's lobby, people involved with the exhibit said.
Related
:
Leveille said he was told by staff at the building who viewed security footage of the incident that it showed an apparent thief enter the building wearing a ski mask, slice the wires holding two paintings aloft with a knife, and then run off.
Libby declined to discuss or share the purported footage and wouldn't comment on whether there was, indeed, a ski mask-wearing thief, but said in a statement that building management remains 'committed to fostering a vibrant and inclusive arts community in Union Square and will do everything in our power to ensure such an incident does not happen again.'
Advertisement
To protect the
other artworks, the gallery was promptly taken down, said Peter Belford, who sits on the board of directors for Somerville Open Studios.
'It's disappointing. It's horrible,' he said. 'We're working to help local artists, feature local artists, and put their art into public spaces. For one person to do something that prevents us from doing that is very unfortunate.'
Related
:
Plans to open a new gallery in the building
are now in the works, the building manager and Belford said.
'We won't let this stop us from trying to bring arts to the community and support local artists,' Belford said.
Why someone would steal these particular
paintings
is a mystery to Leveille.
While he said he is proud to have a following of patrons who support his work, the painting itself likely would have sold for around $2,000. A decent amount of money, sure, but the Gardner Museum heist it was not.
'You're not running off with a Sargent painting,' he said.
Building management has offered to compensate him for the value of the artwork, which he appreciates, but the painting also had significant sentimental value. Leveille said he chose to paint the decommissioned salvage yard, which closed in 2022, because he has fond memories of visiting it with his grandfather, who sourced car parts there.
'It feels personal,' he said. 'It's something that I spent a lot of time with. I put a lot of energy and emotion and hours into it.'
Related
:
Allen Nissenbaum, who owns the auto parts property in the painting, said in an interview he hadn't seen the artwork before it was stolen but was 'honored' Leveille had created such a loving tribute. How did he feel about it being stolen? 'Pissed,' he said.
Advertisement
The fact that this theft happened so soon after the gallery launched and that the thief targeted his painting so quickly, Leveille said, suggests perhaps that he was being targeted. He just can't understand why.
If it was someone who liked the painting but was on a budget, he said, he would have been happy to work something out with them. He's done so in the past with other potential buyers, either by offering discounts to people with limited means or by helping fans find smaller and less expensive paintings they can afford.
This was different. 'It's not a conversation. It's not a negotiation. It's just literally brute force,' Leveille said.
While there is no evidence yet the incidents are related, the theft has drawn comparisons to
For his part, Leveille doesn't expect to see his painting again. 'Unless somebody gets busted doing something else and there's my painting on the wall,' he said.
Still, he feels compelled to speak out publicly about what happened and has asked on his Instagram account and on Reddit for anyone with information about the heist, or who might have seen his painting appear somewhere, to come forward.
If anything, he just wants to let potential area art thieves know they can't steal from local artists with impunity.
Advertisement
'I want whoever stole it to hear that people are looking for it,' he said. 'It's not one and done, and you got away with it.'
Adam Leveille posed for a portrait at his home studio in Somerville.
Erin Clark/Globe Staff
Spencer Buell can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
26-07-2025
- Business Insider
Tree wars are tearing through Vacationland USA
An ocean view is priceless in coastal New England — unless you cut down a neighbor's trees to get it. Cases of alleged unauthorized tree-cutting and poisoning, or so-called "timber trespass," have sparked bitter neighbor-versus-neighbor legal feuds across wealthy US enclaves in recent years, with some resulting in seven-figure payouts. One lawsuit playing out in a Massachusetts court involves a homeowner on the exclusive New England island of Nantucket who has accused her neighbor of chopping down a swath of nearly 50-year-old trees on her family's property. The plaintiff, Patricia Belford, is seeking $1.4 million in damages and has alleged in the court papers that Jonathan Jacoby trespassed onto her property and cut down the trees "to enhance the ocean view" from his own compound — there's the main house, guest cottage, pool, and hot tub — that sits on about a half-acre next door. Belford said in the lawsuit that the tree-felling occurred during the winter offseason on Nantucket, a nearly 48-square-mile island off Cape Cod, where billionaires own estates. The median home sale price last year was $3.73 million, according to a report from an island realtor, Fisher Real Estate. Jacoby, the June lawsuit alleged, walked across his property at 3 Tautemo Way and onto Belford's land. On his own, he used a chainsaw to cut down 16 30-foot-high cedar, cherry, and Leyland cypress trees before he asked his landscaper to help him clean up the debris, the lawsuit and an attached statement by the landscaper to local police say. "The loss of the trees has significantly diminished the value and character of the Belford Property," the lawsuit said. "The trees were a mature and integral part of the landscape, planted and cared for by the Belford family for nearly 50 years." Jacoby's home was recently put on the market for nearly $10 million, with a listing that boasted "sweeping views of the Atlantic Ocean." Those views that the latest listing touted were "conspicuously missing" from previous, pre-treegate listings, Belford's lawsuit said. The home was taken off the market this month. "It's usually done in some sort of act of desperation," a real estate agent on the island told Business Insider of similar illicit tree trimmings. "They need that bump. This property has previously been on the market, and they haven't been able to sell it. Therein lies the motivation." Jacoby is facing criminal charges over the tree-cutting ordeal. The Nantucket Police Department has charged Jacoby with vandalizing property, a felony, and the misdemeanors of trespassing and cutting/destroying trees, the chief of police confirmed to BI. An attorney for Jacoby, James Merberg, declined to comment on the criminal case and lawsuit but said that Jacoby will enter a plea of not guilty to the charges. Jacoby is scheduled to be arraigned on September 15. Jacoby could not be reached for comment, but he defended his actions to The Boston Globe, saying in an email, "I wasn't trespassing, I was clearing out her crappy trees." "Nantucket, the Vineyard — places where there is so much money at play — money and ego can get in the way very quickly," Glenn Wood, Belford's attorney, told BI, referring to the brazenness of the alleged action — and the attention it has gotten from the media. Tree law, it turns out, is an active legal niche. While most lawsuits don't accuse neighbors of such deliberate violations and most payouts or settlements don't reach seven figures, there have been a number of high-profile disputes that involve stealth maneuvers and big money. Tree-cutting fights aren't rare It's easy to see why trees can spur neighborly spats. A dead tree causes an eyesore; a large one blocks a view; a tree struck by lightning can leave debris. One look at the subreddit "tree law," which has 150,000 members, and the subject matter's universality becomes clear. Some people post asking for advice, like what to do about a neighbor's willow whose branches bow onto their roof. Others post on the latest news in the space, like a Missouri law regarding the sale of invasive species. New Hampshire-based attorney Israel Piedra, who started the website last year, told BI that tree-cutting disputes are "more common than people would think." Piedra, an attorney at the firm Welts, White & Fontaine, P.C., said he has carved out a practice representing property owners who have had their trees cut down without permission and has handled more than 100 such cases in recent years, primarily out of New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Most cases, he said, do not involve accusations as "egregious" as those in the Nantucket lawsuit. "More commonly, you're dealing with a case where there isn't actually intentional conduct, or there isn't malicious intent," Piedra said, explaining that the majority of cases he has handled involve a careless homeowner who did not check the property line before cutting down trees. "They try to make it look like a mistake, or at least maintain some level of plausible deniability," he said. He said these cases are usually settled out of court through a neighbor's homeowner's insurance or a contractor's commercial liability insurance, and don't involve such high-value property or high-value damage claims. Piedra said he has never had a case settle for more than $1 million, though some cases have settled for six-figure sums. Timber trespass laws, Piedra said, vary state by state, with the New England states of Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts having some of the strongest in the country. "There's a lot of people looking for lawyers that do this kind of work," he said. When money grows on trees The allegations in the Nantucket lawsuit are extreme — crossing a property line, taking down healthy trees, the expenses involved. Putting in replacement trees, which would have to be brought from off the island, would cost nearly $500,000, Belford's lawsuit said. There have been other high-profile, big-ticket squabbles. An incident on Nantucket's sister island, Martha's Vineyard, ended in 2023 with a $2.5 million settlement after inn owners were accused of having more than 100 trees cut down on a neighboring property in a move that, a lawsuit said, "wreaked havoc and devastation akin to a war zone." In a 2006 case, a defendant in Vermont was ordered to pay $1.8 million in damages after timber trespassing. In one of the most publicized instances of human-on-tree destruction, last year, Amelia and Arthur Bond agreed to pay more than $1.7 million in fines and settlements after they'd applied herbicide to the area near the oak trees on the property of Lisa Gorman, the widow of the former L.L. Bean president and heir, in the idyllic New England coastal town of Camden, Maine. Like in the case of Jacoby and Belford, that of the Bonds and Gorman involved multimillion-dollar properties and a water view. The Bonds' weapon of choice was Tebuthioron, an herbicide that, according to a consent agreement, Amelia Bond — the former CEO of St. Louis Community Foundation, a charity with about $500 million in assets — applied to two large oak trees on Gorman's summer property, an oceanfront estate valued at $5 million. Once the chemical started to wreak havoc on Gorman's trees, Amelia Bond — whose 5,000 square-foot, $3.7 million mansion sits up the hill — allegedly swooped in and offered to cover half of the cost of their removal, Gorman's attorney said in a letter to a town official. What looked like neighborly kindness was really a ploy to get a better look at the water, the letter said. The pair confessed and paid more than $1.5 million to Gorman, $180,000 to the town, $4,500 to the Maine Board of Pesticides Control Board, and $30,000 for environmental testing, according to documents from a Camden Select Board meeting. The Bonds and their attorney did not respond to requests for comment from BI. Gorman, through her attorney, declined to comment. With details like a poisoning gone wrong, a wealthy heir, and a vacation hot spot, it's no wonder that tree law has become a surprisingly sexy corner of the legal world. "You mix all that into a cocktail," Wood, Belford's attorney, told BI. "It makes for an interesting fact pattern."
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Yahoo
Nantucket man walked into neighbor's yard and cut down 50-year-old trees to improve his ocean view, suit says
A woman on the vacation island of Nantucket is suing her neighbor after he allegedly walked onto her property and cut down several of her trees for a better view of the ocean — and the increased property value that comes with it. The lawsuit accuses Jonathan Jacoby of using a chainsaw to fell 16 of Patricia Belford's nearly 50-year-old cedar, cherry, and Leyland cypress trees. Three weeks after he allegedly cut down the trees, Jacoby listed his home for sale for nearly $10 million, according to the Boston Globe. Listed among the home's features: its "sweeping view of the Atlantic Ocean," according to the complaint. Belford points out in her lawsuit that the ocean vistas were "conspicuously missing from the property's prior listings." A pair of Nantucket neighbors are embroiled in a lawsuit over cut trees and ocean views. Patricia Belford is suing her neighbor, Jonathan Jacoby, for allegedly cutting down her nearly 50-year-old trees. Her lawsuit claims Jacoby cut down the trees to increase the property value on his home. (stock image) (Getty Images) When asked why he destroyed Belford's trees, Jacoby provided a terse response. "I wasn't trespassing, I was clearing out her crappy trees," he told the Boston Globe in a single-line email. The Independent has requested comment from Jacoby's attorney, James Merberg. Many of the "crappy trees" that Jacoby allegedly toppled were more than 30 feet tall. They also provided Belford with "a natural buffer and privacy screen between the Belford home and neighbor's parcels,' the complaint says. Belford filed her suit in the Superior Court in Nantucket. She is alleging negligence, property damage, personal injury, and trespassing. The available court documents have not revealed how much she is asking for in damages. According to the lawsuit, the property damage caused at the house is estimated at more than $486,000. To purchase and transport one 30-foot-tall Leyland cypress — not including planting the tree — it would cost around $22,114, the Boston Globe determined. 'The trees at issue were planted by the Belford family in the 1970s and maintained for nearly five decades,' the lawsuit says. 'Their removal was not only a violation of the Plaintiff's property rights, but also caused lasting damage to the character, value, and privacy of the property.' Belford has also reported the incident to the police. According to the lawsuit, there is "an active and ongoing criminal proceeding" in the Nantucket Police Department related to Jacoby's alleged lumberjack activities. Jacoby's former landscaper, Krasimir Kirilov, reportedly gave a voluntary statement to the Nantucket police concerning the investigation, according to the lawsuit. He told police he knew nothing about the tree cutting. "I was surprised to find that out," the landscaper reportedly said.
New York Post
03-07-2025
- New York Post
Nantucket homeowner lists property for $10M after chopping down neighbor's 50-year-old trees to create ‘sweeping' ocean views: lawsuit
A Nantucket homeowner secretly chopped down a litany of his neighbor's 50-year-old trees to carve out 'sweeping views' of the Atlantic Ocean for a property he listed for nearly $10 million, a lawsuit alleged. Patricia Belford claims her neighbor, Jonathan Jacoby, trespassed onto her property in February and leveled 16 towering cedar, cherry, and Leyland cypress trees – gutting her property's charm and value to enhance the views from the upper level of his home. Months later, Jacoby put the four-bedroom, three-bath Massachusetts house at 3 Tautemo Way on the market for $9.975 million, touting the endless blue horizon, a selling point notably absent from the property's previous listing, according to the Nantucket Superior Court lawsuit filed on June 23. Advertisement 4 Aerial view of the feuding Nantucket houses near the ocean. LINK MLS A prior listing showed the .46-acre property sold for $1.825 million — $30,000 over the asking price. 'The way I feel is that I am confident once all of the facts and evidence have been presented, that justice will be served,' Matt Erisman, Belford's property manager, told the Nantucket Current. Advertisement 'However, much of what has been taken from the Belfords is irreplaceable, and it's sickening.' The 30-foot brushes, planted by the Belford family in the 1970s and carefully maintained since, stood just beyond the shared boundary with the alleged vandal's property, creating a natural barrier along the roadway that provided shade, aesthetic appeal, privacy, reduced noise, the filing states. 4 Cut tree stumps and branches in a yard pictured in the lawsuit. Superior Court – Nantucket Erisman discovered the alleged arbor assault when he spotted the savaged trunks and Jacoby's former landscaper, Krasimir Kirilov, clearing away debris from the 1 Tautemo Way home. Advertisement Kirilov later told police that Jacoby personally hacked down the trees and hired him to haul away the wreckage – with the property owner's supposed permission, the suit alleges. 'I was just about to complete the cleanup when the caretaker Matt came to the property, and at that moment I realized he was not aware of the cleanup work I was doing,' the shaken gardener said in a March 11 statement to the Nantucket Police Department. 4 A picture of Cut down tree stumps and surrounding debris included in the suit. Superior Court – Nantucket 'I was surprised to find that out, and I explained what was going on, and he said he had no idea about it.' Advertisement Authorities have since launched an investigation into the vegetation massacre, with charges now pending against Jacoby, the local outlet reported. Nantucket police did not immediately provide information to The Post regarding the case. 4 Trees removed from the yard to create the ocean view. Superior Court – Nantucket Belford is seeking over $1.4 million in damages – valuing each mutilated tree at roughly $486,000. Bay State law punishes anyone who willfully mows down trees on someone else's land without permission by tripling the damages owed. Jacoby's attorney, Jim Merberg, told The Post that his client had permission to cut down the trees. 'My client is firmly of the belief that he had permission to take down these dead trees,' Merberg said, noting he toppled the evergreens during the day and with 'transparency.' 'He did it in a way a person clearly with permission would do it. It will all get sorted out in court down the road.'
