After decades in Assad jails, political prisoner wants justice
Tatari, arrested in 1981 and sentenced to life behind bars, was among scores of prisoners who walked free when longtime ruler Assad was overthrown on December 8 in an Islamist-led offensive.
He has made it out alive after 43 years in jail, but tens of thousands of Syrian families are still searching for their loved ones who disappeared long ago in Syria's hellish prison system.
"I came close to death under torture," Tatari told AFP in his small Damascus apartment.
Since a military field court gave him a life sentence for "collaborating with foreign countries" -- an accusation he denies -- Tatari was moved from one prison to another, first under late president Hafez al-Assad and then his son Bashar who succeeded him in 2000.
Showing old pictures of him in his pilot uniform, Tatari said he was not seeking revenge, but stressed that "everyone must be held accountable for their crimes".
"We do not want anyone to be imprisoned" without due process, said Tatari.
More than two million Syrians were jailed under the Assad dynasty's rule, half of them after anti-government protests in 2011 escalated into civil war, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor.
The Britain-based monitor says around 200,000 died in custody.
Diab Serriya, co-founder of the Association of Detainees and Missing Persons of Saydnaya Prison, said that Tatari was "the longest-serving political prisoner in Syria and the Middle East".
Rights group Amnesty International has called the notorious Saydnaya prison outside Damascus a "human slaughterhouse".
Tatari had been detained there, but he said his 15 years in the Palmyra prison in the Syrian desert were the most difficult.
- 'Wished for death' -
The Palmyra facility operated "without any discipline, any laws and any humanity", Tatari said.
Detainees were "not afraid of torture -- we wished for death", he added.
"Everything that has been said about torture in Palmyra... is an understatement."
"A guard could kill a prisoner if he was displeased with him," Tatari said, adding that inmates were forced under torture to say phrases like "Hafez al-Assad is your god", although he refused to do so.
In 1980, Palmyra witnessed a massacre of hundreds of mostly Islamist detainees, gunned down by helicopters or executed in their cells after a failed assassination attempt on Hafez al-Assad.
Tatari said he was completely disconnected from the outside world there, only learning of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union through a prisoner who had returned from a hospital visit.
In Sweida prison in the south, where Tatari was transferred after the 2011 revolt began, some inmates had phones that they would keep hidden from the guards.
"The cell phone gets you out of prison, it makes you feel alive," he said, recalling how he used to conceal his device in a hole dug in his cell.
But after his phone was discovered, he was transferred to a prison in Tartus -- his final detention facility before gaining freedom.
- Dreams of escape -
Tatari was one of several military officers who were opposed to Syria's intervention in Lebanon in 1976, and to the violent repression in the early 1980s of the Muslim Brotherhood, Syria's main opposition force at the time.
"Many of us were against involving the army in political operations," he said.
After two of his fellow pilots defected and fled to Jordan in 1980, he escaped to Egypt and then on to Jordan.
But he returned when security forces began harassing his family and was arrested on arrival.
His wife was pregnant at the time with their first and only son.
For years, the family assumed Tatari was dead, before receiving a proof of life in 1997 after paying bribes, a common practice under the Assads' rule.
It was then that Tatari was finally able to meet his son, then aged 16, under the watchful eye of guards during the family's first authorised prison visit that year.
"I was afraid... I ended the meeting after 15 minutes," Tatari said.
His wife has since died and their son left Syria, having received threats at the start of the protest movement, which had spiralled into war and eventually led to Assad's overthrow.
During his time behind bars, Tatari said he "used to escape prison with my thoughts, daydreams and drawing".
"The regime getting toppled overnight was beyond my dreams... No one expected it to happen so quickly."
at/nad/ami/cms
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
29 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
China and the US clash at the UN over the Panama Canal, a focus of Trump's attention
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United States and China clashed over the Panama Canal at the United Nations on Monday, with the U.S. warning that Beijing's influence over the key waterway could threaten global trade and security and China calling U.S. accusations a pretext to take over the canal. The clash took place at a U.N. Security Council meeting where Panama's President José Raúl Mulino stressed the neutrality of the canal and his country's ownership of the waterway linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Panama holds the council presidency this month, and Mulino was chairing a meeting on challenges to maritime security. Interpol Secretary General Valdecy Urquiza told members these include piracy, armed robbery, transnational crime and cyber criminals weaponizing artificial intelligence to attack ports where there is 'minimal cyber security, maximum exposure.' U.S. President Donald Trump thrust Panama into the spotlight even before winning election last November by suggesting that his country should consider retaking control of the Panama Canal and accusing Panama of ceding influence to China. The U.S. built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Control of the waterway transferred to Panama in 1999 under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter. China's U.N. Ambassador Fu Cong emphasized to the council that 'Panama has consistently and effectively managed the canal, making significant contributions to global shipping and trade.' 'China has always respected the permanent neutrality of the canal and firmly supports Panama in safeguarding its sovereignty over the canal to ensure its openness and smooth operation,' he said. Acting U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea, who spoke afterward, went after China, expressing concern about its 'outsized influence over the Panama Canal area, especially over critical infrastructure and port operations.' Alluding to its claims in the South China Sea, she said, 'China's expansive and unlawful maritime claims and aggressive actions demonstrate its threat to maritime security and commerce.' She said the U.S. rejects these claims and supports countries opposing them. 'China's influence in the canal area is not just a risk to Panama and the United States, but rather a potential threat to global trade and security,' Shea said. The Trump administration has pressured China to have the Hong Kong-based operator of ports at either end of the canal sell those interests to a U.S. consortium that includes BlackRock Inc. Panama has vehemently rejected a takeover of the canal, but in April, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Panama and agreed with Mulino to step up security coordination. The agreement also gives U.S. troops access to strategic air and naval facilities in the Central American nation, which sparked large protests in Panama's capital. China's Fu asked for the floor to respond to Shea's accusations after all council members spoke, this time lashing out at the Trump administration. 'The United States' fabrication of lies and groundless attacks against China are nothing but a pretext for seeking control of the canal,' he said. The Chinese envoy called the U.S. and its deployment of offensive weapons in the South China Sea area 'the biggest disrupter of peace and stability' in the region, and he accused the administration of exacerbating risks to global maritime security. 'China firmly opposes economic coercion and bullying practices and urges the United States to stop fabricating rumors, lies and creating trouble,' Fu said. Murillo then responded, saying he wanted to stress Panama's sovereignty 'in terms of the ownership of the canal' and the multilateral treaty governing its administration. He called the canal's neutrality 'the only and the best defense' to any specific or global threats.


USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Pennsylvania steel plant explosions caught on video leave at least 1 dead
At least one person is dead as another person remains missing with at least 10 injured following a series of explosions at a steel plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania, on the outskirts of Pittsburgh, on Monday, Aug. 11, officials said. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said that the U.S. Steel Clairton Coke Works plant was the site of "multiple explosions," and that search-and-rescue efforts continued at the scene as of a statement posted to social media just after 2:15 p.m. ET. The Allegany County Police Department confirmed that one person died in a statement posted to Facebook just before 4:30 p.m. ET. The department stated that one person previously believed to be missing had been located and transported to a local hospital. The second person believed to be missing remains unaccounted for, the statement added. Nine other people were transported to area hospitals to receive treatment for a variety of injuries, according to the department. Video of the explosions, which took place around 10:30 a.m. ET, was captured by the BreatheProject, a Pittsburgh-based nonprofit that advocates for improvements to air quality in southwestern Pennsylvania. The video shows a plume of dark smoke rising from the plant that continued to spew for over 25 minutes. Live updates: Steel plant explosion leaves at least 1 dead, 10 injured Residents near plant advised to stay indoors The Allegheny County Department of Health issued a statement saying it was "actively monitoring the explosion" in coordination with first responders. Residents within one mile of the plant were being advised "out of an abundance of caution" to remain indoors, close windows and doors and set their home cooling units to recirculation. Air quality monitors had not detected levels of toxins above federal standards, the department said. "If you're in the area, continue to follow the instructions of local authorities," Shapiro said in his statement. U.S. Steel Executive Vice President Scott Buckiso told reporters at an afternoon news conference that the plant is stable except for the two coke oven batteries that were shut down after the 10:50 a.m. explosion. An investigation into the cause has begun as part of the search for the missing worker. "It's an ongoing rescue effort for the one person that is still not accounted for,'' Buckiso said. "We think we know the general location of that employee, but we're not 100% sure.'' This is a developing story Contributing: Melina Khan & Phaedra Trethan – USA TODAY


New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump, Newsom square off in court over deployment of troops to quell LA riots
Justice Department lawyers were in federal court Monday to defend the Trump administration's deployment of Marines and California National Guard troops during violent anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles in June. The three-day trial kicked off in San Francisco, with attorneys for the state arguing the deployment — which California Gov. Gavin Newsom strenuously objected to — violated a federal law against using military forces for domestic law enforcement. 4 Trump administration and State of California lawyers are facing off in federal court this week over the deployment of National Guard members during June's anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement The protests began June 6 as lawful demonstrations stemming from a series of raids conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement that saw more than 100 illegal immigrants rounded up around the city. Hundreds took to the streets, chanting in opposition and waving Mexican flags and anti-ICE signs while clashing with cops and federal immigration officers. 4 The riots began as protests but quickly descended into anarchy. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement But the protests soon escalated into full-blown riots, with cars burned in the streets, public buildings vandalized and local businesses pillaged by looters. As the violence dragged on, President Trump announced he was deploying some 4,000 Coast Guard members and around 700 active-duty Marines to the City of Angels to put an end to the anarchy. Newsom condemned the deployments, saying it amounted to using soldiers as 'props in the federal government's propaganda machine.' The Trump administration fired back, arguing the state's sanctuary city laws preventing local law enforcement from upholding immigration laws made federal intervention necessary. Advertisement Newsom sued the administration, and federal Judge Charles R. Breyer — a former President Clinton appointee who is overseeing the California bench trial — ruled the deployment was illegal. However, hours later an appeals court rejected Breyer's ruling which cleared the way for the mobilization to continue. 4 Trump's lawyers have argued the president was within his rights to order the troop deployments. By July 1, nearly all of the National Guard members and Marines called to Los Angeles had been released, with around 300 still in the city. Advertisement Those remaining on duty are 'supporting the request for assistance' from federal law enforcement agencies, William Harrington, former deputy chief of staff for the Army task force in charge of the Guard troops said in court Monday, according to the New York Times. 4 California Gov. Gavin Newsom's lawyers insist the mobilizations were illegal under the Posse Comitatus Act, a 1878 federal law prohibiting the use of soldiers to engage in civil law enforcement. Jonathan Alcorn/UPI/Shutterstock The trial could set a legal precedent for the extent of a commander-in-chief's authority over the military on US soil. Newsom's lawyers are vehement that sending troops to Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 federal law prohibiting the president from using armed forces to engage in civil law enforcement. Attorneys for the state also argue that by deploying troops over the objections of the governor and other California officials, Trump violated the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, which delineates the balance of power between the federal government and US states. Also being alleged is that Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth violated the Administrative Procedure Act, arguing they 'lack authority to federalize members of the California National Guard without issuing such orders through Governor Newsom,' the complaint reads. Trump's lawyers have staked their counter-argument on a little-known law — Section 12406(3) of the US Code — which permits the president to federalize the National Guard under certain circumstances. Advertisement Among them, if the US is in danger of being invaded or currently under invasion, if there is an ongoing rebellion or danger of one occurring, or if the president is unable 'with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' Newsom and California are seeking a formal declaration from the court that Trump and Hegseth's orders were illegal, as well as injunctive relief, which would prohibit future deployments of the California National Guard without the governor's express approval. The bench trial opened on the same day President Trump announced he was placing Washington, DC's police department under federal control and deploying the National Guard to patrol the streets amid a surge of violent crime in the US capital.