Teen TikTok star shot dead after "repeated rejections" of man, police say
Pakistani police on Tuesday said a 17-year-old TikTok star was shot dead by a man who had repeatedly contacted her online.
Sana Yousaf, who turned 17 last week and had more than a million followers across her social media accounts, was killed at her home in the capital Islamabad Monday evening.
Police have arrested a 22-year-old on suspicion of her murder. They say he spent hours loitering outside her home.
"It was a case of repeated rejections. The boy was trying to reach out to her time and again," Islamabad police chief Syed Ali Nasir Rizvi said during a news conference.
"It was a gruesome and cold-blooded murder," Rizvi added.
Yousaf had more than 800,000 followers on TikTok, which is wildly popular in Pakistan. She posted lip-sync videos, skincare tips and promotional content for beauty products.
In the last video posted on her account, hours before her murder, she was seen cutting a cake for her birthday.
"Rest in Peace" and "Justice for Sana," some comments under the video read.
Violence against women is pervasive in Pakistan according to the country's Human Rights Commission, and cases of women being attacked after rejecting marriage proposals are not uncommon.
In 2021, 27-year-old Noor Mukadam was beheaded by her Pakistani-American boyfriend, Zahir Jaffer, after she rejected his marriage proposal in a case that sparked widespread anger. Jaffer was sentenced to death.
In 2016, Khadija Siddiqui survived being stabbed 23 times by a jilted ex-boyfriend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mom hailed as a ‘pro' after hauling her kids, 8 and 10, around Disney World — in a stroller: ‘She gave no f–ks'
A mom's gotta do what a mom's gotta do. How someone chooses to parent their children is a personal decision — but when you share on social media how you go about it, people are bound to share their ruthless opinions. That's what happened to a Massachusetts mom named Nicki Marie when she posted a TikTok video of herself pushing her two kids in a stroller while at Disney. No, these weren't toddlers getting wheeled around — they were grown kids — 8 and 10 years old, to be exact. 'When I got divorced, one of the first things I thought was, 'How will I do Disney with just me and two kids?'' Nicki Marie told in an interview. To find a solution to her problem, Nicki Marie brought her stroller — nicknamed 'Kim' into the mix. 'I'm trying to let down my guard so my kids see me having fun. I bring a stroller because I'm anticipating what could go wrong that day,' she said in the interview. Technically, no one has publicly shamed this mom's stroller using ways, so she's the one doing the teasing: 'I'm making fun of myself before you point it out to me,' the mom said. Despite poking fun at herself, she doesn't think too much about what other people think especially with her iconic voiceover choice in the video she shared, that said 'And she gave no f—s.' However, people online have mixed thoughts on this single mom's stroller-loving ways. Most were positive and in support of her smart tactic. 'We went to Disney for the first time in March. My boys are 8 & 9, kinda wish we would have done a stroller lol.' 'I fully support this. There is no way to make your kids walk these insane miles in the heat without taking a little water break in a shady stroller.' 'My husband and I are going next week, I'm just trying to figure out if I can have him push me in a stroller.' And of course, there were some haters — as expected. 'Absolutely not. My kids very rarely used a stroller and had no problem walking, including at Disney when they were 3. Hauling a stroller sucked.' 'None. Zero. After 30,000 steps and bell to bell, I'm not schlepping all the stuff and sleeping kids.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries
US President Donald Trump has resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term, announcing that citizens of 12 countries would be banned from visiting the United States and those from seven others would face restrictions. The ban takes effect Monday at 12.01am, a cushion that may avoid the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice in 2017. Mr Trump, who signalled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him. Some, but not all, of 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Mr Trump's first term. The new ban includes Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. There will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. In a video released on social media, Mr Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Mr Trump's restricted list. The Department of Homeland Security says he overstayed a tourist visa. Mr Trump said some countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of visa overstays of tourists, business visitors and students who arrive by air and sea, singling out countries with high percentages of remaining after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Mr Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there. Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Mr Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. 'To include Afghanistan – a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years – is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' said Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac. Mr Trump wrote that Afghanistan 'lacks a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures'. He also cited its visa overstay rates. Haiti, which avoided the travel ban during Mr Trump's first term, was also included for high overstay rates and large numbers who came to the US illegally. Haitians continue to flee poverty, hunger and political instability deepens while police and a UN-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85% of its capital, Port-au-Prince. 'Haiti lacks a central authority with sufficient availability and dissemination of law enforcement information necessary to ensure its nationals do not undermine the national security of the United States,' Mr Trump wrote. The Iranian government offered no immediate reaction to being included. The Trump administration called it a 'state sponsor of terrorism', barring visitors except for those already holding visas or coming into the US on special visas America issues for minorities facing persecution. Other Middle East nations on the list – Libya, Sudan and Yemen – all face ongoing civil strife and territory overseen by opposing factions. Sudan has an active war, while Yemen's war is largely stalemated and Libyan forces remain armed. International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations roundly condemned the new ban. 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. The travel ban results from a January 20 executive order Mr Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Mr Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the US by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travellers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the US or detained at US airports after they landed. They included students as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban', was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Mr Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do Grandmothers Deserve Baby Showers Too? New Trend Sparks Debate
Is it OK for grandmothers to have their own baby showers to celebrate the arrival of future grandchildren? 'It's a big deal to become a new grandparent and it deserves to be celebrated, but it's not the same as becoming a parent,' a grandmother of three, who uses the pseudonym DeeDee Moore on social media, tells Moore, who runs the TikTok account and website 'More Than Grand,' unpacked the topic in a video captioned, 'What do you think about granny showers?' 'OK, there are definitely two opinions about grandmother showers,' Moore said in the video. 'Opinion one: Grandmother showers are a lovely way to welcome a friend or co-worker into their new role. Opinion two: Granny showers are inappropriate and tacky gift grabs. So, which is it?' 'If a group of co-workers gets together and has a lunch where they celebrate someone becoming a new grandmother — giving her a card and a cake and a book about grandparenting or some things to keep at her house for the baby — it's a lovely way to welcome somebody to this new stage of life,' Moore said in the video. Moore added: 'When the grandmother shower rivals the shower for the actual parents, that's where it crosses a line.' 'Traditionally, a shower is thrown to help provide a young couple with the things that they can't afford themselves,' Moore pointed out in the video. 'It's harder to justify a shower for a grandmother who can likely afford most of the things she needs and probably won't need that many things to begin with.' Moore said gift-givers should think about what expecting parents need before they gift the grandparents. 'So, what do you think: Are grandmother showers a good trend or one that we should say goodbye to?' Moore asked in the video. The TikTok responses were heated: 'It's peak narcissism.' 'I don't understand the 'new role' comment. There is no 'role.' We're the parents. They get to observe and show love.' 'No grandmother shower. No circumstances support this.' 'A cute lunch with some goodies would be great, but wanting gifts like cribs and baby clothes is TOO much and puts an expectation that the baby will be sleeping over grandma's house a bunch.' 'Inappropriate and tacky. If the person is becoming a grandparent, they've already had their own children. The grandchild isn't a 'do-over' for them.' 'My friend is going to be a first-time grandmother. We are definitely having a get-together to celebrate her excitement.' 'I think the key is that grandma's shower should include a different set of guests, so the same people aren't getting hit up for gifts twice.' ''No' to the shower. But 'Yes' to a few friends celebrating new grandparents.' 'It's tacky as hell.' 'I can totally see how this would get out of hand. It's sweet for a few close friends to help you celebrate your new role but tread very lightly.' 'I've never heard of it, but I think it's great.' 'The absolute only time a grandparent shower should happen is if it's thrown by the parents of the baby. Or, possibly a small surprise party at work planned and attended by co-workers only.' Moore tells that she believes celebrating a future grandchild with close friends or co-workers is a nice way to mark a new life stage — but she has some reservations. First, she says, parents should preferably be the ones to suggest a 'grand shower.' When it's the grandparents' idea, they should get the parents' blessing. 'It's one thing if friends throw you a little shower — you don't need permission for that — but if you're planning a shower and have not consulted with the parents ... that's not OK,' says Moore. 'The prime focus needs to be on the new mom.' According to Moore, 'grand showers' are even less necessary for veteran grandparents, who have already experienced a change in the family dynamic. Moore says 'meal-prep showers' could be a replacement for grandparent showers. 'Get everyone in the kitchen to make meals for the new family,' says Moore. 'You can enjoy a glass of champagne and talk about how wonderful it is to become a new grandparent while providing something useful to the parents.' This article was originally published on
