
SC dropped probe on Allahabad HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav after Rajya Sabha alert
The Supreme Court was preparing to initiate an in-house inquiry into Allahabad high court judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav's controversial speech at a VHP event last year, but dropped the plan after receiving a categorical letter from the Rajya Sabha secretariat that asserted exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, people aware of the matter said.
The people cited above confirmed that then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna had set the process in motion to assess whether the judge's conduct warranted scrutiny in the wake of an adverse report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice. However, the move was halted after the Rajya Sabha secretariat's letter in March underlined that the constitutional mandate for any such proceeding lies solely with the chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and ultimately with Parliament and the President.
This letter effectively stalled the judiciary's plan to initiate an in-house inquiry – an internal mechanism laid down through judicial precedents to examine complaints of misconduct against sitting judges of the superior judiciary, against Justice Yadav, whose comments at the VHP's December 8, 2024, event in Prayagraj drew widespread condemnation for violating the principles of secularism and judicial impartiality.
HT reached out to the Rajya secretariat for a response on the next course of action but did not get one immediately.
In February, Rajya Sabha chairman and vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar said that only Parliament and President have the jurisdiction over the matter
'The jurisdiction for the stated subject matter constitutionally lies in exclusivity with the chairman Rajya Sabha and in an eventuality with the Parliament and honourable President. Taking note of public domain information and inputs available, it is expedient that the Secretary General, Rajya Sabha shares this information with the Secretary General, Supreme Court of India,' he said in Parliament on February 13.
Justice Yadav, addressing a gathering organised by the legal cell of the VHP within the Allahabad High Court Bar Association premises, made a series of incendiary statements that targeted the Muslim community and invoked majoritarian themes.
In his speech, he reportedly asserted that 'India should function according to the wishes of the majority,' claimed 'only a Hindu can make this country a 'Vishwa Guru',' and linked practices such as triple talaq and halala to societal backwardness, calling for their abolition under the proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC). Video clips of the speech, which went viral on social media, show him allegedly using derogatory communal slurs.His remarks framed the UCC as a Hindu-Muslim binary, stating that while Hindu customs had evolved to address historical wrongs, Muslims had resisted reform.
The speech triggered outrage among political leaders, jurists and civil society, with senior advocate Kapil Sibal leading a group of 55 opposition MPs in filing a notice in the Rajya Sabha seeking Justice Yadav's impeachment for 'grave violation of judicial ethics.' The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) also demanded an in-house inquiry and his immediate suspension, citing a clear breach of the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life adopted by the Supreme Court in 1997.
Amid mounting criticism, the Supreme Court swiftly sought a report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice on December 10, 2024. A week later, on December 17, the apex court collegium, comprising CJI Khanna and Justices Bhushan R Gavai, Surya Kant, Hrishikesh Roy and Abhay S Oka, summoned Justice Yadav for a 30-minute closed-door meeting to ascertain whether his public comments violated the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct or judicial ethics outlined in internal codes.
While Justice Yadav reportedly assured the collegium judges he would apologise publicly, he failed to do so in the weeks that followed. Instead, in a January 2025 letter to the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court, the judge doubled down on his remarks, claiming they had been misrepresented by vested interests and asserting that his speech reflected societal concerns 'consistent with constitutional values.' Appointed in 2019, Justice Yadav is set to retire on April 15, 2026.
People cited above said that CJI Khanna subsequently sought a fresh report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice, referring to additional complaints against Justice Yadav from a law student and a retired IPS officer. But by then, an unexpected development complicated matters.
In March 2025, the Supreme Court administration received a formal communication from the Rajya Sabha secretariat, informing it that the matter of Justice Yadav's conduct, arising out of the December 13 impeachment motion signed by 55 MPs, was already under active consideration.
'The court's secretary general brought the letter to the notice of the then CJI, who was clear that an in-house inquiry, being a non-statutory and internal mechanism, should not run parallel to a statutory process under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968,' a person familiar with the matter told HT. 'The Rajya Sabha's categorical assertion that it was seized of the matter prompted the judiciary to defer to the parliamentary process,' this person added.
The Judges (Inquiry) Act mandates that a motion seeking removal of a High Court or Supreme Court judge for 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' must be admitted by the presiding officer of the House concerned. To be sure, the Vice President and Rajya Sabha chairman, Jagdeep Dhankhar, has yet to decide on the admissibility of the motion and whether to constitute a formal inquiry committee.
'The idea was not to create constitutional friction or undermine parliamentary privilege…That's the sole reason why no in-house probe was set up despite the initial steps,' the person cited above added.
Another person aware of the deliberations within the collegium said that all members were informed of the decision to halt the in-house inquiry after the receipt of the Rajya Sabha's letter. 'There was a kind of consensus that the matter, being under legislative scrutiny, should not be clouded by a simultaneous judicial process,' the person said.
Opposition lawmakers, meanwhile, continue to push for clarity on the status of the impeachment motion. Speaking to HT on condition of anonymity, a senior MP said last month that his party planned to raise the matter during the monsoon session. 'During the budget session, the chairman had said that he was assessing the veracity of the signatures on the notice. We would like to know the status of that notice too...the notices have been given in both the Houses and it is imperative it should be taken up,' the lawmaker said.
In his formal reply to the complaints, Justice Yadav reportedly maintained in January that he has done no wrong. He described his speech as an articulation of issues affecting society and claimed that his references were misconstrued. On the criticism of his previous judicial orders related to cow protection, he is said to have responded that these reflected India's cultural ethos and legal recognition of cow protection, not any form of judicial bias.
Notably, Justice Yadav did not tender an apology in his correspondence, reinforcing his stance that his speech was neither communal nor violative of judicial conduct. He rather asserted that judges, who often face unfair attacks, deserve protection and support from senior members of the judiciary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Twist in UP politics: Swami Prasad Maurya launches bloc, names himself CM candidate
Former minister and a prominent OBC face in Uttar Pradesh politics, Swami Prasad Maurya on Thursday announced the launch of a new political front - Lok Morcha - comprising nine small parties. Addressing a press conference, Maurya declared himself as the chief ministerial candidate of the Morcha. 'We will launch a campaign for the 2027 assembly election with the slogan - UP Bachao - BJP Hatao (Save UP - Remove BJP from power). The parties that joined Lok Morcha include Apni Janata Party led by Swami Prasad Maurya, Rashtriya Samanta Dal led by Motilal Shastri, Samyak Party led by Rajamani Suvvaiya Rai, Janseva Dal led by Vinesh Thakur, Political Justice Party led by Rajesh Siddharth, Sarvlokhit Samaj Party led by Satya Narayan Maurya, Swatantra Janata Raj Party led by Ghanshyam Kori, Sabka Dal-U led by Pramod Lodhi and Loktantra Suraksha Party led by Rajkumar Saini. Majority of the parties forming the Lok Morcha are led by leaders from backward communities. Maurya said the Lok Morcha will launch a movement across UP on public issues. From Friday, the leaders of the Morcha will organise meetings in the various districts of Lucknow division to enlighten people about the programme and ideology of the Morcha. The representation of the various castes in the party organisation will be given according to their population- 'jiski jitni sankha bhari- uski utni hissedari' will be our slogan to win the support of various castes, he said. Launching a scathing attack on the state government, Murya said that law and order has deteriorated, reservation is not implemented in hiring staff through outsourcing, the price of the essential commodities has skyrocketed, education has been privatised and children coming from poor families are deprived of education, the farmers are exploited and the Muslim community is terrorised, he said. The Lok Morcha will raise a demand for polling through ballot papers in assembly and Lok Sabha elections, he said. Once a close aide of BSP chief Mayawati, Maurya was minister in the BSP government - 2007-12. On August 8, 2016 he joined the BJP along with his supporters. He was given a ticket from his traditional seat Padrauna in the 2017 assembly election, Maurya represented Padrauna seat in the assembly in 2009 by poll and 2012 assembly election as well. He won the seat again in the 2017 assembly election and was made minister in the BJP government. He rose in rebellion before the 2022 assembly election and joined the Samajwadi Party. He contested assembly election from Fazilnagar seat but was defeated by the BJP candidate. Later, in February 2024 he quit the Samajwadi Party.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
BJP slams Yunus govt ‘inaction' after Tagore mansion attacked in Bangladesh—'Islamists sending message'
On Tuesday, a mob reportedly vandalised the house, now a museum, in Sirajganj, Bangladesh, and assaulted the museum director, only two days after an altercation between a visitor and the museum staff over parking fees escalated into a local protest. The mob targeted the heritage site, including an auditorium, following which the authorities formed a three-member committee to investigate the matter. The police have reportedly booked 50 persons so far. At a press conference, BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra said, 'The behaviour of the Bangladesh interim government of Muhammad Yunus is not appropriate. It has taken no action so far. It could not protect such a significant international monument. A deplorable message goes out to the world. The BJP condemns this behaviour.' New Delhi: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has attacked the Muhammad Yunus-led Bangladesh interim government for its 'inaction' after an attack on the ancestral home of Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore on 10 June. The BJP criticised Yunus Thursday for failing to save the UNESCO-protected Rabindra Kachharibari from a 'pre-planned attack' by Islamists, with the incident turning into a diplomatic flashpoint. Sambit Patra, however, said that the members of Jamaat-e-Islami and Hefazat-e-Islam were suspected to be behind the attack. Calling the incident an ideological attack on the ideology of Tagore, Patra said, 'Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore was no ordinary figure. He was not just a literary icon; he was a multifaceted individual who made a significant contribution to the world. He was a man with a personality that went beyond borders.' BJP leader and West Bengal Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari, on the other hand, pointed fingers at Khaleda Zia's Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Chhatra Shibir activists for the vandalism. 'The sacred legacy of our most precious Kobiguru Rabindranath Thakur was desecrated in Sirajganj, Bangladesh, where a mob led by BNP and Chhatra Shibir activists vandalized the historic Rabindra Kachari Bari,' Adhikari wrote in an X post. He also added political colour to his comments. Comparing the Mamata Banerjee-led government and the Yunus government and accusing both of giving space to radical forces, he warned, 'This is a wake-up call for the Hindus of West Bengal. When extremist forces gain ground, they spare no one; not even a figure revered worldwide like Tagore.' BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya wrote on X: 'The mob raised hateful slogans against Tagore, shattered windows, and destroyed furniture—an open assault on Bengal's cultural soul … Whether it is attacks on temples, disruption of Hindu livelihoods, or the suppression of age-old traditions—Bengal's civilisational core is under siege. Culture, identity, and faith—all are being targeted.' Pre-planned attack 'Today, the topic is Bangladesh. We are not intruding on the international domain. However, it is about Rabindranath Tagore, so the BJP takes it very seriously and sensitively. His ancestral house in Bangladesh was attacked and damaged,' Sambit Patra told the media, adding, 'His Kachharibari, built by his grandfather, was attacked.' Patra further alleged, 'We are getting to know that the people of Jamaat-e-Islami and Hefazat-e-Islam carried out this attack. It is coming to light that this was a pre-planned attack. For five days, they planned the attack on the house of Rabindranath Tagore, who was the foundation and pillar of our civilisation and culture of Bengal, so that they could send a big message to the world.' Since Yunus took the reins in Bangladesh after the fall of Awami League leader and ex-PM Sheikh Hasina, the New Delhi-Dhaka relations have deteriorated, with the former accusing Dhaka of failing to protect minorities or check anti-Hindu violence. Moreover, India and the external affairs minister have condemned Yunus for calling Northeast India 'landlocked' during his trip to China and did not take his meeting with the deputy speaker of Nepal in good faith. 'We are the only guardians of the ocean,' Yunus also said during his China visit in March this year while inviting Chinese investment to Bangladesh. He went further, suggesting that the geographical placement of China offered a 'huge possibility', claiming the region could become 'an extension of the Chinese economy'. 'From Bangladesh, you can go anywhere you want. The ocean is our backyard,' Yunus declared. On Wednesday, Yunus also voiced his problem with India. He said Prime Minister Narendra Modi had brushed aside his request to prevent Sheikh Hasina from making political statements from Indian soil, where she had landed after waves of anti-quota protests drove her out of Bangladesh on 5 August 2024. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: Bangladesh elections in April 2026, Yunus announces in televised address


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Rolling out the women's quota
In September 2023, Parliament passed the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, the law that mandates setting aside one-third or 33% of the total seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies for women. The law also states that the reservation for women in the legislature can be rolled out only after the delimitation of Lok Sabha constituencies, which, in turn, can be done only after the census is completed. The government recently announced that the census, due in 2021, will now be completed by March 1, 2027. So, women's quota in the House can be rolled out only after the census and delimitation exercises are completed. Against this backdrop, the plan to hold the 2029 general election with the women's quota in place may seem a tall order, but is possible. There are two challenges the political executive and administration will face. First, the census. Experience suggests that it may take nearly two years for the administration to process the enumeration data. This time caste will be added as an enumeration category, a first since 1931. However, digital technology is expected to help enumerators complete the process in less than a year. This should leave a sufficient window for the political executive to surmount the second hurdle, which is the delimitation exercise. The lack of a political consensus on delimitation of the Lok Sabha constituencies makes it a potentially contentious exercise: States including Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, and Punjab have formed a Joint Action Committee on Fair Delimitation, which convened in Chennai in March, and demanded that a freeze on the number of parliamentary constituencies, based on the 1971 Census, be extended for another 25 years. However, the Centre has assured the restive States that their concerns will be addressed and that their current tally of seats will be protected. The challenge before the Union government is how to firewall the delimitation exercise from the contingencies of electoral politics. This will surely test its persuasive powers and tactical acumen. What could aid its push to roll out the women's quota is the broad consensus in favour of political reservation for women: Women outvoted men (65.8% was the turnout for women as compared to 65.6% for men) in the 2024 general election, and it's natural that this enthusiasm is translated into political representation in Parliament.