Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4
On Monday (Jul 28), court records were updated after a hearing was held in the morning. Ong remains on bail.
The former managing director of Hotel Properties Ltd, Ong is widely known for bringing the Formula 1 night race to Singapore in 2008, and owns the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix (GP).
He faces one charge of abetting offences under Section 165 of the Penal Code – which forbids public servants from accepting gifts from people involved with them in an official capacity – and one charge of abetting the obstruction of justice.
The first charge, for abetting an offence under Section 165, relates to flights and a hotel stay. Ong allegedly offered Iswaran a trip to Doha in December 2022, and arranged for his private jet to fly him there. The flight was worth US$7,700.
The second charge was for allegedly instructing Singapore GP director Mok Chee Liang, in May 2023, to bill Iswaran for the business-class ticket from Doha to Singapore – an action that would have obstructed the course of justice.
Those found guilty of offences under Section 165 can be jailed for up to two years, fined, or both. Abetting an offence would result in the same punishment, if the offence is committed as a consequence of the abetment.
The maximum penalty for obstructing the course of justice is jail time of up to seven years, a fine, or both.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds. SINGAPORE - The liquidators for three companies of Ng Yu Zhi, the alleged nickel-trading fraudster at the centre of a $1.5 billion nickel trading scam, scored a legal victory on July 29 to recover more than $900 million from nine former directors and employees for their role in Singapore's biggest Ponzi scheme. In 2021, the liquidators of Envy Asset Management (EAM), Envy Global Trading (EGT) and Envy Management Holdings (EMH) sued Ng, former directors Lee Si Ye and Ju Xiao, and former employee Cheong Ming Feng. Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds, supposedly for nickel trading. Of those sums, $593 million, US$192.2 million and €880,000 remain outstanding to investors. In a 180-page judgment issued July 29, the liquidators, who are represented by lawyers Daryl Fong and Lin Ruizi of Shook Lin & Bok, were awarded damages after Ms Lee, Mr Ju and Mr Cheong were found to have breached their duties as directors. They also received damages for fraudulent trading by Mr Ju. The trio were also ordered to pay back about $27 million in commission payments, profit sharing, bonuses, CPF payments, directors' fees and dividends. The High Court, however, ruled that the July 29 judgment is 'not binding' on Ng, who was made bankrupt in December 2022. Civil proceedings against the former managing director of EGT and EAM stopped as a result. Ng's criminal trial on 42 charges ended on July 7 after he opted not to take the stand. He had faced a total of 108 charges over offences including cheating, forgery, fraudulent trading, money laundering and criminal breach of trust. In awarding damages to the liquidators, High Court Judicial Commissioner Mohamed Faizal found that the nickel trading scheme did not exist and none of the investors' monies were used to buy nickel from Poseidon Nickel. This is the Australian firm that Ng claimed to have bought nickel from. Instead the funds were transferred to Ng through Envy Asset Management Trading (EAMT), paid as directors' fees to Ng and Ms Lee, and as commission payments, profit sharing fees to the defendants and other employees. The funds were also used to pay referral fees or 'profits' in excess of the invested principal to investors; and transferred or paid to other companies owned by Ng or his Envy companies, the judicial commissioner found. The High Court also found that the Envy companies were 'hopelessly insolvent and unable to pay their debts. Neither EGT nor EMH had any legitimate, revenue-generating business and there was no other meaningful business undertaken by the Envy companies.' There was also 'compelling evidence of the shocking level of ineptitude and nonchalance' on the part of Ms Lee, who allegedly helped Ng cover up details of fraudulent transfers of $416.5 million and US$17.7 million to his own bank accounts under false pretences, according to the ruling. She was found to be 'grossly negligent' but 'did not have actual knowledge' of the Ponzi scheme as she herself was being duped by Ng, with her own family members and loved ones also invested in the scheme, the judicial commissioner pointed out. As for Mr Ju, the High Court found that he was in breach of his directors' duties and liable for fraudulent trading, among other things. 'That he was willing to forge documents, fraudulently change the paid-up capital sums for EGT and mislead investors ... spoke to his entire approach to his role as a director and employee of the company. These actions also reflect his willingness to be complicit in whatever he was asked to do. This made a mockery of his duties as a director of EGT,' the judicial commissioner said. Mr Cheong, the ex-employee, knew that he was creating forgeries, and also became aware that these were being circulated to both internal employees and external investors, but the High Court found that he did not know that such actions were being done to prop up a sham scheme. For one thing , Mr Cheong was 'not particularly sophisticated and possessed a rather rudimentary understanding of the business'. His own investments 'started even before he joined the Envy companies and he had assisted some of his friends to do the same, which suggests that he himself bought into the logic of the purported nickel trading,' the judicial commissioner said. Regardless of whether Ms Lee, Mr Ju or Mr Cheong had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme, they were still ordered to return most of the monies they had received from the Envy companies. In a separate 62-page judgment released July 29, the High Court ordered six other former employees of the Envy companies to cough up more than $42 million in fictitious profits, commission payments, profit sharing and referral fees paid to them. This award is subject to a deduction of income tax payments made by these six employees. Former employees Lau Lee Sheng, Benjamin Teo Wei Wen, Ms Shen Xuhuai, Koh Hong Jie (Xu Hongjie), Guo Yujia and Jordan Chua Wei Jian were named defendants in this suit brought by the liquidators. The High Court allowed the liquidators to claw back monies paid to them after finding that the Envy companies 'were never under any obligation to pay the commission payments and profit sharing payments to the defendants because the (companies) never made any actual profit.'
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
6-year-old missing boy's body found in forest; father who reported him missing arrested
MALAYSIA: A six-year-old boy who was reported missing in Johor Bahru last week is now believed to have been murdered by his own biological father. The child, identified as M. Tishant, was last seen on Jul 24 in Taman Bukit Indah, Johor Bahru. After four days of frantic searching, police found a body believed to be that of the missing boy across state lines, in a forest in Negeri Sembilan. The remains were found around 4:30 p.m. on Monday (Jul 28), following the arrest and confession of the boy's 36-year-old father. The suspect led the police to the site where the child's body had been buried. The investigation began as a missing persons case under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which deals with child neglect, but based on the new evidence and the suspect's confession, the police are now treating this as a murder case under Section 302 of the Penal Code. Section 302 carries the death penalty or a prison sentence of up to 40 years, along with whipping, upon conviction. The local press reported that it was the father himself who first lodged the missing person's report at around 2:15 a.m. on July 24, claiming that his son had vanished. Police say the suspect is cooperating with the investigation, and an autopsy will be conducted to determine the exact cause of death. Investigations are ongoing. () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Man scammed 10 victims on Carousell over exercise clothes, misappropriated his hairdresser's money
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Malaysian national Ong Kok Mun admitted to five offences, including cheating, criminal breach of trust, drug charges and assisting others to retain their benefits from criminal conduct. SINGAPORE – A man scammed 10 victims on Carousell into handing him over $900 in 2024 thinking that they were buying exercise clothes from him. Malaysian national Ong Kok Mun, 39, also misappropriated about $1,800 of his hairdresser's money that same year. On July 29, Ong admitted to five offences, including cheating, criminal breach of trust, drug charges and assisting others to retain their benefits from criminal conduct. Nine other cheating charges and one drug-related offence will be taken into consideration for his sentencing on July 31. The court heard that Ong, a former delivery man, lost his job in February 2024. He then purportedly bought exercise garments in bulk from Shopee and resold them on Carousell. Between Feb 3 and Feb 14 that year, 10 people paid Ong a total of $920 for the clothes. But he cut off contact after getting the money and did not deliver the apparel to them. One victim paid him $155 for four sport bras and two pairs of shorts from Lululemon, but never received the items. Ong later admitted that he had used the money to pay for his personal expenses and accommodation at a hotel after his supply of exercise clothes ran out. Ong also misappropriated money from people he k new personally, such as a hairdresser of whom he had been a regular customer for many years. In January 2024, he told the hairdresser – a fellow 39-year-old Malaysian – that he had unused credits in his Shopback account. The hairdresser asked Ong if he could help him buy some Chinese New Year hampers at a discount using those credits. Ong then got the hairdresser to transfer $1,812 to his bank account, but did not buy the hampers nor return the money. Court documents did not state what he used the money for. Ong has not made restitution to any of his victims. During his unemployment period, Ong's former gang member offered him a job with a criminal syndicate. He would look for people who were willing to open and relinquish their bank accounts, which would then be used to receive money from scam victims. Ong received about $1,000 in commission for each bank account. Between March 10 and April 1, 2024, he referred at least 18 bank accounts to the syndicate. Six of these accounts received $422,999 in scam proceeds from 49 victims. Ong was arrested on April 3, 2024. The police searched his room at the Darlene Hotel in Geylang and found methamphetamine, which he kept for personal consumption. He admitted that he had started abusing the drug almost every day since June 2023 due to stress. Court documents showed that Ong was previously admitted to the Drug Rehabilitation Centre and jailed for drug consumption. Mr Edwin Ho of the Public Defender's Office, who represented Ong, said his client's involvement with the criminal syndicate was driven by financial desperation. 'He promises that this will be his last brush with the law,' added Mr Ho.
