‘Our voice will be louder': two UK Jewish movements to unite as progressive group
Liberal Judaism and Reform Judaism took the historic step of voting to unite at parallel meetings on Sunday. Each vote easily exceeded the required 75% threshold for the move, with about 95% in favour.
Ed Kessler, who chaired an advisory board overseeing the merger, said: 'This is the biggest change and most significant development in British Judaism since the second world war.'
Progressive Judaism would provide a 'voice and a space that brings together timeless Jewish tradition with the diversity and values of 21st-century Jewish life', he added.
It is the first ever merger of two Jewish denominations, and the first in any major religion for more than half a century.
Most British Jews are Orthodox, though the progressive tradition has grown over recent decades. Progressive Judaism will differ from the Orthodox tradition in its fundamental commitment to equality. About half its rabbis are women, and one in five are LGBTQ+.
Karen Newman, the chair of Liberal Judaism, said the new movement 'will manifest from day one its commitment to a Judaism that is non-dogmatic, inclusive and celebrates diversity in policy, prayer, and practice'.
Paul Langsford, chair of the Movement for Reform Judaism, said: 'As a unified movement, we will now be stronger, our voice will be louder and we will be able to bring even greater benefit not just to our own members, but to the whole Jewish community and wider British society.'
The merger has taken two years of consultations and negotiations, and will be formally launched in November.
Rabbi Charley Baginsky, of Liberal Judaism, said: 'We are now seeing the fruition of the next iteration of progressive Jewish history. Through this vote, our members are both standing on the shoulders of all those who came before us and creating something long and lasting for our children and the generations who come after us.'
Rabbi Jonathan Romain, head of the Rabbinic Court of Reform Judaism, said: 'There is so much division in the world, it is incumbent on faith groups to show that coexisting in harmony can be a reality to live out, not just an ideal to pray for. This merger is a great example of showing that differences can be overcome with a mix of commonsense and goodwill.'
The Reform and Liberal traditions are both Zionist movements, while believing it is not disloyal to criticise Israel. 'Within Progressive Judaism, diversity of views and voices – including around Israel/Palestine – are welcome and debate is encouraged,' said a spokesperson.
Jews made up 0.46% of the population of England and Wales in the 2021 census. More than half live in Greater London.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour is flooding Britain's streets with a tidal wave of dangerous criminals: PHILIP FLOWER
As a young sergeant in the Met 30 years ago, I chased and tackled an armed robber who had stabbed a sub-postmistress during a raid. I had a truncheon. He had a whacking great knife, and he tried to wield it against me and another copper as a crowd of schoolchildren in the street watched in mute horror. We disarmed the man and arrested him. The sub-postmistress was badly shaken but recovered from her injuries. And the robber got four years. At the time, I was disappointed with the sentence, but today it's likely he would serve less than half that. Under Labour's shambolic scheme to reduce overcrowding in prisons he might well be deemed a 'low risk' and released after serving just 40 per cent of his time. In other words, if he'd already done a year on remand waiting for trial, he could be sentenced this week – and out by Christmas. Such a travesty of justice is not a rare event. It's happening 100 times a day: According to the Ministry of Justice, criminals are being given early release at the rate of 3,000 a month. Latest figures show over 26,400 prisoners have been let out early in the first seven months of the scheme – with a significant number of them, around 3 per cent, sentenced to ten years or more. To describe such people as 'low risk', as the Government does, is farcical. Judges do not sentence criminals to ten years unless they are a real danger to society. As well as violent offenders, these could be serious drug traffickers, or people who supply guns to gangs, or fraudsters who prey on the elderly. Not only will they have committed a serious offence, but it's very likely their record will also show a long list of previous crimes. Sentencing Council guidelines are stringent. Many judges admit privately that they would like to impose tougher penalties, but their rulings are tightly constrained by directives that must be followed. If a defendant gets ten years, it's because anything less is not safe. Surveys show that between two-thirds and three-quarters of the public believe sentences are already too lenient. Few officers disagree with that. It is demoralising for police to put their safety on the line every day to protect society, only for the thugs and the lawbreakers to smirk as they are once again let off lightly. And if they do get sent to jail, they have the reassurance of knowing they will probably serve less than half their sentence. That undermines the deterrent effect of prison and allows criminals to feel they've beaten the system. It's no wonder that, when the first wave of prisoners won early release in September last year, they were blowing kisses and flicking V-signs at the cameras. There's no way, of course, that the parole boards operating under Labour's hastily devised scheme can begin to assess each case thoroughly. With an average of 100 releases a day, seven days a week, the authorities can barely have time to shout 'Next, please!' – let alone discuss the potential risk each felon presents. Serious issues such as mental health and past history of violence are all too likely to be overlooked. Despite this mass release, Britain's prisons are still gravely overcrowded. Last year, the former chief inspector of prisons, Dame Anne Owers, warned the system could be only days from breakdown. Her successor, Charlie Taylor, says: 'The Government dealt with the problem not by turning off the taps but by letting out the bathwater.' That's an understatement. To flood the streets of Britain's towns and cities with 3,000 criminals a month isn't overflow. It's a tidal wave.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Alex Salmond's allies hit back at Nicola Sturgeon's claims he leaked details of sexual misconduct saga
Allies of Alex Salmond have hit back at Nicola Sturgeon 's claims he may have leaked details of his own sexual misconduct saga. The ex-SNP leader and Alba Party founder was cleared in 2020 of 13 sexual offence charges, including attempted rape, though his lawyer conceded during the trial that his client could have been a 'better man'. The latest extract from Sturgeon's soon-to-be published memoir, Frankly, centres around how Salmond reacted to multiple allegations of sexual misconduct levelled against him in 2018 - many of which made their way into the press. In the book Sturgeon denies any responsibility for the leaks and says that she does not know who was behind them. Controversially, she also claims in her memoir that it would have been 'classic Alex' to have made the leaks himself. Her remarks have caused fury among the Scottish political elite, with Kenny MacAskill - the man who succeeded Salmond as Alba Party leader - calling Sturgeon out for her 'hypocrisy'. Meanwhile, Chris McEleny, the party's former general secretary, branded Sturgeon's speculations a 'fabrication'. MacAskill, a former SNP minister who succeeded Salmond as Alba Party leader, recently called for a public inquiry into the way sexual misconduct complaints against Salmond were handled. In the book Sturgeon denies any responsibility for the leaks and says that she does not know who was behind them - but suggested it would have been 'classic Alex' for him to have He posted on X: 'It's one thing to be supposedly candid in your autobiography. 'Quite another to block openness and transparency when in office and by those you continue to support. 'This hypocrisy is yet another reason for an inquiry into the Scottish government's actions relating to Alex Salmond.' Alex Salmond served as first minister of Scotland from 2007 but stood down in 2014 after losing the Scottish independence referendum. Sturgeon took over the top job and in 2018 allegations against Salmond began to surface, following a review of the Scottish government's 'policies and processes for addressing inappropriate conduct' in the wake of the #metoo scandal. Salmond was accused of a string of sexual offences between June 2008 and November 2014, which ranged from him stroking a civil servant's hair to trying to rape a former Scottish Government official in Bute House. However, in March 2020 he was cleared of all charges, although his lawyer Alex Prentice KC famously said: 'If in some ways the former first minister had been a better man, I wouldn't be here, you wouldn't be here, none of us would be here. 'I'm not here to suggest he always behaved well or couldn't have been a better man on occasions. That would be a waste of my time. MacAskill, a former SNP minister, called Sturgeon out for her 'hypocrisy' after claiming she 'block[ed] openness and transparency when in office' The pair were once close, but Sturgeon now says that once she realised Salmond's 'thirst for revenge' was greater than the bond between them, she knew their friendship was over 'But I'm in a court of law and I'm dealing, not with whether he could have been a better man because he certainly could have been better. 'I'm dealing with whether or not it was established he was guilty of serious, sometimes very serious, criminal charges.' Additionally a judicial review in 2019 found that the Scottish government's investigation into Salmond's alleged misconduct was unfair, unlawful and biased. As a result Salmond received £500,000 in legal expenses. Chris McEleny, the Alba Party's former general secretary, who was himself expelled following an investigation into 'gross misconduct' earlier this year, called Sturgeon's remarks a 'fabrication'. He said the investigation into Salmond was a 'stitch-up' and claimed that a number of public bodies had 'conspired to jail Salmond'. He said: 'Alex Salmond delivered an SNP government, an SNP majority and an independence referendum whereas Nicola Sturgeon delivered nothing whatsoever for the national cause. 'Nicola might think she can fabricate her own version of the truth now that Alex is no longer here but the reality is her book will end up in a bargain basket whilst Alex Salmond will reside in the pages of the Scottish history books.' The story about the investigation of sexual misconduct claims against Salmond was broken by journalist David Clegg, then political editor of the Daily Record. Speaking on BBC Scotland's The Sunday Show, Mr Clegg, who is currently editor of The Courier, called the notion that Alex Salmond had leaked the story himself 'a conspiracy theory too far'. He said: 'But I think it shows the level of suspicion and the deep rift that had formed between Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon prior to his death.' Me Clegg said a document arrived at the Daily Record office with the claims against Salmond summarised - but described the idea that it came from Salmond as 'not credible'. He added: 'There is obviously some mystery and speculation about what went on seven years ago and how that happened. 'But if it was Alex Salmond who had leaked it, when I phoned him up that night to put the claims to him, he did an incredible acting job of seeming surprised and shocked. 'I have heard this from people close to Nicola Sturgeon before and it's always struck me as not credible and I would be very surprised if it was the case.' Salmond died of a heart attack in North Macedonia last October, aged 69 - but before his death he maintained there had been a 'conspiracy' between his accusers to bring him down. 'What he never did was show any contrition,' lamented Sturgeon, who added that she felt 'sick' over the allegations. In an extract published by The Sunday Times, the former First Minister added that 'ruthless' Salmond would have done anything to extricate himself from blame - even if it meant the downfall of his party. 'There was also never the merest hint of concern about the damage he did to the party he previously led. 'Indeed, it felt to me that he would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him. 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all.' Sturgeon said the notion his accusers had collaborated with one another to accuse him of misconduct was 'a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct'. She added: 'That he tried to distort and weaponise genuine expressions of shock, in some cases trauma, was truly disgraceful, and it strikes at the heart of why I find it so hard to forgive him.' Retired SNP politician Alex Neil said Sturgeon should issue a retraction after journalist David Clegg categorically denied that Alex Salmond had leaked the report on his own sexual misconduct accusations At the point of realising his 'thirst for revenge' was greater than the bond between them, Sturgeon said she knew their friendship was over for good and she went through a 'grieving process'. She wrote: 'For a time after we stopped speaking I would have conversations with him in my head about politics and the issues of the day. 'I had occasional, vivid dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft.' And even now after Salmond's passing, Sturgeon admitted his impact on her continues and she will 'never quite escape the shadow he casts, even in death'. Ms Sturgeon ruled Scottish politics for years before she walked away from Scotland's top job in March 2023 - shortly before her husband Peter Murrell was arrested in a police probe into the SNP's finances. She was arrested in June 2023 in relation to the Operation Branchform investigation into the SNP's finances. Sturgeon was subsequently released without charge pending further investigation, while Mr Murrell - formerly SNP chief executive - was eventually charged in relation to the alleged embezzlement of party funds.
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Convicted Indian asylum seekers will be deported while human rights appeals heard
Foreign criminals from India and 14 other countries will be deported before their human rights appeals have been heard after the Government announced an expansion to its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said foreign criminals had been 'exploiting' the immigration system by 'remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on'. She has expanded a scheme that allows the UK to deport offenders who have had a human rights claim against their removal rejected, with any appeals heard from abroad over a video link. It comes as the Government struggles to tackle the small boats crisis. A further 435 migrants who arrived in small boats were brought to shore on Saturday – the highest total since the 'one-in, one-out' deal with France was announced. The total number arriving in boats this year has hit 25,000, with that figure reached more quickly than in any previous year. The rules currently apply to foreign offenders from eight countries, but ministers are adding another 15 countries to the list, including India, Bulgaria and Australia. The other countries now in the scheme are Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The scheme is designed to prevent lengthy human rights appeals that can prevent offenders from being deported because of court backlogs and delays. Labour has ramped up its policy on deportations after criticism from the Conservatives and Reform UK that too many jail cell places were taken up by foreign criminals. On Sunday the Home Office announced it would change the law to allow foreign offenders to be immediately deported on conviction to reduce the number of migrants in British jails. Ms Cooper said: 'Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.' The Home Office said the expansion of 'deport now, appeal later' would help 'scale-up' the UK's ability to remove foreign criminals. However, a Home Office spokesman could not give a figure for the number of deportations that would happen under the new rules because decisions would be made on a 'case-by-case basis'. Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, said the move would save £54,000 a year per prison place. Since Labour came to power last year, almost 5,200 foreign offenders have been deported – a 14 per cent increase on the previous 12 months. Although officials have said increasing deportations will help ease pressure on overcrowded prisons, figures from the Ministry of Justice from the end of June suggest there are currently just 772 prisoners from the 15 new countries covered by 'deport now, appeal later'. Of the new countries, only Indians are in the top nationalities among current prisoners. There are no offenders from Botswana or Brunei currently behind bars. The 'deport now, appeal later' scheme for human rights claims was introduced in 2014 but was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court three years later, in cases where deportation would prevent an offender from giving live evidence in their appeal. The court noted that giving evidence over a video link could be sufficient, provided it was financially and logistically possible, in effect limiting the policy to countries where video appeal facilities were realistically available. The UK currently has arrangements for video appeals with eight countries, including Tanzania, Belize, Finland and Estonia. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said: 'We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country. 'Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer.'
