Is American research safe? Why US officials are zeroing in on the University of Michigan
The University of Michigan is facing a federal investigation by the US Department of Education following the arrests of two Chinese scientists linked to its research facilities.
The inquiry centers on the university's handling of foreign funding and potential risks to national security, particularly concerning collaborations with Chinese institutions.
The investigation was announced after federal authorities charged two individuals in separate incidents involving the smuggling of biological materials into the US. Both scientists were associated with the University of Michigan and were apprehended within days of each other.
Federal probe linked to national security concerns
The Department of Education cited "highly disturbing criminal charges" as the basis for the investigation. According to documents obtained by the
Associated Press
, the department expressed concern that the university's research labs remain "vulnerable to sabotage." Paul Moore, the department's chief investigative counsel, stated, as reported by the
Associated Press
, that "despite the University of Michigan's history of downplaying its vulnerabilities to malign foreign influence, recent reports reveal that UM's research laboratories remain vulnerable."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Most Successful Way of Intraday Trading is "Market Profile"
TradeWise
Learn More
Undo
The university is now required to submit financial records and detailed information on research collaborations with institutions outside the US. Officials accuse the university of being "incomplete, inaccurate and untimely" in its disclosures about foreign funding, according to the
Associated Press.
Criminal cases prompt action from US authorities
The first arrest involved a Chinese scientist and his girlfriend, who were working at a University of Michigan laboratory.
According to the FBI, the pair attempted to smuggle a toxic fungus into the US, but the effort was intercepted. Days later, another Chinese scientist was arrested upon arrival in the US. He is accused of shipping biological material to a lab at the university.
In response, the university announced a review of its research security protocols in June. However, the Education Department, in a formal letter, raised concerns that some officials at the university had previously downplayed potential risks associated with Chinese research partnerships.
Focus on foreign funding and transparency
US law requires all universities to report foreign gifts and contracts that total $250,000 or more. While the law had seen little enforcement for years, the Trump administration renewed efforts to investigate underreporting. The Education Department has opened similar investigations into Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of California, Berkeley.
The Department's letter singled out Ann Chih Lin, director of the university's Center for Chinese Studies, for allegedly minimizing the national security threat. Officials wrote that "Lin's apparent indifference to the national security concerns of the largest single source of funding for UM's annual research expenditures — the American taxpayer — is particularly unsettling," as quoted by the
Associated Press
.
University response and broader context
University spokesperson Colleen Mastony stated the institution "will cooperate with federal investigators and takes its responsibility to comply with the law extremely seriously," as reported by the
Associated Press
. She added, "We strongly condemn any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university's critical public mission."
The University of Michigan ended its partnership with a university in Shanghai in January, following pressure from House Republicans. The decision aligned with broader congressional efforts urging US universities to sever ties with Chinese institutions deemed security risks.
According to the
Associated Press
, more than 270,000 Chinese international students were enrolled in US institutions during the 2023–24 academic year, accounting for approximately one-fourth of all foreign students.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Docus that hint at Hillary role in plan to tie Trump to Russia false?
The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Hillary Clinton 's campaign conspired to frame Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on Thursday shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported email from July 27, 2016, that said Hillary had approved a campaign proposal to tie Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private email server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported emails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The release of the annex was no exception. John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from "a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency." Kash Patel, the FBI director, declared on social media that the annex revealed "evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Salt Spring: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Hillary approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did "not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication," he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the "Clinton Plan intelligence," as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US govt's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticise FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more sceptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. Durham's report also mentioned that Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous. But Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the "Clinton Plan intelligence" was Russian disinformation. Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false, but he used court filings to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in efforts to scrutinize possible ties between Trump and Russia, which ended in acquittals.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Friend not hubby's relative under Sec 498A: Bombay HC
Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of Bombay high court recently held that a friend of husband cannot be treated as his "relative" under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalises cruelty to a wife by her husband or his relatives. The court quashed criminal proceedings against a Nagpur resident, who was accused of abetting dowry harassment against his friend's wife. A division bench comprising Justices Anil Pansare and Mahendra Nerlikar said the definition of "relative" must be interpreted strictly. "A friend cannot be said to be a relative as he is neither a blood relative nor did he have any relation through marriage or adoption," the bench ruled in its July 29 order. The friend approached the court under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR registered at Chimur police station in Chandrapur district and the pending criminal case before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chimur. The FIR, lodged on June 13, 2022, alleged that the petitioner would frequently visit the couple's home and instigate the husband to demand a plot of land and a car from his wife's family. If the demands were not fulfilled, he allegedly encouraged the husband to send his wife back to her parental home. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo While the counsel for the friend, SA Mohta, argued that he was not related to the husband and hence Section 498A was not applicable to him, the prosecution contended that a broader interpretation of the term "relative" should be adopted to cover such abetment by outsiders. HC relied on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dechamma IM versus State of Karnataka (2024), where it was held that even a girlfriend or a woman in a romantic relationship with a man cannot be considered a "relative" for the purposes of prosecution under Section 498A. "The word 'relative' brings within its purview a status. Such a status must be conferred either by blood, marriage or adoption," the SC had observed. The Nagpur bench then concluded that the same principle would apply to a friend of the husband. "Therefore, considering the above facts and upon plain reading of Section 498A of the IPC, we conclude that a friend of the husband will not fall under the definition of 'relative'," the bench held. The court clarified that the petitioner's application did not seek relief for the husband, his mother, and his father, and hence proceedings against them would continue.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Stock tip scam nets3cr: Four arrested
1 2 Hyderabad: Sleuths from the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau (TGCSB) have arrested four cyber fraudsters, including a city-based software consultant involved in a drone start-up, for duping a city businessman out of 3 crore through a fake stock market investment scheme. The victim, a businessman from North Lalaguda, informed the police that he was added to a WhatsApp group titled "SMC Global Securities" on April 14 by individuals identified as Anu Prita and Ajay. On June 19, the complainant was persuaded to subscribe to an initial public offering (IPO) and was pressured to transfer at least 3 crore for share allocation. Trusting the fraudsters, who assured him that the funds could be withdrawn at any time, the victim transferred the sum in 16 transactions to various bank accounts. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Although he was allowed to make a token withdrawal of 10,000, he was later informed that his account had gone into a negative balance. This prompted him to file a complaint with TGCSB on June 28. Investigators traced one bank account in Kerala that had received 77 lakh. Further examination revealed that 8 lakh had been routed to a current account with a leading private bank held in the name of "Drones Spray", a company started by Srinivas Manubothula (45), a software consultant from Narsingi, for his drone software start-up. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Duong 9b: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo Police arrested Srinivas along with his alleged accomplices: Syed Yousuf (45); Chekka Yeshaya (54); and Mohammed Jaber Ahmed (42) All of them were arrested in Hyderabad. "Srinivas had incurred losses in the business he started in 2023 and was seeking investors. His friend Shekar, who supplies bank accounts to cyber fraudsters, introduced him to the others. Srinivas agreed to let them use his bank account in exchange for a 10% commission. They took the SIM card linked to Srinivas' bank account and, after routing 4.3 crore through it, returned the SIM card along with 2 lakh in cash," said TGCSB Director Shikha Goel.
