Trump and Putin end summit without Ukraine deal
Trump, fond of calling himself a master deal-maker, rolled out the red carpet for Putin at an Alaska air base for the first time the Russian leader was allowed on Western soil since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
After an abrupt ending to three hours of talks with aides, Trump and Putin offered warm words but took no questions from reporters -- highly unusual for the media-savvy US president.
"We're not there yet, but we've made progress. There's no deal until there's a deal," Trump said.
He called the meeting "extremely productive" with "many points" agreed, although he did not offer specifics.
"There are just a very few that are left; some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant," Trump said without elaborating.
Putin also spoke in general terms of cooperation in a joint press appearance that lasted just 12 minutes.
"We hope that the understanding we have reached will... pave the way for peace in Ukraine," Putin said.
As Trump mused about a second meeting, Putin smiled and said in English: "Next time in Moscow."
The former KGB agent quickly tried to flatter Trump, who has voiced admiration for the Russian leader in the past.
Putin told Trump he agreed with him that the Ukraine war, which Putin ordered, would not have happened if Trump were president instead of Joe Biden.
Trump, for his part, again complained of a "hoax" that Russia intervened to help him in the 2016 election -- a finding backed by US intelligence.
The friendly reception was a stark contrast to Trump's berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky when he met him at the White House in February.
Trump earlier said he sought a three-way meeting with Zelensky but did not announce one at the summit.
Trump said he would now consult Zelensky as well as NATO leaders, who have voiced unease about the US leader's outreach to Putin.
"Now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said in a Fox News interview after the summit.
Putin warned Ukraine and European countries to "not create any obstacles" and not "make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues."
Trump invited Putin just a week ago and ensured there was some carefully choreographed drama for their first in-person meeting since 2019.
The two leaders arrived in their respective presidential jets and descended on the tarmac of an air base, with Trump clapping as Putin appeared.
US military might was on display with a B-2 stealth bomber flying overhead, as a reporter shouted audibly to Putin, "Will you stop killing civilians?"
Putin, undaunted, grinned widely as Trump took the unusual step of escorting him into "The Beast," the secure US presidential limousine, before a meeting in a room before a screen that said -- in English only -- "Pursuing Peace."
Putin smiled and joked with Russian reporters on the visit, a landmark for a leader who is facing an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court related to the Ukraine war, which has killed tens of thousands of people.
- Battlefield gains -
Russia, in recent days, has made battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations, although Ukraine announced as Putin was flying in that it had retaken several villages.
Trump had insisted he would be firm with Putin, after coming under heated criticism for appearing cowed during a 2018 summit in Helsinki.
While he was traveling to Alaska, the White House announced that Trump had scrapped a plan to see Putin alone, and he instead held the talks alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his roving envoy Steve Witkoff.
Zelensky was not included and has refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia.
"It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelensky said in a social media post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Serbia's president vows 'strong response' after days of unrest
BELGRADE: Serbia's president on Sunday vowed a "strong" response to anti-government protests, after nearly a week of violent clashes involving his supporters, police and demonstrators across the country. Clashes have erupted in the capital, Belgrade and other cities for five nights in a row, with fireworks, stones, stun grenades and tear gas used. More than 130 police officers have been injured so far, the right-wing president, Aleksandar Vucic, said at a press conference in Belgrade, with dozens of citizens also reporting injuries and seeking medical assistance. On Saturday, violence flared in Belgrade, Novi Sad and Valjevo, where a small group of masked men attacked and set fire to the empty offices of Vucic's ruling Serbian Progressive Party. "You will see the full determination of the Serbian state. We will use everything at our disposal to restore law, peace and order", Vucic said. He added that the government needed a few days to prepare "the legal and formal framework" for the response. "It will be very different from what you have seen so far", he added, without disclosing details, but said that declaring a state of emergency was not being considered. Vucic compared anti-government protesters with "terrorists", a term he has frequently repeated since mass demonstrations began late last year. Almost daily protests have gripped Serbia since November, following the collapse of a railway station roof that killed 16 people. The tragedy became a symbol of deep-rooted corruption in the Balkan nation, with demands for a transparent investigation growing into calls for early elections. At their peak, the protests drew hundreds of thousands onto the streets. The mostly peaceful demonstrations deteriorated earlier this week when large groups of pro-government supporters — attacked protesters. That sparked violent clashes, further fuelled by videos shared online showing police striking unarmed demonstrators with batons. Police have denied allegations of brutality and accused demonstrators of attacking officers. The European Union's commissioner for enlargement, Marta Kos, earlier this week said violence reported at protests was "deeply concerning". Vucic said he had also received personal messages from other European officials recently, but did not provide further details. The protests were also being followed in Russia, which remains a close Serbian ally despite Belgrade's declared path to the EU. Russia's foreign ministry issued a statement saying that it may offer further support to Vucic and describing the protests as "violent riots". "Russia cannot remain unresponsive to what is happening in brotherly Serbia", it said. While the protests have so far led to the resignation of the prime minister and the collapse of the government, Vucic has remained defiant. He has repeatedly rejected calls for early elections and denounced the demonstrations as part of a foreign plot to overthrow him, claiming that "billions of euros" had allegedly been invested in the scheme. — AFP
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
Trade War: US tariffs cripple Indian exports and competitiveness
The Trump administration's trade negotiations with India aimed to secure better access to India's agricultural and dairy markets. The inconsequential outcome of the talks, India's Russian oil imports, and the potential reduction of Indian exports to the US contributed to the escalation of the trade war. Initially, the Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, effective August 1, 2025. In continuation of this development, on August 6, 2025, the US administration announced an additional punitive tariff of 25%, effective August 27, 2025, if no deal is reached. This makes India the most heavily taxed trading partner in Asia. The trade tariffs were aimed at disrupting the India-Russia energy ties and isolating Russia in the Ukraine conflict. The US is India's top export market, accounting for 18% of its exports. This development in the trade war is expected to impact $87 billion in Indian exports, and it is predicted that the country's GDP will decline to 6%. Indian MSMEs risk losing their global competitiveness to rivals, with tariffs on India at 50% compared to China's 30% and Vietnam's 20%. The US has also issued a warning of new 'secondary tariffs' on countries trading with Russia. The tariffs aim to coerce India to diversify its 35% to 40% crude oil imports from Russia. Several sectors, including engineering & automobiles, gems & jewelry, and textiles & leather, will be severely affected, and India faces a potential threat of supply chain shifts. Semiconductors, critical minerals, and the pharmaceutical sector are exempt from additional tax for now. It is estimated that Indian exports to the US will drop by 70% if tariffs reach 50%. The textile and apparel market is very vulnerable. Already, many US companies have shifted orders to Bangladesh and Vietnam, and this could further trigger job losses for millions. India is the world's largest cut diamond industry, employing 2 million workers and generating exports worth $10 billion. Approximately 32% of Indian auto parts are exported to the US. The tariffs will make many products uncompetitive. India exports 40% of its seafood, mainly Shrimp, to the USA. The fears of tariffs have resulted in farmers halting sowings. Labor-intensive industries, such as textiles, garments, automobiles, and jewelry, face a significant threat of job loss. There is a major fear that 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 people in textile hubs alone will lose their jobs. The sentiment is that most entrepreneurs are accelerating shipments before the tariff implementation date and exploring alternative diversification destinations, such as China, Russia, and Japan. India also plans to shift towards being self-reliant and to diversify its exports. The Indian export-driven economy faces a significant challenge with the US tariffs imposed in August 2025. It has the potential to disrupt $35 billion in annual losses, impact key industries such as seafood, gems, and textiles, and collectively displace millions of jobs that significantly contribute to GDP growth. In the broader context, it will impact the global competitiveness of many products, drag GDP into a downward trajectory, and increase inflationary pressures. India needs to focus on accelerating its market diversification and enhancing domestic manufacturing, while simultaneously pursuing diplomatic negotiations. India has taken a firm stand that these tariffs are unjustified and unwarranted. India's energy imports are from 40 different countries, which are decisions based on market dynamics and should not be at the mercy of geopolitical escalations. The tariffs have prompted India to expand and diversify its exports to maintain strategic autonomy. From a broader perspective, if the trade war is not de-escalated, it could significantly strain US-India bilateral trade relationships and affect defense ties, prompting India to strengthen its relationships with Russia, China, and many other countries, thereby profoundly reorienting global power dynamics.
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
In high-stakes summit, Trump, not Putin, budges
Donald Trump wanted to go bold - a high-pomp, high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin to test whether the Russian leader would compromise on the Ukraine war. In the end, it looks like it was Trump, not Putin, who budged. Putin, visibly delighted as he stepped foot in the West for the first time since ordering the 2022 war, made no apparent concession at the talks at an Alaska air base. In a brief joint media appearance with Trump, who unusually took no questions, Putin again spoke of addressing the "root causes" of the Ukraine war and warned Kyiv and Europeans against disrupting "emerging progress" with the United States, the top defender of Ukraine under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. Trump, who bills himself as a master negotiator, acknowledged there was "no deal" but said there were "very few" areas of disagreement, although he was vague on what they were. But posting hours later on his Truth Social account, Trump said he wanted Russia and Ukraine to "go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war" and not a ceasefire. Trump's own administration had been pushing a ceasefire for months, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signing on after intense pressure from Trump. Putin had repeatedly rejected truce offers and kept up attacks on Ukraine, seeking to maximise battlefield advantage. Trump had vowed to be firm with Putin after wide criticism of the US president's cowed appearance before him at a 2018 summit in Helsinki. But Putin again found ways to flatter and trigger Trump, who in his second term constantly speaks unprompted about his many grievances. Putin told Trump before the cameras that there would have been no war - which Putin himself launched - if Trump were president in 2022 rather than Biden, a frequent Trump talking point. Trump bemoaned the effect on ties with Putin of what he again called the "hoax" of the findings by US intelligence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, Trump said that "one of the most interesting things" Putin told him was about... the US voting system. Trump said approvingly that Putin - who has held power in Russia since 2000 and was declared the winner of elections last year with 88 per cent of the vote - told him of the risks of mail-in ballots and said of Trump's 2020 loss to Biden, "You won that election by so much." US election authorities and experts have found no evidence of wide-scale fraud from mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, which Trump, uniquely in US history, refused to concede. Trump's Democratic rivals voiced outrage that the summit secured no breakthrough and said it only served to normalise Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Experts said it was too early to write off the summit completely, as much is not known about what was discussed behind closed doors. Trump will meet Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defence Priorities, which backs US restraint, said that Trump's critics have been proven wrong in saying he would "give Ukraine to Putin or force Kyiv to accept surrender." "His focus has been and remains getting Putin to the negotiating table. Mr Trump deserves credit rather than condemnation for his efforts so far," she said. But Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, said an initial read was that "Putin scored a victory by showing up, and Trump's limited words and tense demeanour left Putin to control the narrative." "For a man so attached to showmanship, Trump unusually allowed Putin to be the star of what should have been the Trump show," she said. - AFP The writer covers State Department for the international news agency AFP
