Shocking moment fishermen dad and his topless son scrap with officials after they were caught angling without licence
DISTURBING footage shows a father and son violently attacking environment agency officers who asked for their fishing licences.
The duo, who verbally and physically assaulted two officers, fists flying have been whacked with a hefty £12,000 court bill.
3
3
Anglers Sidney Bowman, 75, and a topless Andrew Bowman, 44, assaulted two Environment Agency officers who had asked for their names and addresses after they caught them fishing without a licence.
Despite being informed that they were on camera, Sidney poked an officer in the eye after his son hit his colleague in the face.
Only after police arrived on the scene did Sidney and Andrew confirm their identities.
The anglers were punished for the assault at Poole Hall Fishery, Alverley, Shropshire, on September 6 2023 at Telford Magistrates' Court last month on April 25.
The punch up started when Andrew refused to give his details to the officers and told his Dad not to either.
The Environment Agency officers started issuing a caution at this point, but then Andrew started to become verbally and physically abusive, threatening officers and moving his equipment.
Spooked, the officers moved a fishing knife away from the aggressors at which point Andrew thwacked one officer in the face.
The other officer warned Andrew's Dad, 'don't do it,' but Sidney then tried to grab the officer's chest and 'poked him in the eye with flailing arms.'
The court heard how Andrew had to be taken to the ground after refusing to be handcuffed.
He decided it was a good idea to claim he was called David Wilkes and lie about his address.
Only after the police were called did the duo fess up to the correct details.
3
Sidney pled guilty to two counts of assaulting an emergency worker and one count of fishing without a licence.
He was ordered to pay an £806 fine, a £322 victim surcharge and £4,000 costs.
Andrew admitted two counts of assaulting an emergency worker, two counts of obstructing a water bailiff and one count of fishing without a licence.
He was handed a £634 fine, a £253 victim surcharge, £50 compensation and £6,000 costs.
Environment Agency water bailiffs are considered constables 'for the purposes of enforcing fisheries legislation' and are protected under the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018.
A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said: "These sentences handed out show that the courts will not allow assault of public servants to go unpunished.
"It sends out a strong message to other people trying to stop our officers from performing their duties.
"Our officers do endure abuse and threats of violence in carrying out important work to protect people and the environment.
"The Environment Agency will not hesitate to prosecute those that obstruct or assault its staff.
"If people suspect illegal fishing incidents they should call our 24/7 hotline on 0800 807060."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Judge tells Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni to work out dispute over dismissal of emotional distress claims
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's legal squabble over her claims of emotional distress hit a roadblock Tuesday when a federal judge refused to let Lively dismiss them on her preferred terms, instead telling both sides to reach an agreement. The recent dispute between the 'It Ends With Us' co-stars, who have been entangled in a high-profile legal battle for months, arose after Baldoni's lawyers requested Lively's medical and mental health records to defend against her claims that he intentionally and negligently inflicted emotional distress while they were on the set of the film. Lively's initial complaint in December accused Baldoni of sexual harassment, as well as retaliation, after she raised issues about his on-set behavior — allegations Baldoni's lawyers have denied. Since then, the two stars have been embroiled in a tense legal standoff, with each accusing the other of having orchestrated a smear campaign. Rather than provide medical and mental health records requested by Baldoni's team, Lively offered to drop her emotional distress claims, according to court documents filed Monday. In response, Baldoni's lawyers Monday disputed her request to dismiss the claims 'without prejudice,' meaning she would be able to refile them later. In a court filing, Baldoni's team argued that Lively should permanently dismiss her claims if she will not provide the medical records it requested. In its own court filing hours later, Lively's team called Baldoni's motion a 'false and plainly improper public relations stunt' and asked the court to deny and strike the motion entirely. On Tuesday morning, U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman of the Southern District of New York denied Lively's request but wrote that she can file a formal motion asking for dismissal without prejudice. Otherwise, Liman wrote, Lively's and Baldoni's teams must agree among themselves whether the dismissal would be with or without prejudice. He also denied Baldoni's motion to force Lively to provide her medical records, saying the request is rendered moot now that Lively is withdrawing her emotional distress claims. Liman's ruling pressures Lively to dismiss her claims either way, as he wrote that 'if the claims are not dismissed, the Court will preclude Lively from offering any evidence of emotional distress.' In a statement, Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb wrote that Lively offered to dismiss those claims 'because they are no longer necessary, and she will continue to pursue emotional distress damages through other claims in her lawsuit, including sexual harassment and retaliation.' 'In addition, the Baldoni-Wayfarer strategy of filing retaliatory claims has exposed them to expansive damages under California law,' Lively's lawyers wrote. (Wayfarer Studios, the production company behind 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni co-founded, is a defendant along with Baldoni.) 'This is exactly where both parties were before the Baldoni-Wayfarer Parties rushed to file this utterly pointless motion to compel, all searching for yet another press moment,' Lively's lawyers wrote. Lawyers for Baldoni did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday. Baldoni's filing Monday argued that Lively was trying to avoid providing her medical records while preserving her claims of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. 'Ms. Lively cannot have it both ways. If Ms. Lively wants to withdraw her frivolous IED [intentional infliction of emotional distress] Claims, the Wayfarer Parties are entitled to a dismissal with prejudice to ensure they will not be re-filed,' Baldoni's lawyers said in the filing. 'If Ms. Lively is unwilling to stipulate to the dismissal of her IED Claims with prejudice, then the Wayfarer Parties will continue to defend against them, and she must produce her medical information and documents as set forth herein.' Baldoni's lawyers were specifically seeking the names and addresses of her health care providers, their treatment notes and signed privacy forms authorizing the release of her records. They wrote in their filing Monday that because she claimed emotional injuries, Lively has placed her mental condition 'at issue' and thus 'waived any doctor-patient privilege.' Lively's lawyers countered Baldoni's motion in their response Monday, arguing that Lively voluntarily agreed to withdraw her emotional distress claims 'in good faith' to streamline the case. They added that Baldoni's team had conceded that that means their request for medical records would become moot. Lively's filing also claimed that Baldoni's lawyers did not raise any objections to her proposed revisions to the joint stipulation for dismissal during a conference call Monday. It alleged that Baldoni's team instead rushed to file a 'clearly pre-written Motion the minute that the teleconference concluded.' 'Almost immediately thereafter, tabloid media began reporting 'exclusively' on Ms. Lively's 'shock' move, claiming that she has 'sensationally' dropped her IIED claim, quoting extensively from the Motion,' Lively's filing said. Aside from asking the court to deny and strike the motion, Lively's lawyers had asked Liman on Monday to consider sanctions for the opposition's 'continued abuse of this Court's docket.' 'The Motion was filed for a single audience: the media,' Lively's filing said. 'There is nothing for this Court to compel.'
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doctor warns of 'highly toxic' effect of popular natural remedy - after it puts toddler in a coma
Ingesting tea tree oil could result in life-threatening organ damage, seizures and even a coma, a GP has warned. According to Dr Sermed Mezher, a UK based doctor, swallowing tiny amounts of the essential oil can result in serious poisoning 'within a minute'. In an Instagram video that has so far been viewed over 2.1million times, Dr Mezher explained the risks in response to a video of a young boy who ended up in a coma after swallowing it. Dr Mezher said: 'Swallowing tea tree oil can be highly toxic due to its potent chemical composition, which includes terpinen-4-ol, cineole, and other volatile compounds.' Terpinen-4-ol is the most abundant compound in tea tree oil—extracted from the Melaleuca alternifolia tree—which posses antifungal and anti-inflammatory properties. However when ingested, the oil can rapidly affect the nervous system, leading to drowsiness, loss of coordination and seizures. In 2022 alone, the US poison control centre treated more than 2,200 cases of toxicity linked to tea tree oil. 'One of them was a 23-month-old boy who drank just 10mls which put him in a coma for five hours until he thankfully recovered,' Dr Mezher explained. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sermed Mezher (@drsermedmezher) He added that its supposed benefits for skin health may also be bogus. 'Tree oil has been sold as a miracle cure to multiple skin conditions, and yet there's very little evidence that it works,' he said. A 2023 study found that tea tree oil has antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that helped treat teenage and adult acne—though researchers cautioned it was not possible to draw conclusions on its safety. The poison control centre treated twice as many cases of toxicity caused by tea tree oil compared to any other essential oil, including cinnamon, clove and eucalyptus oil. 'I don't know about you, but I am not keeping this at home,' Dr Mezher cautioned. As well as attacking the nervous system, ingesting the 'horrifically toxic' product can also irritate the gastrointestinal tract, causing nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. 'Tea tree oil is also harsh on the liver,' Dr Mezher added. 'The body struggles to metabolise its toxic components, potentially leading to organ damage with repeated or high-dose exposure.' 'Because tea tree oil absorbs quickly into the bloodstream, poisoning symptoms can appear within minutes to a few hours. 'If ingestion occurs, immediate medical attention is essential to prevent serious complications.' The NHS warns against trying to make someone who has swallowed something poisonous and is unconscious sick, and recommends instead putting them in the recovery position until an ambulance arrives. Tea tree oil, a common ingredient in many skincare products, has previously been linked to a number of superbug infections including MRSA—a type of bacteria that is resistant to treatment and causes life-threatening infection. US scientists discovered that repeated low-dose use of the essential oil made the MRSA bacteria, as well as and salmonella, more resistant to antibiotics. Professor David McDowell, from the University of Ulster, warned that people who use tea tree oil on their skin repeatedly to treat acne, could be 'stressing' the bacteria on the skin rather than killing it—increasing their resistance to antibiotics. 'Although tea tree oil may be an effective antimicrobial agent when appropriately used at high concentrations, its application at low concentrations may contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance in human pathogens,' he warned.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
White Brits will be a minority in the UK within the next 40 years, report claims
White Brits will become a minority race in the UK population within the next 40 years, a new report has claimed. A study into birth rates and migration levels has predicted that white British people will make up only 33.7 per cent of the population by the end of the century. The research conducted by Professor Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University says the projected change will come in phases: first falling from the current level of 73 per cent to 57 per cent by 2050, then into the minority levels by 2063. Professor Goodwin's report also suggests significant changes for foreign-born citizens and second-generation immigrants, who currently make up less than 20 per cent of the population. These groups, the report says, will comprise 33.5 per cent of the UK's population in the next 25 years. It also predicts a near three-times increase in the number of Muslims living in the UK, suggesting that almost one in five people living in Britain will be followers of Islam by the end of the century. By the year 2100, the report expects 60 per cent of people living in the UK to have at least have one immigrant parent. Professor Goodwin said his research, which was based on Office for National Statistics and census data, will 'spark anxiety, concern and political opposition' among voters who wish to 'maintain the culture of the traditional majority'. He added: 'By the end of the current century, most of the people on these islands will not be able to trace their roots in this country back more than one or two generations. 'This raises enormous questions about the capacity of our country and leaders to unify people around a shared sense of identity, values, ways of life, and culture, and avoid the very real risk of us becoming what Sir Keir Starmer referred to in May as "an island of strangers".' In the report titled 'Demographic Change and the Future of the United Kingdom', Professor Goodwin also warned of the UK's ability to 'absorb and manage this scale of demographic change'. He said: 'What these projections show is that the UK is currently on course to experience enormous and historically unprecedented changes in the composition of its population.' Professor Goodwin's projections were based on non-white ethnic groups having a higher fertility rate until the end of the century. The UK- born fertility rate used was 1.39 for those born in the UK , 1.97 for foreign-born people, for Muslims it was 2.35, and for non-Muslims 1.54. The report comes just days after 1,200 migrants crossed the Channel to the UK in what was labelled 'a day of shame '. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer even faced criticism from one of his own ministers who said control of Britain's borders had been lost as a surge in dinghy crossings overwhelmed French and UK border patrol vessels. The latest Home Office figures show that 1,194 migrants arrived in 18 boats, bringing the provisional annual total so far to 14,811. This is 42 per cent higher than the 10,448 at the same point last year and 95 per cent up from the same point in 2023, 7,610. It is still lower than the highest daily total of 1,305 arrivals since data began in 2018, which was recorded on September 3, 2022. But the total of arrivals for the year, 14,811, is the highest ever recorded for the first five months of a year since data was first recorded on Channel crossings in 2018. It has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year - and n 2024 the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9, reaching 14,058. At Gravelines in northern France, more than half a dozen French police officers stood by and watched as migrants waded into the sea and scrambled on to an inflatable boat. French authorities said they rescued 184 people. One of Sir Keir's senior cabinet ministers admitted the scenes were 'pretty shocking' as he said the UK had 'lost control of its borders over the last five years'. Defence Secretary John Healey told Sky News that the latest crossings revealed a 'really big problem' - but insisted there was pressure being put on France for better co-operation and crackdowns ahead. Britain had agreed a deal in 2023 to pay France £480million over three years to stop the crossings, including £175million in the current financial year – more than £480,000 per day. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp branded the latest Channel scenes 'a disgrace but sadly entirely expected' and 'a day of shame for the Labour Government'. He added: 'It's a shameful failure by the French to discharge their duties to stop illegal migration. The French are failing to stop these crossings by illegal immigrants. 'Over a thousand illegal immigrants in a single day, boats flooding the Channel, Border Force stretched beyond breaking point, and even fishing vessels drafted in because our maritime rescue services are overwhelmed.' And Richard Tice MP, deputy leader of Reform UK, said: 'It looks like we pay hundreds of millions to give French police officers photography lessons because they are certainly not providing any security. Frankly, the Government should be suing the French for our money back.' At least 18 migrant boats were seen leaving the French coast on Sunday, June 1, carrying more than 1,000 people - exceeding the previous daily record for 2025 of 825, set earlier last month. Mr Healey added: 'Pretty shocking, those scenes [on Sunday]. The truth is, Britain's lost control of its borders over the last five years. 'The last government last year left an asylum system in chaos and record levels of immigration. 'But I think that [Sunday] tells us a really big problem which is that you've got French police unable to intervene to intervene and intercept the boats when they are in shallow water. 'We saw the smugglers launching elsewhere and coming round like a taxi to pick them up.' Mr Healey insisted there was 'new co-operation' with the French suggesting their officials would intervene in the water. When asked whether he was 'hacked off' with France for not doing so now, Mr Healey said: 'They are not doing it, but we've got the agreement that they will change the way they work. 'Our concentration now is to push them to get that into operation so they can intercept these smugglers and stop these people in the boats, not just on the shore.'
