logo
Man accused of wielding knife in broad daylight claims it was for self-protection

Man accused of wielding knife in broad daylight claims it was for self-protection

Sunday World29-04-2025

David Covaciu (28) insisted his actions were fuelled by ongoing 'unease' in his estate
David Covaciu on his way into Monaghan Courthouse on Monday morning. Photo Rory Geary
A man in his 20s accused of brandishing a knife in broad daylight in a county Monaghan town on Sunday evening has insisted his actions were fuelled by ongoing 'unease' in the locality and for self-protection purposes.
David Covaciu (28) of Ardee Road, Magheross, Carrickmacross, Monaghan, was remanded in custody by Judge Raymond Finnegan after appearing at a sitting of Monaghan District Court on Monday arising from an incident along Main Street, Carrickmacross, Co Monaghan at around 7.30pm the previous evening.
The accused, who had the benefit of a Romanian interpreter, sat in the custody suite of the court as details surrounding the alleged episode and three ensuing charges were heard.
They included two charges of knife possession under section 9 (1) and (4) of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act, 1990 alongside a section 6 public order charge.
Inspector Damien Martin addressed the court at the outset of proceedings to reveal the State were objecting to bail under Section 2 of the Bail Act 1997.
Garda Barry Sheehy underlined those objections on the basis of the seriousness of the charges adding that the section 9 (4) charge carried the possibility of up to five years in prison on indictment
David Covaciu on his way into Monaghan Courthouse on Monday morning. Photo Rory Geary
Judge Finnegan was similarly informed of how those objections also extended to alleged evidence gardai had which included eye witness accounts and video footage that showed him allegedly acting in an 'aggressive and threatening' manner.
Garda Sheehy added how it will be contended the unemployed former farm worker was caught 'red-handed' in broad daylight in an episode that had caused 'considerable distress' locally.
Defence solicitor Roísín Courtney detailed how her client had instructed her his decision to carry a flick-knife had stemmed from fears over his own personal safety.
'I am not in any way justifying carrying a knife. I asked him the blank question as to why he was carrying a knife and he said was for his own protection as there is some unease in the local estate where he lives,' she told the court.
Ms Courtney added how her client had ties to the area and had been living locally for much of the past decade.
Garda Sheehy replied, saying gardaí were aware of some 'ongoing issues' over the past two to three weeks in the greater Carrickmacross area that had led to a 'bit of unrest'.
Read more Armed man arrested after he's spotted wielding knife at traffic in broad daylight
He also stated gardaí had recovered the weapon they believed had been used during the incident, describing it as being silver in colour and four inches in length.
Garda Sheehy also insisted, when asked by Judge Finnegan, that those caught up in the incident were 'not directly' linked to the aforementioned tension which had emerged locally in recent times.
In summing up the State's case, Inspector Martin said the incident and its immediate aftermath had generated 'considerable disquiet' in the local community.
'It was very threatening behaviour in Main Street on a Sunday evening,' he said.
'There are fears as we don't know what his motivations were and we don't why he was carrying a knife and we have no guarantees this behaviour won't escalate.'
In response, Ms Courtney said Covaciu was 'very drunk' and could not recall his involvement in what had transpired less than 24 hours earlier.
Having been presented with video footage of the incident by gardaí during his detention, Ms Courtney said her client had shown 'incredible remorse' and was 'shocked' by his behaviour.
To that end, she insisted 'stringent conditions' would suffice in addressing the concerns both the State and the court may harbour as to whether Covaciu would answer his bail.
Judge Finnegan, however, disagreed and remanded Covaciu in custody to appear back at a sitting of Cavan District Court via video link on Thursday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Addict was on bail for burglary at time of alleged shoplifting spree, court told
Addict was on bail for burglary at time of alleged shoplifting spree, court told

Sunday World

time4 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Addict was on bail for burglary at time of alleged shoplifting spree, court told

'I stole yeah, but do you not think I need professional help?' Charles Reilly admitted he had stolen in the past to feed a persistent drug habit. A father of two and 'chronic drug user' has been remanded in custody accused of carrying out a shoplifting spree in a midlands town while on bail for burglary and theft related incidents, a court has heard. Thirty-three-year-old Charles Reilly, of River Court, Great Water Street, Longford was brought before a sitting of Longford District Court charged with stealing over €600 worth of clothes and food items from three shops in Longford town over the course of a six week period. Two of those allegedly took place on the same day, on April 11, when Mr Reilly was accused of walking into Durkins, along the town's Ballymahon Street and exiting moments later with €280 worth of men's clothing. Charles Reilly admitted he had stolen in the past to feed a persistent drug habit. Later that same day, Garda Maeve Daly said it will be the alleged Mr Reilly entered Dealz, Market Square to steal almost €50 of food items. The same discount store was allegedly targeted by the accused on May 20, she added, in an incident that resulted in the theft of almost €130 of clothes. Nine days later, Judge Deirdre Gearty was told how Mr Reilly was positively identified on CCTV selecting a number of bedding items before concealing them in a bag and covering the goods with a jacket. In all of the alleged thefts, Mr Reilly was adjudged to have passed all points of payment without making any effort to pay for the near €650 worth of goods which were taken, the contents of which remain outstanding. In a contested bail hearing, the court heard of garda objections to bail under both section 2 of the Bail Act 1997 and O'Callaghan Rules. Garda Daly said despite there being no CCTV available for the second theft which Mr Reilly stood accused of in April, he was found sporting the same attire in both incidents. The court heard how the State's rationale in registering its objection to bail being afforded to Mr Reilly was predicated on fears the sum of goods taken in the alleged thefts may be disposed of by the Longford man. Garda Daly said gardaí likewise harboured fears of possible witness intimidation, a concern which was based on the close proximity of Mr Reilly's home to the shops which had fallen foul of the alleged thefts. Judge Gearty was similarly informed of how Mr Reilly was a 'chronic drug user' and heroin addict who gardaí believed, if granted bail, had the propensity to go on and commit further crimes to feed his addiction. Charles Reilly outside Longford Courthouse. Equally, Garda Daly said the accused was on bail for an alleged burglary in Longford town in early March, in addition to bail which had been sanctioned at the end of February for an alleged theft incident. Part of those conditions, it was added, had obligated Mr Reilly to abide by daily sign on conditions, in an order he had failed to comply with since April 9. John Quinn, defending, contended those anxieties could be suitably addressed by the tabling of a 'substantial' cash lodgement in a vow which would provide the necessary incentive for his client to abide by whatever terms thee court chose to implement. Taking the stand himself, Mr Reilly pledged to adhere to those measures as he came under cross-examination from court presenter for the State, Sgt Enda Daly. 'Your health isn't good,' observed Sgt Daly, as he looked directly at Mr Reilly as he sat in the witness box. 'I know you a long time and I just don't think you look that well at the moment.' The accused, for his part agreed as he revealed how he had recently spent a period of time in hospital. In conceding the addictive challenges he was attempting to curb, Mr Reilly admitted that while he had resorted to crime in the past to feed his drug habit, he was no longer under the influence of heroin. Charles Reilly, the court heard, was already on bail in connection to separate burglary and theft incidents when he was arrested in connection to a string of thefts from retail outlets in Longford town. 'I am taking drugs, but not heroin,' he said. I ran out of money and I did steal, but thank God I am on a methadone programme now.' Sgt Daly, however, said the very fact Mr Reilly was back before the courts facing four separate theft charges indicated otherwise. 'I stole yeah, but do you not think I need professional help?' Mr Reilly snapped in response. 'Prison is not the place for me and I need help.' Judge Gearty, in delivering her verdict, said the State had been 'fully justified' in raising its objections to bail. She said despite Mr Reilly's medical ailments, for which the court empathised with, there were no meaningful conditions which could be applied in order to allay the fears which had been outlined by the State. As such, she stressed the court's decision to refuse bail was grounded on the seriousness of the charges, the strength of evidence presented, the possible intimidation of witnesses, risk of reoffending and addiction issues. He was consequently remanded in custody to appear back via video link at a sitting of Longford District Court next Tuesday (June 10). In making that order, Judge Gearty directed Mr Reilly to receive all appropriate medical attention as part of his remand. Charles Reilly admitted he had stolen in the past to feed a persistent drug habit. Today's News in 90 Seconds - 08 June 2025

Man allegedly told neighbour he was ‘going to kill him' after row over tree
Man allegedly told neighbour he was ‘going to kill him' after row over tree

Sunday World

time4 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Man allegedly told neighbour he was ‘going to kill him' after row over tree

John Joe Bartley (54) Ranaghan, Castlepollard, Westmeath appeared at a sitting of Mullingar District Court A father of four and his wife were left 'extremely shaken' when their neighbour allegedly told him to ring for an ambulance 'because he was going to kill him' following a heated row over a fallen tree in the wake of Storm Eowyn. John Joe Bartley (54) Ranaghan, Castlepollard, Westmeath appeared at a sitting of Mullingar District Court charged with trespassing and causing €300 worth of damage when he was accused of throwing stones at the window of his victim's home. The court was told how the incident had stemmed from Bartley's attempts to cut a tree that had fallen outside the home of his neighbour on January 31 this year. John Joe Bartley allegedly told his neighbour to phone an ambulance because "he was going to kill him" when the man informed him he was going to contact gardaí, a court has heard. Sgt Sheila Kenny said it will be the State's case that the accused began shouting obscenities when noticing the injured party looking out from his front porch. When the man informed Bartley of his intention to contact gardaí, Judge Bernadette Owens was told it will be alleged the accused advised him on two separate occasions to 'ring an ambulance because he was going to kill him'. Sgt Kenny said the State will also contend how moments later, Bartley attempted to gain entry to his neighbour's home only to find its doors had been locked by the man. Having failed in those attempts, Sgt Kenny said it will be further alleged that Bartley then picked up stones from the ground and began throwing them at a window, causing chips to its glass. The incident, it was alleged, came to a close when Bartley shouted in the direction of the man for a second time before getting behind the wheel of his van and leaving. Sgt Kenny said the man and his wife had been left 'extremely shaken' by the incident with 'upset' also being caused to the couple's four young children who were inside the house at the time. John Joe Bartley outside Mullingar Courthouse. Bartley, who wore blue jeans with a navy and white shirt together with a green jacket to court, did not speak or enter a plea and instead stood quietly alongside his solicitor Louis Kiernan. Having noted the estimated €300 damage which had been caused as a result of the incident, Judge Owens ruled the case was one which could be dealt with in the District Court as she accepted jurisdiction. Mr Kiernan, meanwhile, applied for the disclosure of all relevant State evidence in order to consider his client's position in terms of meeting the case. Judge Owens remanded Bartley on bail to a sitting of Mullingar District Court on September 18. John Joe Bartley outside Mullingar Courthouse. Today's News in 90 Seconds - 08 June 2025

Residents rage at notorious €100,000 drug ship stuck in Cork harbour
Residents rage at notorious €100,000 drug ship stuck in Cork harbour

Irish Daily Mirror

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Residents rage at notorious €100,000 drug ship stuck in Cork harbour

The people of a harbour village are sick to the teeth of looking at a big steel monster every day – the notorious drug ship the MV Matthew that is costing the State €100,000 a week to store and maintain. Passage West in Cork harbour has become home to the big bulk vessel for the past few months and there is no sign of it moving any time soon. Locals complain that they can't sleep at night, such is the 'weird sounds and noise' that come from the ship after dark and some even fear it is haunted. One man said: 'They have to keep the power on 24/7 to keep it afloat otherwise God knows what might happen. But it makes all sorts of funny noises especially at night and people say they can't sleep with the racket. 'Some even believe there is a ghost onboard but I wouldn't believe a word of that. Everyone around here has an opinion and are sick and tired of the sight of it. 'This ship is an eyesore in our harbour and trust me, we are fed up looking at it every day. The sooner it is gone the better.' But for the poor beleaguered Irish taxpayer there is nothing funny about keeping the MV Matthew seaworthy while it waits to be sold for shipping or scrap. The Revenue Commissioners is responsible for its current safekeeping and it is costing the State around €100,000 a week to keep it afloat since it was seized by our brave Army Rangers and naval service on September 26, 2023, in an international drugs sting. Our troops found over 2.2 tonnes of cocaine onboard the Panama registered vessel with a street value of €157 million, one of the biggest drug seizures in the history of the State. The Revenue has been given the all-clear by the courts to go ahead and sell it on the international market and is now under severe pressure from the people of Passage West to get it done as quickly as possible. Locals had hoped it would be gone by the end of summer but now the whole process could take several months and even run into next year. Seamus McGrath, Fianna Fail TD from Co Cork, who represents the area, has been inundated with complaints from people who want the ship removed. He has repeatedly called on the Revenue Commissioners to move much faster. He said: 'The whole process needs to be hurried up. It is taking far too long to dispose of the ship. 'I'm very concerned about the delays with the process and am being told by the Revenue that it will take several more months. 'In reality that could be the end of the year. I am calling on Revenue to review the disposal process and try to speed it up. 'The community has put up with a lot in terms of noise and it really needs to be sorted.' Sinn Fein councillor Eoghan Fahy said: 'Revenue need to at least advise us of what steps have been taken to sell it to date and what they intend to do in the coming weeks and months to dispose of the MV Matthew.' Revenue says it could not shut down the power on a ship of that size to stop the noise. Revenue Commissioners stated: 'An order of disposal was granted in respect of the MV Matthew on December 2, 2024.' The ship has been formally confiscated by the State and any monies received from the sale will be offset against the €6 million spent to keep it in ship-shape.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store