Drunk driver without license crashes car, pretends to be his brother
A South Korean court said Sunday it had upheld an earlier ruling that handed down a two-year prison sentence to a 29-year-old man for causing a car crash while driving under the influence of alcohol and without a valid license, and for pretending to be his brother when stopped by police.
The defendant was found guilty of charges including dangerous driving resulting in injury, drunk driving, and document forgery, according to the Chuncheon branch of the Seoul High Court. He was also ordered to pay a 2 million won ($1,460) fine.
The defendant crashed his car into another vehicle on a road in Wonju, Gangwon Province, on Feb. 24, 2024. He was intoxicated at the time and did not have a valid driver's license. The collision injured three people in the other car.
The man falsely claimed to be his younger brother when police arrived on the scene, and forged his brother's signature on police documents related to the accident.
The defendant claimed that his punishment was disproportionate to his offense, but the appellate court upheld the earlier ruling made by the Wonju branch of the Chuncheon District Court.
The court pointed out that he committed the crime despite being punished for a previous drunk driving offense. The victim of the identity theft offense -- the defendant's brother -- did not want the man to be punished, but the court said such crimes undermine public order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Drunk driver without license crashes car, pretends to be his brother
A South Korean court said Sunday it had upheld an earlier ruling that handed down a two-year prison sentence to a 29-year-old man for causing a car crash while driving under the influence of alcohol and without a valid license, and for pretending to be his brother when stopped by police. The defendant was found guilty of charges including dangerous driving resulting in injury, drunk driving, and document forgery, according to the Chuncheon branch of the Seoul High Court. He was also ordered to pay a 2 million won ($1,460) fine. The defendant crashed his car into another vehicle on a road in Wonju, Gangwon Province, on Feb. 24, 2024. He was intoxicated at the time and did not have a valid driver's license. The collision injured three people in the other car. The man falsely claimed to be his younger brother when police arrived on the scene, and forged his brother's signature on police documents related to the accident. The defendant claimed that his punishment was disproportionate to his offense, but the appellate court upheld the earlier ruling made by the Wonju branch of the Chuncheon District Court. The court pointed out that he committed the crime despite being punished for a previous drunk driving offense. The victim of the identity theft offense -- the defendant's brother -- did not want the man to be punished, but the court said such crimes undermine public order.
Korea Herald
5 days ago
- Korea Herald
Chinese woman detained for allegedly attempting to enter home of BTS' Jungkook
A Chinese woman has been apprehended for allegedly attempting to trespass into the home of BTS member Jungkook on the day of his discharge from military service, police said Thursday. The woman in her 30s is accused of pressing the keypad door lock of Jungkook's home in Seoul's Yongsan district multiple times at 11:20 p.m. Wednesday, according to police. Police detained the woman on the scene following reports of her alleged attempted trespassing. The woman reportedly told police she came to South Korea to see Jungkook, who was discharged from the South Korean military Wednesday following 18 months of mandatory service. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
5 days ago
- Korea Herald
Constitutional complaint filed against suspension of Lee Jae-myung's criminal trials
A court complaint has been filed with the Constitutional Court of Korea to examine whether the Seoul courts' recent decisions to delay President Lee Jae-myung's criminal trials were constitutional. According to the Constitutional Court, four complaints were submitted to the court from Monday to Tuesday, claiming that the indefinite delays of Lee's trials, granted by the Seoul High Court and the Seoul Central District Court, violated the equal rights. The constitutional complaint can be filed by anyone whose basic rights guaranteed under the Constitution have been infringed upon by public authorities. The complaints included claims that the application of presidential immunity to Lee's retrial on charges of election law violation and a separate criminal trial related to alleged breach of trust charges over Daejang-dong development projects in Seongnam, Gyeonggi Province, is unconstitutional. They also requested the court to declare Article 84 of the Constitution unconstitutional. Article 84 of the Constitution stipulates that the president cannot be criminally prosecuted while in office except in cases of insurrection or treason. But it does not clarify whether this immunity extends to ongoing trials that began before the president took office, making it difficult to have a consistent interpretation of the law. The constitutional complaints stemmed from a narrow interpretation, which suggests that prosecution solely refers to the act of indictment, meaning Lee's ongoing criminal trials could legally proceed regardless of his status as president. Meanwhile, the Seoul Central District Court and the Seoul High Court postponed Lee's hearing schedules as they found that prosecution constitutes not only the act of indictment, but encompasses all ensuing judicial proceedings as well. 'The court has rescheduled the hearing date and will set a new date later. The decision was made after considering Article 84 of the Constitution,' the Seoul High Court said on Monday, without giving a new date for the hearing. Cheon Dae-yeop, chief of the Supreme Court's Court Administration Office and a Supreme Court justice, previously claimed that the judges of each court will have to decide whether to stop or proceed with the trials by applying Article 84 of the Constitution to a criminal defendant who has been elected president. The Constitutional Court reportedly assigned the complaint to a panel of three justices to conduct a preliminary review. If the panel finds the complaint legally sufficient, it will be referred to the full court session for a hearing.
