Why Navitas Semiconductor Skyrocketed Yet Again Today
Navitas inked a historic deal with Nvidia for its next-generation Rubin-based data center systems.
The company makes innovative silicon carbide and gallium nitride chips.
Today, Navitas sought to capitalize on its recent stock price increase.
10 stocks we like better than Navitas Semiconductor ›
Shares of Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ: NVTS) skyrocketed as much as 70.7% on Tuesday, before settling down to a 40.9% gain as of 1:22 p.m. ET.
The massive gain comes on the heels of last Wednesday's near-200% gain after hours, after the company announced a potentially game-changing deal with Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA).
Today, Navitas announced it would be following up that bit of good news with an equity sale, which aims to raise $50 million at much higher prices. While an equity raise would normally send a stock down, the stock is actually increasing again today.
Coming into last week's announcement, Navitas seemed like a speculative small-cap company. Last quarter's revenue was just $14 million, a decline from the prior-year quarter, with operating losses of $25.3 million. With small volumes of declining revenue, short interest in the company had crept up to 12.8% of shares outstanding and 18.4% of the float as of April 30.
However, things may have changed last Wednesday, when Navitas issued a press release announcing its gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC) chips had been selected to go into Nvidia's upcoming 800V DC architecture, which will be used in Nvidia's upcoming Rubin Ultra-based data center chip systems.
GaN and SiC-based chips have been somewhat of a niche product in the chip industry to date, and only cost-effective for the most trying environments where higher voltages under higher temperatures are required, such as electric vehicles and infrastructure. And while EVs have been in a prolonged slump, artificial intelligence (AI) data centers are becoming increasingly power-hungry, to the point where using more SiC and GaN chips may now be required.
The announcement likely produced a massive short squeeze last week. However, today, Navitas announced a new at-the-market (ATM) offering, whereby the company can sell shares in the open market to raise cash. In the press release, the company announced it had sold all the prior $50 million ATM authorization, and had signed up for a new ATM program of similar size.
Normally, when a company announces it has diluted shareholders and may continue to do so, the stock goes down; however, it appears investors actually cheered this announcement. Likely, the company sold a lot of stock last week after the big surge, so investors may believe it raised that cash at attractive prices.
Of note, the company only had $75 million in cash as of the end of last quarter, so raising more cash at attractive prices to extend Navitas' runway was met with applause.
Navitas is hard to value right now, as it's unclear as to the impact of the Nvidia contract. While last week's announcement was certainly great news, I'd be wary of chasing any stock merely on the mention of a partnership with or investment from Nvidia. These moves are driven by hype-by-association, with unclear tangible effects.
Before you buy stock in Navitas Semiconductor, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Navitas Semiconductor wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $639,271!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $804,688!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 957% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 167% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Billy Duberstein and/or his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Why Navitas Semiconductor Skyrocketed Yet Again Today was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New premium flights launched between Taipei and Inland Empire
Taiwan-based Starlux Airlines has launched nonstop service between Taipei and Ontario International Airport, its fourth destination in the United States and second in Southern California. The inaugural flight landed Friday at Ontario at 5:05 p.m. and was greeted with a water cannon salute. The route is part of the airline's continued U.S. expansion, following launches in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. 'This new route is an important milestone for STARLUX,' said Walter Liang, chief passenger commercial officer. 'Ontario's strategic location within the Greater Los Angeles area positions us to better connect the diverse communities of Southern California to and from Asia in luxury and comfort.' Liang said the route gives travelers 14 flights weekly across two airports in Southern California. The greater Los Angeles area is home to more than 2.5 million Asian Americans, including large Taiwanese, Filipino, Chinese, Vietnamese and Korean populations, company officials said. Starlux hopes the new service will provide greater access to its network of more than two dozen destinations in Asia. The airline will operate Airbus A350-900 aircraft on the route four times a week: Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Saturdays. One flight that will depart Ontario around 11 p.m. will arrive in Taipei around 4:15 a.m., two days later due to time change. Some return flights will depart in the evening from Taipei and arrive in Ontario the same day, but hours earlier than the departure, at least according to local time. During the inaugural landing, the gate-side launch ceremony included remarks by Ontario airport CEO Atif Elkadi and the director general of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Los Angeles, as well as officials from Starlux and Alaska Airlines. Starlux promotes its international service as a premium experience, offering four cabin classes and amenities such as Michelin-rated meals, aromatherapy and custom seating. 'With our new service to Ontario, we continue to redefine luxury air travel,' Liang said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cereal maker Post enters pasta business with $880M Ronzoni purchase
Cereal maker Post enters pasta business with $880M Ronzoni purchase originally appeared on Bring Me The News. Post, the foods manufacturer known for cereal brands including Malt-O-Meal and Fruity Pebbles, is entering the pasta business. St. Louis-based parent company Post Holdings announced it has bought back 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, the company it spun off in 2018. 8th Avenue was primarily known for nut butters, granola bars, nuts and dried fruit products it made for grocery chains and private label companies, but in the seven years since it was spun off from Post, it also acquired Ronzoni. Now, Post's 880 million purchase marks the company's first foray into dried pasta, with Ronzoni one of the biggest brand names in the 8th Avenue portfolio. The 8th Avenue goods will be added to the Post Consumer Brands umbrella, which is based in Lakeville, Minnesota. "With this acquisition, we further our strategy of tactical private label positioning alongside leading brands. I am pleased to welcome back the approximately 1,580 employees of 8th Avenue who will join us as Post colleagues," said Rob Vitale, President and CEO of Post. While Barilla is the undisputed No. 1 brand of dried pasta in the U.S., Ronzoni is among the biggest competitors, with grocery studies generally placing it as the 2nd-4th most popular brand among American consumers. Post says the acquisition of 8th Avenue is expected to close on July 1, with the $880 million purchase price including the assumption of $111 million of financial leases. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 4, 2025, where it first appeared.

Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Superpower Struggle Puts Iraqi Kurdistan's Oil Autonomy at Risk
It has been over two years since the Baghdad-based Federal Government of Iraq (FGI) placed an embargo on independent oil exports from the Erbil-based Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI). The legal basis for the halting of these essential flows to the finances of the semi-autonomous region of Kurdistan was the International Chamber of Commerce's (ICC) order that they would not be resumed until Turkey paid the FGI the US$1.5 billion in damages for these allegedly unauthorised oil exports over many previous years. That said, the real reason why the FGI moved to stop the KRI's independent oil sales is simply that it wants to remove any independent status from the region and roll it into the rest of Iraq as just another province like any other. Baghdad has correctly identified the best way of doing this as cutting off the KRI's key source of revenue through which it finances its semi-autonomous status – revenues from independent oil sales. Early in his new office, Iraq's Prime Minister Mohammed Al-Sudani carefully laid out this as being Baghdad's plan when he introduced the new Unified Oil Law being drafted at the time. He said that it would be run in every respect out of Baghdad, that it will govern all oil and gas production and investments in both Iraq and its semi-autonomous Kurdistan region, and that it will constitute 'a strong factor for Iraq's unity'.Unsurprisingly, the great global powers have their own views on whether the KRI should lose its semi-independent status and be subsumed into a greater Iraq. To begin with, both the U.S. and its allies, and China and its allies, know that Iraq as a whole is full of oil (and associated gas). The FGI side officially holds a very conservatively-estimated 145 billion barrels of proved crude oil reserves (nearly 18% of the Middle East's total, and the fifth biggest on the planet), according to the Energy Information Administration. Unofficially, it is extremely likely that it holds much more oil than this. In October 2010, Iraq's Oil Ministry increased its own official figure for the country's proven reserves but at the same time stated that Iraq's undiscovered resources amounted to around 215 billion barrels, as analysed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. This was also a figure that had been arrived at in a 1997 detailed study by the respected independent oil and gas firm Petrolog. However, even this did not include the KRI's actual and potential oil reserves. As the International Energy Agency highlighted at the time, before the relatively recent rise of exploration activity in the semi-autonomous region, more than half of the exploratory wells had been drilled prior to 1962 -- a time when technical limits and a low oil price gave a much tighter definition of a commercially successful well than would be the case today. Based on the previous limited exploration and development of oil fields in the KRI area, the proven oil reserves figure was first put at around 4 billion barrels. This was subsequently upgraded by the KRG to around 45 billion barrels but, again, this may well be a very conservative estimate of the oil resources there. Additionally important to both sets of superpowers is Iraq's geographical and geopolitical importance, located as it is in the heart of the world's greatest hydrocarbons region. In the former's case it is a key link in the land bridge from the Asia-Pacific region into Europe and in the case of the latter it is a core part of the Shia Crescent of Power dominated by Iran as a counterpoint to the Sunni style of Islam championed by Saudi Arabia. Given these factors, the stakes for both the West and the East in winning the most influence in the country – north, south or combined – are exceptionally high. To put it plainly: the U.S. and its key allies want the KRI to terminate all links with Chinese, Russian and Iranian companies connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps over the long term, a senior source who works closely with the European Union's (E.U.) energy security complex exclusively told recently. 'This could then be used as a bridgehead to reassert the West's influence in the rest of Iraq through big investment deals firstly, and then related infrastructure developments,' he added. The most notable such deal in the south of Iraq so far is TotalEnergies' US$27 billion four-pronged deal, including the cornerstone Common Seawater Supply Project, analysed fully in my latest book. In the north, BP's US$25 billion deal across five major oil fields is similarly strategically vital for the West's future plans. The U.S. and Israel also have a further strategic interest in utilising the Kurdistan Region as a base for ongoing monitoring operations against Iran, according to the E.U. source. On the other side of the equation, China and Russia have long been behind the idea of subsuming the KRI into the wider Iraq. As a senior political source in Moscow exclusively told many months ago: 'Iraq will be one unified country and by keeping the West out of energy deals there, the end of Western hegemony in the Middle East will become the decisive chapter in the West's final demise.' Legally speaking, Iraq's 2005 Constitution cannot settle the matter of whether the KRI or FGI has the predominant rights over revenues from oil drilled in the KRI's area. According to the KRG, it has authority under Articles 112 and 115 to manage oil and gas in the Kurdistan Region extracted from fields that were not in production in 2005 -- the year that the Constitution was adopted by referendum. In addition, the KRG maintains that Article 115 states: 'All powers not stipulated in the exclusive powers of the federal government belong to the authorities of the regions and governorates that are not organised in a region.' As such, the KRG maintains that, as relevant powers are not otherwise stipulated in the Constitution, it has the authority to sell and receive revenue from its oil and gas exports. Additionally, it argues the Constitution provides that, should a dispute arise, priority shall be given to the law of the regions and governorates. However, the FGI maintains that under Article 111, oil and gas are under the ownership of all the people of Iraq in all the regions and governorates, which means they should be controlled by the FGI via the State Organization for Marketing of Oil. Consequently, given the lack of legal clarity on the issue, the KRI's future looks set to be determined by a straight superpower brawl. China would seem currently to have the advantage in terms of land and resources held. More than a third of all Iraq's proven oil and gas reserves and over two-thirds of its current production are managed by Chinese companies, according to industry figures. In hard numbers, Chinese companies combined have direct shares in around 24 billion barrels of reserves and are responsible for production of around 3.0 million barrels per day (bpd). Additionally, it has developed a spider's web of influence through multiple infrastructure projects that run adjunct to its oil and gas developments, as also detailed fully in my latest book. That said, the U.S. and its allies appear to be picking up the pace on building out their presence across Iraq, too, in line with the aforementioned plan to do so. In addition to the potentially game-changing projects of TotalEnergies and BP, May 19 saw two deals signed by U.S. firms HKN Energy, and WesternZagros, to develop two fields – the Miran gas field and the Topkhana oil and gas field -- in the KRI area. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright was also very clear about the deeper intention behind these deals, saying that they align with the administration's broader strategy of striking commercial deals with allies to counter Iran's influence. By extension, given the extremely strong links between Tehran and Beijing and Moscow, this also means countering China's and Russia's influence across Iraq as well. By Simon Watkins for More Top Reads From this article on