Minister demands overhaul of UK's leading AI institute
Peter Kyle said it was clear further action was needed to ensure the government-backed Alan Turing Institute met its full potential.
In a letter to ATI's chair, seen by the Guardian, Kyle said the institute should be changed to prioritise defence, national security and 'sovereign capabilities' – a reference to nation states being able to control their own AI technology.
The call for new priorities implies a downgrading of ATI's focus on health and the environment, which are two of three core subjects for the institute, alongside defence and security, under its 'Turing 2.0' strategy.
'Moving forward, defence and national security projects should form a core of ATI's activities, and relationships with the UK's security, defence, and intelligence communities should be strengthened accordingly,' Kyle wrote.
Making clear that the Turing 2.0 strategy did not meet government requirements, Kyle indicated that he expected leadership changes at ATI.
'To realise this vision, it is imperative that the ATI's leadership reflects the institute's reformed focus,' he wrote in a letter first reported by Politico. 'While we acknowledge the success of the current leadership in delivering reform at the institute during a difficult period, careful consideration should be given to the importance of an executive team who possesses a relevant background and sector knowledge to lead this transition.'
ATI is chaired by Doug Gurr, the former head of Amazon's UK operations and interim chair of the UK's competition watchdog.
The institute is going through a restructuring under its chief executive, Jean Innes, which one in five staff have said puts ATI's credibility in 'serious jeopardy'. At the end of last year, ATI employed 440 staff, but it has since launched a redundancy process.
Although the institute is nominally independent, it recently secured £100m from the government in a five-year funding deal. The letter said ATI's 'longer-term funding arrangement' could be reviewed next year. The government would maintain its current level of research and development from national security and defence for the next three years, Kyle wrote, and would increase the number of defence and national security staff embedded in the institute.
Dame Wendy Hall, a professor of computer science at the University of Southampton and the co-chair of a 2017 government AI review, said ATI would cease to be a national institute under the government's proposed changes.
'If the institute focuses on defence and security it ceases to be a national institute on AI,' Hall said. 'It's not broad enough. If the government wants an AI institute that does defence and security then it should just call it that.'
In February, the government indicated a focus on national security with its AI strategy by renaming its AI Safety Institute, established under the premiership of Rishi Sunak, the AI Security Institute.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
Kyle's letter also referred to the government's 50-point AI action plan as a 'testament' to the UK's AI ambitions, The plan's targets include a 20-fold increase in the amount of AI computing power under public control by 2030, and embedding AI in the public sector.
A spokesperson for ATI said the institute was focused on 'high-impact missions' that support the UK including in defence and national security.
'We share the government's vision of AI transforming the UK for the better, welcome the recognition of our critical role, and will continue to work closely with the government to support its priorities and deliver science and innovation for the public good,' said the spokesperson.
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said the changes would be a 'natural next step' for ATI following the safety institute renaming.
'These proposed changes would not only ensure the Alan Turing Institute delivers real value for money – it would see it taking on a key role in safeguarding our national security,' said the spokesperson.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Seven UK airports where staff ‘get paid bonuses to catch easyJet passengers with oversized cabin bags' are revealed
A LEAKED email has revealed how airport staff earn bonuses for catching out passengers travelling with oversized baggage. Staff at Swissport are reportedly receiving bonuses for stopping tourists with large bags at gates in airports. 6 6 The email described how staff could receive £1.20 (£1 after tax) per bag they seize. It was sent to Swissport employees at seven UK airports. The firm runs passenger gates at airports across the world, including the UK. Staff at Belfast, Birmingham, Glasgow, Jersey, Liverpool and Newcastle airports received the email. Seen by The Sunday Times the message encourages staff to stop holidaymakers at gates if they suspect their bag is too large. Staff were incentivised with payments for every bag they flagged as too big. The email described this as 'the easyJet gate bag revenue incentive' and said it was intended to 'reward agents doing the right thing.' It went on to detail how payments would be made directly to employees who caught out travellers with large bags. The Sun understands the email was sent in November 2023 with the policy still in force today. Staff who were concerned with meeting their targets were told they would be provided with internal tracking to identify opportunities for training and support for individual agents. Moment EasyJet passenger is SLAPPED by airport worker as he screams abuse at staff after being refused entry to plane It was signed by Dean Martin, a Swissport station manager at Glasgow airport and read: 'Thank you for your ongoing contribution to the success of easyJet' Staff members employed by another company, DHL Supply Chain, also have an incentive programme for identifying easyJet bags as too large. Under DHL Supply Chain staff at Gatwick, Bristol and Manchester airports recieve a nominal fee for catching out unsuspecting easyJet travellers. Passengers on easyJet flights are allowed by the airline to take one small bag on their plane for free. 6 6 Larger bags can be placed in overhead lockers but customers are charged extra for this service. The airline made an eye watering £9 billion in revenue last year. The incentive for staff applies if they catch a passenger whose bag is deemed too big for them to take it onto the plane. This is usually either because customers haven't paid to take a larger suitcase on board or because their free hand luggage is too large. Boarding gates are usually equipped with metal boxes that customers bags must fit into to be eligible to take on board. If customers bags are too large to fit into the boxes they are charged an extra fee at the gate for their luggage. EasyJet is said to charge £48 at the gate for this, £1.20 of that is paid to the ground handler. Both Swissport and DHL Supply Chain decide how much their staff are paid for catching out unsuspecting holidaymakers. 6 6 A spokesman for easyJet said: 'EasyJet is focused on ensuring our ground handling partners apply our policies correctly and consistently in fairness to all our customers. 'Our bag policies and options are well understood and we remind customers of this when booking, before they travel and on their boarding pass, which means a very small proportion of customers who don't comply will be charged at the airport.' A spokesman for Swissport said: 'We serve our airline customers and apply their policies under terms and conditions for managing their operation. "We're highly professional and our focus is on delivering safe and efficient operations, which we do day in and day out for four million flights per year.' A spokeswoman for DHL Supply Chain said the company requires 'all colleagues to consistently adhere to [the easyJet baggage policy] and this is recognised as part of their remuneration'. She added: 'Doing so ensures we provide a smooth travel experience for every passenger.' The Sun has contacted Swissport and easyJet for comment. Holiday packing tips Jemma Solomon, aka The Label Lady has got 5 packing tips to help you get organised for your next holiday. 1. Write a list Think about all the essentials you need to take with you; suncream, medicine, a few games for the kids, beach towels, and write everything in one list, which you can tick off as you add it to your suitcase. Or for complete ease, try Google's AI app - Gemini - which will create a list for you and help you not over pack. 2. Involve your kids Jemma said: 'My girls are getting older, they're 11 and nine, and they enjoy helping to pack. So I send them a list, and say 'this is what you need' and they follow the list. 'And then I give them a rucksack each - and say to them 'you can have whatever you want in there as long as it's not liquid', and they can take that on the plane. And that's their 'home away from home' items.' 3. Try a hack or two She said: "I think they all work, but for different reasons - and you've just got to pick the right one for your trip. "Rolling your clothes is really good to stop your clothes from getting creases. And if you're trying to get a lot of items into your case, it's a space saver. 'Packing cubes are great - for example, I'm going on holiday with my three kids and we're all using the same suitcase for our clothes. "These handy compartments let you separate your clothes, toiletries and tech into designated cubes, maximising luggage space by keeping your items compressed and neatly stacked. "I love taking them abroad with the family and it means my kids can easily take charge of their own items once we've arrived." 4. Decant beauty products Do you really need to take full-size bottles of shampoo and conditioner with you? The beauty industry has evolved so much, you can now buy shampoo bars or sheets - which are much lighter and smaller. Or, if you'll be popping to the shops when you're abroad, consider buying some items when you arrive. 5. Get organised before you come home Jemma said: 'When you repack on holiday [before coming home], the trick is to separate clean from dirty clothes. 'Also pack it in some form of order - so lights, darks, colours for items that need washing, or if you wash your clothes by person in the household, piles for each person. "Then you can put it straight into the washing machine. Do it straight away, don't leave it."
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
James McMurdock says ‘business dealings' compliant after he resigns Reform whip
MP James McMurdock has said 'all' of his 'business dealings' complied with regulations after he resigned the Reform UK whip amid questions related to Covid loans. The MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock 'removed the party whip from himself' pending the outcome of an investigation relating to allegations around 'business propriety during the pandemic'. The Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to Mr McMurdock took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic. In a statement posted on X on Saturday afternoon, Mr McMurdock said he had been contacted by a reporter. 'I confirmed to the journalist that all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same.' He added: 'As a precautionary measure, and for the protection of Reform UK, I have asked to have the whip suspended temporarily.' According to Companies House, Mr McMurdock is listed as the current director of Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, and a former director of J A M Financial Limited, a position he resigned in 2021. Both firms are shown to have overdue accounts and confirmation statements, and both have an 'active proposal to strike off'. Reform's chief whip Lee Anderson had earlier said that the allegations against Mr McMurdock which led to him removing the whip 'relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP'. Mr Anderson said Mr McMurdock has 'agreed to co-operate in full with any investigation'. In a statement published on Reform's X account on Saturday afternoon, Mr Anderson said: 'I have today received a call from James McMurdock who has advised me, as chief whip, that he has removed the party whip from himself pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations that are likely to be published by a national newspaper. 'The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP,' Mr Anderson said. The statement said Reform would not be commenting further for the moment. Mr McMurdock has represented South Basildon and East Thurrock since last July's general election. He won the seat by 98 votes, beating Labour into second place, and taking the seat from the Conservatives.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Chelsea face being BANNED from playing Delap, Joao Pedro and Gittens in the Champions League after £27m fine
CHELSEA could be banned from fielding Liam Delap, Joao Pedro and other summer signings in next season's Champions League. The Blues have already splashed out more than £160m on Delap, Pedro, Brazilian youngster Willian Estevao and more arrivals, with Jamie Gittens also joining today from Borussia Dortmund in a deal worth £52m. 3 3 3 But if Chelsea are unable to balance the books by selling or loaning out players in the remainder of the window, the terms of their Uefa punishment for breaking financial rules will prevent them registering them all for the Champions League. That is why homegrown defender Trevoh Chalobah is very likely to be sold this summer. Yet even a £40m fee for Chalobah would not be enough to cover the costs of all the new recruits. Uefa last week fined Chelsea a total of £27m, with a potential £52m more to come, for breaching regulations on football earnings and squad cost controls. As part of the settlement, the Blues also accepted they could not add players to the 25-man A list for Uefa competitions without the annual cost of those players being covered by savings from removing existing members of the list. The annual cost of a player is calculated by adding his wages to the amortisation value of his transfer fee. For example Delap has joined Chelsea from Ipswich for a fee of £30m on a six-year contract. But Uefa regulations say clubs have to calculate the amortisation over a five-year period. Therefore, the amortisation cost of Delap next season will be £30m divided by five - £6m. If the striker is on wages of £100,000 a week, that is £5.2m a year, making the total Delap cost £11.2m. Chelsea CONFIRM transfer of Jamie Gittens as £52m Borussia Dortmund star becomes seventh addition of the summer Should Chelsea want just him to play in the Champions League, they would have to find more than £11.2m in savings from players they wanted to take off the list. The value of an outgoing player is calculated by adding their wages to any profit on their sale. That is why Chalobah is particularly vulnerable to being sold. As a product of the Chelsea academy, his value on the books is zero so any fee received would be pure profit. That was the case when Chelsea sold Mason Mount and Conor Gallagher in the last two summers. A £40m fee for Chalobah, plus the saving in wages, would cover the costs related to Delap, £60m signing Joao Pedro and some others - but not all incomings this summer. If Chelsea wanted to sell a player like goalkeeper Robert Sanchez, however, the maths is different. Sanchez arrived from Brighton for £25m two years ago. Amortisation for each of those two years is £5m (£25m divided by 5) making a cost of £10m. Sanchez's value on the books is now £15m (£25m minus the £10m amortisation) so Chelsea would need to sell him for more than that to bank a profit, on top of the saving in wages. Of the 25 players on Chelsea's A list for the knockout stages of the Europa Conference League, the only big earner to leave so far is on-loan Jadon Sancho. The Blues are believed to have paid half of Sancho's £300,000 per week wages from his Manchester United contract - £150,000 a week.. Chelsea paid £5m to get out of an obligation to buy the winger. Sancho's departure will save them £7.8m in wages, but it's still not enough to cover the likely £11.2m cost of Delap. Noni Madueke is now reported to have agreed personal terms with Arsenal, which would free up more funds for the Blues.
