It's not hard to see through RFK Jr.'s ‘radical transparency' pledge
Peter Lurie is executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Aaron Kesselheim is a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. Joshua Sharfstein served as principal deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration during the Obama administration.
In his inaugural speech upon taking over as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declared that his plans include 'radical transparency.' He has subsequently repeated that phrase multiple times, but what it actually means — to Kennedy and for the rest of us — is far from clear.
Government transparency efforts generally start with the premise that an open and engaged agency functions more effectively and inspires public trust. Transparency programs have involved more public explanation of government action, quicker release of documents and databases, more opportunities for public comment, and an aversion to sudden, unexplained major changes in direction. In its conventional form, transparency operates neutrally, without regard to specific political objectives.
To date, Kennedy's 'radical transparency' looks nothing like this. After an initial pause on agency communications, HHS eliminated communications teams across the department. These teams include people who understand how to reach the public and clinicians to share information on drug and device recalls, outbreak investigations, and other health topics. Beyond the communications teams, there has been little effort to make knowledgeable people available for public engagement: HHS has not permitted experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, to brief the country on one of the worst measles outbreaks in decades.
Also gone are most of the staffers who respond to requests for government documents under the Freedom of Information Act — one of the most important federal statutes related to open government — even though the department already faced formidable backlogs. (One exception appears to be the sparing of staff fulfilling requests for vaccine data filed by Kennedy's campaign lawyer, who is known for vaccine-related petitions and litigation.)
Kennedy's team also appears to be undermining the integrity of and access to important health datasets. Before Kennedy's confirmation, HHS interpreted President Donald Trump's executive orders on gender and diversity as requiring certain national health datasets to be hidden, at least temporarily, from public view. After a judge required the department to make the information available again, its websites presenting these data now state — without further explanation — that they are 'being modified to comply with President Trump's Executive Orders.'
Meanwhile, HHS has dismissed entire teams supporting major national studies. These include the National Survey of Drug Use on Health, the nation's leading effort to understand addiction, and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a critical source of information on risk factors for preterm delivery and other adverse birth outcomes.
Even completed scientific studies are being delayed, altered or quashed. After three-quarters of a century of uninterrupted publication, the department failed to publish the CDC's flagship Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report for several weeks, delaying information on the spreading avian flu epidemic. Public Health Reports, a journal of the Surgeon General's Office, is now demanding revisions of accepted, peer-reviewed articles to conform with bans on certain terms.
Public participation in department decision-making has also been restricted. The Food and Drug Administration and the CDC have canceled or postponed open advisory committee meetings on vaccines. And HHS rescinded a federal commitment made in 1971 allowing public comment on rules related to public property, loans, grants, benefits and contracts.
Kennedy has yet to explain major changes at the department itself. HHS has dismissed approximately 10,000 employees (some erroneously) and is embarking on a major reorganization, with only a brief media statement explaining what appears to be the fundamental reshaping of multiple agencies. NIH has canceled hundreds of grants on the grounds of ill-defined 'gender ideology,' 'DEI,' or 'no longer effectuat[ing] agency priorities.' Also poorly explained: Why NIH has stopped multiple grants to South Africa that are critical to understanding how best to fight the global scourges of tuberculosis and AIDS. And Kennedy has yet to answer questions about why HHS pushed out an FDA leader in charge of reviewing vaccines, brought on a well-known anti-vaccine activist to reexamine vaccine safety data or prompted a leading food scientist at NIH to claim he was being censored.
With so much obfuscation and opacity at HHS, it has become crystal clear that 'radical transparency' is not about openness and engagement. So what does the term actually mean?
The HHS website on 'radical transparency' includes five items. One, inexplicably, is 'Ending Anti-Semitism on College Campuses.' A second is a press release stating that Kennedy has ordered the FDA to 'explore rulemaking' to stop food additives from entering the food supply without the agency being notified. A third is a list of terminated contracts that provides no explanations for the terminations.
The two remaining points are aggregations of data already in the public domain. One brings together information on chemical contaminants from several existing datasets. The other includes details on conflicts of interest among members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a key focus of Kennedy's attention. In the past, he has claimed that 97 percent of the committee's members have conflicts of interest and has stated that 'almost all' have 'severe, severe conflicts of interest.' The new website, which aggregates information disclosed at the committee's public meetings, actually demonstrates that Kennedy is wrong. Many meetings involve no conflicts of interest, and at others, members regularly disclose conflicts and abstain from relevant votes.
Meanwhile, Kennedy's signature Make America Healthy Again Commission held its first meeting behind closed doors.
So far, the selective releases of 'radical transparency' seem to be little more than tactics in pursuit of the secretary's own agenda. With so much at stake for their health, Americans deserve to understand what HHS is up to and why. 'Radical transparency' needs a lot more transparency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Unpacking RFK's lengthy social media post after firing vaccine committee members
Unpacking RFK's lengthy social media post after firing vaccine committee members Show Caption Hide Caption RFK Jr. expels entire CDC vaccine advisory committee Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. removed a 17-member panel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that issues recommendations on vaccines. unbranded - Newsworthy A day after abruptly firing the entire committee that advises the federal government on vaccine safety, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he would reconstitute it with 'highly credentialed physicians and scientists' amid backlash from his detractors about the terminations. In a long post on X on June 10, Kennedy criticized the process by which the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices recommends new vaccines, implying that "adequate safety trials" were not being conducted before recommending new vaccines to children, a notion that was strongly disputed by vaccine experts. Kennedy, who has a long record of promoting anti-vaccine views, also said the new Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices will have no 'ideological anti-vaxxers' but that the committee will apply 'evidence-based decision-making with objectivity and common sense.' 'The most outrageous example of ACIP's malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children,' he wrote. Kennedy said a compliant American child receives more shots now from conception to 18 years of age compared to 1986, none of which required placebo-controlled trials. That was the year when the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was set up, protecting vaccine makers from liability and establishing a federal program to compensate individuals injured by certain vaccines. 'This means that no one can scientifically ascertain whether these products are averting more problems than they are causing,' he wrote. A placebo-controlled study is a type of clinical trial where one group of participants receives an active treatment, while another group receives an inactive substance, helping researchers to determine whether the active treatment is truly effective. But conducting placebo-controlled studies on vaccines that are improvements on existing vaccines presents ethical and practical challenges, say vaccine experts. 'If a vaccine for a serious disease (e.g., measles, polio) already exists and is proven effective, giving participants a placebo instead of the vaccine could expose them to preventable harm or death,' wrote Dr. Jerome Adams, the former U.S. Surgeon General under President Trump's first term, in a June 9 post on X. How do vaccines work? Medical experts explain. New vaccines always undergo a placebo-controlled study, said Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the Food and Drug Administration Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. But Kennedy's definition of placebo is different from FDA's, said Offit. Kennedy has sought to narrowly define placebos as salt water, said Offit, while the FDA defines it as an 'inactive substance.' 'A placebo may contain sodium sulfate or potassium sulfate or may contain sucrose, or it may contain an emulsifier – those are all generally regarded as safe,' said Offit. 'He doesn't regard them as safe.' HHS did not respond to USA TODAY seeking a comment on how Kennedy's definition differs from that of the FDA. Offit said Kennedy is a lawyer who has spent years suing pharmaceutical companies, and 'his job is to scare people about vaccines ultimately, so he can bring them back to court and sue companies,' he said. Meanwhile, in his announcement of the removal of the 17 members of the ACIP committee Kennedy said the purpose was to insulate the committee from 'conflicts of interest.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated
NEW YORK (AP) — More than 460 laid-off employees at the nation's top public health agency received notices Wednesday that they are being reinstated, according to a union representing the workers. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed reinstatement notices went out to the former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employees, but provided few details. About 2,400 CDC employees lost their jobs in a wave of cuts across federal health agencies in early April, according to a tally at the time. Whole CDC programs were essentially shut down, including some focused on smoking, lead poisoning, gun violence, asthma and air quality, and workplace safety and health. The entire office that handles Freedom of Information Act requests was shuttered. Infectious disease programs took a hit, too, including programs that fight outbreaks in other countries, labs focused on HIV and hepatitis in the U.S., and staff trying to eliminate tuberculosis. An estimated 200 of the reinstated workers are based in the CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, HHS officials confirmed. Staffers at a CDC lab that does testing for sexually transmitted diseases are being brought back, said one CDC employee who wasn't authorized to discuss what happened and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Also reinstated are an estimated 150 employees at the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, including people staffing a lab that works on lead poisoning, according to the union and employees. Layoffs at federal agencies were challenged in lawsuits, with judges in some cases ordering federal agencies to halt terminations of employees. Officials at HHS have never detailed how they made the layoff decisions in the first place. And they did not answer questions about why the notices went out, or how decisions were made about who to bring back. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency was streamlining operations and that 'the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective.' "The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services — whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases,' he said. This is not the first time that employees at the Atlanta-based agency were told they were being terminated only to then be told to come back. After an earlier round of termination notices went out in February, about 180 CDC employees in March were told to come back. __ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Mayor Brandon Johnson's administration says no obligation to hand city ID records to ICE
Mayor Brandon Johnson on Wednesday condemned the federal government's hunt for local records following news of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement subpoenaing a municipal ID program used by noncitizens. 'It's bad,' the mayor told reporters at his weekly news conference. 'It's wrong.' The mayor's short remarks came after the Tribune reported Friday that the city received a summons April 17 requiring the city to turn over the past three years of CityKey records, according to a copy obtained by the Tribune in a Freedom of Information Act request. Johnson corporation counsel Mary Richardson-Lowry said the administration won't cooperate with the subpoena because doing so would expose vulnerable applicants. 'We respectfully declined within the bounds of the law, given the privacy issues and specifically the exposure of groups like domestic violence victims, which would have been exposed had that information been provided, which would have been in contravention to their rights,' Richardson-Lowry said. 'We will continue to monitor … all administrative warrants, as we are doing now, and we've put a process in place should we receive future administrative warrants from this administration.' The ICE subpoena called on the city to 'provide a copy of the application and all supporting documents for all individuals who applied for a CityKey identification card between April 17, 2022, and April 17, 2025, and used any foreign document as proof of identity, including but not limited to: consular identification card, foreign driver's license, or foreign passport.' Richardson-Lowry noted the subpoena was an administrative warrant, meaning the city does not have to comply unless ICE chooses to escalate by seeking a court order. 'Should they move towards a court setting, we will respond in kind,' Richardson-Lowry said. 'In some other categories, we produce documents that we do think we're obligated to produce. But with respect to CityKey, we don't believe such an obligation is there.' The ID program was launched in 2017 by former Mayor Rahm Emanuel and city Clerk Anna Valencia as part of a stand against Trump — though it is not just for immigrants. While officials trumpeted the safety of the CityKey application during its inception, promising the city wouldn't keep identifying documents in case federal officials sought to track down applicants, the situation recently changed. After being overwhelmed by demand for the IDs by Venezuelan migrants at in-person events in fall 2023, Valencia started offering an online application in December 2024. To meet state document requirements, the clerk's office has kept application materials for more than 2,700 people who used the online CityKey system since then, a spokesperson for Valencia told the Tribune on Friday. Johnson spokesperson Cassio Mendoza said Friday, 'Turning over personal information would betray the privacy and trust of residents who participated in the program. Mayor Johnson will continue to resist any attempts by the federal government to violate the rights and protections of Chicagoans.' Tonantzin Carmona, former chief of policy for the city clerk, told the Tribune Wednesday that the office 'examined every possible worst case scenario of how data could be used against a particular group to harm them' before CityKey's 2017 launch — including a federal subpoena. 'We definitely discussed this possible scenario,' Carmona, who left the clerk's office in 2019 and is now a Brookings Institution fellow, said. 'Disabling the online portal may be the most responsible course of action.' Carmona added that the federal government's actions could create a 'chilling effect' across the U.S. Outside Chicago, the Trump administration has been pressuring the Internal Revenue Service to share data with ICE to identify immigrants for deportations. A federal judge in May refused to block the IRS from doing so. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Trump in allowing his Department of Government Efficiency to access personal data stored in Social Security systems. 'City officials should be prepared for it to not be the only program that gets targeted,' Carmona said. 'This moment isn't just about records. It's about whether people feel that they can exist in public spaces, seek help from public agencies or like, fully belong in the city they call home.' CityKey appeals to immigrants because it allows noncitizens to obtain a city government-issued ID. It's unclear how many of its 87,100-plus applicants during the time period encompassed in ICE's subpoena are immigrants. The city clerk policy is to only retain records for those who apply via the online portal. The Tribune also obtained an ICE subpoena sent to Chicago's Department of Streets and Sanitation on March 21 that sought payroll records for current and recent employees as part of a worker eligibility audit. 'It's important to a community that wants to be an immigrant sanctuary to also be a data sanctuary, and that means to collect and retain as little information as possible about immigrants,' Adam Schwartz, privacy litigation director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said. 'The solution is for the holders of the data — in this case, the mayor of the City of Chicago — to fight back and say, 'No. We're going to use every legal tool at our disposal to protect data privacy.''
