‘There won't be a VAT increase because of MK Party': Shivambu claims credit, calls for Godongwana's resignation
MK Party (MKP) secretary-general Floyd Shivambu has taken credit for the reversal of the proposed value added tax (VAT) hike, saying 'there won't be a VAT increase because of the MK Party".
On Thursday, finance minister Enoch Godongwana announced the contentious hike has been scrapped after extensive consultations with political parties and parliamentary committee recommendations.
Speaking to supporters on the sidelines of MKP leader Jacob Zuma's court case in Pietermaritzburg on Thursday, Shivambu said: 'It's only the MK Party that went to the streets to reject the VAT increase. There is no other political party that went to march against the increase.'
The proposed VAT hike was opposed by several political parties. The DA and EFF challenged it in court while other parties, including ActionSA, Build One SA and the IFP, engaged with the ANC to find alternative solutions to raise revenue.
'When others were trying to discuss VAT in court and in parliament it's only us who went to the ground to reject the VAT increase because we know you cannot win in the courts or in the boardrooms what you have not won on the ground,' Shivambu said.
He called for Godongwana's immediate resignation, accusing him of attempting to maul the working class and poor people with the VAT hike.
'He must step down with immediate effect. We cannot continue to be led by people who do not have ideas on what to do with this country.'
The MKP is not the only party claiming credit for the VAT increase reversal.
Build One SA leader Mmusi Maimane praised the negotiations with the ANC, saying they led to the decision to scrap the VAT hike.
'When we voted in support of the fiscal framework, misinformation campaigns came at us fast and loud. But we didn't waver,' Maimane said.
'We knew responsible negotiations around the table were the best way to find agreement to stop the proposed 0.5% percentage-point VAT increase, and today that's exactly what's happened.'
The DA also believes the reversal was a result of its opposition to the tax increase. The party challenged the process by filing an urgent application in the Western Cape high court to contest the constitutionality of the increase and procedural flaws in tabling it.
'From the outset, the DA has opposed the tax increase, highlighting its impact on struggling South African households,' said DA federal chair Helen Zille.
'This exposed the arbitrary power the minister of finance sought to wield in imposing the VAT hike. The approach by lawyers acting on behalf of the minister with a proposal for an out of court settlement to scrap the VAT hike marks a critical turning point in the battle. It is clear the Treasury had no choice but to reverse its decision in the face of our relentless and strategic legal pressure.'
TimesLIVE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The Unintended Consequences of US Refugee Policy for South African Minorities
Members of the Khoi and San community camped outside the Union Building in 2019 demanding that their rights be recognised. Image: Oupa Mokoena/African News Agency (ANA) Clyde N.S. Ramalaine The recent resettlement of 49 South Africans, described as 'Afrikaners', to the United States under refugee status via the US Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) has drawn public ridicule, suspicion, and commentary. While some predict their imminent return to sunny South Africa, the event offers an unexpected opportunity to examine how USRAP's criteria could inadvertently apply to other historically marginalised South African groups, particularly the KhoeSan and Coloured communities. This article does not support or validate the ideological narratives of groups like AfriForum or Solidarity, who claim persecution under terms like 'white genocide.' Such claims are unsubstantiated, racially selective, and morally indefensible. Instead, this article offers a literal and policy-driven reading of USRAP's eligibility framework, focusing not on its intentions but on its possible implications for marginalised non-white South African identities. USRAP eligibility criteria Under Executive Order 14204, USRAP permits applications from South Africans who meet three conditions: Must be of South African nationality; Must be of Afrikaner ethnicity or a member of a racial minority; Must articulate past persecution or fear of future persecution. Although influenced by racialised narratives of white Afrikaner persecution, the policy does not explicitly exclude non-white groups. This opens an interpretive doorway that, when read literally and consistently, may qualify KhoeSan and Coloured South Africans—groups with longstanding, legitimate claims of marginalisation. South African nationality - A contested construct The idea of a unified 'South African nationality' is not neutral or straightforward. South African identity has been deeply shaped by colonial conquest, apartheid-era racial division, and selective post-apartheid nation-building. Far from a cohesive category, 'South African' is an ongoing site of contestation, haunted by economic inequality, cultural marginalisation, and incomplete reconciliation. Under apartheid, nationality was fractured across pseudo-ethnic 'homelands.' Today, the uncritically adopted 'Rainbow Nation' rhetoric fails to conceal the persistence of racial and spatial disparities. For many, especially KhoeSan and Coloured South Africans, national identity remains fractured, imposed, and weaponised against their claims to full inclusion and recognition. Afrikaner identity - An exclusionary social construct The term 'Afrikaner' has always been a politically fluid concept. It was only in the 20th century, under apartheid, that it solidified as a synonym for white Afrikaans speakers. However, Afrikaans itself is a Creole language born at the Cape from African, European, and Asian linguistic influences. Millions of non-white South Africans—particularly the KhoeSan and Coloured communities—speak Afrikaans as their mother tongue and have made significant contributions to its literary and cultural legacy. If 'Afrikaner' is used to denote those rooted in Africa who speak Afrikaans, then the most authentic claimants are arguably the KhoeSan and Coloured peoples. To exclude them is to perpetuate apartheid's racial gatekeeping. The USRAP, though likely intending to privilege white identities, inadvertently opens space for those previously denied recognition within the very cultural matrix it seeks to protect. The notion of a "white Afrikaner" as a uniquely persecuted category is built on historical erasure. Afrikaner culture is not racially homogeneous. Its racialisation is a mid-20th-century political invention, not a cultural or linguistic truth. If USRAP implicitly assumes whiteness under the 'Afrikaner' identity, it contradicts its own stated openness. Racial minorities - Recognition beyond whiteness The policy's second clause, which asserts, 'or a member of a racial minority', broadens the scope for inclusion. Here, the KhoeSan and Coloured groups qualify, both as racial minorities and as communities subjected to historical persecution and contemporary marginalisation. The KhoeSan, South Africa's first people, have endured centuries of displacement, genocide, and erasure. Today, despite growing self-identification, they remain denied official indigeneity and reparative justice. Their exclusion from land reform and identity recognition makes them textbook examples of persecuted minorities. Coloured South Africans, a category created by apartheid to obscure Indigenous ancestry and maintain social control, also remain in a state of political liminality. This imposed identity, still used in state policy, has allowed the post-apartheid government to deny both their indigeneity and their oppression, framing them as 'beneficiaries' of apartheid while excluding them from targeted redress. Post-1994 policy continues to maintain racial categories rooted in apartheid logic. In practice, this has meant retaining the 'Coloured' label to contain indigenous claims and limit state accountability. Despite Steve Biko's inclusive definition of Black Consciousness, embracing all non-white oppressed peoples, the state's operational framework reserves 'African' identity for Nguni-Bantu groups, excluding KhoeSan and Coloured communities from full African identification and associated redress. A policy that outruns Its intentions The original purpose of the USRAP criteria appears to have been the protection of white South Africans fearing political and land displacement. However, its language is broad enough to permit reinterpretation. A literal application of its three criteria—nationality, minority status, and persecution—clearly allows for KhoeSan and Coloured inclusion. If USRAP is truly about offering refuge to marginalised South Africans, then KhoiSan and Coloured communities not only qualify but arguably embody the policy's intent more authentically than the white Afrikaners it was implicitly designed to protect. The US Refugee Admissions Program, though politically motivated and ideologically framed, unintentionally exposes the contradictions in South African identity politics and racial categorisation. Its criteria, if interpreted without racial bias, could provide an unexpected platform for historically marginalised communities like the KhoeSan and Coloured peoples to assert claims long denied by the South African state. This article is not an endorsement of emigration as a political solution. Rather, it is a call to critically examine how refugee policy, constructed with one ideological target in mind, might unintentionally illuminate deeper questions of identity, marginalisation, and justice. USRAP, as worded, opens a policy loophole. This gateway challenges racialised assumptions about Afrikaner identity and repositions the conversation around who truly qualifies as persecuted in post-apartheid South Africa.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Monday, 2 June 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Monday, 2 June 2025. The New York Times front page reported that fear within the F.B.I. deepens as Patel expels an official. The Hindustan Times' front page reported that India eyes retaliation as the US rejects a WTO notice. China Daily's front page reported that the provocative rhetoric of the US was criticised. Daily Mail's front page reported that Labour's defence spending is in retreat. The Guardian front page reported that exercise is more effective than drugs in preventing cancer from returning. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Mixed news for petrol price change this week
South African finance minister Enoch Godongwana recently announced inflation-based tax hikes, which will see petrol and diesel increase to R4.01c/l and R3.85c/l, respectively, effective from 4 June 2025. As a result, fuel taxes will be going up 15 cents per litre for diesel and 16 cents per litre for petrol, but there will still be a slight decline at the petrol pumps this week. According to month-end data from the Central Energy Fund (CEF), the fuel price balance remains positive thanks to a stronger rand and lower international oil prices. Without adding in the tax increase, these are the following projections: Petrol 93: decrease of 20 cents per litre decrease of 20 cents per litre Petrol 95: decrease of 20 cents per litre decrease of 20 cents per litre Diesel 0.05% (wholesale): decrease of 52 cents per litre decrease of 52 cents per litre Diesel 0.005% (wholesale): decrease of 52 cents per litre However, when factoring in the coming fuel levy increases, this is effectively the current projected outcome: 93: decrease of 4 cents per litre decrease of 4 cents per litre 95: decrease of 4 cents per litre decrease of 4 cents per litre Diesel 0.05% (wholesale): decrease of 37 cents per litre decrease of 37 cents per litre Diesel 0.005% (wholesale): decrease of 37 cents per litre The final overall price changes for both petrol and diesel will be confirmed early this month with the new prices taking effect at midnight on Tuesday, 3 June 2025. INLAND May Petrol 93 R21.29 Petrol 95 R21.40 Diesel 0.05% R18.90 Diesel 0.005% R18.94 Illuminating Paraffin R13.05 COASTAL May 93 R20.50 95 R20.61 Diesel 0.05% R18.11 Diesel 0.005% R18.18 Illuminating Paraffin R12.05 Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
