Ameris Bancorp's (NYSE:ABCB) investors will be pleased with their solid 227% return over the last five years
Ameris Bancorp (NYSE:ABCB) shareholders have seen the share price descend 13% over the month. But in stark contrast, the returns over the last half decade have impressed. It's fair to say most would be happy with 203% the gain in that time. Generally speaking the long term returns will give you a better idea of business quality than short periods can. Ultimately business performance will determine whether the stock price continues the positive long term trend.
So let's assess the underlying fundamentals over the last 5 years and see if they've moved in lock-step with shareholder returns.
See our latest analysis for Ameris Bancorp
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
Over half a decade, Ameris Bancorp managed to grow its earnings per share at 14% a year. This EPS growth is lower than the 25% average annual increase in the share price. This suggests that market participants hold the company in higher regard, these days. And that's hardly shocking given the track record of growth.
The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
We know that Ameris Bancorp has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts.
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for Ameris Bancorp the TSR over the last 5 years was 227%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
It's nice to see that Ameris Bancorp shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 26% over the last year. That's including the dividend. However, that falls short of the 27% TSR per annum it has made for shareholders, each year, over five years. If you would like to research Ameris Bancorp in more detail then you might want to take a look at whether insiders have been buying or selling shares in the company.
Of course Ameris Bancorp may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy? Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard major general clarifies military's role in Los Angeles National Guard Major General Scott Sherman outlined the role of military personnel in Los Angeles and said troops will not conduct arrests. President Donald Trump's administration is stepping up deportation efforts in California with immigration raids at restaurants, traffic stops and routine legal check-ins. The immigration crackdown, while popular with voters in polls, has sparked protests in Los Angeles. Long term, economists warn that fewer immigrants could take a hit to the economy, prompting labor shortages and slowing economic growth. "Immigrants play a huge role in the California economy,' said Giovanni Peri, an economics professor at the University of California, Davis. Without immigrants, 'there will be less economic growth. Less opportunity, also, for local companies and American workers.' 'Wave of panic': Businesses are in crosshairs of Trump immigration crackdown Why the U.S. is 'immigrant dependent' The country's economy has become 'very immigrant dependent,' according to Christopher Thornberg, founding partner at Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles research and consulting firm. About 479,000 U.S.-born workers were added to the labor force over the last five years compared with 3.6 million foreign-born workers, according to an October report from the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan research organization. The report pointed to a spike in immigration and retirements, coupled with a slowdown in U.S.-born working-age population growth. In California, immigrants make up roughly one-third of workers and comprise an outsized share of the workforce in physically intensive sectors like construction and agriculture. Critics say these workers are lowering wages for American-born citizens or taking away jobs. But Peri said that doesn't pan out in the data. Immigrants may reduce wages for native-born Americans with competing skills, according to Harvard economics professor George Borjas, but it slightly increases the income of native-born citizens overall. A separate 2024 working paper co-authored by Peri found immigrants had no significant effect on wages for those born in the U.S. who are college educated and a positive effect on wages for their American-born peers who are less educated. Instead, Peri said immigrants are filling the holes in industries struggling to hire. Immigrants account for 28% of care workers in long-term care settings, according to the nonprofit health policy organization KFF. In California, immigrants make up 44% of manufacturing jobs and 40% of construction jobs, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank based in Washington D.C. Some of those jobs are held by undocumented workers. About 1.8 million people, or 17% of immigrants in California, were undocumented as of 2022, according to Pew. The vast majority – 1.4 million – had no legal protections through programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or active asylum claims. "It would be lovely to deal with this with an expansion of the legal immigration system,' Peri said. 'But lacking that, undocumented immigrants are doing a lot of these jobs. And losing some of them would make the situation worse.' Pushing away immigrants, Peri argues, prevents companies from growing and creating more jobs that would benefit U.S.-born workers. One 2024 analysis from Jamshid Damooei, executive director of the Center for Economics of Social Issues at California Lutheran University, found work from undocumented employees created an additional 1.25 million jobs in California. And because the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are not criminals, but people who have been part of their local communities for years if not decades, 'in the majority of cases, the effects of just indiscriminately deporting these people is going to have very little benefit for the American people,' Peri said. Revenue vs. cost It's true that immigrants add costs for the government; they benefit from public education, health services and other state-specific policies. But research generally finds immigration tends to raise the federal government's revenue more than its costs, with immigrants adding an estimated $1.2 trillion in federal revenues between 2024 and 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. State and local governments' costs tend to increase more than their revenues from a surge in immigration, but Peri said the rise in immigration is a net benefit overall. Even undocumented workers, Peri argued, boost the government's coffers because they pay a considerable amount of taxes. At the same time, they are ineligible for most federal benefits like Social Security and food stamps. Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022, according to a 2024 study from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonpartisan think tank. Trump and Newsom: Trump's battle with Newsom, California expands beyond immigration What happens if the immigration crackdown continues? Thornberg doesn't expect Trump to deport every undocumented worker in the country, and views the crackdown in California as 'more of a blown-up spectacle' that 'may get tied up in the courts.' Already, Trump has said he would back off certain deportation efforts to avoid labor shortages in areas like agriculture and hospitality. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in a June 12 post on Truth Social. 'Changes are coming!' While an immediate labor shortage is unlikely, Thornberg believes we're more likely to see people discouraged from coming to the U.S. in the years to come, resulting in a tighter labor market. That could mean higher wages for workers as companies step up recruitment efforts, but it would slow economic growth overall. Trump's efforts to constrain immigration during his first term played out in a similar fashion; by 2019, the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.5%, its lowest level since 1969, with earnings up 3.5% from 2018. Meanwhile, economic growth slowed to 2.3%, down from 2.9% the year prior, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Peri said a tight labor market could have ripple effects across the economy, such as driving up the cost to produce certain items. Companies may be more inclined to import cheaper goods at a time when the Trump administration is pushing for more U.S. manufacturing through tariffs. 'This could have a cascade of effects,' he said. 'There is no doubt at all that immigration and immigrants who do those simple, manual jobs are very important at making the economy go.'
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
The Elon Musk DOGE legacy that just won't die
Call it zombie management: Each week, federal workers inside a few agencies still dutifully email a report, detailing the 5 things they did in the previous seven days. Why it matters: The emails, born from an out-of-nowhere Elon Musk X post, show how hard it can be undo even the smallest of changes once unleashed on the largest workforce in the U.S. Catch up quick: One Saturday in February, Musk posted that all federal employees would get an email asking them to explain what they'd accomplished over the last week. Failure to respond more than once, he said, would get you fired. The Office of Personnel Management quickly followed up with a email to millions of federal workers, giving them until Monday night to respond (minus the firing threat). The big picture: The request blindsided the White House, including chief of staff Susie Wiles, two senior administration officials tell Axios. It was the first documented time that White House officials, publicly and privately, resisted Musk and chafed at his style of personnel management. "To use a phrase Susie might use, she was fit to be tied at Musk," one of the officials said of Wiles' level of annoyance. Some officials promptly told their staffs to ignore it, starting with FBI director Kash Patel. Other appointees soon followed suit. The Office of Personnel Management pretty quickly said it was discretionary. Zoom in: Like a zombie in a workplace horror movie, these emails live on, a sort of vestigial Muskian management tool. Employees at OPM are encouraged to do it. The folks at NOAA must send it as well, said one agency employee. "We're told to send it every Monday before midnight," says a Social Security employee. "It takes a while," they said. "I have never gotten a response from anyone." An employee at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has been largely gutted by the White House and had most of its work halted, said they hadn't been told to stop sending them, but stopped anyway. "Got tired of saying I hadn't accomplished anything because we haven't been given any work," they said. For the record: "Commissioner Bisignano is streamlining the Social Security Administration to deliver more efficient service for American taxpayers," Liz Huston, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement responding to questions about why the agency is still doing this. At least for SSA, the emails are a temporary practice until they get a better system in place, an agency official tells Axios. OPM stands by them too. "This practice is vital to maintain accountability and transparency in employee contributions," says spokeswoman McLaurine Pinover, who says she submits these weekly. "It's an easy way to share my work with leadership." "The mission of eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse is a part of the DNA of the federal government and will continue under the direction of the President, his cabinet, and agency heads to enhance government efficiency and prioritize responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars," says White House spokesman Harrison Fields.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where Foreign Citizens Are Buying Homes In US
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. International homebuyers are losing interest in purchasing properties in the U.S., according to a new study by with warm-weather markets suffering the most from this retreat—though Miami remains the most sought-after destination in the country. An expert spoke with Newsweek about what's driving the numbers. Why It Matters Foreign nationals represent a very small percentage of all homebuyers in the U.S., but their activities still bring dozens of billions of dollars to the country's housing market. According to 2024 data from the National Association of Realtors (NAR), foreign buyers made 1.3 percent of 4.06 million existing-home sales last year, for a total of $42 billion, which was about 2 percent of the total $2.1 trillion of the dollar volume of existing-home sales that same year. A majority of these foreign buyers lived in the U.S. (57 percent), while 45 percent bought the property for use as a vacation home, rental, or both. Dwindling interest among international buyers—especially Canadians, who represent the majority of foreign nationals purchasing homes in the U.S., suggest that the U.S. housing market has become less appealing, partially because of Donald Trump's aggressive trade policies which have targeted the U.S. neighbor and the country's biggest trading partners. This is very bad news for U.S. sellers, who are already struggling with rising inventory and falling sales, as buyers are kept on the sidelines by historically elevated mortgage rates and sky-high prices. What To Know study, published earlier this month, shows that interest in buying a residential property in the U.S. fell in all countries that can be considered the top foreign customers in the world for American homes. Between January and March, according to Canadians represented the biggest share of foreign home shoppers in the U.S., making up 34.7 percent of international traffic, followed by the U.K. (5.7 percent), Mexico (5.4 percent), Germany (3.8 percent), and Australia (3.2 percent). These numbers represent the people who showed interest in buying a home in the U.S., not those who concluded a purchase in the country. We find these same nationalities in NAR's 2024 data about international home buyers. According to the group, 13 percent of foreign buyers in 2024 were from Canada, while 11 percent came from China, 11 percent from Mexico, 10 percent from India, and 4 percent from Colombia. Together, these buyers put over $21 billion in the U.S. housing market last year. This year, based on their diminished interest in the first quarter of 2025, their investment is likely to be a little smaller. Online traffic from Canadian buyers, reported, plunged by 40.7 percent to 34.7 percent from the last quarter of 2024 to the first quarter of 2025. This retreat, according to economist Jiayi Xu, conceded exactly "with the implementation of U.S. tariffs on imported goods and a shift in U.S.-Canada relations," she told Newsweek. Canada was among the first U.S. trading partners to be hit by the Trump administration's sweeping tariffs earlier this year, and it is now facing a 50 percent tariff on its steel and aluminum imported to the U.S. as well as a 10 percent levy on some energy products. "These factors may have contributed to reduced interest among Canadians in purchasing homes or relocating to the U.S.," Xu said. But it is not just tariffs that have antagonized Canadian buyers. Trump's rhetoric about annexing the U.S. neighbor and turning into the "51st state" has angered many in Canada, who are now reconsidering even whether they should vacation south of the border. No Other Country Filling In For Canada "The drop in the share of Canadian home shoppers from 40.7 percent in Q1 2024 to 34.7 percent in Q1 2025 is primarily due to fewer Canadians purchasing homes in the US, rather than growing demand from other nationalities," Xu told Newsweek. "There is no significant increase in interest from other countries," she added. "In short, the decline is driven by reduced activity from Canada itself—not by increased competition from other countries." Interest among Mexican homebuyers, which remains relatively high, has also slightly fallen from 5.8 percent to 5.4 percent between Q1 2024 and Q1 2025, found. The country is facing similar tariffs as those applied to Canada. Florida Is Both Biggest Loser and Biggest Winner "The Sunshine State, which has long been a magnet for out-of-state movers with its sunny skies and relatively low taxes, has experienced some of the biggest drops in the share of international views from would-be buyers," Xu said. The most dramatic plunge in interest among Canadian buyers was reported in Naples, Florida, which until recently had been the most popular destination for Canadians looking to buy a second home in a warm destination. Between October and December 2024, more than 73 percent of international traffic to Naples came from Canada. This number has now fallen to 59.6 percent in the first quarter of 2025, down 13.5 percent. Other Florida cities suffered drops: North Port saw a fall in Canadian traffic of 13 percentage points during the same time, while Cape Coral reported a dip of 10.8 percentage points and Tampa one of 10.1 percentage points. Florida, however, still has the number one metropolitan area Canadian home shoppers are looking into: Miami. "Miami stands out for its year-round sunshine, beautiful beaches and vibrant lifestyle," Xu said. "In addition to its cultural diversity and global appeal, Miami's tax-friendly environment and thriving luxury real estate market continue to attract international home buyers seeking both investment opportunities and a high quality of life." Miami had the highest share of traffic from international buyers in the country in the first quarter of the year, at 8.7 percent, followed by New York (4.9 percent), Los Angeles (4.6 percent), Orlando (2.9 percent), Dallas (2.8 percent), Houston (2.6 percent), Tampa (2.5 percent) and Phoenix (2.3 percent). "New York is known for its concentration of global business opportunities, world-renowned universities, and established luxury real estate, while Los Angeles appeals with its thriving entertainment industry, cultural diversity, and sunny climate," Xu explained. "Both markets offer strong long-term investment potential and large immigrant communities that offer international buyers a welcoming and culturally connected environment." Three cities in the West—San Francisco, San Diego and Las Vegas—fell off the top 20 markets that interested international buyers the most, mainly because of their ongoing affordability issues.
