iPhone 17 might finally fix Apple's stingy ways with display upgrades
Social media is currently flooded with all kinds of rumors and concept renders purportedly depicting the upcoming iPhone 17 series. A few reliable insiders have also backed the claims of a fresh design. However, there's another upgrade situation that will matter to users on a day-to-day basis.
According to Bloomberg, the baseline iPhone 17 model could finally get a high refresh rate aka ProMotion display. 'The device is likely to get some small enhancements to its rear camera, as well as a ProMotion display, which allows for smoother scrolling and animation,' says the report.
If you've been following the competing Android ecosystem, high refresh rate screens are no longer a talking point. Even budget phones that cost as little as $200 will serve you a 90Hz or 120Hz panel. In the Apple ecosystem, you will have to spend at least a thousand dollars to experience that perk on an iPhone, or an iPad.
Yes, Apple has received its fair share of criticism. And yes, the difference is discernible, especially when you shift from a 90Hz panel to a 90Hz or 120Hz screen. Once you've made the jump to a 90Hz panel, the subsequent figures at 120Hz, 144Hz, or even the165Hz panels on one of Asus' ROG series smartphones.
An argument can be made that your phone interactions will look perfectly fine running on a 60Hz panel, especially if it's an iPhone. Digital Trends' Mark Jansen documented his experience of switching back to 60Hz screen on the iPhone 15, and not really missing the high refresh rate convenience.
The situation was not too different with the iPhone 16. You see, an added dash of fluidity with screen interactions is a welcome change. But random stutters and snags ruin that upgrade, especially on non-Pixel Android phones. Apple, on the other hand, does a fantastic job of optimizing the UI interactions, from touch transitions to animations.
That, however, doesn't mean an $800 iPhone doesn't deserve a high refresh rate screen. If that didn't matter to users, Apple wouldn't restrict the ProMotion tech offering a 120Hz peak refresh rate to the expensive 'Pro' iPhones and iPads.
There's a discernible visual perk to be served. It was only a matter of cost-cutting from Apple, until the supply chain brings down the cost of 120Hz panels to such an extent that Apple doesn't feel the pinch on its profit margins. In 2025, the situation seems to have changed in Apple's favor, paving the way for high-refresh rate panel on iPhones.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
18 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Apple Watch tipped for major control center upgrade in watchOS 26 — what we know
WWDC 2025 is going to be a big deal for all of Apple's software, with redesigns reportedly coming for every operating system in the ecosystem — including watchOS. And according to a report from 9to5Mac, the upcoming watchOS 26 could include a long-requested feature for the best Apple Watches — third-party Control Center widgets. Right now, the Apple Watch Control Center is limited to Apple's own tiles and toggles. But a source speaking to the site claims that it will change, with third-party support coming for the first time. On top of that, the layout is tipped to be fully customizable via the Watch app on iPhone. That should be a lot simpler to change up the look of things compared to the current method, which is all contained on the watch itself. While the report doesn't specify any specific third parties, I doubt it'll be long before developers jump on this opportunity. That way, Apple Watch users have the opportunity to toggle specific features on or off much faster than they can right now. Apple's big redesign has been described as the "most dramatic overhaul" in Apple's history, and given the scope, it's not hard to see why that may be the case. While this was initially expected to help close the gaps between iOS and macOS, reports suggest the redesign will expand across the entire Apple ecosystem. In other words, every Apple device, from phones and laptops to TV streamers and wearables, will have a similar unified design language. Reports also suggest that the new "Solarium" UI is actually based on Apple's visionOS. That means more translucent elements, and maybe even floating icons. But Mark Gurman claims that the images circulating on the internet aren't "representative" of what the final designs are — so we'll have to wait until WWDC 2025 to see what Apple has planned. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Thankfully, with the keynote address taking place on June 9, we don't have that long to wait and see what's coming.
CNET
18 minutes ago
- CNET
He Got Us Talking to Alexa. Now He Wants to Kill Off AI Hallucinations
If it weren't for Amazon, it's entirely possible that instead of calling out to Alexa to change the music on our speakers, we might have been calling out to Evi instead. That's because the tech we know today as Amazon's smart assistant started out life with the name of Evi (pronounced ee-vee), as named by its original developer, William Tunstall-Pedoe. The British entrepreneur and computer scientist was experimenting with artificial intelligence before most of us had even heard of it. Inspired by sci-fi, he "arrogantly" set out to create a way for humans to talk to computers way back in 2008, he said at SXSW London this week. Arrogant or not, Tunstall-Pedoe's efforts were so successful that Evi, which launched in 2012 around the same time as Apple's Siri, was acquired by Amazon and he joined a team working on a top-secret voice assistant project. What resulted from that project was the tech we all know today as Alexa. That original mission accomplished, Tunstall-Pedoe now has a new challenge in his sights: to kill off AI hallucinations, which he says makes the technology highly risky for all of us to use. Hallucinations are the inaccurate pieces of information and content that AI generates out of thin air. They are, said Tunstall-Pedoe, "an intrinsic problem" of the technology. Through the experience he had with Alexa, he learned that people personify the technology and assume that when it's speaking back to them it's thinking the way we think. "What it's doing is truly remarkable, but it's doing something different from thinking," said Tunstall-Pedoe. "That sets expectations… that what it's telling you is true." Innumerable examples of AI generating nonsense show us that truth and accuracy are never guaranteed. Tunstall-Pedoe was concerned that the industry isn't doing enough to tackle hallucinations, so formed his own company, Unlikely AI, to tackle what he views as a high-stakes problem. Anytime we speak to an AI, there's a chance that what it's telling us is false, he said. "You can take that away into your life, take decisions on it, or you put it on the internet and it gets spread by others, [or] used to train future AIs to make the world a worse place." Some AI hallucinations have little impact, but in industries where the cost of getting things wrong – in medicine, law, finance and insurance, for example – inaccurately generated content can have severe consequences. These are the industries that Unlikely AI is targeting for now, said Tunstall-Pedoe Unlikely AI uses a mix of deep tech and proprietary tech to ground outputs in logic, minimizing the risk of hallucinations, as well as to log the decision-making process of algorithms. This makes it possible for companies to understand where things have gone wrong, when they inevitably do. Right now, AI can never be 100% accurate due to the underlying tech, said Tunstall-Pedoe. But advances currently happening in his own company and others like it mean that we're moving towards a point where accuracy can be achieved. For now, Unlikely AI is mainly being used by business customers, but eventually Tunstall-Pedoe believes it will be built into services and software all of us use. The change being brought about by AI, like any change, presents us with risks, he said. But overall he remains "biased towards optimism" that AI will be a net positive for society.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Blinks First in Bitter Trump Feud That Cost Him $34 Billion
(Bloomberg) -- When Elon Musk and Donald Trump joined forces during the presidential campaign, there was always a question over how long their alliance would last and who would prevail if it didn't work out. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars After the public spat between the world's richest man and its most-powerful leader spun out of control, the answer was clear: it was Musk who eventually backed down when Tesla Inc.'s stock price tanked and his net worth crumbled by $34 billion. The two billionaires have stopped swapping social media barbs since Thursday evening. But the damage to Musk's business empire will be difficult repair — with Tesla's stock up only about 4% in pre-market trading, recouping on a fraction of its previous day's slide. After the fight wiped a record $153 billion from the market value of the electric carmaker Thursday and dragged down broader indexes, it became clear that Musk had the most to lose. And he blinked, pulling back from a threat to idle SpaceX's astronaut-carrying vehicle and heeding the online advice to back off from a series of attacks. At various points Musk claimed credit for Trump's victory, endorsed his impeachment and even suggested the president was implicated in the sex crimes of Jeffrey Epstein. By 9:20 p.m., Musk had calmed, telling a user on his X platform that cooling off for a couple of days was ' good advice.' The conflict marks a turning point in a relationship that defined the first several months of Trump's return to office, when Musk and his small band of young techie coders raced through the government, seeking to slash spending, shutter agencies and cut the federal workforce. It also sends a warning shot to other billionaires who recently threw their support behind Trump, reminding them of the danger of crossing a president who is known to carry a grudge. Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency seemed to embody Trump's pledge to radically shrink the size of the government and act by executive order, circumventing Congress' constitutional power over the purse strings. The effort ultimately fell short of its goal of cutting $1 trillion from the budget by ferreting out government waste — mustering just $180 billion of savings, by its own accounting. But when Musk left his role late last month, the two appeared on good terms at an Oval Office press conference, where Musk said he expected to remain a friend and adviser to the president. The tension began when Musk started attacking Trump's signature legislation, the so-called 'big beautiful bill' that would extend the Republican's first-term tax cuts and tack on some new ones. To offset some of the cost, it also included spending cuts, including the elimination of a $7,500 tax credit for electric-vehicle buyers that JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts estimate would deal a hit of roughly $1.2 billion to Tesla's full-year profit. Musk, who was also upset by Trump's decision to withdraw the nomination of his associate Jared Isaacman to lead the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, started using his social-media feed to urge senators to kill the tax bill, calling it an 'disgusting abomination' that would worsen the deficit and add to the national debt. The opposition left Republican lawmakers in the awkward position of choosing sides between Musk, who has quickly become a key financial backer for the party's political efforts, and Trump, the singular political force who has reshaped the party in his image. Musk's position, though, was largely waved off by the White House as a difference of opinion until the moment when Trump was asked about Musk's lobbying during a televised meeting in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said during the meeting. 'He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next.' It was then that a remarkable scene began to unfold. Musk started to rebuke Trump, firing off rebuttals on social media as the president spoke. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk posted, citing his financial support for Republicans during the 2024 election. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' The two went on to argue about the nature of Musk's departure from the White House. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!,' Trump posted. Musk responded that Trump's claim he was asked to leave was 'such an obvious lie' and 'so sad.' It continued to escalate. Musk floated the idea of creating a new political party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle' and continued to egg Trump on after the president threatened to cut off government contracts for Musk's companies. That would pose a major hit to Musk, since SpaceX and Tesla have received is $22.5 billion from federal unclassified contracts since the 2000 fiscal year, according to Bloomberg Government data. Musk appeared unconcerned about the financial risk of angering Trump. He responded 'yes' to an X user's suggestion Trump be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance and argued that the president's tariff regime would tip the country into a recession. Musk also needled Trump over his past relationship with Epstein: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk wrote. The White House declined to comment on the Epstein accusation. On Wall Street, the reaction was swift and punishing. A selloff in Tesla stock built as the two traded barbs, driving it down at once point as much as 18%, before paring the loss slightly by the end of the trading day. Several people in the party with ties to both Trump and Musk — as well as random social-media posters — tried to find a quick off-ramp for hostilities and clear a pathway to peace. By late afternoon, with the power Trump wields threatening to wipe out a good chunk of Musk's wealth, the message finally started to sink in. In a reply to billionaire Bill Ackman, an ally of both Trump and Musk who said they should 'make peace for the benefit of our great country,' Musk responded: 'You're not wrong.' Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
