logo
Will County Board OKs pay raises for countywide elected officials, board members

Will County Board OKs pay raises for countywide elected officials, board members

Chicago Tribune17-04-2025
Will County Board members and countywide elected officials will see pay hikes after the 2026 and 2028 elections, after nearly two decades without a salary increase.
The board voted 13-9 to approve salary increases for countywide elected positions, with two Republicans joining Democrats in support of the raises.
'I'm trying to right the ship,' Speaker Joe VanDuyne, a Wilmington Democrat, said.
Will County has 10 countywide elected officials, but the County Board does not set the salary for the regional superintendent of schools, state's attorney or sheriff.
Countywide elected officials make $93,116, which has been stagnant since 2007. The measure will increase it to $116,000 after the next election.
'These are full-time positions,' VanDuyne said. 'In this day in age to make $93,000 a year to lead a countywide department is way underpaid. It's a full-time job and they need to be paid accordingly.'
Will County Treasurer Tim Brophy did a comparison of countywide elected officials' pay in the Chicago collar counties and some of the most populous counties statewide, based on the 2020 census. He said he excluded Cook County because it is an anomaly.
Countywide officials in DuPage County, with nearly 933,000 residents, make just over $151,000 a year and have an auto allowance. Lake County officials make just over $134,000 a year for their population of about 714,000 residents.
With just over 696,000 residents, Will County ranks third in population among the Illinois counties, excluding Cook, but elected officials' salaries rank 11th, according to the data.
The average salary of some of Illinois' most populous counties is $116,516, Brophy said.
Will County at 865 square miles is also the largest of the collar counties in size and is about 2 1/2 times the geographic size of DuPage County, Brophy said.
Brophy said the higher compensation for countywide elected officials will put Will County about average among its peer counties.
He said the elected officials have professional skill sets and would make more money in the private sector, but choose to give back to their communities. Unlike the private sector, the officials have to run for reelection every four years to retain their jobs, he said.
A higher salary is a better incentive for qualified individuals to run for public office, Brophy said.
The countywide elected officials salary will increase to $116,000 after the 2026 election, then increase $3,000 a year for the following three years.
The county executive's salary will increase to $125,000 a year after the 2028 election and increase to $128,750 for fiscal year 2029-30.
Officials whose term expires in 2028 will see their salaries increase to $122,000 after the 2028 election and then raise by $3,000 the next year.
'The law says you cannot give yourself a raise,' VanDuyne said. 'We are paying the position, not the individual.'
Before the vote, some board members asked to send the plan back to committee for more discussion or reduce the size of the raises, both of which failed.
Board member David Oxley, a Lockport Republican who voted in favor of the raises, said he felt it was a double-edged sword. The population of the county continues to increase, resulting in a higher workload for the officials. Private sector employees would not expect to work in the same job for so long without a raise, he said.
Frankie Pretzel, a New Lenox Republican, said he supported the raises because of the commitment from Democrats to work with the Republicans to find cost-saving measures in the budget.
Jackie Traynere, a Bolingbrook Democrat, said the board would not have been in the predicament had it not 'kicked the can down the road' for so long.
Still many Republicans were not convinced.
Mark Revis, a Republican from Plainfield, said many of his constituents have told him taxes are too high and residents are on a fixed income.
'I think everybody is deserving of a raise. I know they work hard; I know they put in the hours,' Revis said. 'But when I speak with residents and the constituents I represent, they are more deserving of a break on their property taxes than you guys are deserving of said raises.'
Board member Judy Ogalla, a Monee Republican, said when the board approved the $93,116 salary, it was above the median salary at the time.
Raquell Mitchell, a Republican from Bolingbrook, noted the government is funded through property taxes.
'The question is always where is the money coming from,' she said. 'We know exactly where the money is coming from. It's coming from the taxpayers' pockets.'
The County Board also approved a pay raise for its own members, effective after the 2026 and 2028 elections. The 12-10 vote was mostly along party lines with 10 Republicans voting against the plan.
The last time the board approved a salary increase was Nov. 17, 2005, when it approved gradually raising salaries by $500 a year starting after the November 2006 election.
The rate for board members increased to $21,500 a year Dec. 1, 2006 and then increased an additional $500 per year until Dec. 1, 2009, when it reached its current level of $23,000.
VanDuyne said the raises could allow for more participation in county government. He said while it is easier for individuals who are retired to give back, he also wants to encourage a diverse demographic to seek office. He cited mothers who may need the extra compensation to pay for child care, or workers who are paid hourly, as examples.
Destinee Ortiz, a Romeoville Democrat, agreed, saying increasing salaries for the board allows more people the opportunity to participate in elected office, not just those who are retired or independently wealthy.
'It ensures that public service is accessible to people of all economic backgrounds, not just the wealthy,' Ortiz said. 'Fair compensation recognizes the time, the responsibility, the personal sacrifice the job requires and helps attract qualified, diverse candidates who otherwise might be excluded, which ultimately leads to more representation and effective government.'
Sherry Newquist, a Democrat from Steger, said while she has voted against pay raises for board members before, she said the time demanded of the board has increased.
The salary for County Board members will increase to $28,000 after the 2026 election and then by $2,500 for each of the next three years. The six members whose terms will be voted on in 2028 will receive the same pay as the board members in fiscal year 2028-29.
The County Board speaker, the leader of the board and selected by its 22 members, will earn an additional $10,000 per year.
The County Board tried to vote on pay raises last June, but Republicans walked out of the meeting after members believed the Democrats were trying to change the terms of the deal. Because members walked out of the room, the votes on pay raises could not take place due to a lack of quorum.
VanDuyne said wanted to bring this forward now because it is not an election year. Last year, the board attempted to raise salaries for the countywide elected officials and the County Board members just months before the November election.
Sherry Williams, the Democratic Leader from Crest Hill, said she believes people should be fairly compensated for their work. She said she knows some board members will be adamantly against raises, but not increasing compensation for nearly two decades was wrong.
'Are we saying people will never get an increase, because that's not realistic,' Williams said. 'This is a good time. If not now, when?'
After the November 2026 election, the raises for the treasurer and county clerk and 16 of the 22 County Board members whose seats are up will take effect.
In 2028, the raises for the county executive, auditor, circuit clerk of the courts, coroner, recorder of deeds and the six remaining County Board positions will take effect. The board is elected on staggered terms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom, Booker rally support for California redistricting on DNC call
Newsom, Booker rally support for California redistricting on DNC call

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Newsom, Booker rally support for California redistricting on DNC call

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) appeared alongside Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin and Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) as they rallied their party behind California's redistricting measure. 'Yes, we'll fight fire with fire. Yes, we will push back. It's not about whether we play hardball anymore. It's about how we play hardball,' Newsom said on the call. Newsom and California Democrats released a new set of congressional lines last week that look to offset expected gains Texas Republicans will likely make with their new House map once passed. Democrats are seeking to put their House map on the ballot before voters this November, pressing voters to allow lawmakers to redraw the map in the middle of the decade and bypass the state's independent redistricting commission. Republicans have already challenging California Democrats' ability to put the measure before voters and other top GOP leaders like former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R) have also signaled they're preparing to fight the map. The appearance of Booker and Newsom together is notable given both have been floated as 2028 White House hopefuls. The two painted a picture of democracy under threat and emphasized the stakes of the redistricting battle. 'The is all hands-on deck right now. People are going to ask, 'Where did you stand when Donald Trump was violating court orders?' 'Where did you stand when he was trashing the concept of due process in our country?'' Booker said. ''Where did you stand when he was sending out masked unidentified people in unmarked vehicles to sweep people off of our streets?'' 'I'll be damned if I'm going to continue to let Donald Trump, Republicans from Texas continue to disregard, demean and degrade other Americans, to deny them their rights without a fight,' he added later. During the call, state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) was asked to leave at one point while she was participating in the call from a bathroom in the Texas Capitol, saying 'They said it's a felony for me to do this. Apparently I can't be on the floor or in a bathroom.' It's unclear what wrongdoing Collier committed. The Hill has reached out to Collier's office, the Texas House Democratic Caucus and Texas House GOP caucus for comment. Democrats on the call slammed the move. 'Rep. Collier in the bathroom has more dignity than Donald Trump in the Oval Office,' Booker said. 'That is outrageous. What they're trying to do right there, is silence an American leader, silence a Black woman and that is outrageous,' he added.

Trump purchased $100M+ in bonds since January, filings show
Trump purchased $100M+ in bonds since January, filings show

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump purchased $100M+ in bonds since January, filings show

President Trump purchased over $100 million worth of bonds since he took office for his second term in January, according to Office of Government Ethics filings. The filings, released on Tuesday night, showed that the president began purchasing on Jan. 21, the day after the inauguration, and purchased over 30 more corporate and municipal bonds in that month. Through Aug. 1, he made nearly 700 bond purchases. The filing is a periodic report released after the Office of Government Ethics reviewed the transactions and certified them as in compliance, including getting Trump's signature, according to a senior White House official. The official said that the president has no role in managing his investments, and they are managed by a third-party financial institution. The official added that neither Trump nor any member of family had direct input into the investments and all decisions are made by independent management. The bonds Trump purchased, according to the filings, was sold by entities like Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, a health facility in Alachua County, Fla., a Michigan public power agency and a Johnson County, Kan., park and recreation office. Bonds were also purchased from some major companies, including Home Depot, T-Mobile USA, UnitedHealth Group, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Qualcomm. The filing does not give a specific amount of each purchase, but the lowest range from $50,001 to $100,000 and the largest range from $500,001 to $1 million. Trump has been criticized for mingling politics with his business interests throughout his second term, with ethics watchdogs and Democrats accusing him of profiting off of the presidency through ventures like the launch of a cryptocurrency, Trump-branded sneakers and Bibles and a line of fragrances.

Elon Musk's wealth distribution idea, ‘anti-racist' math scam and other commentary
Elon Musk's wealth distribution idea, ‘anti-racist' math scam and other commentary

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Elon Musk's wealth distribution idea, ‘anti-racist' math scam and other commentary

Health watch: RFK Jr.'s Herbicide Debacle It seems the 'RFK Jr.-led Make America Healthy Again commission is planning to chicken out of a crusade against glyphosate, an herbicide that the HHS secretary has argued causes cancer,' explains The Free Press' River Page. The Environmental Protection Agency 'has repeatedly concluded that glyphosate,' a k a Roundup, 'is safe if used according to label directions,' but 'in May, the MAHA commission specifically called out glyphosate' in a report that was 'effectively, a list of problems' with solutions to come in a second report. But banning glyphosate 'could cost farmers nearly $2 billion.' And thus, 'two weeks ago, an EPA official' said 'the unreleased report was going to state that glyphosate is safe after all.' 'This is what happens when the ideals of MAHA collide with a hugely powerful corner of the MAGA base' — farmers. Schools beat: The 'Anti-Racist' Math Scam Advertisement Renaissance Technologies billionaire Jim Simons sent much of his charitable donations to math and science research, but his daughter Liz is instead 'supercharging a movement to remake K-12 mathematics education according to social justice principles,' reports Lee Fang at RealClearInvestigatons. The goal: 'to motivate disadvantaged students while dispensing with the traditional features of math,' like numbers — even though 'no credible research' shows this approach improves performance. With the Gates Foundation joining in, billionaires are pushing lunacy like 'elevating DEI practices and anti-racist activism into all math instruction' — even as they're met with 'sharp criticism from parents and educators' because approaches 'that have increased rather than decreased academic rigor' have seen 'notable improvements in black student performance.' Anti-trust alert: Lobbyists Rule at Justice Advertisement 'Genuine MAGA reformers' at the Justice Department are pitted against 'MAGA-in-name-only lobbyists,' frets former Antitrust Division lawyer Roger P. Alford at UnHerd. The pseudo-MAGA lobbyists — enabled by the attorney general's chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, and acting Associate AG Stanley Woodward — end run those who 'strive to remain true to President Trump's populist message.' There's 'nothing wrong with lobbying done the right way,' but with legal settlements worked out at booze-filled lunches, these swamp creatures 'are violating fundamental moral principles.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Dems Must Do Better Than Newsom Advertisement Gavin Newsom 'wants to be president,' grumbles Michael Baharaeen at The Liberal Patriot, and 'has all but crowned himself the leader' of the Trump Resistance. But 'Democrats would do well not to allow their anger at Trump' get the better of them and back a 'candidate with many of his own vulnerabilities' just because he's 'willing to throw punches at Republicans.' Newsom's national appeal is 'quite limited': He's 'struggled' as governor, with California suffering 'net population loss' thanks largely to the state's 'unaffordability.' He's spent his 'career in a deep-blue state' and as the 'executive of by far its most liberal major city,' when Democrats need swing voters who'll be deeply skeptical of a 'blue-state governor' who's 'failed to adequately handle the issues they care about most.' From the right: AI's No Excuse for More Welfare Tesla's Elon Musk, OpenAI's Sam Altman and other high rollers 'envision a 'massive wealth-redistribution system' to placate worries over technology displacing human work,' warns The Wall Street Journal's Jason L. Riley. Advertisement But 'universal basic income' is an old, bad idea. Sure, 'the economic uncertainty surrounding AI' lends 'understandable appeal' to 'the idea of a social insurance program in the form of a minimum level of income for everyone.' Argh: Since 'the early days' of America's 'war on poverty,' it seems we've lost the understanding that 'you alleviate privation by reducing dependency on the government and creating incentives to become more productive.' Fact is, 'taking from workers to give to those who refuse to work is a recipe for resentment and a bumper crop of layabouts.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store