How developing brain in teens plays key role in consent for sex

India Today

a day ago

When the government recently argued in the Supreme Court against lowering the age of consent for sex from 18 to 16, it relied on legal precedent and the need to protect minors from exploitation. But this old debate gains more nuance when seen through the lens of neuroscience: the teenage brain isn't just a smaller version of an adult's, it is also developing. What's interesting is that the brain doesn't develop as a composite whole. The reward centres focusing on risk-taking behaviours develop faster than the parts that focus on impulse-control.Neuroscience also has an answer to the big question: teenagers might be physically capable of sex, but are they neurologically ready to make an informed decision, and say yes or no?This is as adolescence is a period of intense brain development. The body often reaches physical maturity well before 18, but the brain's decision-making systems take a little longer.IN TEENAGE BRAINS, ACCELERATORS OUTPACE THE BRAKESThe prefrontal cortex is of central importance here as it is the part of the brain which weighs consequences, controls impulses, and plans ahead. Research shows it continues maturing well into the 20s.That's why the question of teenage consent for sex is complicated. While it is a reality, the law must weigh this reality against protection from harm.Consent isn't just saying "yes" or "no."It's understanding it to its full extent. While the teenage brain is capable of creativity and learning, it is not yet consistently wired for sound judgement in high-stakes, emotionally charged situations like intimacy and sexual intercourse.While the prefrontal cortex control is lagging, the limbic system, which drives reward-seeking and emotional reactions, is in overdrive during adolescence.Psychologist Laurence Steinberg calls this the brain's "accelerator", outpacing its "brakes".The result: teenagers are more prone to risk-taking, dopamine-seeking, and acting on impulse, especially in "hot" situations charged with emotion or peer pressure.This impulsiveness is accounted for in many laws across the globe.AGE OF CONSENT: WHY IT'S 18 IN INDIA BUT 14 IN GERMANYGlobally, the age of consent ranges from 14 in Germany to 16 in the UK and 18 in several countries. Many nations balance lower ages with "close-in-age" or "Romeo and Juliet" clauses that prevent criminalising consensual sex between peers while still punishing coercion, exploitation, or large age gaps.India's Pocso Act has no such clause, meaning even consensual sex between a 17-year-old and an 18-year-old can lead to serious criminal charges.But the law doesn't operate in a vacuum.In India, sex education is patchy, and taboos mean many adolescents navigate relationships without accurate information or supportive adults. Gender norms often tilt power toward older men, making younger girls particularly vulnerable.This is why the conversation cannot be only about where to set the legal threshold.Even if the age of consent remains at 18, young people need comprehensive, age-appropriate sex education that goes beyond anatomy to teach consent, communication, and recognising unhealthy dynamics. Without that, any legal age becomes a blunt instrument in a much more complicated reality.Sexual decision-making often takes place in this high-risk zone, with strong emotions, peer pressure, and an incomplete grasp of long-term consequences.The stakes are real.In Sundargarh, Odisha, a 24-year-old allegedly lured a 16-year-old into a sexual relationship with the promise of marriage. She became pregnant; the newborn died. He was arrested under Pocso.In Ludhiana, Punjab, a 17-year-old met two people, who she had befriended on social media, at a hotel. She was allegedly drugged, intimate moments recorded, and blackmailed. Her mother's intervention led to an FIR under Pocso and charges of criminal intimidation.TEENAGE BRAINS WIRED FOR SHORT-TERM GRATIFICATIONScience doesn't say teenagers can't make any decisions. But it does show that some decisions, especially those with lasting consequences, are often made when the brain is biased toward short-term rewards.In sexual situations, that bias affects not only the decision to have sex but also the ability to handle consent, resist pressure, and anticipate consequences of emotional harm, pregnancy, or legal trouble.Advocates for lowering the age say the current law is too punitive for close-to-age relationships.Critics argue the higher age limit is a protective barrier against coercion and grooming, risks that rise as the decision-making parts of the brain are still developing.Research shows that in risky situations, the brains of adolescents light up in reward areas but lag in control regions, making resistance harder.Teenagers often overestimate how much they understand and underestimate the risks, a pattern intensified in emotional or socially pressured contexts. In sex, where power imbalances can be subtle, this matters.An age of consent at 18 offers a margin of safety, closer to when most people have better neurological maturity. Lowering it to 16 assumes readiness comes earlier. Science shows that while some teenagers are mature at 16, most are still in transition. Though science shows us how a developing brain plays a key role in risky behaviour and consent, sex education is of the utmost importance. Also, important is to remember that adolescents undergo a hormonal rush, and their romance doesn't get criminalised.- EndsTrending Reel
advertisement