logo
The bloated quango with a £1.7bn pensions bill – paid for by the taxpayer

The bloated quango with a £1.7bn pensions bill – paid for by the taxpayer

Yahoo01-03-2025

Taxpayers have been handed an eight-figure bill for a gold-plated government pension scheme that cannot afford its payments, new figures show.
The Environment Agency's closed pension fund has taken £1.25bn in government bailouts and needs almost £400m more, according to a Freedom of Information request by The Telegraph.
The scheme still holds £264m in assets, but has lost £65m through investments in the past two years alone. The taxpayer has funded every pension payment made in the past 19 years.
In the late 1980s, Britain's state-run water industry employed 50,000 workers, and their pensions were held in the Water Authorities Superannuation Fund. After privatisation in 1989, staff and their pensions were transferred to the newly-formed National Rivers Authority and private water companies.
All remaining pensions, for those who had either already retired or left to work elsewhere, were moved into a closed fund. The Government and the National Rivers Authority accepted that the fund might one day be unable to meet its obligations, but every pension was also legally guaranteed by the state.
When the Environment Agency was created in 1996, it took over managing the scheme, and by the scheme's 2004 valuation, it had a deficit of £880m.
The former environment secretary, Margaret Beckett, duly contacted the scheme to confirm it would run out of money by autumn of 2006, and that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs would fully fund pensions from April the same year.
The arrangement cost the taxpayer £91m in 2006-07, and has required an average of £69.5m a year in funding ever since.
Neil Record, a pensions expert and former Bank of England economist, said it was a glaring example of 'both waste and protecting public sector workers at the expense of ordinary taxpayers.'
He said: 'A whole panoply of scheme compliance and administration is effectively being wasted because the Government has chosen to bail out the failing scheme with cash every year – leaving the pension scheme as onlooker.
'Were it in the private sector, the same scheme would fall into the Pension Protection Fund, and the pensioners would see a fall in their pensions – sharing the costs of the bailout.
'It is a microcosm of everything that is wrong with public sector culture.'
The generous scheme, which is part of the Local Government Pension Scheme, provides retirees with a pension worth one 80th of their final salary for every year worked, along with an automatic tax-free lump sum of three times their annual entitlement.
It means a worker retiring on £50,000 after a 30-year career would receive £18,750 a year, rising annually with inflation, and a one-off lump sum of £56,000.
Almost 8,800 pensioners are currently being paid by the scheme, with nearly 600 more yet to claim. It cost the taxpayer £42m in 2023-24.
Meanwhile, the Environment Agency's multi-billion pound open scheme, run separately for current workers, made a profit of £369m during the same period.
Across the two schemes combined, there are 103 members with annual pensions in excess of £50,000, and two members receiving more than £100,000.
An Environment Agency spokesman said: 'The Closed Fund pension has outperformed its benchmark on investment returns, and grant-in-aid payments are used to ensure we meet our statutory obligation to fund members' pensions.
'It is managed according to the high standards of financial integrity expected of those responsible for the management of public assets.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London

Thousands of people have gathered to 'send a message' to the Government with a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform. Campaign group The People's Assembly said it expected trade unionists, campaigners and activists to attend the event in central London on Saturday. MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'

British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change

Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One — but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store