BlackRock Reportedly To Take 10% Of Circle IPO: Major Asset Manager Doubles Down on Stablecoin Strategy
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
BlackRock (NYSE:BLK), the world's largest asset manager, is planning to acquire approximately 10% of Circle Internet Group's initial public offering, representing a significant vote of confidence in the stablecoin sector, according to Bloomberg. Circle, the issuer of USDC (USD Coin), is seeking to raise up to $624 million in what appears to be an oversubscribed offering set to price on June 4.
Don't Miss:
— no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies.
Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – .
Offering Size and Demand:
Target raise: Up to $624 million
BlackRock stake: ~10% of shares offered
Ark Investment Management: Up to $150 million interest
Existing Business Relationship:
BlackRock manages Circle's government money market fund
The Circle Reserve Fund holds $30 billion in net assets as of April 2024
This fund backs 90% of USDC stablecoin reserves
For BlackRock: This investment represents more than financial returns—it's a strategic positioning move. BlackRock already manages the reserves backing USDC, making this equity stake a natural extension of their existing relationship. The investment aligns with BlackRock's broader crypto strategy, including their successful Bitcoin ETF launch.
For Circle: The backing from both BlackRock and Ark Investment provides institutional credibility crucial for a crypto company going public. Having established asset managers as cornerstone investors should help stabilize the stock post-IPO and attract additional institutional interest.
The timing appears opportune for crypto companies seeking public market access. The current political environment under President Donald Trump has created a more favorable regulatory landscape for digital assets. Proposed legislation requiring stablecoins to be backed by cash and safe assets—exactly Circle's model—could provide competitive advantages over less regulated competitors.
Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase.
Regulatory Evolution: While the current environment appears favorable, crypto regulations remain in flux. Future policy changes could impact stablecoin operations and profitability.
Market Volatility: Crypto-related stocks typically exhibit higher volatility than traditional financial services companies. Investors should expect significant price swings.
Competition Intensifying: The stablecoin market faces increasing competition from both crypto-native companies and traditional financial institutions exploring central bank digital currencies.
This deal represents the continued convergence of traditional finance and cryptocurrency. For retail investors, Circle's IPO offers exposure to the growing stablecoin market through a regulated, public company structure. However, investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and the speculative nature of crypto-adjacent investments.
The strong institutional backing suggests professional investors see long-term value in Circle's business model, but past performance in crypto markets demonstrates that institutional interest doesn't guarantee steady returns.
BlackRock's planned investment in Circle reflects the asset manager's conviction that stablecoins will play an increasingly important role in the financial system. For the broader market, this deal signals continued institutional adoption of crypto infrastructure, potentially paving the way for more traditional finance companies to deepen their cryptocurrency exposure through regulated, public market vehicles.
Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: .
Image: Shutterstock
Send To MSN: 0
This article BlackRock Reportedly To Take 10% Of Circle IPO: Major Asset Manager Doubles Down on Stablecoin Strategy originally appeared on Benzinga.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Toyota's $33B Shock Deal: Akio Toyoda Goes All-In to Break Up Japan's Old Corporate Order
Toyota (NYSE:TM) is making a move that could send tremors through Japan's boardrooms. In a surprise announcement, Toyota Industries a key supplier and the world's largest forklift maker confirmed it received a 4.7 trillion ($33 billion) take-private offer. The bid is led by a newly formed holding company backed by Toyota Motor and Toyota Fudosan, with chair Akio Toyoda committing 1 billion of his own cash. The offer comes in 11% below Toyota Industries' closing price, but it's still a 23% premium from before buyout rumors surfaced in April suggesting this may not just be a financial play, but a strategic overhaul of Japan's most entrenched industrial group. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with TM. What's at stake isn't just control of a parts manufacturer. This is about untying the Toyota Group's famously tangled web of cross-shareholdings a legacy structure long criticized by Japan's regulators. Under the proposed deal, suppliers Aisin and Denso will exit their holdings, and Toyota Industries will sell its 9% stake in Toyota Motor back to the parent. A new three-owner structure will take its place: Toyota Motor, Toyota Fudosan, and Akio Toyoda himself. The group says this tighter structure will dynamically and swiftly accelerate collaboration across the mobility ecosystem but it also raises questions. Toyota Industries is shouldering 1.7 trillion in net debt, pushing enterprise value above 6 trillion. Some analysts warn there's little transparency in how this deal was priced, especially as the company plans to dump a significant portion of its cross-holdings. Still, the message is loud: Japan's largest corporate empire is leaning into governance reform and doing it on its own terms. With Toyoda putting skin in the game, and regulators watching closely, the move could signal a broader shakeup in Japan Inc. Parent-subsidiary listings and circular ownership structures have been under fire for years, but few have tackled them at this scale. If Toyota pulls this off, others may follow. If it stumbles, expect scrutiny. Either way, the old guard of Japanese capitalism might be entering its next act one untangled shareholding at a time. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.


Fox News
16 minutes ago
- Fox News
CNN polling expert marvels at collapse of Democratic advantage with middle class in Trump era
CNN senior political data reporter Harry Enten Monday marveled at how Democrats continue to face a stark lack of confidence from voters on the economy and middle class issues. Voter dissatisfaction with former President Biden's management of the economy was one of the major issues that led to President Donald Trump's return to the White House. While Trump may have stirred controversy with his tariff and immigration policy shakeups since then, the economy appears to be one key area where he retains voters' trust. CNN host Kate Bolduan observed as she spoke to Enten that, according to CNN's own polling, Republicans are actually gaining ground in terms of being trusted to help America's struggling middle class. "Yeah, you know, historically speaking, 'Which is the party of the middle class?' has been a huge advantage for Democrats," Enten said, referring to one question from the polling. He said Democrats had a 23-point advantage on this question in 1989 and a 17-point advantage in 2016, "But by this decade, we already started seeing declines back in 2022, where you saw that Democrats led, but only by four points, well within the margin of error." Now it's tied. "This, I think, speaks to Democratic ills more than anything else," he argued. "They have traditionally been the party of the middle class. No more! Donald Trump and the Republican Party have taken that mantle away, and now a key advantage for Democrats historically has gone 'adios, amigos,' and now there is no party that is the party of the middle class. Republicans have completely closed the gap, Kate." Enten also said while one might think Trump's rocky experimentation with tariffs might shake voters' faith in Republicans and make them consider the opposition, but, "It ain't so. It ain't so!" The data reporter noted that in November 2023, Republicans had an 11-point advantage as "the party that is closest to your economic views." He noted, "Now it's still within that range, still within that margin of error, plus eight point advantage for the Republican Party. How is that possible, Democrats?" Enten continued to break down the numbers, wondering, "How is it possible after all the recession fears? After the stock market's been doing all of this, after all the tariffs that Americans are against, and Republicans still hold an eight-point lead on the economy? Are you kidding me?" He argued that CNN's poll was echoed by similar findings from Reuters/Ipsos, showing that confidence in Republicans to handle the economy has risen. "And again, this is after months of supposed economic uncertainty in which the stock market's been going bonkers, in which tariff wars that Americans are against have been going on. And yet, despite all of that, the Democrats are down by 12 points on the economy," he said. "This speaks to Democratic problems on the economy better than basically anything that you could possibly look at," Enten continued, arguing that even if approval ratings are slightly lower than they once were, Republicans maintain a clear advantage with public opinion on their management of the economy.


Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans have made it a priority this year to require people to prove citizenship before they can register to vote. Turning that aspiration into reality has proved difficult. Trump's executive order directing a documentary, proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal elections has been blocked by a judge, while federal legislation to accomplish it doesn't appear to have the votes to pass in the Senate. At the same time, state-level efforts have found little success, even in places where Republicans control the legislature and governor's office. The most recent state effort to falter is in Texas, where a Senate bill failed to gain full legislative approval before lawmakers adjourned on Monday. The Texas bill was one of the nation's most sweeping proof-of-citizenship proposals because it would have applied not only to new registrants but also to the state's roughly 18.6 million registered voters. 'The bill authors failed spectacularly to explain how this bill would be implemented and how it would be able to be implemented without inconveniencing a ton of voters,' said Anthony Gutierrez, director of the voting rights group Common Cause Texas. Voting by noncitizens is already illegal and punishable as a felony, potentially leading to deportation, but Trump and his allies have pressed for a proof-of-citizenship mandate by arguing it would improve public confidence in elections. Before his win last year, Trump falsely claimed noncitizens might vote in large enough numbers to sway the outcome . Although noncitizen voting does occur, research and reviews of state cases has shown it to be rare and more often a mistake. Voting rights groups say the various proposals seeking to require proof-of-citizenship are overly burdensome and threaten to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Many do not have easy access to their birth certificates, have not gotten a U.S. passport or have a name that no longer matches the one on their birth certificate — such as women who changed their last name when they married. The number of states considering bills related to proof of citizenship for voting tripled from 2023 to this year, said Liz Avore, senior policy adviser with the Voting Rights Lab, an advocacy group that tracks election legislation in the states. That hasn't resulted in many new laws, at least so far. Republicans in Wyoming passed their own proof-of-citizenship legislation, but similar measures have stalled or failed in multiple GOP-led states, including Florida, Missouri, Texas and Utah. A proposal remains active in Ohio, although Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, has said he doesn't want to sign any more bills that make it harder to vote. In Texas, the legislation swiftly passed the state Senate after it was introduced in March but never made it to a floor vote in the House. It was unclear why legislation that was such a priority for Senate Republicans – every one of them co-authored the bill — ended up faltering. 'I just think people realized, as flawed as this playbook has been in other states, Texas didn't need to make this mistake,' said Rep. John Bucy, a Democrat who serves as vice chair of the House elections committee. Bucy pointed to specific concerns about married women who changed their last name. This surfaced in local elections earlier this year in New Hampshire , which passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement last year. Other states that previously sought to add such a requirement have faced lawsuits and complications when trying to implement it. In Arizona, a state audit found that problems with the way data was handled had affected the tracking and verification of residents' citizenship status. It came after officials had identified some 200,000 voters who were thought to have provided proof of their citizenship but had not. A proof-of-citizenship requirement was in effect for three years in Kansas before it was overturned by federal courts. The state's own expert estimated that almost all of the roughly 30,000 people who were prevented from registering to vote while it was in effect were U.S. citizens who otherwise had been eligible. In Missouri, legislation seeking to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement cleared a Senate committee but never came to a vote in the Republican-led chamber. Republican state Sen. Ben Brown had promoted the legislation as a follow-up to a constitutional amendment stating that only U.S. citizens can vote, which Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved last November. He said there were several factors that led to the bill not advancing this year. Due to the session's limited schedule, he chose to prioritize another elections bill banning foreign contributions in state ballot measure campaigns. 'Our legislative session ending mid-May means a lot of things die at the finish line because you simply run out of time,' Brown said, noting he also took time to research concerns raised by local election officials and plans to reintroduce the proof-of-citizenship bill next year. The Republican-controlled Legislature in Utah also prioritized other election changes, adding voter ID requirements and requiring people to opt in to receive their ballots in the mail. Before Gov. Spencer Cox signed the bill into law, Utah was the only Republican-controlled state that allowed all elections to be conducted by mail without a need to opt in. Under the Florida bill that has failed to advance, voter registration applications wouldn't be considered valid until state officials had verified citizenship, either by confirming a previous voting history, checking the applicant's status in state and federal databases, or verifying documents they provided. The bill would have required voters to prove their citizenship even when updating their registration to change their address or party affiliation. Its sponsor, Republican state Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, said it was meant to follow through on Trump's executive order: 'This bill fully answers the president's call,' she said. ___ Cassidy reported from Atlanta. Associated Press writers Mead Gruver in Cheyenne, Wyoming; David A. Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; and Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .