logo
Gov. Murphy's budget is bad for local news

Gov. Murphy's budget is bad for local news

Yahoo22-03-2025

Gov. Phil Murphy once said supporting local news strengthens our democracy, but his last budget proposal slashes state funding for it. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
Nearly seven years ago, Gov. Phil Murphy took a bold step toward reviving, strengthening, and transforming local media and civic engagement.
In August 2018, eight months into Murphy's first term, he signed a widely popular, bipartisan bill establishing the New Jersey Civic Information Consortium, an entity formed to provide financial aid to create and support trustworthy, community-based news.
'I believe the Consortium is a viable means to begin to combat the widespread proliferation of deliberately false or misleading information that threatens our democracy and contributed to getting President Trump elected,' Murphy said then.
State funding for the consortium has risen from $500,000 to $3 million.
Now, with nine months left until Murphy leaves office, his last budget plan proposes quite a different commitment to the consortium: zero dollars. His spending plan also includes a planned 75% cut in state subsidies to NJ PBS, which operates NJ Spotlight News. The state's current budget provides $1 million in funding to NJ PBS; Murphy's plan would slash that to $250,000.
March 16-22, 2025, is Sunshine Week, a nonpartisan collaboration among groups in the journalism, civic, education, government and private sectors that shines a light on the importance of public records and open government.
As I write this, transparency advocates nationwide are commemorating the 20th anniversary of Sunshine Week, an annual observance that highlights the importance of your right to know what your government is up to. For New Jersey citizens, the sunshine is slowly being blotted out by the Murphy administration, which also helped the Legislature take an ax to our public records law last year.
Murphy's office declined to comment but noted the governor said when he presented his budget plan to lawmakers last month that it would include some belt-tightening. Even with Murphy's proposed cuts, the state would spend a billion or so dollars more than it takes in.
'And while, yes, every responsible budget, including this one, requires hard decisions — like scaling back programs that we would rather increase funding for — we can, and we must, make those decisions while also keeping our promises, whether it be making the full payment into our pension system or fully funding our public education system,' he said.
I'll remember this when Murphy signs a budget in June that will undoubtedly be stuffed at the last minute with hundreds of millions of dollars for lawmakers' pet projects.
If you're unfamiliar with the New Jersey Civic Information Consortium, take a look at its recent grant recipients, which range from hyperlocal news site Montclair Local to conservative think tank Garden State Initiative to the New Jersey Coalition to End Homelessness. Its purpose is not to funnel money to corporate media; it's legitimately interested in aiding news outlets, community groups, and other organizations that seek to broaden civic engagement.
(Full disclosure: While the New Jersey Monitor has not received any funding from the consortium, I have applied for some. My thoughts on Murphy's plan to end state subsidies for it would be the same regardless.)
Chris Daggett, the consortium's interim director, urged lawmakers this week to restore funding to the group (the Legislature has until June 30 to strike a budget that will get Murphy's signature). Daggett told me that with the tsunami of change coming from Washington, D.C., local news is more critical than ever if we want to bridge the nation's widening partisan divide.
'For me this is not about saving journalism, this is about democracy,' he said. 'When people aren't informed, they aren't engaged, and when they aren't engaged, democracy dies.'
Mike Rispoli works for the nonprofit Free Press, founded in 2003 to support independent journalism and protect public media. Rispoli — who sits on the New Jersey Civic Information Consortium board but stressed he was not speaking on its behalf — said he understands that states are making very difficult budgetary decisions right now.
But Rispoli said today's media landscape, where the Trump administration is going after media organizations it doesn't like and billionaire media moguls are putting editorial pressure on their newsrooms to protect themselves from the president's onslaught, demands more.
'If people care about our communities and what they need in this moment, being able to make sense out of a very chaotic world, this is the moment where we need to be investing more into independent journalism, not less,' he said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

School board chair defends controversial tax vote that could trigger state audit
School board chair defends controversial tax vote that could trigger state audit

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

School board chair defends controversial tax vote that could trigger state audit

Fayette school board chairman Tyler Murphy on Friday defended the school district in the face of a threatened state audit, lawmakers' criticism and a Kentucky attorney general's opinion of unlawfulness. 'FCPS is not the problem. In fact, we've stepped up time and again to fill the gap left by misplaced priorities at the state and federal levels, recognizing that our public schools remain the bedrock of our community and our local economy,' Murphy said in a Facebook post. Republican Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman ruled Wednesday the school board failed to provide the legally required notice to the public before its May 27 meeting and vote to ask the fiscal court to raise the occupational license tax for schools. On Friday, Fayette Superintendent Demetrus Liggins said the school board will hold a second vote on June 23. The school board will also a public hearing on a yet to be announced day on raising the tax. Parents and other people in the community, Democrats and Republicans, have expressed concerns about a lack of transparency in how the school board handled the vote. Notice of a May 27 vote was made known to the public only when it was attached to an online meeting agenda on the Memorial Day weekend before. Some have raised concerns about the school board's process, others about the possibility of a tax rate increase, and many others about the district's budget shortfall. Republican Kentucky Auditor Allison Ball said Thursday she is considering a financial examination or audit of the school district. Sen. Amanda Mays Bledsoe, R-Lexington, and Rep. Matt Lockett, R-Nicholasville are among those criticizing the district for a lack of transparency. Bledsoe asked for the AG opinion and talked to Ball about conducting a state audit. That drew a rebuke from Murphy. 'We don't need lectures from those pushing policies that harm working families and children,' he said. 'Our community rejected voucher schemes at the ballot box, and our community will continue to defend public education from political theatrics designed to distract and divide,' he said. 'While we always welcome dialogue and feedback that help us improve, it's important that the conversation begins with facts and reflects the reality of the work happening in our schools each day.' According to the attorney general's opinion, the school board's 3-2 vote to ask the Fayette Fiscal Court to increase school tax rates on residents and businesses' net income from 0.5% to 0.75% was improper. That's because, under state law, school boards must notify the public and hold a formal hearing before voting on new or increased taxes. Fayette school district officials argue the vote was legal and the tax increase was needed to cover a $16 million budget shortfall. The district recently approved an $848 million tentative budget for 2025-2026. The reality is that FCPS is a district with real momentum, he said: ▪ The district has received five consecutive perfect financial audits from independent, outside auditors, demonstrating responsible fiscal stewardship. ▪ Not a single FCPS school is labeled 'underperforming.' ▪ Though FCPS educates 6% of Kentucky's students, Fayette students account for 34% of the state's highest academic performers. ▪ The district continues to narrow opportunity gaps for student groups who have historically been underserved, improving outcomes in academic achievement, access to advanced coursework and readiness for college, careers, and life. ▪ FCPS maintains a financial transparency dashboard where anyone can track the district's expenses and budget. He said FCPS is on budget and in the black for FY2025. 'While we are proud of the progress being made, we are equally committed to transparency and continuous improvement. We know we must keep raising the bar for ourselves, in how we communicate, how we govern, and how we deliver on the promise of public education,' Murphy said 'That said, it's hard to ignore the broader political landscape. At a time when Washington and Frankfort are plagued by division, and decisions are too often made to benefit the powerful few, public schools have become a convenient target.'

Students, Senators hope to keep Job Corps open
Students, Senators hope to keep Job Corps open

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Students, Senators hope to keep Job Corps open

HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — Friday was the move-out date set for students in New Haven's Job Corps program. Hartford students have a looming deadline to be out of their dorms by June 13. This comes after the Department of Labor announced a federal pause on all Job Corps programs nationwide. In the week since the announcement, Connecticut Senators Richard Blumenthal (D) and Chris Murphy (D) joined the fight to keep both centers open. Connecticut Job Corps centers to pause operations in June In a press conference outside of the Hartford center, Sen. Murphy said, 'Why shut these doors, why throw these kids all out onto the street, why shutter a program that's changing lives? There's no answer.' The Department of Labor released a transparency report citing the reasoning for pausing the program. One of the main factors is the financial deficit, specifically the cost per graduate. Nationwide the cost is about $155,000 per graduate, in Hartford it's more than a quarter million dollars and in New Haven it's below the national average at $149,000 per graduate. However on Friday, Sen. Blumenthal argued, 'The amount of money spent on this program, is like a pittance, it's money falling out of your pocket, it's the money in your sofa at home which is not a lot. It's a minuscule amount that has an enormous impact.' To continue in the fight to keep the doors of the centers open, a court order was filed to reverse the pause on the program in Connecticut. Sen. Murphy said what the administration is trying to do is illegal. 'We believe these doors will stay open if the courts do what they're supposed to do and uphold the constitution and repeatedly say that the president cannot shutter a program that congress has authorized and appropriated,' Murphy said. The next court hearing is set for June 17 and they're hoping to see the current temporary restraining order converted into an injunction so both campuses can bring students back and continue operating as normal. News 8 talked with Hartford Job Corps student Tylher Jamieson, who told us she's been in the program since November. 'To be completely honest with you, I thought I had no chance,' Jamieson said. 'I thought I was going to be useless and a failure for the rest of my life.' But seven months ago, that all changed after she joined Job Corps. 'I'm still proud of who I was seven months ago for being able to deal with everything I dealt with, but right now I've shown I'm a hard worker, I have an amazing work ethic and I am smart and I am able to do this stuff and this program is what helped me realize that,' Jamieson said. Jamieson is currently on track to becoming a licensed practicing nurse. She is set to take some board exam over the next few weeks. However, if this program shuts down she said her life will look totally different. '(I will) obtain my diploma, get my drivers license and get a part-time job because that's all I'll be able to do.' On June 17, Job Corps Centers in Connecticut will find out their fate and if the court decides on an injunction the directors say students will be welcomed back and operations will go on as normal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive
With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive

Spending totals for this campaign have already more than doubled those in every gubernatorial primary since at least the turn of the millennium. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor) Candidates and outside groups have spent more than $122.5 million on this year's gubernatorial primary, a total greater than any other in state history and one that stands to rise in the race's closing days, the New Jersey Election Law Commission said Friday. The spending total includes $54.9 million from the candidates themselves and $67.7 million from outside groups. Between them, $14 million remained unspent, and that number could swell from late-arriving donations to independent expenditure groups, which face no contribution limits. Voting is underway and ends Tuesday. Spending totals for this campaign have already more than doubled those in every gubernatorial primary since at least the turn of the millennium and have outpaced even the most expensive gubernatorial general election. That November 2005 race between Democrat Jon Corzine and Republican Doug Forrester cost about $98 million after adjustments to inflation, the commission said. This year's 11 gubernatorial candidates had about $6.7 million left in reserves on May 27, the last date covered by regular pre-election campaign finance disclosures. The commission credited the number of candidacies and a larger gubernatorial fund match for the increase. Candidates who meet fundraising and spending thresholds can receive up to $5.5 million in matching public dollars for the primary in exchange for observing an $8.7 million primary spending cap and participating in debates hosted by the commission. Five of the eight candidates have maxed out or nearly maxed out their matching funds. Of the $54.9 million spent by the candidates, Democrats Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop and Rep. Mikie Sherrill lead the pack, with Fulop spending nearly $8.7 million and Sherrill shelling out $8.5 million as of May 27. Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who unsuccessfully ran for governor in 2017 and 2021, spent $8 million, followed by Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat, at $7.9 million. Spending by outside groups is dominated by Working New Jersey, a super PAC funded by an independent expenditure group linked to statewide teachers union the New Jersey Education Association. It is responsible for more than half of the outside spending in the race, with at least $37.5 million boosting Democrat Sean Spiller, the union's president. Spiller's own campaign has spent only $342,059. Spiller's Democratic rivals have seen less but still sizable support from independent expenditure groups. They have boosted Rep. Josh Gottheimer to the tune of $11.6 million; Fulop, $7.4 million; former state Sen. Steve Sweeney, $4.3 million; and Sherrill, $3.8 million. A group run in part by Trump ally Kellyanne Conway has spent $1.3 million supporting Ciattarelli's campaign. Gubernatorial totals far exceed fundraising and spending on this year's Assembly races (all 80 seats in the chamber are on the ballot this year). Not counting independent expenditures, Assembly candidates have raised nearly $26.3 million and spent about $15.4 million, the commission said. Most of that money, $20.8 million, has flowed to incumbents. Collectively, challengers have raised just under $5.5 million. The ratio is similarly split along party lines. Democratic candidates account for $21.6 million of the funds raised, while only $4.7 million went to Republicans. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store