Forum: Ensure parity in subsidies for Healthier SG patients
I signed up for Healthier SG with my general practitioner (GP) in late 2023 and have since been receiving treatment for my diabetes there. I am 66 years old and part of the Merdeka Generation.
Healthier SG patients were supposed to enjoy the same subsidised rates as polyclinic patients. But this wasn't the experience I had. For instance, I currently pay 40 cents per pill for metformin at my GP – significantly more than what I would pay at a polyclinic.
Recently, my GP referred me to the Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic for an X-ray for a frozen shoulder. To my surprise, I was charged $50 and told that Chas and Merdeka Generation subsidies did not apply because the referral came from a private clinic.
When I explained that my GP is in the Healthier SG panel, the staff were unable to offer a clear explanation.
I have since written to the Ministry of Health for clarification but am still awaiting a response.
The purpose of Healthier SG is to give patients more personalised care through their regular GPs while also easing the load on polyclinics. But if patients continue to face higher costs and inconsistent subsidies, it defeats the point of the scheme.
As someone who is semi-retired and needs to manage my expenses carefully, I am seriously considering returning to polyclinic care instead.
Subramani Hariharan
More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
China to make all hospitals offer epidurals to incentivise childbirth
A growing number of provinces across China are also beginning to include childbirth anaesthesia costs as part of their medical insurance schemes. PHOTO: REUTERS HONG KONG - China said that by the end of 2025 all tertiary level hospitals must offer epidural anaesthesia during childbirth, a move it said would help promote a "friendly childbearing environment" for women. Tertiary hospitals - those with more than 500 beds, must provide epidural anaesthesia services by 2025 while secondary hospitals - those containing more than 100 beds - must provide the services by 2027, China's National Health Commission (NHC) said in a statement last week. Authorities are struggling to boost birth rates in the world's second-largest economy after China's population fell for a third consecutive year in 2024 with experts warning the downturn will worsen in the coming years. Around 30 per cent of pregnant women in China receive anaesthesia to relieve pain during childbirth, compared with more than 70 per cent in some developed countries, the official China Daily said. The World Health Organisation recommends epidurals for healthy pregnant women requesting pain relief, and it is widely utilised in many countries around the world, including France, where around 82 per cent of pregnant women opt to have one, and in the United States and Canada where more than 67 per cent do. The move will "improve the comfort level and security of medical services" and "further enhance people's sense of happiness and promote a friendly childbearing environment," the NHC said. A growing number of provinces across China are also beginning to include childbirth anaesthesia costs as part of their medical insurance schemes to encourage more women to have children. High childcare costs as well as job uncertainty and a slowing economy have discouraged many young Chinese from getting married and starting a family. In June, health authorities in China's south-western Sichuan province proposed to extend marriage leave up to 25 days and maternity leave up to 150 days, to help create a "fertility-friendly society." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: SFA adopts a science-based approach in regulating food colourings
We refer to the letter by Ang Chiew Leng, 'Look into reviewing food dyes used in Singapore' (ST, May 20). Synthetic colouring compounds allowed for use in food in Singapore must first be assessed by the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) to be safe for consumption. SFA adopts a science-based risk management approach that is consistent with international standards to ensure food safety. When assessing the safety of synthetic food colourings, SFA takes reference from the assessments by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Where JECFA assessments are not available, SFA will take into consideration relevant published scientific information such as toxicity studies as well as evaluations conducted by major developed countries. SFA reviews our food safety standards from time to time, closely monitors for new scientific evidence and engages other regulators on the impact of synthetic food colourings on human health. More information on the safety of food additives and food colourings can be found on SFA's website. Joanne Chan Sheot Harn (Associate Professor) Centre Director National Centre for Food Science Singapore Food Agency More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Ensure parity in subsidies for Healthier SG patients
I signed up for Healthier SG with my general practitioner (GP) in late 2023 and have since been receiving treatment for my diabetes there. I am 66 years old and part of the Merdeka Generation. Healthier SG patients were supposed to enjoy the same subsidised rates as polyclinic patients. But this wasn't the experience I had. For instance, I currently pay 40 cents per pill for metformin at my GP – significantly more than what I would pay at a polyclinic. Recently, my GP referred me to the Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic for an X-ray for a frozen shoulder. To my surprise, I was charged $50 and told that Chas and Merdeka Generation subsidies did not apply because the referral came from a private clinic. When I explained that my GP is in the Healthier SG panel, the staff were unable to offer a clear explanation. I have since written to the Ministry of Health for clarification but am still awaiting a response. The purpose of Healthier SG is to give patients more personalised care through their regular GPs while also easing the load on polyclinics. But if patients continue to face higher costs and inconsistent subsidies, it defeats the point of the scheme. As someone who is semi-retired and needs to manage my expenses carefully, I am seriously considering returning to polyclinic care instead. Subramani Hariharan More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
