logo
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody

Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody

McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody.
U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody.
Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order.
'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement.
In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement.
Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.'
Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities.
Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week.
The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s.
The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children.
The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs.
In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April.
The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated.
Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting
Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting

The Brief President Donald Trump said he plans to issue an executive order to ban mail-in ballots and voting machines before the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has claimed there was fraud in the 2020 presidential election, election officials say there has been no evidence of this. Experts said only Congress could change federal election law. (FOX 9) - President Donald Trump vowed Monday to lead what he calls "a movement" to eliminate mail-in voting. Trump said he is working with attorneys on drafting an executive order towards his goal ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Election law experts and Minnesota election officials point to the U.S. Constitution and say a president is not given the authority to change election law. The backstory Trump posted a similar message earlier on Monday on social media and said his reason for this pledge is a matter of election integrity. "We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt," said Trump. How can this be achieved? Fact check An election law expert said only Congress can change how federal elections are run. "States basically operate both the state and federal, but the U.S. government under the Constitution has some authority to be able to regulate the time, place, and manner of federal elections," said David Schultz, political science professor at Hamline University and law professor at University of St. Thomas. "Could Congress pass a law that basically bans mail-in voting for federal elections. The answer is yes. But notice what I said, is that Congress would have to a law to be able to do that. The president can't issue an executive order. Could Congress pass a law that prevents states from using mail-in ballots in their own elections, the answer is no." Local perspective Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon addressed some of Trump's remarks in a statement sent to FOX 9. "The U.S. Constitution gives states full control of the time, place, and manner of elections – subject only to action by Congress. A President has no power to grab election authority from states. "America's elections are run largely by local communities. This choice is intentional to ensure that towns, cities, and counties have full control over who represents them. The people who do the work of administering elections are our neighbors and friends, each of whom takes an oath to follow the law, prevent fraud, and conduct their work in a fair and impartial manner. These local election administrators register voters, create ballots, count ballots, and so much more. Once their work is complete on election night, they report the results to our office. Our office never touches a ballot during an election." Simon also responded to Trump's mention of voter fraud. "Every election cycle, everywhere, Minnesota included, you're going to have a very few bad apples who do the wrong thing and engage in some sort of misconduct, but man it is a microscopic level. We know that because we get all the reports, by law, from all of the prosecutors," said Simon. Simon addressed Trump's statement about the prevalence of mail-in voting. "Just about the only country in the world that uses it," said Trump. "There are dozens of countries around the world from Japan, Australia, New Zealand, most of Western Europe that use and have the option of mail in balloting," said Simon. Secretary Simon also responded to Trump's concerns about voting machines. Simon said electronic tabulating equipment gets certified by both state and federal authorities and is more accurate than hand counting. Plus, in Minnesota, paper ballots are used to check the accuracy of machine results, and paper ballots are kept for two years after every election. What they're saying Donna Bergstrom, Deputy Chair of the Republican Party of Minnesota sent FOX 9 this statement. "President Trump is right to shine a spotlight on the flaws and vulnerabilities of mail-in voting. Election integrity is the foundation of our representative democracy, and Minnesotans deserve to know that their vote is secure and accurately counted. Even Democrats like Amy Klobuchar and Angie Craig have admitted Minnesota's mail system is unreliable—you can't even depend on getting your electric bill on time, so why would we turn the integrity of our elections over to that same broken system? "At the same time, we recognize that in a few remote areas of Minnesota, mail-in ballots are the only option because of the distance from polling places, and as a retired United States Marine, I know that our military members deserve access to voting and sometimes this is their only option. But those are specialized exceptions." The Source Minnesota Secretary of State, Political Science and Law professor, President Donald Trump, Republican Party of Minnesota, FOX News, and the Associated Press.

Tarrant County officials to vote on drastic reduction of early voting and election day sites
Tarrant County officials to vote on drastic reduction of early voting and election day sites

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tarrant County officials to vote on drastic reduction of early voting and election day sites

The Brief Tarrant County commissioners will vote on a proposal to significantly reduce the number of early voting and Election Day polling locations. The plan would cut the number of early voting sites by more than half, from 51 to 24, and Election Day locations from 349 to 214. Some commissioners and local residents are raising concerns about potential voter suppression and confusion, while the rationale for the cuts remains unclear. TARRANT COUNTY, Texas - On Tuesday, Tarrant County commissioners will consider slashing the number of election days and early voting locations. Opponents are trying to rally the opposition ahead of the vote. Local perspective FOX 4 reached out to all the Tarrant County commissioners to see if they wanted to make any comments ahead of tomorrow's meeting. The agenda came out on Friday as some say they are still reviewing the proposal. Commissioner Alisa Simmons tells FOX 4's Peyton Yager that she's been working all weekend to get this specific agenda item postponed, but she says she has been met with pushback. "How? Where? Why? How the election administrators got to this point," said Commissioner Simmons. Just some of the questions Democrat Tarrant County Commissioner Alisa Simmons is preparing to bring to Tuesday's Commissioner's Court Meeting. What we know On the agenda is a plan to reduce the number of early voting locations by half and slash more than 100 election day voting locations for the upcoming off-year election in November. If passed, the number of early voting locations would go from 51 to 24. Election day locations would be 214 compared to last year's 349. What they're saying "The contrast is stark. This is evidence of voter suppression. This tactic is in the form of impeding and limiting access to the ballot box," said Simmons. Commissioner Simmons told FOX 4 on Monday that she hasn't received a clear reason for the drastic drop. Democrat Precinct One Commissioner Roderick Miles stated on Monday, "I stand firmly against any actions, policies, or proposals that even resemble voter suppression." Republican Precinct Four Commissioner Manny Ramirez also told FOX 4 that he has several concerns and is looking forward to hearing the elections administrator's rationale or formula for the proposal. Dig deeper Last September, an effort to eliminate early voting sites at several college campuses failed in a 4 to 1 vote at a Special Commissioner Court Meeting. Republican County Judge Tim O'Hare was the lone voter in favor of arguing the college locations were too close to other polling sites, and it was a waste of money. The proposal was nixed following a four-hour fiery public comment. Commissioner Simmons is expecting the same turnout on Tuesday. "This will cause so much voter confusion. People have grown accustomed to voting at the places they live near or work near," said Simmons. What's next Neither Republican Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare's office nor Republican Commissioner Matt Krause responded to FOX 4's request for comment on Monday. Commissioners' court meets tomorrow at 10 a.m. This is still on the agenda and people can sign up for public comment. The Source Information in this article was provided from interviews and public comment obtained by FOX 4's Peyton Yager. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store