Trump says Putin agrees with him US should not have mail-in voting
"Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting," Trump told Fox News Channel's "Hannity" after a nearly three-hour meeting between the leaders in Alaska. "He said there's not a country in the world that uses it now."
Trump, who promoted the false narrative that he, not Democrat Joe Biden, won the 2020 election, cited his agreement with Putin over absentee voting as he pressed his fellow Republicans to try harder to advance overhauls to the U.S. voting system that he has long sought.
Trump has voted by mail in some previous elections and urged his supporters to do so in 2024.
Putin, who has been Russia's president or prime minister since 1999, was elected to another term in office with 87% of the vote in a 2024 election that drew allegations of vote rigging from some independent polling observers, opposition voices and Western governments. The most formidable opposition leader, Alexei Navalny, died in an Arctic penal colony in 2024.
Russia's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment on his conversation with Trump.
The Russian president has previously said some U.S. elections were marred by fraudulent voting, without presenting evidence. The position mirrors Trump's false claims of widespread voter fraud following the 2020 election.
Justice Department and Senate investigations found that Moscow tried to influence campaigns to help Trump win in the 2016 election. U.S. intelligence officials have said they believe Russia tried to do the same in 2020 elections and preferred Trump to win in 2024.
Trump and some of his top aides long have asserted that he and his presidential campaigns were falsely accused of colluding with Russia, a claim he brought up again in Alaska on Friday. The U.S. intelligence community never reached such a conclusion.
Trump, who has not ruled out seeking a third term in office despite a constitutional prohibition, on Friday showed impatience with Republicans for not prioritizing election reform legislation.
"The Republicans want it, but not strongly enough," Trump said during the interview. "You can't have a great democracy with mail-in voting."
Some Republicans, echoing Trump's claims, argue that changes like restricting absentee voting and requiring identification could reduce the risks of ballot tampering, impersonation or other forms of fraud that independent analysts say is rare.
Nearly three dozen countries from Canada to Germany and South Korea allow some form of postal vote, though more than half of them place some restrictions on which voters qualify, according to the Sweden-based International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, an intergovernmental advocacy group.
The Trump administration has stepped back from commenting on the fairness or integrity of elections conducted by many foreign countries in a significant departure from Washington's traditional approach of promoting democratic elections overseas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Attorney General William Barr Says He Didn't See Trump Implicated In Epstein Files
WASHINGTON — Former Attorney General William Barr told lawmakers on Monday that President Donald Trump isn't implicated in the government's investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Barr sat for an hourslong deposition after receiving a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee last month amid a furor over the Trump administration's refusal to release its files from its investigation of Epstein's crimes. 'What Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list,' House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) told reporters outside the deposition room. High-profile Trump supporters, including top officials in his administration, have previously speculated that the government has a list of Epstein's clients that hasn't seen the light of day because powerful people whose names appear on the list have conspired to keep the material hidden. Trump's current attorney general, Pam Bondi, said earlier this year that she had the client list literally sitting on her desk. In July, however, the Justice Department said there was no client list, no conspiracy to hide incriminating material and no reason to release any further information about the Epstein case. Related: Trump was friends with Epstein for years, and his name is reportedly mentioned repeatedly in the government's Epstein files, but Barr said that if there was anything truly damaging, it would have come out already. 'He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out,' Comer said Monday. Related: Barr was attorney general when Epstein died in prison in 2019 after being arrested and charged with sex trafficking of minors. Epstein had previously been arrested in 2006, but struck a sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors to avoid federal charges. The Justice Department then indicted him in 2019 after the scale of his crimes came to wider attention. The following year, the department issued a memo criticizing its prior refusal to prosecute Epstein. Related: Comer's committee issued subpoenas for Barr and other former attorneys general as part of a batch also targeting former first couple Bill and Hillary Clinton. The subpoenas were approved on a bipartisan basis last month during a surprising subcommittee vote. House Democrats said Barr's testimony on Monday left them with more questions about the Trump administration's refusal this year to release its files from the case. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) said it appeared Republicans conducted the deposition in a half-hearted manner. 'The question is if they are truly invested in doing what's right and making sure that there's real transparency for the American people,' Crockett told reporters. 'Right now, it doesn't seem like that. It seems like they are going through the motions, and they want people to believe that they are digging in. But at the end of the day, I don't think that we've learned anything through the Republican questioning.' Related: Comer said his committee's Epstein investigation was bipartisan and that he wished Democrats wouldn't 'politicize' things. He also said he believed his subpoena for the actual Epstein files would be successful. 'I'm under the impression that they're gathering all these documents, and that's what the subpoena called for,' Comer said. 'And I think the administration knows this is what Congress wants, Republicans and Democrats. And I think President Trump has said clearly [that] he wants to release all the documents. So we're going to get the documents.' Related... Trump Administration Ignores Chuck Schumer's Deadline For Epstein Files Epstein Accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records To Remain Sealed Trump's Sleight-Of-Hand On The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Swalwell's 2026 Playbook: Subpoenas For Trump, Statehood For D.C., And A Side Of Shade
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said Democrats would use subpoena power to target President Donald Trump and his administration if the party wins control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 elections. In a video clip posted on X, Swalwell criticized Trump's call to send federal law enforcement and military forces to Washington, D.C., to address violent crime. 'We find D.C. under the control of a wannabe aspiring dictator,' he said. In the same clip, Swalwell added: 'If we take back the House, we will send subpoenas to the Trump administration to make sure that we hold them accountable for their crimes.' Trump has denied all allegations, calling the New York prosecution and other criminal cases politically motivated. Several of his court cases remain active. Swalwell also revisited efforts to grant Washington, D.C., statehood. He highlighted a 2021 bill introduced by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) that garnered 202 cosponsors but stalled in the Senate due to filibuster resistance from both Republicans and some Democrats. Supporters say statehood would grant the city's residents full voting rights in Congress. Opponents argue it would require a constitutional amendment and could shift the political balance in the federal district.
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MSNBC Name Change Mercilessly Mocked as ‘One of the Worst Branding Disasters in Media History'
"MSNBC's horrible rebrand is going to bring Americans together again," one social media user jokes Versant's Monday announcement that MSNBC will be rebranded as MS NOW (My Source News Opinion World) has generated comparisons online to Warner Bros. Discovery's multiple HBO name changes in recent years and has been met with widespread derision. The rebrand comes as parent company Comcast plans to spin off its cable news channels into a new company called Versant. When that plan was originally announced, there were concerns that MSNBC's separation from NBCUniversal would result in it losing its easily identifiable name. More from TheWrap MSNBC Name Change Mercilessly Mocked as 'One of the Worst Branding Disasters in Media History' Spike Lee's Colin Kaepernick Docuseries Scrapped at ESPN Due to 'Creative Differences' David Geffen Responds to Ex-Husband's 'Ludicrous and Contrived' Lawsuit: 'Petty Gossip and Salacious Lies' State Department Papers Found on Alaska Hotel Printer Include Sensitive Details of Trump's Summit With Putin Those concerns were temporarily dispelled when Versant's prospective CEO Mark Lazarus told staffers in January that they did not have to worry about the network changing its name. Now, not only is MSNBC rebranding, but its name change also brings with it a new logo that does not feature the NBC Peacock logo that has long helped identify the network as part of the NBCUniversal family. 'This name further underscores our mission: to serve as your destination for breaking news and thoughtful analysis and remain the home for the perspectives that you've relied on for nearly 30 years,' the network wrote in an official statement shared Monday morning. 'For our viewers who have watched us for decades, it may be hard to imagine this network by any other name,' the statement continued. 'We understand. But our promise to you remains as it always has. You know who we are, and what we do.' Social media users were swift to express their displeasure with the change. One user on X called it 'one of the worst branding disasters in media history' and wrote that the new MS NOW logo 'looks like it belongs on a discount computer from 1998.' Another user vowed that, much like how they refused to call HBO Max just 'Max' after it was temporarily rebranded, they will 'never call [MSNBC] the new name.' 'This rebrand leaves me a little speechless,' a different user also admitted on X, while another user joked that 'MSNBC's horrible rebrand is going to bring Americans together again.' You can check out some of the morning's social media reactions yourself below. The post MSNBC Name Change Mercilessly Mocked as 'One of the Worst Branding Disasters in Media History' appeared first on TheWrap. Solve the daily Crossword