Tanya Hinrichsen eligible for parole next year after stabbing death of husband, Steven Hinrichsen
Warning: This story contains content that may distress some readers.
Tanya Hinrichsen was initially found guilty of the 2018 murder of her husband of 14 years, Steven Hinrichsen, and jailed for life with a non-parole period of 22 years, but her conviction was set aside when she won a re-trial on appeal in 2023.
Ahead of her Supreme Court retrial she pleaded guilty to a charge of manslaughter, which was accepted by prosecutors, and she has now been re-sentenced to a reduced prison term of nine-and-a-half years.
Her non-parole period is now seven years, seven months and seven days — making her eligible to apply for release on parole in July 2026.
During her re-sentencing, Justice Anne Bampton said Hinrichsen, 47, had provided the keys to the Housing Trust home she shared with Mr Hinrichsen to allow her new lover Gavin Scott Skinner and his friend, Robert Thrupp, to bash and stab the 63-year-old in December 2018.
"Steven Hinrichsen was physically vulnerable and heavily sedated by pain medication," Justice Bampton said.
"You were his wife and his carer.
"You exposed him to the thuggery of Mr Skinner by participating in the plan to assault him and by providing Mr Skinner and Mr Thrupp with access to your keys to the Morphett Vale home.
"He was stabbed by Gavin Skinner who was originally a friend of Mr Hinrichsen's and with whom, in the months before the stabbing, you had commenced a sexual relationship."
She said there were at least "65 separate applications of force resulting in 71 injuries being sustained by Mr Hinrichsen, some of which were consistent with self-defence" — to his chest, back, hands and foot.
"A framed photograph of him was smashed over his body," she said.
Mr Hinrichsen used a wheelchair and walking frame for mobility due to recent surgery and back pain.
She said Hinrichsen wore an engagement ring from Skinner and referred to him as her future husband.
"You and Mr Skinner acted with increasing hostility towards Mr Hinrichsen."
She said there had been earlier acts of violence and threats which Skinner had perpetrated against Mr Hinrichsen which were revealed in text messages exchanged between Skinner and Hinrichsen.
"The text messages between you and Mr Skinner are demonstrative of the animosity you each held towards Mr Hinrichsen," she said.
"It is evident that you considered him to be hampering your relationship and that you were frustrated by not having a place to live together."
Justice Bampton said Hinrichsen continued to receive letters from Skinner while in custody but had discarded them and not responded.
She said nine victim impact statements read during a pre-sentence hearing had detailed the "lifelong damage" Hinrichsen had caused Mr Hinrichsen's loved ones.
Justice Bampton said Hinrichsen had been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), which was amenable to treatment, and that the victim impact statements had "a profound impact" on her.
"It was submitted that you knew what you did was wrong and that you are sincerely remorseful for the harm that you have caused," she said.
Skinner is serving a life sentence with a 24-year non-parole period, while Thrupp — who was found guilty of manslaughter for his role in the offending — was jailed for nine years with a non-parole period of seven years, two months and 13 days.
He will be eligible to apply for release on parole at the end of February 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
38 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Melbourne teenager ‘shot himself' with homemade gun
A teenager is fighting for life after a firearm mishap at a Melbourne home. Police are investigating reports a 16-year-old boy was playing with a homemade gun when it discharged inside the home in Seaford in the city's south east, about 4.30pm on Sunday. It is believed the boy was at a friend's home when the incident occurred. He was taken to the Alfred Hospital, where he remains in a critical condition. The injured teenager is a known criminal and was involved in an attack on a boy in Glen Huntly in September 2023, 7NEWS reports. Ben Phikihpoom, the victim, was walking home from school when he was mugged by a group of teens two years ago. Ben, who was 15-years-old at the time, was dragged into a stolen car in an attempted kidnapping, before he was thrown from the vehicle. He suffered serious, lifelong injuries, but has now returned to school. There's no suggestion he has any connection to Sunday's shooting. Regarding Sunday's incident, police will look into who owned the weapon and if it was registered. Police are not looking for anyone else in relation to the believed accidental shooting. A Victoria Police statement said: 'At this early stage detectives are not actively looking for anyone else in relation to the matter and the investigation is ongoing.'

Daily Telegraph
an hour ago
- Daily Telegraph
Anthony Michael Mu: MKR star faces child assault allegations in Brisbane
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. A My Kitchen Rules star allegedly subjected a child to a torrent of vile abuse – including an occasion where he allegedly dragged and choked her over a dispute about tomato sauce. Anthony Michael Mu pleaded not guilty to seven charges, including assault occasioning bodily harm, common assault and observations in breach of privacy, at the start of his hearing at Richlands Magistrates Court on Monday. While listed for a single day, the summary trial was adjourned until October due to scheduling conflicts at the court. At least four other witnesses are due to give evidence. Members of Mr Mu's family and a large group of supporters packed out the courtroom - some at times appearing to make remarks and at from the public gallery as witnesses gave their evidence. Severalturned up wearing badges that read 'False allegations destroy lives'. Mr Mu and his wife, Claudean Uamaki-Mu, both appeared on the Channel 7 reality cooking show in 2023 and were promoted as 'married battlers', 'a fiery Italian and a super chill Samoan with hearts of gold.' Anthony Michael Mu has pleaded not guilty to seven charges, including assault occasioning bodily harm, common assault and observations in breach of privacy. Picture: NewsWire/ Glenn Campbell Claudean Uamaki-Mu attended court in support of her husband on Monday. Picture: NewsWire/ Glenn Campbell The pair have been in and out of court for more than a year on abuse-related allegations, with Ms Uamaki-Mu pleading guilty to six charges of common assault in May. She walked from court with no convictions recorded, along with a 12-month good behaviour bond and $1000 recognisance. On the first day of Mr Mu's trial, a woman – who cannot be named for legal reasons – told the court about several assaults she alleged Mr Mu subjected her to years ago. At the time, she was a child under the age of 18. One allegedly involved her being beaten with a metal spatula on her hands, arm and knuckles. On another occasion, the woman said she was allegedly 'tackled' through a wall by Mr Mu after she 'rolled her eyes' at him and was set upon by Mr Mu during a birthday party before allegedly being pushed down stairs. At work the next week, the woman said a co-worker noticed one of her bruises. 'She asked if she could take photos of the bruises. I was really scared and nervous and said no,' the woman said. Mr Mu is alleged to have assaulted a child on several occasions. Picture: NewsWire/ Glenn Campbell The woman said that when she was an adult, Mr Mu went to get McDonald's for dinner. The court was told the woman 'sighed' after Mr Mu said he forgot her tomato sauce for her meal, leading to him getting 'irate' and calling her a 'disrespectful c**t'. Mr Mu allegedly threw a burger at the back of her head, grabbed her hair and screamed at her to 'get the f**k up'. 'I couldn't quite stand because he had the back of my hair in his hands. I slipped and fell … he dragged me by my hair,' she said. 'I believe he was still calling me a 'disrespectful c**t'.' The woman said she felt her hair was being pulled out but did not see any clumps of hair on the floor, aside from feeling 'a lot of pain'. 'I remember he pulled me up to my feet by my hair. He then choked me on the wall,' she continued. 'I was hyperventilating when this was happening. 'It was no more than 30 seconds to a minute.' The court was told the woman was too scared to report the alleged abuses to police. During cross-examination by defence barrister Stephen Kissick, the woman denied that she was lying about the alleged assaults for either publicity or financial gain. Mr Mu's barrister Stephen Kissick questioned the witness whether she was lying about the alleged assaults taking place, but the woman rejected this question. Picture: NewsWire/ Glenn Campbell Mr Kissick asked if she had been 'reminded' about the alleged abuse during conversations with people she was still in touch with. 'No, we didn't need reminding,' the woman said. She rejected suggestions that she had been laughing and joking about the allegations before appearing teary and 'hyperventilating' when she went to visit police. Mr Kissick put to the woman the allegations in her statement were a 'complete game' against Mr Mu and Ms Uamaki-Mu, but the woman rejected this. Mr Kissick asked her: 'You're prepared to say anything against these people, aren't you?' The woman replied: 'No, only the truth.' The trial will resume in October. Mr Mu remains on bail. Originally published as Child allegedly hit, kicked, dragged by hair, called 'disrespectful c**t' by ex-MKR star, court told

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Strange bedfellows
MYLEE HOGAN: Today the president filing a libel lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch, his company News Corp and the reporters behind this article that claims Trump sent Epstein a 'bawdy' 50th birthday letter in 2003 … - Seven News 6pm (Sydney), 19 July 2025 Hello, welcome to Media Watch, I'm Linton Besser. And first tonight, the vortex of intrigues and deceptions now threatening to engulf the White House as Donald Trump tries and fails to douse the flames of the Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theory he helped to set alight. And not for the first time, marshalling a brigade of lawyers to his cause. MYLEE HOGAN: Seeking $15 billion in damages, the president called it a 'FAKE NEWS 'article' … - Seven News 6pm (Sydney), 19 July 2025 Ten days ago the US president filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, a Rupert Murdoch-controlled newspaper, after its team reported evidence of just how pally Donald Trump was with the financier and convicted sex trafficker—a letter to Epstein bearing Trump's name in a 2003 album of warm felicitations: It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair. - The Wall Street Journal, 18 July 2025 And what did those typewritten words say? Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey. Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it… Donald: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret. - The Wall Street Journal, 18 July 2025 Cue apoplexy from Camp Trump with his usual purple denials, before pulling the trigger on a lawsuit that very same day and yanking the newspaper's White House access to his trip to Scotland. Murdoch's Journal was undeterred however, and soon after took another swing at the President. Donald Trump rode to power on the back of a MAGA obsession with deep-state secrecy, whose flames he's happily fanned: DONALD TRUMP: … her friend, or boyfriend … JONATHAN SWAN: Epstein. DONALD TRUMP: … was either killed or committed suicide in jail … DONALD TRUMP: … he died in jail. Was he killed? Was it suicide? - AXIOS on HBO, Youtube, 4 August 2020 Now the crows have come home to roost, because, despite the efforts of his administration, and some right-wing media, to distance Trump from Epstein it's obvious to everyone with half a brain that Donald Trump was indeed an Epstein familiar, with The New York Times also reporting the album story late last week. Trump is now seeking 15 billion dollars in damages from the Murdoch empire, marking a new twist in the on-and-off-again affair between the two men. After years of boosting by Murdoch's Fox News, in February the 'Dirty Digger' was invited to play a bit part during yet another piece of Oval Office theatre: DONALD TRUMP: … Rupert is in a class by himself, he's an amazing guy … - C-SPAN, 4 February 2025 But along the way Murdoch's occasional distaste for Trump has surfaced in his other outlets: TRUMPTY DUMPTY - The New York Post, 10 November 2022 Trump Is the Republican Party's Biggest Loser - The Wall Street Journal, The Editorial Board, 9 November 2022 Donald Trump's litigation against The Wall Street Journal is far from his first foray against the press. Trump has become accustomed to handing out libel lawsuits like confetti. The writs have returned meanwhile, a handsome $100 million windfall in settlements paid by media companies cowed perhaps by the prospect of presidential retaliation including ABC America, social media giant Meta, and most infamous of all, CBS owner Paramount which settled a Trump complaint over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris as CBS talk show star Stephen Colbert explained earlier this month: STEPHEN COLBERT: This settlement is for a nuisance lawsuit Trump filed claiming that 60 Minutes deceptively edited their interview with then candidate Kamala Harris last fall. Paramount knows they could have easily fought it because in their own words 'the lawsuit was completely without merit'. - The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, CBS/YouTube, 15 July 2025 Three days later Colbert was opening his show like this: STEPHEN COLBERT: I want to let you know something that I found out just last night. Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending The Late Show in May. And… AUDIENCE: Boo! Nooo! - The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, CBS/YouTube, 18 July 2025 Speculation ran rife this was yet another capitulation, with Paramount doing anything in its power to grease the way for a multibillion-dollar merger needing US Government approval. Paramount claimed its decision to axe the show was 'purely financial', which means of course whatever warmth the decision brought to the breast of the president was but mere serendipity. Then last week, lo and behold, it emerged that Paramount's betrayal of its 60 Minutes team, its pay-off to Trump and its cancellation of America's number one late night show franchise had done little harm to its interests, the mega-merger getting the rubber-stamp. So, does the latest Wall Street Journal investigation mean Rupert Murdoch is making a stand for America's free press? Not everyone is convinced: If Rupert Murdoch becomes a white knight standing up to a rampantly bullying US president, the world has moved into the upside-down. - The Conversation, 22 July 2025 Which could mean Americans have to look elsewhere for a white knight: DONALD TRUMP: Why is my dick so small? ARTIST: But that's the size it is in the photo. DONALD TRUMP: Get that guy outta here. I'm gonna sue you. I'm gonna sue both of you. Hahahah. - South Park, Network Ten, 24 July 2024 The creators of comedy cult-hit South Park launching a scathing take-down of both Donald Trump and Paramount's 60 Minutes settlement less than 24 hours after signing a multi-billion dollar deal with, yes, Paramount which bothered Donald Trump not one little bit. South Park and Rupert Murdoch linking arms in defiance of an increasingly authoritarian White House, what a bizarre footnote in the unravelling of the great American experiment.