4 biggest handwashing mistakes that could increase germs and viruses
Doctors recommend washing with soap and water for at least 20 seconds to reduce the spread of infectious diseases.
The NFID 2025 State of Handwashing Report, recently released by the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, provides details on Americans' handwashing habits (and mistakes).
Why Your Laundry Could Be Making You Sick And What To Do About It
The report is based on a survey of 3,587 U.S. adults, conducted in November and December 2024 and March 2025.
Robert Hopkins Jr., MD, medical director of NFID in Maryland, spoke to Fox News Digital about what Americans are doing wrong when it comes to handwashing.
Read On The Fox News App
"We have to recognize that there are a number of important infections that hand sanitizers are not effective at preventing," Hopkins said.
One example is norovirus, a highly contagious stomach virus that is common on cruise ships and is also spread seasonally.
The virus cannot be killed with hand sanitizer, but is "easily destroyed" with soap and water, according to Hopkins.
A Common Killer Bug Is Endangering Americans: 'Pandemic In Plain Sight'
Certain viruses are "encapsulated" and can be destroyed with either soap and water or hand sanitizer, the expert said. However, there is also an "unencapsulated" type of virus, which has an outer coat that does not break down from the alcohol in hand sanitizer.
Using soap and water is a more effective way to kill the germs, the doctor noted.
When people cough or sneeze into their sleeve, they could still spread germs afterward.
"If you cough into your sleeve … go ahead and wash your hands with soap and water as well," Hopkins advised.
Common Medical Test Linked To 5% Of Cancers, Study Suggests: 'Use Them Wisely'
"We also have to recognize that we often bring our hands up close to our face, touch our nose, our glasses, other parts of our face," noted the doctor, who is based in Arkansas.
"If we have bacteria or viruses on our hands, we can introduce them into our mucous membranes, where we can get infections."
The NFID report stated that one in four respondents washed their hands more frequently in the fall and winter, when cold and flu are prevalent.
"The seasonal variance is understandable given that some respiratory diseases, including flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), tend to peak during fall and winter," the report stated.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
"However, other germs — like those that cause colds, norovirus and other infectious diseases — can spread throughout the year. It is important to maintain proper hand hygiene all year round to help stay healthy."
Most adults wash their hands after using the bathroom (69%), handling food (48%) and handling human or animal waste (39%), according to NFID's report.
Only 30% of respondents, however, reported that they are likely to wash their hands after sneezing or coughing.
Nearly half of survey respondents admitted to forgetting or choosing not to wash their hands at key times, like after visiting a grocery store, restaurant, doctor's office, pharmacy, clinic or hospital.
"We need to reinforce the importance of this simple tool," Hopkins said of handwashing.
"I think most of the public health campaigns around hand hygiene have been focused on healthcare settings," he added.
Regarding handwashing as a practice in general, Hopkins emphasized, "We need to bring this back into the fold."
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"If everybody washed their hands more consistently, we could probably save somewhere in the neighborhood of a million lives a year."Original article source: 4 biggest handwashing mistakes that could increase germs and viruses
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Caffeinated coffees are mostly free of toxins, with a few exceptions
That cup of joe that jolts you awake in the morning is pretty safe when it comes to contaminants and toxins, a new investigation has found. Well … almost. 'While some contaminants were present, most were found at minimal levels and well below the European Union's safety limits per 6-ounce serving. This means coffee is generally safe,' said Molly Hamilton, executive director of the nonprofit Clean Label Project, which conducted the investigation into caffeinated coffees. That's great news because coffee has a stellar résumé: Studies have found drinking about 3 cups of black coffee a day provides health benefits, such as reducing risk for such issues as heart disease, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes, liver disease, prostate cancer, stroke, dementia and more. But here's the grind — the testing found traces of a worrisome herbicide called glyphosate and one of its byproducts. Glyphosate is a popular herbicide that has been linked to hormone disruptions and neurotoxic effects, including the development of autism and other developmental disorders in children. The first MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) Commission report, released in May, raised concerns about the impact of glyphosate and other pesticides on children's health. The US Environmental Protection Agency and other regulatory bodies, however, say numerous studies and risk assessments have shown no adverse effects of glyphosate at levels found in the food supply. Plastics from packaging In addition to glyphosate, testing found some coffees also contained small amounts of phthalates, a plasticizer found in consumer products such as food storage containers, shampoo, makeup, perfume and children's toys. Phthalates have been linked with reproductive problems, such as genital malformations and undescended testes in baby boys and lower sperm counts and testosterone levels in adult males. Studies have also linked phthalates to asthma, childhood obesity and cancer. Testing found the highest levels of phthalates in coffee sold in cans, followed by pods and finally bags. The reason for that isn't yet clear, 'so our next study is going to be analyzing the packaging assembly line to discover why there is a change in contaminants,' Hamilton said. 'The Clean Label Project plays an important role in post-market testing for contaminants in everyday consumer products, including this recent report on coffee,' said David Andrews, acting chief science officer for the Environmental Working Group, or EWG, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group that maintains a database on personal care products that contain toxins. 'The higher phthalate levels found in coffee pods and canned coffee suggest that packaging could be a meaningful source of exposure to these chemicals of concern,' Andrews said. The National Coffee Association, which represents the US coffee industry told CNN that it was 'highly irresponsible to mislead Americans about the safety of their favorite beverage.' 'Decades of independent scientific evidence show that coffee drinkers live longer, healthier lives,' NCA President and CEO William 'Bill' Murray said in an email. Traces of a popular pesticide The Clean Label Project measures levels of heavy metals, pesticides and plasticizers in food and consumer products. The organization also checks to see whether the tested products' labels list those contaminants. To do the testing, Clean Label obtained samples of coffee from 45 popular brands — which they did not name. Coffee beans were grown in Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Kenya, Peru and Hawaii. A certified lab conducted over 7,000 tests looking for pesticides, including glyphosate; heavy metals such as lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium; mycotoxins, which are toxic chemical compounds produced by some molds that grow on crops; and phthalates, a plasticizer found in consumer products such as food wrapping, food storage containers, shampoo, makeup, perfume and children's toys. The tests found scant glyphosate, but 'significant' amounts of aminomethylphosphonic acid, or AMPA, a byproduct of glyphosate as it breaks down in the environment, according to the report. The half-life of AMPA is longer than that of glyphosate, which means it can persist in the environment and is easily absorbed by plants from soil and water. In addition, AMPA has been shown to damage cellular DNA in prostate cells and cause an increased risk of liver inflammation and metabolic disorders in young adults. Surprising finding in organic coffees Testing found organic coffees bested conventional coffees in total amounts of contaminants, but there was one oddity — there were levels of AMPA in all of the 12 organic coffees tested. Of the 45 samples of conventionally grown coffees, only 29 tested positive for aminomethylphosphonic acid, according to the report. While certified organic coffee growers cannot use pesticides like glyphosate, it's possible for organic fields to be contaminated by runoff from neighboring conventional farms, Hamilton said. 'Still, the detection of AMPA in 100% of organic samples we tested is definitely a wake-up call,' she said. 'We definitely need stronger safeguards and greater transparency in our food system.' Other contaminants in coffee Levels of heavy metals depended on where the coffee was grown. Africa has some of the lowest levels of heavy metals, while the highest were found in Hawaiian coffee. Hawaii, however, is a volcanic island and therefore expected to have more significant levels of heavy metals in the soil. An analysis also found 100% of the tested coffee samples contained small amounts of acrylamide, a colorless, odorless chemical formed when certain foods are cooked at high temperatures, such as when frying, baking and roasting. Acrylamide has been linked to cancer in animals when they are exposed to extremely high doses. However, the chemical is not thought to be toxic to humans at small levels of consumption. Despite that, the US Food and Drug Administration has advised manufacturers to attempt to lower levels in the food supply. Clean Label's testing found levels of acrylamide varied with the degree of roasting of coffee beans. The highest levels of acrylamide were found in medium roasts, followed by light roasts and dark roasts. 'The dark coffees are the best choice because they are roasted at lower temperatures for a longer period of time so acrylamide levels don't rise,' Hamilton explained. 'The light coffees are roasted minimally, so here too, acrylamide levels don't build up. 'However, medium roasts have the higher levels of acrylamide because they are roasted at higher temperatures long enough to darken the beans,' she said. What to do? What could a coffee lover take away from the testing? 'When you decide which coffee to buy, choose darker or the lightest roasts in bags or pods and consider where coffee is grown, which can impact the levels of heavy metals,' Hamilton said. 'But I want to stress that it's important to put these findings into context,' she added. 'Caffeinated coffee is still one of the cleanest product categories we've ever tested. 'Our report isn't meant to raise alarm or keep consumers from drinking coffee, but rather to empower people on how to choose the cleanest, safest cup of coffee.'
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
New MAHA Commission Report to Be Released
The Make America Healthy Again Commission is slated to offer solutions to problems it identified in its first report. The commission chaired by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is slated to release its next report. The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission 'is on track to submit its Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy report to the President on August 12th,' Kush Desai, a spokesman for the White House, told The Epoch Times in an email on Monday. 'The report will be unveiled to the public shortly thereafter as we coordinate the schedules of the President and the various cabinet members who are a part of the Commission,' he added. Story continues below advertisement A spokesperson for Kennedy's Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment. The commission's first report was released in May. It largely details problems with the health of Americans and attributes the rise of chronic diseases among children to a poor diet full of ultraprocessed foods, exposure to chemicals, a lack of physical activity, and the overprescription of medications. 'America will begin reversing the childhood chronic disease crisis during this administration by getting to the truth of why we are getting sick and spurring pro-growth policies and innovations to reverse these trends,' the report states. A short section at the end features 10 recommendations, including advising new government-funded trials on the effects of various diets and calling for the development of new systems to monitor the safety of drugs and vaccines. Story continues below advertisement President Donald Trump established the commission shortly after his second term began. In an executive order in February, he said the commission should 'study the scope of the childhood chronic disease crisis and any potential contributing causes, including the American diet, absorption of toxic material, medical treatments, lifestyle, environmental factors, Government policies, food production techniques, electromagnetic radiation, and corporate influence or cronyism.' Per the order, the commission was required to submit its first report to the president within 100 days. It was also required to present a strategy to Trump on how to address chronic diseases, including obesity, within 180 days. That deadline was Aug. 12. Kennedy has emphasized removing synthetic additives from foods, with regulators in his department banning several and working with companies to remove others. He has also targeted ultra-processed foods such as soda, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says provide more than half of Americans' calories. Dr. Jim Krieger, executive director of Healthy Food America, told a briefing ahead of the report's release that officials could propose new, mandatory labels on products that are high in fat, sugar, and salt, or contain certain additives, as well as a new tax on beverages with sugar. 'There are many things that can be done,' he said.
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
The CDC shooting aftermath
Driving the Day GUNMAN HITS THE CDC — CDC employees across all of the agency's campuses will be teleworking today, agency leadership told employees, according to a partial recording of a staff call obtained by POLITICO, after a gunman shot multiple rounds into four buildings on the agency's main campus in Atlanta on Friday. The agency is also offering administrative leave for employees who had to shelter in place. The campus saw some facility damage, including broken locks and doors, as law enforcement worked to clear and secure the area, CDC officials said on the call. Media outlets have reported that the gunman believed the Covid-19 vaccine had made him sick, citing law enforcement. A police officer was killed while responding to the incident, though no CDC staff were harmed. The agency is conducting a 'full security assessment,' agency Director Susan Monarez said on the call. 'There was a lot that went right, there was a lot that we want to make sure that we put in place so that when you do return, that everyone can feel safe and supported,' Monarez said. The backlash: Dr. Elizabeth Soda, an infectious disease doctor with the CDC's Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, called for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to resign on Sunday. 'I am enraged at Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,' said Soda, noting she was speaking in her 'own private capacity.' 'As health secretary, his lies are costing people their lives. His dangerous rhetoric is making Americans sicker as scientific decision-making is destroyed.' Former U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams also criticized Kennedy's response, calling it 'tepid' and too slow. 'How you respond to a crisis defines a leader, and quite frankly, Secretary Kennedy has failed in his first major test in this regard,' Adams told CBS's Margaret Brennan on 'Face the Nation.' Kennedy addressed the incident in a post on social media platform X on Saturday. 'We are actively supporting CDC staff on the ground and across the agency. Public health workers show up every day with purpose — even in moments of grief and uncertainty,' he wrote. He also addressed agency staff in an email sent to CDC employees Saturday. An HHS spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. Background: The Georgia Bureau of Investigation said 30-year-old Patrick Joseph White, of Kennesaw, Georgia, shot at the agency complex. 'He very deeply believed that vaccines had hurt him, and that they were hurting other people,' one of White's neighbors, Nancy Hoalst, told The New York Times on Saturday. DeKalb County police officer David Rose was shot and killed while responding to the attack. He was 33, had two children, and his wife was pregnant with a third. Monarez noted on the call that the agency is working to set up a donation for Rose's family. Key context: The shooting comes amid an already tumultuous time for CDC staff. Hundreds of agency employees received termination notices in April, but some were sporadically rehired. The Trump administration has also proposed slashing the agency's budget by roughly half. Kennedy has repeatedly raised concerns over the Covid vaccine's safety. Since he began leading HHS in February, the CDC has stopped recommending the vaccine for healthy pregnant people and narrowed the recommendations for healthy children. Kennedy said earlier this week that HHS would halt $500 million in funding for mRNA research, the technology used to create the first Covid vaccines, citing safety concerns. Many public health experts pushed back on that decision. WELCOME TO MONDAY PULSE. We're closely watching for the second MAHA report this week. Any intel on timing or contents? Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@ and sgardner@ and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. Industry Intel NEW PLAN FOR INDIRECT COSTS — Academia has a counteroffer in the standoff between the Trump administration and universities over grant funding, POLITICO's Erin Schumaker reports. The federal government has long provided grantees with funding for administrative and facilities costs on top of research awards. But now, allies of President Donald Trump accuse the schools of using the payments as slush funds to pursue progressive causes like diversity, equity and inclusion. The universities deny misusing those funds, but to placate Trump, they're proposing the establishment of a more transparent model for recouping overhead costs. Currently, those fees are negotiated separately with each institution and can vary widely. At stake is more than $4 billion in funding. Losing that money would slow the search for breakthroughs in health and science and enable foreign rivals to catch up, the scientific community says. A federal district court judge blocked the administration's plan to cap the fees at 15 percent in March, although the administration has appealed. Charting a new path: 'It's been made extremely clear to us from day one by members of Congress that if we don't do something, somebody else will,' Kelvin Droegemeier, a professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who's spearheading the effort on behalf of a coalition of universities and research institutes, told POLITICO. 'They said continuing forward with the current model is not in the cards. We took it to mean we could help be a part of that change or wait for it to happen,' said Droegemeier, who led the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy during Trump's first term. The group proposes a Financial Accountability in Research, or FAIR, plan, which would consist of a detailed accounting of indirect project costs and a shorter, simpler fixed percentage of a project's budget for research organizations to recoup facilities and administrative expenses. The model is designed to show the costs of conducting research so the government and lawmakers can choose what to fund. What's next: Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), who has protested the administration's cap because it would hurt universities in her state, floated the new model to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya at a budget hearing in June, calling it 'far fairer' than Trump's flat rate and saying she believed it would 'increase accountability.' Talks are expected to ramp up when Congress returns from recess next month. AROUND THE AGENCIES GUESS WHO'S BACK — The FDA's top vaccine regulator, who was pushed out roughly two weeks ago under pressure from the White House, has been reinstated, POLITICO's David Lim reports. After Commissioner Marty Makary requested the return of Dr. Vinay Prasad to his job regulating biologics and vaccines, the White House decided the agency could bring him back after reviewing Prasad's past remarks highlighted by far-right provocateur Laura Loomer last month, according to a person familiar with the decision and granted anonymity to discuss the decision. 'At the FDA's request, Dr. Vinay Prasad is resuming leadership of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,' HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said. HHS declined to answer additional questions about Prasad's reinstatement. Why it matters: The return of Prasad marks a personnel victory for HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Makary, who opposed his dismissal. In the days after Prasad's ouster, Makary told reporters he encouraged Prasad to reconsider his exit from government. Loomer immediately slammed the decision to rehire Prasad on social media platform X, describing him as a progressive and referring to his past remarks criticizing President Donald Trump. 'In the coming weeks, I will be ramping up my exposes of officials within HHS and FDA so the American people can see more of the pay for play rot themselves and how rabid Trump haters continue to be hired in the Trump administration,' Loomer posted Saturday. 'There are several Senate Confirmation hearings coming up and I have multiple oppo books ready for distribution!' Sarepta Therapeutics: It's unclear what Prasad's return will mean for Sarepta Therapeutics, which sparred with the FDA center that regulates its Duchenne muscular dystrophy treatment, Elevidys, in the days before he was removed from the job last month. Industry Intel THE IMPACT OF KENNEDY'S mRNA MOVE — Messenger RNA technology, and its potential in cancer treatment and prevention, has excited scientists for years. Now, following HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to yank half a billion dollars in federal funding for mRNA vaccine projects, researchers and drugmakers worry that potential will be curtailed, POLITICO's Lauren Gardner reports. Key context: The rapid development and deployment of mRNA vaccines during the pandemic stoked enthusiasm for the technology's potential to revolutionize cancer treatment. The much faster manufacturing process and the mRNA platform's ability to instruct the immune system to attack problem proteins make it possible to custom-tailor therapies to fight a person's unique tumor. Dozens of treatments are being studied or already in the pipeline. But scientists and industry executives say Kennedy's discouragement of mRNA vaccines for respiratory diseases could dampen investors' enthusiasm for U.S. companies pursuing drug candidates for cancers and rare genetic diseases that have few therapeutic options. And they fear those firms and researchers might decide to move overseas to countries hungry for their expertise — including places like China that could limit Americans' access to treatments developed within their borders. 'If there was a treatment out there for pancreatic cancer but we couldn't get access to it, how would that make you feel if you had a loved one with pancreatic cancer?' said Kate Broderick, chief innovation officer at Maravai LifeSciences, which makes components for drugs and therapies. 'And that is a genuine reality of these cancellations.' An HHS spokesperson called the industry's assessment of potential fallout from Kennedy's mRNA decisions 'false,' adding that other uses of the technology weren't affected by Tuesday's announcement. WHAT WE'RE READING The Wall Street Journal's Liz Essley Whyte reports on how Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is trying to bring MAHA to Alaska. The Washington Post's Sabrina Malhi reports on growing anti-sunscreen sentiment on social media that's worrying dermatologists.
