logo
'My Fault: London' stars, directors on crafting English version of one of Prime Video's biggest hits: 'Filmmaking is about taste'

'My Fault: London' stars, directors on crafting English version of one of Prime Video's biggest hits: 'Filmmaking is about taste'

Yahoo17-02-2025

Starring Asha Banks, Matthew Broome, Enva Lewis, Jason Flemyng, Kerim Hassan and Sam Buchanan, the first book in Mercedes Ron's "The Cupables" trilogy has gotten an English on-screen adaptation with My Fault: London (now on Prime Video). The movie follows the 2023 release of the Spanish-language film, based on the same book, which quickly became the most-watched non-English language film in the streaming platform's history.
The film's stars and directors, Charlotte Fassler and Dani Girdwood, spoke to Yahoo Canada about creating this movie after the success of the Spanish-language version. They also talked about the experience of working with two directors for this film.
Everyone kept telling me that London would be a fresh start.
But I had no idea.
This is interesting because it's, you know, from a book that people really love, then we have the Spanish language movie, now it's this, um, did you feel that pressure to make sure that it still felt like fresh and you were bringing something kind of new to an audience that may come in with some expectations of what this is supposed to look like?
Yeah, completely.
I think that it was kind of daunting to um come into it, you know, with filling um.
We're stepping into big shoes.
Um, so it was, yeah, it was exciting, but it was a bit scary to come into it.
But I mean, what a blessing to have such a passionate fan base like that already exists that are kind of intrigued by what we're going to bring to it.
So I think it was really important for us to, um, bring a new life to it and and see what we could change and make different and it being in London was a massive part of that.
Um, but it was exciting overall.
Matt for you for your hair, there's something interesting where I think um.
It, you can feel like it takes a lot for him to necessarily like open up or be vulnerable.
Like, he very much has this facade and like, he fights and he drives fast cars and like a lot of this is the kind of, I think you can tell to to kind of compensate for some of those emotions.
Um, is it interesting to play a character where, you know, he does have all of these different outlets, but I think deep down inside, it's kind of, we get to see him slowly kind of unpeel that onion and open up to to Ash's character, particularly.
Did you get a You, you, you can judge, you can was it don't judge a book by its cover.
He does all these things and you can judge it.
That's right, isn't it?
Yeah, yeah, OK, good.
Um, but then as an actor, you get to, you get to, like you said, peel all the layers down and get to what's at the center, and I think um.
That's the most interesting part, I think, and then also then how he uh navigates that and expresses that or like deals with it um.
Jason, I'd love to start with you because your character's not necessarily winning like Father of the Year award anytime soon here.
Um, but when he comes into the story, he has this kind of like presence throughout, but when we finally see him, it gets quite intense.
Anything that particularly appealed to you about just the kind of extreme nature of just his entry into the story.
I think um.
I think that villainy has so many different shades, and over, you know, 160 movies playing villains.
Um, I've kind of tested most of those shades.
But the shade that is, um, the betrayal and possible murder of your kin is an interesting one.
So I was really, really.
Up for that because I, I could find no empathy and could find no part of my own life that could inform those decisions I was making, because, you know, I've got twin boys who I adore and who I cut my hands off, you know, if, if necessary.
Um, so yeah, that was really interesting cos that's a dark, dark place to be, um, and you know it comes through addiction and through.
All sorts of reasons that he gets into that place, but wow, that's, that's something else.
Same for you, for your character kind of going off of that.
I think, you know, at one point you're just kind of thinking he has like other motivations.
He's not necessarily like super.
Particularly interested in what happens with Noah.
You're, you're spot on, like it it, for, for Ronnie, it's not about Norah at all, she's collateral, like it's all about his kind of vendetta and what he has against Nick, which clearly when we meet them has been an ongoing thing for the, from before anyway.
um, so yeah, for me there was a lot of playing with, um, you know, that.
Quite toxically masculine trait of not feeling good enough, like he's, he's, he's better looking, he's, he's more successful, he's wealthier, he's got all these things that I've just been in prison, like there's that real kind of hatred for that person which is and and Noah Blesser just gets caught up in the middle of that.
I'd love to know just a little bit about both of you working together and collaborating on your work broadly, you know, what's kind of the particular pleasure of having you both have each other to bounce ideas off of and to really collaborate for projects like, like this and others.
Oh my gosh, it's so much more fun.
You know, I mean, we started our careers together, um, and, you know, we're collaborative, I think, both of us down to our very core and so being able to be on this journey together is so much fun being, you know, Having a shared brain in many ways, you know, we, we often say we're quite ambidextrous.
Like it's not like one of us is more comfortable doing something than the other.
In many ways it's like, you know, just being able to kind of have that shared instinct and, um, and I don't know, directors left and right brain, but you know, we talk out loud.
I really like working for two directors at the same time.
I, I, I've done it with the Hughes Brothers and a couple of other times that I've worked with two directors because you always think, oh that's never gonna work, you know, how's that gonna work?
And it's not as simple as saying.
Which it was the case with the Hughes brothers where one will be technical and one will work the actors.
But with Danny and Charlotte it's really amazing because they they actually swap, there's no, they're very fluid about about the notes, and yet they, they basically have a very similar taste.
They've got the same taste.
They're brilliant.
And that's what the key is.
Filmmaking is about taste.
You know, Matt Vaughan has amazing taste, and he knows what's, he knows instinctively what's right and what's wrong.
And that I think they both have that, and they both have the same taste and it works really well.
They're kind of like two sides of the same mind, like they, they, they, they both know exactly what the other one needs and wants, but also like have their own individual ideas.
So you're getting like two brilliant.
Perspectives, which, which is great cos there's no tunnel vision and also immensely collaborative, the amount of times that we would just want to change things just to try a different one, and they were always like, yes, great idea, try that, doesn't work, it doesn't matter.
So we felt really free in that, didn't we?
I think at first all of us were quite intimidated by having two directors cause it can go really one way or really the other way, they're constantly butting heads and you have like this mash up crazy film, or you could have something like this where these two people work in such beautiful unison together that.
Each of them bounces off of the other and like, like if Danny ever struggled with something, Char was there to pick her up and like likewise vice versa, like both of them just really come in for each other constantly and for us it was like we had two people who were wholly there for us and wholly there for this film to call on constantly.
So I, I, I think that the clear indicator was we played charades on our first week and Danny and Shar got each other's answers like that and I was like, OK, these, these, these two know each other through and through, and I think like that it was like one hive brain.
Do you know what I mean?
So it just, it was, it was joy, we always had somewhere to turn.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Jaws' is turning 50. Where can you stream it?
'Jaws' is turning 50. Where can you stream it?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Jaws' is turning 50. Where can you stream it?

One of the most famous movies of all time happens to be a story about a man-eating shark that terrorizes the fictional island of "Amity." In real life, "Amity" is Martha's Vineyard, where the movie was filmed in 1974. What's also very real is the fact that "Jaws" will turn 50 years old on June 20 of this year. If you are someone who hasn't seen the classic film, which was directed by a young Steven Spielberg, then there are plenty of ways to see the movie right now. The same applies to all those people who have loved the film for decades and just want to see it again. Here's where to watch "Jaws." Here's what to know Are Vineyard rentals, hotels available for 'Jaws' anniversary in June? The film can be streamed on services like Prime Video, Netflix, Peacock, and Tubi. It can be rented, or bought on Apple TV, Fandango At Home, Google Play Movies and the Microsoft Store. Universal Pictures is releasing the film in theaters around Massachusetts and the rest of the country from Aug. 29 to Sept. 4, 2025. At least two movie theaters on the Cape & Islands have shown or will show 'Jaws' in June - Edgartown Cinema 2 on June 8 and the Chatham Orpheum Theater from June 27 to July 1. Explore 'Jaws' filming locations: Martha's Vineyard celebrates anniversary with Amity Week There will be a showing this summer where moviegoers can actually sit in the ocean on Martha's Vineyard and watch "Jaws." According to the Collider website, the Alamo Drafthouse Rolling Roadshow will host "Jaws on the Water" on June 21 in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. What's happening on Martha's Vineyard 'Jaws' is celebrating its 50th anniversary in 2025. The classic movie focuses on when the seaside community of Amity finds its swimmers under attack from a dangerous great white shark. The movie is based on a 1974 novel by author Peter Benchley. While Benchley acknowledged that the shark attacks of 1916 in New Jersey played a role in inspiring the novel, he told BBC in a past interview that "the novel grew out of his lifelong interest in shark attacks, including the exploits of Frank Mundus, the Montauk, Long Island sport fisherman who landed a record 3,427-pound (1554kg) great white." This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times: 'Jaws' is almost 50. Here are places to see it and stream it

41 Confusing TV And Movie Plot Holes
41 Confusing TV And Movie Plot Holes

Buzz Feed

time4 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

41 Confusing TV And Movie Plot Holes

The last time I talked about annoying plot holes, I mentioned the big one in A Quiet Place: why don't they live by the waterfall? But I have another smaller one — where does that nail Evelyn steps on come from? How had no one stepped on it before? Wouldn't someone have noticed it and removed or covered it? And why was there even a nail randomly sticking up from a stair to begin with? Also, you see this newspaper identifying that the creatures are attracted by sound. Now, I haven't seen the Day One sequel, but I assume this invasion happened pretty quickly. Did they really have time to print newspapers? And isn't pretty loud? They were just delivering newspapers as usual during all of this? Who put down this sand in the woods to make people's feet quieter? Wouldn't that have been loud? Where did they even find the sand? Don't they live kind of in the middle of nowhere? Maybe I'm missing something here, but in the second film, why do they have to send an encoded message about their location? monsters don't understand English, do they? And if I remember correctly, this song was also about the monsters fearing water? Wouldn't they have wanted to spread that message more explicitly? I also mentioned some Disney examples in the last post, but I have more, especially from Tangled. First of all, why does Mother Gothel tell Rapunzel her real birthday? Couldn't she just lie so Rapunzel doesn't realize the lanterns are connected to her? Rapunzel's tower appears to have a working stove/oven and a sink. Are we supposed to believe that Gothel made this all on her own? And how'd she get the furniture up there? It's established that she gets up using Rapunzel's hair. There's also a blocked-off entrance and a trapdoor in the floor that Rapunzel doesn't seem aware of until the end, with just a ladder, but she'd still have to move it without Rapunzel noticing. And how did she get up to the tower when Rapunzel's hair was shorter? I'm not gonna otherwise question Rapunzel's magic hair when it comes to keeping it clean and untangled, and not getting caught on things, or even being too heavy for Rapunzel – 'cause, y'know, magic — but I will take issue with how a few kids braided Rapunzel's wildly long hair into THIS. A few things in the most recent season of The Last of Us bothered me. Like in that big battle episode, why was their big solution exploding canisters of gas RIGHT NEXT TO A WOOD WALL that was keeping the infected out??? Doesn't that seem dangerous and counterintuitive? I know Ellie questioned this, but I'm still convinced Dina's pregnancy tests would've all been expired. I also call BS on her finding so many. It's been decades of this; I don't buy that in-demand medical items haven't already been scavenged from literally everywhere. But my biggest issue is with the spores. They seem to literally only exist in one spot to create that one scene for Ellie and Nora. Why do the spores exist in only one location? In the game, they're in a ton of different poorly-ventilated areas. It feels like the show just threw them into one episode and didn't want to deal with them the rest of the time. In another recent example, let's talk about this season of Severance. Near the end, Outie and Innie Mark fight over the idea of reintegration. Why does Outie Mark never mention Petey??? Innie Mark directly challenges the existence of reintegration, and Outie Mark bringing up Petey (whom he couldn't have known about otherwise) would've been proof that it works. He didn't have to mention that Petey died if that was his reason. It feels like the show completely forgot about Petey. It also feels like they forgot about Reghabi for a large stretch. And why is reintegration working so slowly this time? It feels like they just decided that for plot reasons. In The Umbrella Academy, how are Lila and Diego's children — and Allison's daughter — able to exist if the siblings made it so that they never existed? The train took them to the correct timeline, I guess, but still. How could they have done that if their parents never existed? Wouldn't they just fade from existence once they got there? I never totally got the whole Elder Wand thing from Harry Potter. Harry doesn't disarm the Elder Wand from Malfoy, because Dumbledore has been buried with it. He disarms Malfoy's wand from him — so it makes sense that Malfoy's wand's allegiance changes to Harry, but why does the Elder wand's allegiance change if Malfoy never even held it, and Harry never took it from him or anyone else? And WHY DOES HARRY NOT USE THE ELDER WAND TO REPAIR HIS OWN WAND IN THE MOVIE?? He does in the books, but in the movie, we're just supposed to believe he uses Malfoy's old wand forever? On does Joe manage to bring and assemble that cage everywhere he damn goes??? I also think it's so obvious that Nadia doesn't report Marienne in the cage to the police because the writers didn't want Joe to be caught red-handed. I *maybe* buy Marienne, starving, paranoid, and terrified of Joe's capabilities, suggesting that wild plan, but I don't buy Nadia, just a regular college kid, going for it. I also don't buy Joe believing Marienne was dead just from her blood pressure lowering. He's seen enough dead bodies to know the difference. In Hannah Montana, Miley's dad is the famous in-universe musician Robby Ray. He's also Hannah Montana's manager. You're telling me NO ONE put together the fact that his daughter Miley is Hannah? Sure, he wears a "disguise" as Hannah's manager, but that disguise is literally...a mustache. As I admittedly watched this show over a decade ago, I did some digging on this one, and it turns out Robby publicly refers to Hannah as his daughter while presenting her with an award. However, it's also common knowledge, at least where Miley lives, that she's Robby's daughter. So what gives??? I know this isn't the only film to do this, but why do Yelena and her dad speak in English to each other in Thunderbolts? And how does everyone get to that one spot in Bob's mind? Yelena struggles to get there, and she's the one who knows Bob best and the only one he actually trusts. The others show up quickly after, at the exact same time, pretty soon after she gets there (and she went in way before them). How? And how does Bob gain control of his powers so fast? He goes from trying out his powers on a glass of water, immediately shattering it, to being all-powerful and completely in control in the next scene. This happens in a lot of movies and TV shows, and it always pisses me off. Give us a training montage, at the very least! Also, I don't know if this is really a plot hole, as they haven't had time to explain it yet, but how does Selena just announce the new Avengers like that? Is there not still plenty of evidence that she's been experimenting on humans? I mean, Bob's right there. And how in the world is she going to have John Walker be in the group after he publicly beheaded someone with Captain America's shield? And she really got a whole press conference ready that fast in an active situation zone? In Stranger Things, I'm still not buying that Hopper survived just by jumping down a little lower, without at least becoming permanently injured in some way. The blast literally vaporized the other people there!!!! And how did the Russians get him out of there so fast before the US Army showed up? On a similar note, how did Sherlock actually fake his death in Sherlock??? They explain a few different versions — that each has its own issues and feels wildly unrealistic — but never confirm the real one, and it feels lazy. And why was it so important for him to stay away from John for two years? Couldn't he have discreetly confirmed the truth without alerting Moriarty's remaining cronies? In Sinners, why does Stack stay away from Sammie for all those years? Stack "promised" Smoke, but he not an evil vampire now, whose main goal is to turn Smoke and Sammie? Why would he care about that promise, or stick to it after Smoke was dead? Why would he even let Smoke go; wouldn't he try to turn him again the second he let go of him? Even if Vampire Stack was trustworthy, we're supposed to believe Smoke actually trusts he'll leave Sammie alone, or even has time to talk it through? He shows up to save Sammie moments later! Dan's reveal of being Gossip Girl still makes absolutely no sense to me. There are multiple instances when Dan simply couldn't have been Gossip Girl, and that's not even counting all of the Gossip Girl blasts he seems shocked by when he's alone. They also then frame Gossip Girl as a "love letter" to Serena, which is just absolutely ridiculous, considering how much he tortured her. Also, on Pretty Little Liars, Mona's explanation for becoming A makes no sense. She states it's because Aria, Spencer, and Emily took Hanna away from her. weren't even talking when A started sending messages. In fact, A is literally what brought Hanna and the girls back together. And why torture Hanna along with the others? She arguably got it the worst, considering Mona hit her with her car and constantly tormented Hanna over her eating disorder. I won't excuse what Mona did to Emily, but Emily came out fairly quickly, so there wasn't much to torture her over anymore. Spencer and Aria were being groomed, and those things frankly should've been outed to the adults in their lives. But Hanna? Beyond threatening to expose her stealing (which she literally does in Episode 1), most of A's torture centers are around Hanna having been "fat" and trying to get her to relapse. Cece is even worse. She tortures the girls because they "moved on" when Ali was dead. tortures Ali too? Also, how did Jason just forget he had another sibling? And HOW DID CECE FUND THE DOLLHOUSE??? I have to bring up a continuity plot hole with Pretty Little Liars because it's SO bad. Season 3, Episode 13 is Halloween of their Senior year. Season 5, Episode 12 is Thanksgiving. Almost two seasons passed in a matter of weeks??? This includes Caleb recovering from being shot, Ali coming back from the dead, all of Ravenswood, Ezra's betrayal, and much, much more. In Mickey 17, how does Mickey have memories of his past selves who have died? They upload his consciousness into each new version, but how do they have access to the new memories that he's created just before dying, assuming they don't have access to his body? I guess this is less a plot hole than something I just refuse to believe, but it just makes no sense to me that there would EVER be another dinosaur park created after the dinosaurs got out the first time. Jurassic World shouldn't exist. Lost has so many plot holes I should probably ignore it entirely, but one that still bothers me years later is the reveal that Libby had been in the psych ward with Hurley. What did it mean??? What were they trying to tell us?? SO many things were never explained on Lost, but this one really irked me because it genuinely felt as if they forgot about it, and it was such a huge cliffhanger at the time. In Avengers: Endgame, we see Hawkeye's family just chilling when they dust. Same with a ton of Avengers-adjacent people, like Yelena, Scott, and Nakia. Was just no one aware the world was about to end? I know the big battle was in Wakanda, but wasn't there a battle early on in Infinity War in New York? Natasha didn't even want to warn her own sister? This is a sillier plot hole, but it's a funny one. Rhodey and Scott appear to have seen Hot Tub Time Machine, Stan is in that movie. Did they not notice that Bucky was just casually in a movie? Hot Tub Time Machine came out in 2010 too, so that was while Bucky was still the Winter Soldier. Guess he was also an actor on the side? Why didn't Fury ever call Carol before the very end of Infinity War? I know Carol said she was off helping other planets, which, fine, but you're telling me Fury didn't use the device ONCE during the massive global threats of the preceding movies? He didn't even TRY to contact her? Speaking of Carol, how did she find Tony and Nebula at the beginning of Endgame? I have sooo many questions about the cure on The Vampire Diaries. Katherine takes the cure, leading her blood to become the cure. Silas then takes the cure from her, leading to her rapidly aging. It appears you don't age while the cure is in your blood. But then later, when Stefan takes it (and then gives it to Damon), the show acts like they're going to grow old slowly, like a normal human? The whole plan was for Damon to take the cure and grow old with Elena. But wouldn't he still look young and be immortal until someone takes the cure from him? Was the plan for someone to do that when Elena was near death, so they'd die together??? Stefan also mentions in this scene that Damon has eternity with Elena, which makes no sense as Elena is human at this point. Also, Silas drinks ALL of Katherine's blood to ingest the cure, but later, you only need a syringe. What happens to the rest of the person's blood? It's just normal, then? Or could you make multiple cures? Let's talk about when Bonnie brought back the cure from the prison world. How the hell did Bonnie get 200 miles off Nova Scotia alone? And this is, like, a fake world, right? How is the real cure there, with no Silas or any other people existing? Also on TVD — and The Originals – all the Originals have different accents. siblings? At least Rebekah, Elijah, Kol, and Klaus are somewhat similar (I still think Rebekah sounds Australian), but Freya is full-on American. Finally, on Revenge, how is Sammy still alive when Emily/Amanda comes back almost 20 years later???

5 best new movies to stream this weekend on Netflix, Max, Disney Plus, and more (June 14-15)
5 best new movies to stream this weekend on Netflix, Max, Disney Plus, and more (June 14-15)

Tom's Guide

time10 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

5 best new movies to stream this weekend on Netflix, Max, Disney Plus, and more (June 14-15)

Wondering what you should watch this weekend? Every week, the best streaming services roll out a fresh slate of new movies to beat the heat, but figuring out which ones are worth your precious streaming time is harder than you'd think. That's why we're rounding up all the best new movies on streaming to help make that decision an easy one. Leading the pack this week is Disney's latest live-action remake, "Snow White" on Disney Plus. Thriller fans are eating good this week. Apple Plus just got "Echo Valley," a riveting mother-daughter drama starring Julianne Moore and Sydney Sweeney. You can also find the Daisey Ridley-led "Die Hard" clone "Cleaner" on Max or, if you prefer a healthy dose of absurdity with your high-octane action, Prime Video just got "Deep Cover." Finally, this week Netflix got one of my favorite Gerard Butler movies, the fast-paced thriller "Plane." So without further ado, let's dive into all the best new movies on streaming to watch this weekend. Love 'em or hate 'em, Disney shows no signs of slowing down with cranking out live-action remakes. Its latest, "Snow White," has been mired in controversy since its announcement, and unfortunately, the film doesn't offer much to overshadow that noise. To its credit, it's more watchable than some of the other Disney remakes, and there are a few new songs added into the mix for fans of the original. Those curious about all the chatter can now check out "Snow White" on Disney Plus from the comfort of their own couch. Rachel Zegler takes on the role of the titular princess, who is banished from her kingdom by her ruthless stepmother, played by Gal Gadot. To reclaim her rightful place on the throne, she teams up with a group of magical beings and a bandit leader (Andrew Burnap) to challenge the evil Queen and restore peace to the realm. Watch it now on Disney Plus Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. "Echo Valley" is part slow-burn thriller, part tightly coiled mother-daughter drama grounded by masterclass performances from its two leads, Julianne Moore and Sydney Sweeney. It follows grieving horse trainer Kate Garrett (Moore), whose peaceful life on a secluded Pennsylvania farm is shattered when her estranged daughter Claire (Sweeney) arrives late one night covered in blood that is not her own. Claire claims she got in a fight with her boyfriend, but as details emerge, Kate is forced into a devastating moral crossroads. Written by "Mare of Easttown's" Brad Ingelsby, "Echo Valley" treads similarly gritty ground, offering a tense, emotionally charged descent into moral ambiguity. Watch it now on Apple TV Plus In the mood for something lighter? Prime Video just got a hilarious new action comedy that puts three improv performers — Bryce Dallas Howard, Orlando Bloom, and Nick Mohammed — in a precarious predicament. An undercover cop (Sean Bean) recruits the trio to infiltrate London's criminal underworld by pretending to be the very criminals they've only ever played on stage. Their new gig spirals out of control faster than you can say "zip, zap, zop!" While its action sequences aren't all that exciting, the sharp writing and hilarious performances in "Deep Cover" offer plenty of laughs. Orlando Bloom, in particular, is a hoot as a "serious" actor overly committed to the role of playing the group's muscle, come hell or high water. Watch it now on Prime Video Legendary James Bond director Martin Campbell returns with a "Die Hard"-style action thriller led by "Star Wars" actress Daisy Ridley. Though it wears its inspiration on its sleeve, "Cleaner" still delivers a fast-paced and entertaining ride with plenty of nerve-jangling aerial stunts to keep you on the edge of your seat. "Cleaner" kicks off when a group of radical activists storm an energy company's annual gala, taking 300 hostages in a bold attempt to expose corporate corruption. Fortunately for the guests trapped inside, an ex-soldier turned window cleaner (Ridley) just happens to be on the scene, albeit suspended 50 floors up, when the chaos erupts. Channeling her inner Bruce Willis, she springs into action in a desperate fight to save the day. Watch it now on Max One of my favorite Gerard Butler movies, "Plane," just arrived on Netflix, and it's already crash-landed in the streamer's top 10 list. In this high-octane action thriller, Butler stars as commercial airline pilot Brodie Torrance, who's hoping to wrap up one last flight before reuniting with his daughter. But when a violent storm strikes mid-flight and a lightning bolt knocks out the plane's avionics, Torrance is forced to make an emergency landing. Though he gets the plane down safely, he realizes too late that it's on the remote, pirate-controlled Jolo Islands. Stranded and surrounded by danger, he has to team up with a fugitive passenger (Mike Colter) to outwit local warlords and keep the survivors alive long enough for help to arrive. Watch it now on Netflix

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store