Police warn of rise in shoplifting in Inverness
Police say rates of shoplifting and fraud in Inverness increased over the past 12 months.
There were 680 shoplifting incidents in 2024-25, almost 13% more than the 603 reported in 2023-24. For fraud, the figures were 155 incidents in 2023-24 and 168 in 2024-25.
Police Scotland said the three-year average for shoplifting in the city was 423 incidents and 408 for the five-year average.
In a report to Highland Council, the force said the detection rate for the crime was 63% but only 14% for fraud.
More stories from the Highlands and Islands
News from the Highlands and Islands on BBC Sounds
In the report to next week's city of Inverness committee, Ch Insp Jamie Wilson said: "Unfortunately, crimes of dishonesty have increased, particularly theft by shoplifting and fraud.
"My team are actively looking at preventative measures we can implement to drive this number down, whilst robustly investigating any crime of dishonesty reported to the police."
City centre business organisation, Inverness BID, said the Covid pandemic was likely to have affected the average figures but added that shoplifting was a problem.
It said it worked closely with Police Scotland in preventing and responding to retail crime.
A spokesperson said: "Whilst the rise in shoplifting is disappointing, and coincides with a rise in anti-social behaviour in the city centre which impacts on retail outlets, it was not totally unexpected given the financial pressures on retail and our frontline public services."
The spokesperson said this situation had at times led to reduced in-shop security and visible police resources being available.
Retailers in other parts of Scotland have reported problems with shoplifting, including in parts of Edinburgh.
Shoplifters 'out of control' and becoming more brazen, say retailers
How to contact Police Scotland
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Council 'inadequacies' found in handling of leader complaint
There were "inadequacies" in the way City of Edinburgh Council handled a complaint made against former leader Cammy Day, an independent investigation has concluded. Councillor Day became leader of the council in 2022 but stepped down in December 2024 after allegations he had sent inappropriate messages to Ukrainian refugees. In April, a police investigation concluded that there was "no evidence of criminality." An independent review found that the complaint was handled well but found "inadequacies" in the way a previous complaint was dealt with. Edinburgh council tasked the former Information Commissioner Kevin Dunion with reviewing how complaints made against Day were handled. His newly-published report found no evidence of a potential complaint made in 2006 - before Day was a councillor. But he concluded there were inadequacies with the way the then-council leader, Adam Nols-McVey, handled a complaint in 2018 when Day was the deputy leader of the council. The seriousness of an allegation that a "senior Labour councillor" had "groomed" a 15-year-old boy meant Nols-McVey should have shared it with other senior officials, the report said. Emails relating to the complaint were lost, with police later advising the fact the complaint was anonymous meant it couldn't be taken any further. Mr Dunion said the loss of related emails was an "unintended and unexpected consequence" of the information not being shared. More broadly, the report says the council still lacks sufficient safeguards to prevent this type alleged behaviour in future. 'No criminality' in Edinburgh council boss sex message probe Sex message complaint about council boss last year Labour council leader quits over alleged messages The report concluded that recent complaints about Councillor Day's alleged behaviour towards Ukrainian refugees in 2023 were handled properly and in line with the council's policies. He said, overall, complaints were for the most part handled properly and that the policies and procedures in place are broadly effective. Councillor Day denies all the claims that have been made against him, telling a newspaper he is the victim of a co-ordinated political attack. In April, Police Scotland said that no criminality had been established during its investigation into Cammy Day that focused on the 2023 allegations. Councillor Adam Nols-McVey said the report acknowledges that the 2018 complaint was dealt with in a "sensitive manner prioritising the protection of the complainant while raising it with the police, senior council officers and, most importantly, giving the individual concerned advice and directing them to support available". He added "unless alleged victims choose to make an official complaint and go through the process, there are restrictions on what action authorities can take". It raised concerns about "egregious" leaking of information for political motives and alcohol-fuelled behaviour at social functions in the City Chambers. Councillors will consider the report next Thursday.
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
ICE detains the most followed person on TikTok, Khaby Lame
(NewsNation) — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement reportedly detained the most-followed creator on TikTok on Friday. Khaby Lame, whose full name is Seringe Khabane Lame, is an Italian-Senegalese influencer. He was detained for immigration violations at the Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada, according to USA Today. Lame, 25, is a current citizen of Italy and reportedly 'overstayed the terms of his visa,' ICE reported. ICE allegedly gave Lame the option to depart the country voluntarily after he was detained, and Lame chose to leave the U.S. Lame became famous during the COVID-19 pandemic when he was laid off from his job in Italy. He uses the hashtag 'learnfromkhaby' on most of his videos, and he follows along as another creator talks about a complicated hack. Once he watches the 'hack,' he shows himself easily completing it, typically without saying anything. Lame is reportedly an ambassador for the men's clothing company Boss. He is also an ambassador for Binance and UNICEF. Lame moved from Senegal to Italy as a baby, but as The Associated Press reported, he didn't gain Italian citizenship until 2022. In 2024, he was named one of People's Creators of the Year. He told the publication at the time, 'Before TikTok, I was working in a factory. I had a lot of different jobs. I was helping support my family — three little brothers, one older brother and my parents. Then my world changed completely. It's a whole different life now.' Lame's detainment is one small part of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. During his presidential campaign, he had promised to create mass deportations, which have led to ICE raiding workplaces, airports and more across the country.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Prosecutor Allegedly Tried To Jail Him for Fighting Civil Forfeiture. He May Finally Get His Day in Court.
A prosecutor who allegedly weaponized the criminal code to retaliate against a man for filing a class-action lawsuit that challenged the notorious civil forfeiture program in Wayne County, Michigan, is not entitled to prosecutorial immunity, a state appeals court ruled Monday, sending the man's lawsuit against that prosecutor back to the trial court. It is a significant legal victory when considering that such claims are often dead on arrival. Police seized Robert Reeves' Chevrolet Camaro and $2,000 in cash in 2019 on suspicion that he had stolen a skid steer from Home Depot. But as Reason's C.J. Ciaramella wrote in 2023, Reeves was not arrested or charged with a crime, and he was not able to actually challenge the seizure of his vehicle, as the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office (WCPO) declined to file a notice of intent to forfeit it. About seven months later, Reeves joined the class-action suit, filed by the Institute for Justice, a public-interest law firm, which alleged that Wayne County's civil forfeiture program violated the Constitution in multiple ways. Prosecutors responded expeditiously. First, the WCPO wrote the next day to a state police task force instructing it to release Reeves' car and his cash. Then, two weeks later, prosecutors filed felony charges against Reeves for allegedly receiving and concealing stolen property. Perhaps most notably, the government asked a judge to suspend his lawsuit while the criminal case against him proceeded, and Wayne County's Department of Corporation Counsel (DCC) used the charges as a defense against the suit. A judge would dismiss those charges for lack of evidence—in February 2021, over a year later, in part after delays brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prosecutors were undeterred. They refiled the same charges shortly after that dismissal, only for them to again be dismissed for lack of evidence, this time in January 2022. Reeves then sued, alleging those criminal prosecutions violated his First and 14th Amendment rights as part of a concerted effort to derail his complaint against the county's civil forfeiture program—the practice that allows law enforcement to seize people's property even if they have not charged, much less convicted, the owner of a crime. "The pending charges caused Robert to be disqualified for expungement of prior offenses at a free expungement clinic, to spend time imprisoned in a COVID-infested jail, and to lose at least one job, when a police-officer client refused to allow [Reeves] to work as a contractor at his home specifically because of the pending charges," his complaint says. "Defendants' retaliatory prosecutions against [Reeves] were motivated by [Reeves'] participation in a federal class action lawsuit against Wayne County—protected activity under the First and Fourteenth Amendments." His complaint also notes that the "defendants worked together across departments—with the WCPO taking advice and direction from the DCC—in an irregular effort to pursue the criminal prosecutions." Suits like Reeves' are usually doomed before they begin, as prosecutors are protected by absolute immunity for judicial or quasi-judicial functions. In practice, that means victims have no recourse against district attorneys who may falsify evidence, introduce perjured testimony, coerce witnesses, or hide exculpatory information from the defense. But the State of Michigan Court of Appeals reversed a trial court decision and ruled yesterday that Dennis Doherty, the prosecutor who allegedly retaliated against Reeves by bringing felony charges, was not entitled to that protection, because the alleged misconduct did not qualify as quasi-judicial acts. "[Reeves] alleged that Doherty contacted the new officer in charge of the task force to seek clarification, recommended submission of the warrant request, and directed the officer in charge to file that request," the court wrote. "Those allegations suggest that Doherty's conduct was aimed at reviving a dormant prosecution and falls within the category of investigative or administrative acts, not quasi-judicial ones." For those acts, prosecutors are entitled to qualified immunity, the legal doctrine that permits civil suits against state and local government officials only if a plaintiff can prove it was already "clearly established" that the misconduct in question was unconstitutional. The trial court will now evaluate that question here. It's still a very high bar to meet. But in a commentary on how difficult it can be for victims of government abuse to find recourse, Reeves has a glimmer of hope after facing what are typically impossible odds. The post A Prosecutor Allegedly Tried To Jail Him for Fighting Civil Forfeiture. He May Finally Get His Day in Court. appeared first on
