Death toll from Kenya's anti-government protests rises to 16
NAIROBI, Kenya — The number of Kenyans who died during Wednesday's nationwide protests over police brutality and bad governance has doubled to 16, according to the state-funded human rights commission.
Property was also destroyed in the protests that attracted thousands of frustrated young Kenyans. At least two police stations were razed down by angry protesters.
Kenyans demonstrated Wednesday in 23 of 47 counties across the country calling for an end to police brutality and better governance. Thousands chanted anti-government slogans, and the protests morphed to calls for President William Ruto to resign.
Many protesters were enraged by the recent death of a blogger in custody and the shooting of a civilian during protests over the blogger's death.
The country's interior minister Kipchumba Murkomen on Thursday assessed damage to businesses in the capital, Nairobi, where goods were stolen from multiple stores. He said police would follow up with owners whose CCTV cameras captured the looters to ensure swift arrests.
At least two families have identified their deceased kin at the Nairobi mortuary. One relative, Fatma Opango, told local media that her 17-year-old nephew was gunned down in Rongai area in the outskirts of Nairobi.
'I came across his photo in a group online and I started searching for him at the hospitals hoping he had survived,' she told journalists at the mortuary.
Meanwhile in downtown Nairobi, businesspeople counted their losses after looters raided their shops and set some shops on fire.
In one of the buildings where smoke was still billowing on Thursday morning, a phone seller told journalists that she lost stock worth 800,000 Kenya shillings ($6,000.)
Kenyans mobilized Wednesday's protests on social media platforms to mark the one-year anniversary of huge anti-tax protests, when demonstrators stormed parliament and at least 60 people were killed. Twenty others are still missing.
Parliament and the president's office were on Wednesday barricaded with razor wire and protesters were unable to use the roads leading to the two establishments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congo and Rwanda to sign US-mediated peace deal to end conflict in eastern Congo
DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — The Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda are set to sign a peace deal facilitated by the U.S. to help end the decadeslong deadly fighting in eastern Congo. The deal, to be signed in Washington Friday, would also help the U.S. government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the conflict-battered, mineral-rich region. The Central African nation of Congo has been ripped apart by conflict with more than 100 armed groups. The most prominent is the M23 rebel group, backed by neighboring Rwanda, whose major advance early this year left bodies littered on the streets. With 7 million people displaced in Congo, the U.N. has called it 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' Lauded by President Trump last week as 'a Great Day for Africa and ... for the World,' the crucial deal comes as part of other ongoing peace talks to end the conflict, including ones mediated by the African Union as well as Qatar. The agreement involves provisions on respect for territorial integrity, a prohibition of hostilities as well as the disengagement, disarmament and conditional integration of non-state armed groups, U.S. State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott told reporters on Thursday. U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric also said on Thursday that such a deal is welcomed, adding: 'We talk almost every day about … the horrific suffering of civilians, the hunger, the sexual violence, the constant fear, the constant displacement' in eastern Congo. The peace deal will likely not end the conflict quickly Congo hopes the U.S. will provide it with the security support needed to fight the rebels and possibly get them to withdraw from the key cities of Goma and Bukavu, and from the entire region where Rwanda is estimated to have up to 4,000 troops. Rwanda has said it is defending its territorial interests and not supporting the M23. However, the M23 rebels have suggested the agreement won't be binding on them. The rebel group has not been directly involved in the planned peace deal although it has been part of other ongoing peace talks. Corneille Nangaa, leader of the Congo River Alliance that includes the M23, told the Associated Press in March that direct peace talks with Congo can only be held if the country acknowledges their grievances and that 'anything regarding us which are done without us, it's against us.' An M23 spokesman, Oscar Balinda, also echoed those thoughts in an interview with AP this week, saying the U.S.-facilitated deal does not concern the rebels. The US' role in ending the conflict Analysts say the U.S. government's commitment might depend on how much access it has to the minerals being discussed under a separate minerals deal being negotiated. The mostly untapped minerals — estimated to be worth as much as $24 trillion by the U.S. Department of Commerce — are critical to much of the world's technology. Christian Moleka, a political scientist at the Congolese think tank Dypol, called the planned deal a 'major turning point' in the decadeslong conflict, but that the signing could "in no way eliminate all the issues of the conflict.' 'The current draft agreement ignores war crimes and justice for victims by imposing a partnership between the victim and the aggressor,' he said. 'This seems like a trigger-happy proposition and cannot establish lasting peace without justice and reparation.' In Congo's North Kivu province, the hardest hit by the fighting, some believe the peace deal will help resolve the violence but warn justice must still be served for an enduring peace to take hold. 'I don't think the Americans should be trusted 100%,' said Hope Muhinuka, an activist from the province. 'It is up to us to capitalize on all we have now as an opportunity.' —- AP writers Edith M. Lederer in New York, Justin Kabumba in Goma, Congo, Ignatius Ssuuna in Kigali, Rwanda, and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
GNU kicked off with newbie DA ministers told they do not just represent their party
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni says political parties have learned from one another in the government of national unity. ANC ministers had to clarify that ministers, especially from the DA, do not just represent their party. On Thursday, Ntshavheni addressed a press conference in Cape Town. In the first year of the government of national unity (GNU), experienced ANC Cabinet ministers had to constantly remind their DA colleagues that they do not only represent their political parties. 'We had to clarify this is not a DA ministry, it's a government ministry,' Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said on Thursday. But one year into the GNU, the Cabinet has gotten over that hurdle and was 'now moving towards working as a government, accepting that the wins of one are the wins of all', added Ntshavheni when she addressed a post-Cabinet briefing in Cape Town on Thursday. Asked how the GNU was working out, she said it was a huge transition for opposition parties. Ntshavheni added they had to go from criticising the government to finding solutions to the country's challenges. 'It's easier to be in the opposition than to be in government because your job is to criticise when you're in opposition. When you're in government, your job is to find solutions to the country's challenges. That realisation made quite an impact on all of us and a commitment for all of us within the government of national unity to find solutions. 'Coalition governments have fallen in their first year, and through the Budget, we almost went there. But like South Africa and our resourcefulness, we worked it out. We now all agreed on the Budget, what it means, and the work that still needs to be done,' she said. Ntshavheni added that ministers also challenged each other about the pace of implementation. 'In the first year, we had to deal with a lot of DA ministers, and we had to clarify … that [you] are not a DA minister, it's a government minister. We are now getting over that; we are moving towards working as a government, accepting that the wins of one are the wins of all and that there's no one department that is insular from the others. No one department can work outside the support of others,' she said. The GNU was seriously jeopardised in February after the ANC and DA disagreed on the Budget. The ANC rejected a DA proposal in which the parties agreed on shared economic policy management. For the DA, which had pinned its support for the Budget on securing such an agreement, the rejection effectively ended talks on the Budget. The DA had told the ANC that if it passed the Budget, it would effectively end the GNU without its support. The ANC openly said it was shopping for votes among other GNU parties and non-GNU ones in Parliament. Despite the hurdles, Ntshavheni said there were several positives. 'We have had to learn to do the consultation, [we looked at] how do you strengthen the mechanisms of engaging both formally in Cabinet and outside of government, but what I can assure all of you is that decisions in Cabinet have never been on a vote. They've been on a consensus basis to show solidarity,' she added. Ntshavheni said although parties worked in the GNU, she knew they were still competing. 'Next year [in the 2026 local government elections] and by-elections, we will continue contesting each other. We win and lose some, but we are all committed to ensuring we grow South Africa. We are committed to ensuring our parties achieve victory in our different parties,' she added.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
El Salvador Police Say Quotas and Rumors Fueled Bukele's Mass Arrests
The police arrested men based on neighborhood gossip or innocent tattoos, the families of those swept up in El Salvador's mass arrests have long claimed. Now, some police officers who were part of President Nayib Bukele's sweeping crackdown on gangs are saying the same thing. Nearly a dozen officers from El Salvador's national police described facing intense pressure to meet arrest quotas, according to a Human Rights Watch report released this week, as well as three officers from that group who spoke directly to The New York Times, and the leader of the country's main group advocating for police officers. The quotas were imposed after Mr. Bukele declared a state of emergency in 2022, which remains in effect today, and oversaw a campaign of mass arrests, the officers and report said. Mr. Bukele's plan resulted in an astounding turnaround for the tiny Central American country, which for decades had been racked by gang violence. El Salvador quickly became one of the safest countries in the region, a feat Mr. Bukele touted at the White House after he imprisoned some of President Trump's deportees. But the officers and police group leader said arbitrary arrests helped drive that turnaround — as did a fear among the police that they, too, could be dragged to jail as gang collaborators if they defied orders. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
