Canada Post strike: Union files labour practices complaint as talks stall
The Canadian Union of Postal Workers has filed an unfair labour practice complaint against Canada Post over ongoing contract negotiations, as the union scrambles to overcome bargaining pushback from both management and its membership.
The union alleges in the complaint to the Canada Industrial Relations Board that the Crown corporation is bargaining directly with members, interfering with the union's exclusive bargaining rights and trying to discredit the union's reputation, all allegations that Canada Post has denied.
Among the union's main concerns are that Canada Post has pointed members to a website that provides updates on negotiations, and is updating offers based on online feedback, in what the union says is an effort to bypass its intermediary role.
The union alleges that the website also uses alarmist wording and misinformation to call into question the reputation of the union and intimidate and coerce union members.
Story continues below advertisement
'The union is asking the CIRB to order Canada Post to stop this interference, level the playing field by giving the union opportunity to rebut the employer's misinformation on their platforms and order damages to the union and members,' said lead negotiator Lana Smidt in a bulletin.
1:46
Canada Post rejects union's call for binding arbitration
The Crown corporation rejects all the allegations, said spokeswoman Lisa Liu.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'Canada Post places a great importance on keeping employees informed, especially on something as important to them as the collective bargaining process.'
She said in the statement that employers are allowed to express views and communicate with employees during collective bargaining.
'Canada Post has exercised this right responsibly, delivering accurate, neutral and factual information. Employees have a right to understand what is being proposed.'
Story continues below advertisement
She said the postal service has at no time negotiated directly with employees and remains fully committed to concluding collective agreements through the proper channels.
In its complaint, the union cited an industrial relations board precedent stating an employer 'may not make inappropriate selling pitches to employees over the head of the union.'
2:19
Nationwide rallies in support of Canada Post workers as tensions rise
It raised further concerns with how Canada Post has released information — via printouts, QR codes on post office TV screens and hand-held data terminals 'accompanied by a sound alarm,' for example — as well as how quickly it has sent out updates publicly after providing them to the union.
The complaint also exposes divisions within the postal ranks and pushback against union strategy.
'Union representatives have been working very hard to reassure regional and local leadership and the membership to counteract the loss of confidence for the union resulting of Canada Post's direct bargaining campaign,' the Tuesday filing reads.
Story continues below advertisement
'A significant amount of their time and focus are now being spent justifying the union's positions instead of working toward the conclusion of collective agreements through bargaining.'
Canada Post and the roughly 55,000-member CUPW have been working to reach a deal for some 18 months.
On Wednesday, Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu called on Canada Post and the union to return to the bargaining table and hash out terms for binding arbitration as well as continue to try to reach a negotiated settlement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Stalemate between Canada Post and workers drags on as union demands feds stay out
GATINEAU — Canada Post says it has failed to make progress in recent talks with the union representing 55,000 postal workers as an increasingly acrimonious impasse drags on. The Crown corporation says the two sides cannot find common ground even on the terms for an arbitration process, which Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu asked the parties to work toward. Canada Post spokeswoman Lisa Liu says the Canadian Union of Postal Workers has effectively refused to recognize a federally commissioned report that called for major reforms to the 158-year-old institution, including more flexible routes and part-time weekend positions with similar pay rates and benefits. She says the two sides exchanged some information on Thursday and Friday through federal mediators, but managed little contact since. Meanwhile, the union called on members to sign a letter to the minister opposing the prospect of a forced vote on Canada Post's 'final offers.' The letter says that such a move — requested by Canada Post — would amount to government interference, tip the scales in the employer's favour and potentially sow division in the ranks of employees. 'The issues will remain contentious among some, most or all of the membership, depending upon how the vote goes,' the Sunday missive states, adding that resulting resentment would undermine labour peace. Union president Jan Simpson hinted at possible rifts within the membership last week, saying in an update that 'although tensions are high, let's not forget our fight is with the employer, not one another.' Canada Post's 'final offers,' presented May 28, include an end to compulsory overtime, signing bonuses of between $500 and $1,000 and cost-of-living payments that are triggered at a lower inflation threshold. Management's earlier offer of a nearly 14 per cent cumulative wage hike over four years remains unchanged, as does a plan to hire part-time staff for weekend parcel delivery — a major sticking point in the talks. Last Wednesday, the jobs minister called on Canada Post and the union to return to the bargaining table and hash out terms for binding arbitration, with the two sides acres apart on key issues. Hajdu also asked the Crown corporation and union to continue to work toward a deal outside of that process in a dual-track approach to reach a new contract. The union backed down from the threat of a strike last month, but imposed an ongoing overtime ban instead on May 23. A strike would mark the union's second work stoppage in six months, after mail carriers went on strike for 32 days at the height of the pre-holiday shipping season in November and December. That action was part of the same contract negotiations at issue now. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June, 9, 2025. The Canadian Press
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. Story continues below advertisement The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
Canada's Competition Bureau sues DoorDash over customer prices
Canada's Competition Bureau is suing food delivery company DoorDash, alleging it misled customers on some prices and offers, including discounts. According to a release, the federal Competition Bureau says its investigation found that consumers ended up paying more than was advertised on the DoorDash website and mobile applications due to additional 'mandatory fees at checkout.' The bureau says this practice is commonly known as 'drip pricing,' and calls it 'deceptive' because the process lacks transparency. In some cases, the bureau says the additional 'fees' may be misclassified to customers as 'taxes.' 'Parliament has made it clear that businesses must not engage in drip pricing by advertising unattainable prices and then adding mandatory fees,' commissioner of competition Matthew Boswell said in a statement. 'Our litigation against DoorDash is another example of our efforts to ensure consumers are not misled and can trust the prices they see online.' Story continues below advertisement In response to Reuters, DoorDash said it did not hide fees from consumers or mislead consumers and that the Competition Bureau was wrong. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We believe that this … is an overly punitive attempt to make an example of an industry leader in local commerce,' it said in a statement. 4:40 Consumer impact as DoorDash raises fees to offset new gig worker wages in B.C. The Competition Bureau notes that changes to the Competition Act in 2022 'explicitly recognize drip pricing as a harmful business practice.' DoorDash isn't the first company that has been put under the microscope by the Competition Bureau. Last year, the Competition Tribunal determined that furniture retailers Leons and The Brick used what it called deceptive marketing for some discount offers, and that Cineplex used similar methods with its online booking fees. Story continues below advertisement The Competition Bureau says it has filed an application with the Competition Tribunal, which will determine the next steps for DoorDash. It's unclear how much DoorDash may have to pay in fines, but the statement says that for close to a decade, the company has acquired 'nearly $1 billion in mandatory fees for consumers.' The Competition Bureau is also requesting that the tribunal force DoorDash to issue 'restitution' to affected customers, although it's not clear yet if or how those customers may be compensated. — with a file from Reuters.
