Netanyahu Planned Iran Strike Months Before Bringing In Trump: Report
The report claims that after Israel dismantled Iran's air defences and severely weakened its proxy Hezbollah in October last year, Netanyahu issued a general order to prepare for a strike. Israeli intelligence began compiling lists of nuclear scientists and military commanders for targeted killings, while the air force launched operations to neutralise air defence systems across Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq.
By March this year, Israeli officials had already decided to strike Iran by June, with or without US involvement, citing concerns that Tehran would soon rebuild its air defences, sources said. This decision reportedly came weeks before Netanyahu met Trump on April 7.
"It is true there was no better time: Israelis have never been more well-practised, and Iran and their proxies have never been weaker," said an Israeli official. "But that's not enough for us to operate. The reason we operated is necessity and understanding there is no alternative."
The June 13 strike was not pushed by fresh intelligence suggesting an imminent Iranian breakout toward a nuclear weapon, but rather by a strategic opportunity to cripple Tehran's nuclear infrastructure while it was vulnerable. In recent interviews, Netanyahu said he made the "difficult" decision months earlier but finalised the timing just two weeks before the attack.
"Those were my instructions. We're going after the scientists, take them out," Netanyahu said on Israeli TV.
Israel's intelligence services spent years tracking the scientists, with Mossad running a covert campaign that involved smuggling kamikaze drones and missile launchers into Iran. The assassination campaign and airstrikes that followed are said to have killed at least 10 top scientists and damaged key elements of Iran's nuclear and missile programmes.
While Israeli officials believed Iranian scientists were quietly resuming work on weaponisation, US intelligence, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, maintained that Iran's leadership had not ordered a nuclear bomb. Trump, however, dismissed that assessment, telling reporters he believed Iran was "very close" to acquiring one.
While the Israeli security establishment largely backed the decision as a "preventive strike", some officials questioned the wisdom of launching an attack while diplomatic talks led by Trump's envoy were ongoing.
"We should have given the political route a chance," said Danny Citrinowicz, a former senior Israeli intelligence official. "We got operational achievements, but the risks are enormous."
Netanyahu has for over 30 years maintained that Iran's nuclear ambitions warrant military intervention. "All the scientists who were sneaking around," said a close adviser to Netanyahu, "most of them are now sneaking around in hell."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
More than 450 people arrested since Trump's Washington, DC, crackdown began
More than 450 arrests have been made since US President Donald Trump declared a public safety emergency in Washington, DC, and activated National Guard troops to assist local law enforcement, Attorney General Pam Bondi said. In a post on X, Bondi said 52 arrests were made Monday night alone, including an alleged MS-13 gang member, and nine guns were recovered. At the direction of @POTUS, our nation's capital is a SAFER place—and we are just getting started. 52 arrests were made last night, including an MS-13 gang member, and 9 firearms were taken off the streets. Since our mission began, there have been a total of 465 arrests, 68… — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) August 19, 2025 FBI Director Kash Patel said the bureau was responsible for 21 of the arrests Monday night along with several gun recoveries and drug seizures. The administration has also begun clearing homeless encampments across the city, citing public safety concerns. In recent days, armoured vehicles have been stationed near monuments and tourist landmarks, while drivers have been subjected to stops along a busy nightlife strip. Police helicopters from the National Park Service have also patrolled the skies. Officials say a total of 800 troops are expected to be deployed in Washington, along with 500 federal law enforcement agents, including the FBI. Since assuming office, Trump has also sent National Guard troops to Los Angeles to suppress protests sparked by Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation raids. Trump has sought to portray Washington, DC, as overrun with violent crime, even though crime levels are at a 30-year low following a surge in 2023, The Guardian reported. He has claimed, without evidence, that the data is being manipulated and that crime rates are actually worse. Democrats in Congress introduced a joint resolution last week condemning what they called 'egregious attacks on DC home rule.' The city also won a modest legal victory when the White House agreed to keep the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under the authority of Chief Pamela Smith.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump, Zelenskyy & Team Europe: White House talks had the right atmospherics. But a solution to the Ukraine War remains complicated
Talks between Trump, Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House have been on the whole positive. Compared to the fiasco in February where the Trump-Zelenskyy meet had devolved into a nasty shouting match, the atmosphere this time was much more friendly. Zelenskyy and Trump appeared to show a united front and there was very important solidarity from European leaders. Coming after the Trump-Putin Alaska summit, this was certainly reassuring. However, there is still some distance to go for a possible solution to the Russia-Ukraine war. Trump completely changed his tune after meeting Putin. Before the meet he had said that he would push for a ceasefire and was ready to use crippling sanctions in case Putin did not agree. After Alaska, he aligned his view with Putin's and said he was now in favour of a peace deal instead of a ceasefire. Plus, he has talked about land swaps between Ukraine and Russia to end the conflict, despite Zelenskyy making it clear that Ukraine's Constitution simply doesn't allow this. Also, why should Ukraine, the victim in this war whose territory has been invaded and captured, be made to agree to the demands of the aggressor? That's like forcing the victim of abuse to accept the abuser. Second, this is not just about Ukraine's security. Europe's security is also at stake. If Russia is rewarded for its aggression and actually given land for peace, what is to prevent Moscow from launching another invasion against Ukraine few years down the road? Zelenskyy is absolutely right that Russia used occupied Crimea and parts of Donbas it captured in 2014 as a launchpad for the full-scale invasion in 2022. If Russia is given the whole swath from Donbas to Crimea, it will have a huge militarised fort in the heart of Europe to launch future military operations. Of course, nobody wants peace more than Ukrainians. They have endured unimaginable suffering. They have lost and sacrificed their best and brightest in this war. Their cities and towns have been relentlessly bombed – they were even bombed while Zelenskyy was meeting Trump. They face daily missile and drone attacks. Ukrainian children have lost a part of their childhood. Russia kidnapped 20,000 Ukrainian children who need to be returned. Hundreds and thousands of kilometres of Ukrainian territory have been mined. The land destroyed. So yes, Ukrainians want the war to stop. But not at the cost of giving up additional Ukrainian land or accepting a temporary pause in the conflict without real security guarantees. Thankfully, security guarantees featured prominently in the White House talks between Trump, Zelenskyy and the European leaders. The bottomline is Ukraine needs to ensure that Russia will never, ever think of launching another invasion. And there are two ways to do this. Either put boots on the ground in Ukraine as part of a multilateral force or give Ukraine the weapons it needs to beat back the Russians. Again positively, Trump indicated that he would be willing to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine. But the details of this are unclear. Third, we need to get the focus back on ceasefire. Russia is using a clever tactic by keeping the war going while appearing to engage in negotiations. The last time this tactic was used was in Afghanistan by the Taliban who refused to stop fighting even during negotiations. We know what happened after that – the US-backed Afghan government collapsed. This can't be allowed to repeat in Ukraine. It's welcome that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz highlighted the ceasefire point forcefully in the Trump meeting. In fact, the ceasefire should be a limit test for Putin's real intentions. If he doesn't agree, that means he has little desire to stop the conflict until he achieves what he wants – total capitulation of Ukraine. His bluff must be called. Also, Italian PM Giorgia Meloni did well to point out that Putin was made to consider negotiations because of the bravery of the Ukrainians on the battlefield who have held the Russian invaders back. In fact, since November 2022, Russia has only managed to occupy just 1% of Ukrainian territory. Taken together, it's good that the White House meet had the right atmospherics and mood. But much work remains to get over the finishing line. Bilateral and trilateral summits are being planned between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin, perhaps within the next two weeks. Zelenskyy is ready. But it's not yet clear if Putin is willing to meet him. The ball is now in Moscow's court. How it plays it should make it amply clear about its real intentions. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Israel demands release of all hostages after Hamas backs new truce offer
A senior Israeli official on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) said the government stood firm on its call for the release of all hostages in any future Gaza deal, after Hamas accepted a new truce proposal. Mediators are awaiting an official Israeli response to the plan, a day after Hamas signalled its readiness for a fresh round of talks aimed at ending nearly two years of war. Mediator Qatar expressed guarded optimism for the new proposal, noting that it was "almost identical" to an earlier version agreed to by Israel. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, a senior Israeli official told AFP the government's stance had not changed and demanded the release of all hostages in any deal. The two foes have held on-and-off indirect negotiations throughout the war, resulting in two short truces during which Israeli hostages were released in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, but they have ultimately failed to broker a lasting ceasefire. Qatar and Egypt, backed by the United States, have mediated the frequent rounds of shuttle diplomacy. Egypt said Monday that it and Qatar had sent the new proposal to Israel, adding "the ball is now in its court". Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said on Tuesday that Hamas had given a "very positive response, and it truly was almost identical to what the Israeli side had previously agreed to". "We cannot make any claims that a breakthrough has been made. But we do believe it is a positive point," he added. - Mounting pressure - According to a report in Egyptian state-linked outlet Al-Qahera News, the latest deal proposes an initial 60-day truce, a partial hostage release, the freeing of some Palestinian prisoners and provisions allowing for the entry of aid. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to publicly comment on the plan, but said last week that his country would accept "an agreement in which all the hostages are released at once and according to our conditions for ending the war". Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi said on social media that his group had "opened the door wide to the possibility of reaching an agreement, but the question remains whether Netanyahu will once again close it, as he has done in the past". Hamas's acceptance of the proposal comes as Netanyahu faces increasing pressure at home and abroad to end the war. On Sunday, tens of thousands took to the streets in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv to call for the end of the war and a deal to free the remaining hostages still being held captive. Of the 251 hostages taken during Hamas's October 2023 attack that triggered the war, 49 are still in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. The new proposal also comes after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to conquer Gaza City, fanning fears the new offensive will worsen the already catastrophic humanitarian crisis in the devastated territory. Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir -- who has staunchly opposed ending the war -- slammed the plan, warning of a "tragedy" if Netanyahu "gives in to Hamas". - 'Unbearable' - Gaza's civil defence agency reported that 31 people were killed Tuesday by Israeli strikes and fire across the territory. Agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP the situation was "very dangerous and unbearable" in the Zeitoun and Sabra neighbourhoods of Gaza City, where he said "artillery shelling continues intermittently". The Israeli military declined to comment on specific troop movements, saying only that it was "operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities" and took "feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm". Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing swaths of the Palestinian territory mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency or the Israeli military. Sabra resident Hussein al-Dairi, 44, said "tanks are firing shells and mortars, and drones are firing bullets and missiles" in the neighbourhood. "We heard on the news that Hamas had agreed to a truce, but the occupation is escalating the war against us, the civilians," he added. Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed at least 62,064 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, which the United Nations considers reliable.
