&w=3840&q=100)
Sebi bars Varyaa Creations, freezes promoters' shares over IPO misuse
The holdings of seven promoter group members have also been frozen until further directions.
Sebi's investigation revealed that over 71 per cent of the IPO proceeds were transferred to third parties under the guise of issue-related expenses, on the instruction of the lead manager.
The market regulator has also restrained Inventure Merchant Banking Services, the lead manager for the IPO, from taking up any new assignment. This is the second merchant banker, after First Overseas Capital, to be restricted this month by Sebi for lapses in SME IPOs. Sebi noted that the modus operandi in both cases was the same.
The company, engaged in manufacturing and wholesale trading of jewellery, was listed on the SME platform of the BSE in April 2024 and raised ₹20 crore. Sebi's probe found that the company had access to only about 30 per cent of the issue proceeds.
Further, the company had also planned to raise ₹35 crore through a rights issue—an amount significantly higher than the ₹20 crore raised through the IPO, and within just 13 months of the initial fundraising. Sebi stated that such a fundraise cannot be permitted while the investigation is ongoing.
The regulator noted that, as the lock-in period for a portion of the promoters' shareholding was set to expire on May 14, immediate action was necessary to prevent them from offloading their shares.
Highlighting several instances of fund diversion in the SME segment, Sebi whole-time member Ashwani Bhatia remarked: 'The task often feels Sisyphean—but when confronted with facts that strike at the very heart of investor protection and market integrity, Sebi's hands are forced. Inaction is not an option.'
Sebi also advised the BSE and NSE to exercise greater care and diligence while permitting listings, stating that such instances are not in the interest of investors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Inox Wind sells Rs 175 cr stake in EPC subsidiary at ₹7,400 cr valuation
Wind energy solutions provider, Inox Wind (IWL), on Tuesday said it has sold a stake worth ₹175 crore in its EPC subsidiary, Inox Renewable Solutions (formerly Resco Global Wind Services), to investors at a valuation of ₹7,400 crore. The company did not disclose who these investors are. This latest development comes after the National Company Law Tribunal approved the merger of Inox Wind Energy (IWEL) into IWL on June 10, 2025, strengthening the company's balance sheet by reducing liabilities by about ₹2,050 crore. Last September, Inox Renewable Solutions had approved a ₹350 crore equity raise from investors for a single-digit stake. Inox Renewable Solutions offers end-to-end services for wind projects right from the conceptualisation stage up to project commissioning, as well as the construction of transmission infrastructure to evacuate power from such projects, offering turnkey solutions to developers on a plug-and-play basis. It provides services across India with a strong presence in Western India. It is developing common infrastructure on the multi-gigawatt scale at sites across the country, to be utilised for future renewable projects. Inox Wind's scrip ended at ₹144.40 up 3.18% on the BSE, Tuesday.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Expansion plans & easing asset woes to lift CreditAccess
ET Intelligence Group: The stock of CreditAccess Grameen has gained nearly 12% over the past eight trading sessions after the country's largest microfinance lender announced the appointment of Ganesh Narayanan as the new managing director and CEO on August 6 after RBI's approval. The sector indices have gained over 1% during the period. The company has undertaken accelerated write-offs to clean up the loan book , which has resulted in higher credit costs. The situation is expected to normalise from the December quarter. Given the company's plan to open 200 branches in the current fiscal year and receding pressure on asset quality , the credit growth is expected to be higher in the second half of the current fiscal year. Dwindling credit quality in the microfinance segment over the past few quarters has affected the performance of CreditAccess. For its overall portfolio, 90-day PAR (portfolio at risk ratio) shot up to 3.3% from 1.1% in the year-ago quarter. The company has suffered a greater asset quality stress in Karnataka, which accounts for nearly one-third of its loan book. The PAR ratio for Karnataka in the 90 days and above category increased to 5.1% in the June quarter from 2.4% in the previous quarter. Live Events According to the company management, Karnataka has started showing stabilisation in PAR in the current quarter. In addition, the implementation of stricter norms for loan disbursement has reduced the proportion of highly leveraged borrowers (which have borrowed from three or more lenders) to 11.4% in June from 25.3% last August. The credit cost increased to ₹571.9 crore in the June quarter from ₹420.1 crore in the September 2024 quarter. This was largely due to accelerated write-offs as the proportion of new PAR accretion in the credit cost fell to 61% from 90% during the period. This raises hope that credit costs may ease in the second half of the current fiscal year. Apart from asset cleanup, the company has also increased focus on retail financing, which is likely to form 12-15% of the loan book by FY28. The segment contributed 7% to the gross loans in the June quarter compared with 3% in the year-ago quarter. Axis Securities expects annual growth in loan book and net profit at 18% and over 50% between FY25 and FY28. It has raised target price to ₹1,485 from earlier ₹1,350, implying FY27 expected price-book multiple of 2.5. Stock was last traded at ₹1,351 on Tuesday on the BSE.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Making India's climate taxonomy framework work
In May this year, the Ministry of Finance released India's draft Climate Finance Taxonomy for public consultation. As a foundational tool, the taxonomy aims to mobilise climate-aligned investments, prevent greenwashing, and clarify for investors which sectors, technologies and practices contribute to mitigation, adaptation, or transition. Importantly, the document calls itself a 'living' framework, adaptable to India's evolving priorities and international obligations. However, its success as a credible governance tool will depend on how it operationalises this principle. The review architecture Herein is a proposed review mechanism that is structured for the taxonomy, drawing from the recent regulatory innovations under the Paris Agreement's Article 6.4 Mechanism. The Article 6.4 Supervisory Body has adopted a legal and editorial review system for climate market instruments. These principles offer a useful reference for India's taxonomy to ensure investor confidence, legal clarity, and domestic-international alignment. The review system for the climate finance taxonomy should function on two complementary levels. First, there must be a periodic review mechanism that allows for timely course correction. These reviews should be annual and triggered by implementation gaps, evolving international obligations, stakeholder feedback, or policy changes. To be effective, they must follow a structured and predictable process, with fixed timelines, clear documentation protocols, and mandatory public consultation. Alongside this, a recurring review should be institutionalised every five years. This deeper, more comprehensive, process would reassess the taxonomy in light of emerging trends in carbon markets, shifts in global climate finance definitions, and lessons learned from sectoral transitions. A five-year cycle corresponds with India's updated Nationally Determined Contributions timeline and the global stocktake process under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Together, these two levels of review would ensure that the taxonomy remains both responsive in the short term and resilient in the long term. The substantive aspect of the review Two key aspects must form the basis of any meaningful review: legal coherence and substantive content clarity. The legal assessment should examine the taxonomy's alignment with India's laws: Energy Conservation Act, SEBI norms, Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, and international obligations. The review should ensure enforceability, remove redundancies, clarify overlaps and harmonise terms. In addition, the review must identify interdependencies between climate finance mandates and other economic or fiscal measures such as green bonds, blended finance schemes, or environmental risk disclosures, so that revisional inconsistencies are avoided. The substantive editorial review must ensure that the taxonomy remains readable, coherent and technically precise. Definitions must reflect evolving market standards and be usable by both experts and non-experts. Where quantitative thresholds exist, for instance, greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency benchmarks, these must be updated with empirical data and stakeholder input. These reviews should ensure the taxonomy remains accessible for micro, small and medium enterprises, the informal sector, and vulnerable communities, crucial for net-zero goals, but which face barriers. It should provide simplified entry points, staggered compliance timelines, and proportionate expectations, especially in agriculture and small manufacturing. Institutionalising accountability To support such a review structure, the Ministry of Finance should establish a standing unit within the Department of Economic Affairs or an expert committee composed of stakeholders from financial regulators, climate science institutions, legal experts and civil society. Public dashboards can be developed to receive inputs, document implementation experiences and publish review reports. These measures will ensure the taxonomy evolves predictably and transparently Annual review summaries and five-year revision proposals must be made available to the public, ideally in a consolidated format, to improve investor confidence and ease of access. This will also enable better coordination with parallel instruments such as India's carbon market mechanisms, disclosure obligations and green bond frameworks. The taxonomy's rollout coincides with critical developments in India's climate finance ecosystem. The Carbon Credit Trading Scheme is expected to be fully operationalised, green bonds are entering mainstream portfolios, including on the stock market, and the pressure to align public investment flows with long-term climate goals is rising. A weak or opaque taxonomy will undercut these efforts. A 'living document' is only as effective as the process that keeps it alive through active review, transparent revision, and structured engagement. It is hoped that such consideration will form a part of the final climate taxonomy framework. Shashank Pandey is a lawyer and a former Research Fellow at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
