logo
Putin will fight to the bitter end, and may bring the whole of Russia down with him

Putin will fight to the bitter end, and may bring the whole of Russia down with him

Telegraph8 hours ago
Vladimir Putin has chosen to continue his bloody war on Ukraine over a more-than-generous peace deal offered to him by Donald Trump. Yet Russia's massed, merciless missile and drone strikes on Kyiv and other major cities, while horrific, cause relatively few casualties.
And Moscow's summer offensive, slowly steamrollering towards the provincial capital of Sumy in the north and forwards along the line of control in Donbas, is yielding just a few square kilometres of advance at the cost of up to a thousand daily casualties.
What, then, can Putin possibly hope to achieve by choosing war over peace? The most likely answer lies inside the information bubble in which Putin and his top cronies dwell. He is continuing the war because his generals and security chiefs have assured him he can win it – or at the least continue to make strategically important gains by fighting on.
One such prize would be to take the city of Sumy, tucked in Ukraine's top right corner, which faces the Russian border just 15 kilometres away on both its northern and eastern flank. At the St Petersburg economic forum last week Putin claimed that 'we don't have a task to take Sumy, but I don't rule it out,' behaving as if he could pick and choose which Ukrainian cities to take at his leisure. In May, a Russian advance seemed to be gathering pace, doubling April's rate of conquest to an average of 5.5 square miles a day. But now, Ukrainians say, Russia's assault on Sumy has been fought to a standstill. For the time being.
Optimists are declaring Russia's summer offensive over. Realists fear that its only getting started. In western Donetsk last week, Russian forces seized a valuable lithium mine near the village of Shevchenko - a blow to Kyiv's long-term development dreams of Western investment in its post-war reconstruction. Russia's next major push may be in Donbas, forcing Ukraine to redeploy its scarce manpower in a nightmarish game of whack-a-mole along a 1200-km long front line.
One mystery is how Putin's war machine continues to function when Russia's forces are so brutally depleted and so appallingly led. Even self-described Russian patriotic military bloggers post daily horror stories of commanders sending troops into bloody 'meat assaults' – and extracting bribes from their men to avoid being sent to their deaths.
Soldiers are punished for minor infractions by public beatings, by being thrown into pits or tied to trees for days. Those who dare complain are 'zeroed out' by murder or by being sent on suicide missions. Russian generals make false claims about taking villages, while terrible transport and logistics on the front lines mean the death of far more wounded soldiers than on the Ukrainian side. The Russian army is a horror show.
Yet even as they criticise individual commanders they still, for the most part, remain pro-war and avoid criticism of Putin. And while despair, desertion and drug abuse may be rife on the front lines, on the home front Russia's morale remains high.
'The Special Military Operation has become like the weather – something distant that you can't do anything about,' says Alexandra Kuptsova, a software engineer from St Petersburg whose husband signed up for the Russian army last year. 'Yeah, prices are high. A coffee in a fancy cafe costs 800 rubles (£9). Mortgage rates are crazy. But everyone says, this will all be over soon … We just need to finish giving the Ukrainians a kicking, Trump will sign a peace, and we can forget this stupid war ever happened.'
The one certainty of this appalling war is that both sides, like exhausted boxers in the ring, continue to pummel one another in the hope that their opponent's strength and resources will be exhausted.
And if attrition is the game, then it's Russia's massively larger economy and manpower that have the advantage. And Putin, ignoring all voices of pragmatism and reason, seems determined to fight on till the bitter end regardless of the price in blood and treasure.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch: Donald Trump says he will ‘take a look' at deporting Elon Musk after bill backlash
Watch: Donald Trump says he will ‘take a look' at deporting Elon Musk after bill backlash

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Watch: Donald Trump says he will ‘take a look' at deporting Elon Musk after bill backlash

Donald Trump has said that he will 'take a look' at deporting Elon Musk after the billionaire reignited their ongoing feud over the US president's tax and spending megabill. Speaking to reporters outside the White House on Tuesday (1 July), the US president was asked whether he would kick Mr Musk out of the country and back to South Africa. 'I don't know,' he replied. 'We'll have to take a look.' His comments come hours after Mr Musk threatened to bankroll primary challenges against Republican lawmakers who support the "Big, Beautiful Bill", which proposes tax breaks and sweeping cuts to healthcare and food programmes.

Fox & Friends yuk it up over Trump Alligator Alcatraz ‘advice': ‘Do not run in a straight line'
Fox & Friends yuk it up over Trump Alligator Alcatraz ‘advice': ‘Do not run in a straight line'

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Fox & Friends yuk it up over Trump Alligator Alcatraz ‘advice': ‘Do not run in a straight line'

The denizens of Donald Trump's favorite morning show Tuesday gleefully applauded the president for advising detainees of the new immigration detention center in Florida to run in a 'serpentine' pattern to avoid getting eaten by alligators. Ahead of the president's Tuesday visit to the migrant camp colloquially known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' the Trump administration has celebrated the remote location in the Everglades swamps as both a way to punish immigrants in this country illegally and to deter further migration into the country. 'There is only one road leading in, and the only way out is a one-way flight. It is isolated and surrounded by dangerous wildlife and unforgiving terrain. The facility will have up to 5,000 beds to house, process and deport criminal illegal aliens,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt breathlessly described the facility Monday. 'This is an efficient and low-cost way to help carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history.' The Department of Homeland Security, meanwhile, fully leaned into the imagery of carnivorous reptiles threatening detained migrants by tweeting an AI-generated meme of alligators wearing ICE caps outside of the Florida prison center. As he prepared to leave the White House to survey the detention camp, Trump was asked Tuesday morning if the intent was for alligators to literally eat escaping detainees, prompting him to respond: 'I guess that's the concept.' Saying 'this is not a nice business,' the president then claimed that 'snakes are fast but alligators aren't' before quipping that detained migrants would be taught to avoid the treacherous wildlife. 'Don't run in a straight line. Run like this,' Trump said, making a zigzag motion with his hand. 'And you know what? Your chances go up about 1 percent. That's not a good thing.' For what it's worth, experts have long recommended running away from alligators in a straight line if attacked, saying 'everything you hear about running in a zigzag line is untrue.' Moments after the president wrapped up his White House lawn gaggle, the hosts of Fox & Friends chuckled over the prospect of imprisoned immigrants running away from hungry alligators and heeding the president's instructions. 'They did ask about Alligator Alcatraz and he said, 'What if someone gets eaten by an alligator?'' Ainsley Earhardt laughed. 'Teach them how to run!' With co-host Brian Kilmeade repeating Trump's zigzagging hand motion while declaring that detainees need to use a 'serpentine' running pattern, Earhardt added that it was because 'alligators can't move quickly.' 'If an alligator's about to chase you, just keep in mind, the president just gave you advice,' Kilmeade continued. 'Do not run in a straight line.' Earhardt, still giggling, reminded her curvy couch colleagues that it would only give the escapees 'a one percent chance' of survival. 'I'll take it,' Kilmeade responded as the rest of the Fox & Friends crew smiled. While the visualization of migrants crammed into a tent city in the middle of a Florida swamp surrounded by alligators and pythons has further energized Trump's core supporters, the president's deportation actions have grown increasingly unpopular among the American public as a whole. According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, 57 percent of registered voters disapprove of the way the president is handling immigration issues. The same survey found 46 percent of respondents didn't approve of the president's immigration policies in January. YouGov's most recent poll also finds the president underwater. After the survey showed the majority of Americans approved of his immigration policies through April, the tide has turned in recent weeks. The late June survey now finds Trump with just a 45 percent approval rating on immigration.

It is time for Britain to help fill the Middle Eastern void left by Russia and Iran
It is time for Britain to help fill the Middle Eastern void left by Russia and Iran

Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

It is time for Britain to help fill the Middle Eastern void left by Russia and Iran

Love him or hate him, I applaud President Donald Trump for lifting all sanctions on the new Syrian government. As someone who has spent a good deal of time in Syria I believe this is a positive step towards peace in the region. In my opinion, this move is Trump's best chance at his elusive but apparently much desired Nobel Peace Prize. With Israel also suggesting it would like to normalise relations with the new government in Damascus, there is a genuine hope for this ancient land – devastated though it is by 50 years of Assad tyranny, amply aided in recent times by Russia and Iran. However it is a shame that our own government is not as forward leaning as the US president, when we have so much opportunity to act. It is six months since I made my first trip to Damascus and Homs after the fall of Assad, and we have still not managed to get our embassy in Damascus open and aid and advice flowing in. Certainly, there appears to be some great work going on by the Syria team at the FCDO, but I've yet to see the Prime Minister in Damascus or any meaningful government money heading that way. We have no British Ambassador working to get this wonderful place back on its feet as a major force for good in the Middle East. A bit of soft power today is better than a whole lot of hard power tomorrow – have our politicians not learnt anything from our adventures in the Middle East over the last few decades? We need to find our inner Lawrence of Arabia, make friends and influence people rather than blowing things to smithereens. With some surprise last month, I read a piece in Russia Today saying that I am to be blamed for the downfall of Assad by exposing his use of chemical weapons to murder his own people. I know for certain I had very little to do with his downfall but I'm delighted if I helped in any way. President Putin is still using chemical weapons today, on an industrial scale, against Ukraine. People can see that Iran's nuclear programme is a danger: so are chemical weapons. The British Syrian diaspora cannot be praised enough in my opinion, and the British government must understand this jewel in the British crown. It was mainly the British Syrians who set up the Idlib Health Directorate, which they are now helping to turn into Syria's National Health Service. It is them, and a few other Brits, who helped set up the White Helmets civil emergency services in Idlib, which is now being replicated across Syria. It is the diaspora who are using their own money and resources to help rebuild Homs and other towns and cities across the country. They can help the British government make a difference in Syria. British soft power and a bit of hard currency will go a long way to rebuilding this genuinely secular place into a moderate, democratic-ish country. If those of us who operated in Syria during the oppressive rule of Assad and the tyranny of the Jihadists are prepared to give the new government a go, that should be a green light for those who stood back and held our coats to wade in now. I am told it is too dangerous to open the embassy in Damascus and the British government has no money. Perhaps it is time for an ambassador in Damascus who doesn't need six months of risk assessments or a squadron of SAS to protect him, who can get a building from the British Diaspora to fly the British flag from, and can probably get the funds to run it for 6-12 months. I can find such a person very easily. Prime Minister? Over to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store