'We Were Promised Justice - We Are Given Betrayal': Survivors Reject Government's Redress Plan
Survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care are speaking out in heartbreak and anger, calling the Government's so-called "improvements" to redress processes a betrayal of everything they were promised.
'For years, we told our stories. We relived our trauma. We put our trust in the system again, believing change would come," said Karl (Chairman of NZCAST)
"But this week, the Government showed us that our trust was misplaced. Instead of creating the independent redress system survivors desperately need, they have chosen to pour money into the same broken processes that caused so much harm.'
The newly released Cabinet paper confirms that no independent redress body will be created at this time. Instead, existing government agencies responsible for past abuses will continue to control the claims process.
'For survivors, this is not just bureaucracy, it is deeply personal,' said Karl.
"Every letter unanswered, every delay, every retraumatizing interaction with the same agencies that failed us before — these are wounds that never heal. Survivors deserve a redress system they can trust, not faster access to more harm."
The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care made it clear: redress must be independent, survivor-centred, and trauma-informed. Survivors are calling for:
The urgent establishment of a new, independent redress body,
An immediate end to agency-controlled settlements, and
A genuine commitment to the spirit of the Royal Commission's findings.
'We will not be silent while the Government rewrites justice on its own terms. Survivors are demanding more than token gestures. We are demanding dignity, honesty, and the redress we were promised.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
34 minutes ago
- Scoop
Government Backs Voluntary Nature Credits
The Government is supporting the expansion of a voluntary credits nature market through the running of pilot projects across New Zealand. Establishing a market that is durable, measurable and transparent will help farmers, landowners, iwi, and conservation groups unlock new income streams for looking after nature on their land, Associate Minister for the Environment Andrew Hoggard announced today at Fieldays. 'We want to connect those caring for the land with investors who support conservation. Nature credit markets help fund trusted environmental projects that actively protect and restore ecosystems.' Mr Hoggard said international and domestic investors—including corporates, banks, and philanthropists—are seeking high-quality nature and carbon credits that meet global standards. The development of a nature credit market is important to investors and New Zealand's reputation. 'New Zealand companies spent millions on carbon and nature credits mainly offshore last year. With the right framework, we can keep more of that investment at home.' The Government moved quickly to repeal the previous Government's direction to Councils to identify and map Significant Natural Areas (SNA) by suspending parts of the National Policy Statement - Indigenous Biodiversity. 'Farmers and other private landowners are doing their part to protect native biodiversity and want to do more. Supporting voluntary natural credits markets is a chance for the Government to show them the carrot, not just the stick. Privately funded pilot projects are underway to test how nature credit markets can work in the New Zealand context. As part of these pilots, we will test the role for Government which may include setting principles, and a framework for standards, to build market confidence and ensure quality.' Further details on the Government's role and the design of the expanded market will be announced in the coming months. Information about voluntary nature credits market pilots The pilots represent different land conditions, locations, types of market participants, and activities. They will help the Government understand how to meet the high standards of international markets, the role of Government, and what works best in New Zealand. This real-life experience will provide valuable insights as we move to the next stage of market design. Te Toa Whenua Northland, led by Reconnecting Northland. Transitioning around 100 ha from exotic forestry to native including pest control on iwi-owned land. Waituna Nature Credits Prototype Southland, led by Whakamana te Waituna Charitable Trust (Awarua Rūnunga, Ngai Tahu, Fonterra, Southland District Council, Environment Southland, and Department of Conservation). Restoring 400 ha of farmland at lagoon margins to lowland forest & wetlands (RAMSAR protected site). Waimanu Forest Gisborne Led by Aratu Forests. Converting a commercial forestry block to 50 ha of natives for biodiversity uplift and increased recreational and educational values. Scope to expand to up to 5,000 ha. Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari insights Waikato, led by Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari. Observing the current process of issuing credits for conservation and protection activities within the 3,360 ha inland ecological sanctuary. Existing Biodiversity Credits Market (BCM) project standard insights Led by Ekos. Offering market insights from an existing BCM provider. Includes understanding the journey of Reconnecting Northland's proof-of-concept project through this process. Adapted nature credits international standards Led by Boffa Miskell. Testing at-place an additional NZ BCM project standard that is adapting UK methodology to NZ environments as a competitor to domestic or international project standard/certification providers. Voluntary carbon market standard with biodiversity safeguards insights Led by AsureQuality. Testing its carbon project standard, which requires native revegetation, designed to be more applicable and affordable for the New Zealand context. Nature positive credit programme pilot Led by Silver Fern Farms. Testing a processor-led programme for market attraction, and potentially third-party investment, in on-farm nature restoration and enhancement activities that support commercial 'nature positive' claims. Nature-based markets pilots for rural landowners Led by Pāmu Farms. Exploring pathways to make nature-based markets accessible to a range of New Zealand farmers and landholders.
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Reserve Bank criticised by Willis over handling of Adrian Orr exit
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has criticised the Reserve Bank for its sharing of information surrounding former governor Adrian Orr's sudden resignation in March, saying the central bank could "have pulled their socks up." The rebuke comes after the bank yesterday released documents revealing Orr quit in March due to a funding dispute with the bank's board and the Government. It was a fact previously not disclosed publicly, with the media and financial observers having received few answers from the central bank's leadership. "I've expressed that I think they could have shared the information they shared yesterday earlier," Willis told reporters at Fieldays today. "I have spoken to their chairperson, Neil Quigley, and expressed my view that they did not manage that Official Information Act request well, and that I expect them to do better. He has acknowledged that they could have and should have done better." ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News) Multiple journalists and financial observers have had Official Information Act request deadlines about the former governor's departure extended over the past few months. The Finance Minister emphasised expectations around transparency from agencies. "It's my expectation that all government agencies comply with their statutory obligations, and wherever possible, are open and transparent with New Zealanders," she said. "Of course, they need to balance that against their legal obligations when it comes to employment discussions and agreements. "But on this one, I think they could have pulled their socks up." In response to the minister's criticism, Quigley acknowledged shortcomings in handling information requests and added he was limited in what he could've said about Orr's resignation when it was first announced in March. ADVERTISEMENT In what it described as a response to numerous Official Information Act (OIA) requests over the resignation, the Reserve Bank revealed yesterday that Orr resigned after disagreeing with the board and Willis over operational funding. Nicola Willis speaks to media at Parliament on May 6. (Source: 1News) Documents show Orr believed the bank needed $1.031 billion over a five-year period, but the board was willing to accept "considerably less." According to the Reserve Bank, this caused "distress" to Orr and led to his personal decision that he "had achieved all he could as governor" and could not continue with less funding than he thought viable for the bank to fulfil its obligations. The bank eventually secured $750 million in operating expenses and $25.6 million in capital expenditure. Bank chairperson 'regrets' information release delays Quigley said he "regrets" not releasing information on Orr's departure sooner. ADVERTISEMENT "The Reserve Bank was late in producing a response to some of the OIAs we received on Adrian Orr's resignation. I regret that this delay occurred," he said in a statement. "The circumstances and the volume of information associated with the OIAs on Adrian Orr's resignation were complex, and we needed to be sure that our consideration of relevant information was comprehensive. Reserve Bank Board Chair Neil Quigley. (Source: 1News) "As well as our obligations under the OIA, we needed to take into careful consideration the former Governor's exit agreement and privacy law. "For this reason, we extended consultation on the information and our response, including review by senior external counsel." He added that he was "limited" in disclosing why the former governor resigned in March. Reason behind resignation finally revealed officially ADVERTISEMENT Orr had served in the role of governor for seven years at the time of his resignation. He left his job three years before his second five-year term was due to end. Willis and bank officials were tight-lipped for months over the departure of one of the Government's most senior public sector bosses. When the former governor's departure was announced on March 5, little reason was provided beyond that it was his "personal decision". Speaking to reporters on the day, the Reserve Bank's board chairperson Neil Quigley was asked directly why Orr had resigned and whether funding issues were behind it. Quigley was also asked whether there were any "policy, conduct or performance issues which are at the centre of this resignation". He responded: "We have issues that we've been working through, but there are no issues of that type that are behind this resignation." But speaking today, the bank's chairperson said he was "limited" over what he could say at the time of the media conference. "On March 5, I was limited in what I could say about the former governor's resignation both by the terms of his exit agreement and the fact that we were still working through finalisation of the detail of the next five-year funding agreement. "We were conscious of the need to explain to staff of the Reserve Bank the potential implications for staffing levels of a lower level of funding and needed time to consider the details of that."
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Launches Petition To Dump Te Mana o te Wai
ACT is at Fieldays this week, garnering farmers' support for the campaign to scrap the vague, spiritual concept of Te Mana o te Wai and allow regional councils to set their own freshwater standards by scrapping national bottom lines. The party has launched a petition at and is collecting signatures on the ground. 'All Te Mana o te Wai achieves is to drive up costs on users and add uncertainty and ambiguity to consenting. ACT believes the Government should scrap Te Mana o te Wai and national bottom lines, allowing regional councils to set their own standards,' says ACT Agriculture spokesperson Mark Cameron. 'The vague concept of 'Te Mana o te Wai' replaces scientific benchmarks with a subjective idea of the mana of the water that leads to co-governance and unequal treatment based on who someone's ancestors were. 'Instead of clear metrics like nitrate levels or sedimentation rates, councils are being asked to assess spiritual values that cannot be measured or contested. 'Kiwi farmers are the best in the world. They're forecast to return $59.9 billion in export revenue and make up 10% of GDP. We simply can't afford to burden them with spiritual malarky dreamed up in Wellington. 'It means iwi have a right of veto over how water is used. The National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management 2020 requires Te Mana o te Wai to apply to the consenting of all projects involving freshwater management. Consenting is now subject to consideration of mauri, or the 'life-force' of water. 'It has led to water users making large one-off and on-going payments for 'cultural monitoring' services which do nothing for the environment but add costs to consumer and business power bills. 'Is requiring farmers to comply with a spiritual concept going to make them farm better? Of course not. It means they'll have to employ a cultural consultant and waste time and money that could instead be spent improving their farming practices. That's what happens when we regulate water quality based on superstition not science. 'Farmers just want to grow food and look after their land, incorporating spiritual concepts isn't necessary for them to do that. 'ACT is dedicated to real change. We cannot continue with a policy that burdens our farmers unnecessarily. We campaigned on a complete overhaul of the NPS-FM to remove subjective concepts and ensure that our freshwater management is scientifically sound and adapted to the needs of local communities. 'New Zealanders never voted for co-governance. Yet under Te Mana o te Wai, it's being imposed on every dam, drain, and ditch. We need to bring common sense back and let farmers farm.'
