Reserve Bank criticised by Willis over handling of Adrian Orr exit
The rebuke comes after the bank yesterday released documents revealing Orr quit in March due to a funding dispute with the bank's board and the Government.
It was a fact previously not disclosed publicly, with the media and financial observers having received few answers from the central bank's leadership.
"I've expressed that I think they could have shared the information they shared yesterday earlier," Willis told reporters at Fieldays today.
"I have spoken to their chairperson, Neil Quigley, and expressed my view that they did not manage that Official Information Act request well, and that I expect them to do better. He has acknowledged that they could have and should have done better."
ADVERTISEMENT
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News)
Multiple journalists and financial observers have had Official Information Act request deadlines about the former governor's departure extended over the past few months.
The Finance Minister emphasised expectations around transparency from agencies.
"It's my expectation that all government agencies comply with their statutory obligations, and wherever possible, are open and transparent with New Zealanders," she said.
"Of course, they need to balance that against their legal obligations when it comes to employment discussions and agreements.
"But on this one, I think they could have pulled their socks up."
In response to the minister's criticism, Quigley acknowledged shortcomings in handling information requests and added he was limited in what he could've said about Orr's resignation when it was first announced in March.
ADVERTISEMENT
In what it described as a response to numerous Official Information Act (OIA) requests over the resignation, the Reserve Bank revealed yesterday that Orr resigned after disagreeing with the board and Willis over operational funding.
Nicola Willis speaks to media at Parliament on May 6. (Source: 1News)
Documents show Orr believed the bank needed $1.031 billion over a five-year period, but the board was willing to accept "considerably less."
According to the Reserve Bank, this caused "distress" to Orr and led to his personal decision that he "had achieved all he could as governor" and could not continue with less funding than he thought viable for the bank to fulfil its obligations.
The bank eventually secured $750 million in operating expenses and $25.6 million in capital expenditure.
Bank chairperson 'regrets' information release delays
Quigley said he "regrets" not releasing information on Orr's departure sooner.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The Reserve Bank was late in producing a response to some of the OIAs we received on Adrian Orr's resignation. I regret that this delay occurred," he said in a statement.
"The circumstances and the volume of information associated with the OIAs on Adrian Orr's resignation were complex, and we needed to be sure that our consideration of relevant information was comprehensive.
Reserve Bank Board Chair Neil Quigley. (Source: 1News)
"As well as our obligations under the OIA, we needed to take into careful consideration the former Governor's exit agreement and privacy law.
"For this reason, we extended consultation on the information and our response, including review by senior external counsel."
He added that he was "limited" in disclosing why the former governor resigned in March.
Reason behind resignation finally revealed officially
ADVERTISEMENT
Orr had served in the role of governor for seven years at the time of his resignation. He left his job three years before his second five-year term was due to end.
Willis and bank officials were tight-lipped for months over the departure of one of the Government's most senior public sector bosses.
When the former governor's departure was announced on March 5, little reason was provided beyond that it was his "personal decision".
Speaking to reporters on the day, the Reserve Bank's board chairperson Neil Quigley was asked directly why Orr had resigned and whether funding issues were behind it.
Quigley was also asked whether there were any "policy, conduct or performance issues which are at the centre of this resignation".
He responded: "We have issues that we've been working through, but there are no issues of that type that are behind this resignation."
But speaking today, the bank's chairperson said he was "limited" over what he could say at the time of the media conference.
"On March 5, I was limited in what I could say about the former governor's resignation both by the terms of his exit agreement and the fact that we were still working through finalisation of the detail of the next five-year funding agreement.
"We were conscious of the need to explain to staff of the Reserve Bank the potential implications for staffing levels of a lower level of funding and needed time to consider the details of that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
30 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
The importance of clear laws shown in impressive evidence from Italy
If New Zealand's laws were as ambiguous, we would be worse off by $20 billion – or about $10,000 per household – every year. What family would not welcome avoiding that? What is 'poorly drafted' law? The researchers used 10 indicators of writing that likely lacks clarity. It assesses each of over 75,000 Italian laws. One measure is sentence length. According to experts, sentences with more than 25 words are likely to be unclear. The authors found that 85% of the millions of sentences in all of this law exceeded 25 words. That might seem staggering for those who do not read law books. Authors of children's books might think it was absurd. Lawyers are likely less surprised, but still disturbed. Greater clarity in drafting should be easy to fix. So why isn't it? The paper's answer lies in law-making imperatives. These include haste, compromise, personal career aspirations and short-term expediency. Ambiguity conceals likely outcomes. It shields blame and defuses critics' attempts to pinpoint a proposed law's problems. Even lawyers cannot be sure how courts will interpret unclear laws. Nor can judges in a lower court be sure about how a higher court will interpret them. This uncertainty creates a cascade of problems throughout the legal system. The authors examined 620,000 Italian Supreme Court judgments between 2004 and 2017. They found 32% of them reversed a decision of a lower court solely on legal grounds The rule of law is a precondition for national prosperity. The law should be clear and accessible. When it is not clear to judges, it cannot be clear to those who must obey it. The paper next assessed the effects on over 700,000 Italian firms of reversed court decisions. It looked, for example, at changes in their investment spending and output growth. This aspect was another exhaustive, path-breaking achievement. It found the adverse effects were significant. The estimated permanent 5% drop in Italian national income encapsulates that. The paper's approach is ingenious, but too complex to explain here. Are New Zealand's laws better drafted in these respects? It would be good to know, because low productivity is holding New Zealanders back. It should be easy to improve drafting quality. The bigger the gains, the more it should be a priority. To better inform this article, I used AI to count the word lengths of sentences in two of New Zealand's acts. From an Italian perspective, the results were encouraging. The proportion of sentences in the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 that exceeded 25 words was 'only' 70%. For the Resource Management Act 1991, it was 53%. Even so, the implication is that most New Zealanders would not find the Resource Management Act (RMA) law clear and accessible. Parliament could be more insistent about improving clarity. The Government's Regulatory Standards Bill would increase this discipline. One part requires the Government to tell Parliament if a bill is unclear and hard to understand – and explain why. Small comfort, but better than nothing. Of course, there is more to good law than just clear drafting. Its content surely matters even more. Prominent symptoms of content problems include unaffordable housing, and infrastructure delays and inadequacies. However, much more is hidden or accepted as 'part of the woodwork'. Content problems have many sources. Public pressure on governments to 'do something' about the latest adverse headline is one source. Appeasing that pressure can be the easiest option. More mundane are the relentless daily calls on ministers to regulate or spend for this or that partisan or public-spirited cause. Such calls often fail to consider the costs to others. The Italian paper acknowledges that content also matters. It cites literature that shows property rights and institutional quality are key determinants of economic prosperity. The RMA is deficient in both respects. It offends almost everyone. The Regulatory Standards Bill also recognises the importance of protecting private property. Ministers must tell Parliament of any grounds for concern but Parliament can ignore this information at will and continues to be supreme lawmaker. (Most public opposition to this bill ignores this limiting aspect.) Greater transparency about these matters could help inform voters. Governments would spend and regulate more judiciously if more voters rewarded them for doing so. This exhaustive Italian research helps make the potential gains more concrete.
Scoop
30 minutes ago
- Scoop
Genesis And Cogo Launch Go Electric Calculator To Help Kiwi Households Cut Costs And Emissions
Press Release – Genesis Based on research conducted by Rewiring Aotearoa, consumers could save up to $3,000 per year in energy costs with changes such as switching to an EV when its time for a new car and replacing old gas appliances with those powered by electricity. Thursday 21 August Genesis has partnered with global carbon management fintech Cogo to launch the Go Electric Calculator, giving Kiwi households an easy way to see how switching to electric can save money, reduce emissions and future-proof their lifestyle. This is the first time a New Zealand energy provider has rolled out Cogo's electrification solution which provides personalised recommendations on energy upgrades for homes and vehicles. With the Go Electric Calculator, Genesis customers can: Receive tailored suggestions based on their property, vehicle and energy use See potential annual savings from switching appliances, adding solar or upgrading to an EV Understand upfront costs and connect directly with trusted local installers and dealers Based on research conducted by Rewiring Aotearoa, consumers could save up to $3,000 per year in energy costs with changes such as switching to an EV when it's time for a new car and replacing old gas appliances with those powered by electricity. Chief Customer Officer at Genesis, Stephen England-Hall, says 'We've made it our mission at Genesis to support customers to make the transition to electrifying their lives. The Go Electric Calculator is a fantastic, easy-to-use tool that quickly reveals how you can save on your overall energy bill and help the planet.' The partnership supports Genesis' Gen35 strategy to support customers to transition to more renewable forms of energy. Cogo founder and CEO, Ben Gleisner says that 'Electrifying our homes and vehicles is one of the most impactful ways New Zealanders can lower costs and reduce their carbon footprint. By working with Genesis, we're making these decisions simpler, faster and more accessible – helping households take action today while preparing for tomorrow.' The Go Electric Calculator is now available on the Genesis website for New Zealand households.
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Retailers upbeat following OCR cut
Talk of lower interest rates has retailers feeling more positive about the economy. Photo: RNZ Shopkeepers might have high hopes for an economic turnaround and better sales, but the data indicates otherwise. Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young said Wednesday's cut to the official cash rate was unlikely to see shoppers flooding retail stores just yet. The Reserve Bank cut its cash rate by 25 basis points to a three-year low of 3 percent, and left the door open for further reductions. Young said the group's latest quarterly report from April to June,showed 62 percent of retailers did not meet their sales targets. But she said talk of lower interest rates had them feeling more positive about the economy. "Businesses are optimistic that we are through the worst of it, but their trading levels aren't showing that they are. Optimism is based on emotion and trading sales figures are based on fact." She said the next six months would be crucial for businesses facing closure and hoped to see the Reserve Bank deliver on more aggressive cuts. Previous OCR drops had not delivered the hoped-for economic boost, she said. Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young. Photo: Supplied "We're not seeing growth, we're not seeing many green shoots, we're seeing businesses that are still being challenged. Businesses closing, laying off staff, doing restructures. We know a lot of retailers are still trading at a loss. "It's a really difficult economic environment. Consumer confidence needs to be higher in order for retail to survive." Young said there was always a lag between rate changes and spending habits, and right now, people were focused on paying for the essentials. Meanwhile, Kelvin Davidson, chief property economist at Cotality, was not expecting any big changes in the housing market following the lowered OCR. He said despite significant falls in the rate over the past year, the housing market had remained flat. "The influence of low mortgage rates is already out there, yet the housing market isn't really responding. "I think what were seeing on the other side of the ledger is restraint from the weak economy and weak labour market, people have lost jobs and even if you've kept the job there's that spillover impact on confidence." Davidson said until there was a shift in the economy and employment rates, the housing market was unlikely to change, and he expected it would remain subdued for the next six to nine months.
