Labour gives update on sickness and disability benefit reforms as spending cuts expected soon
Labour has given a major update on planned reforms to the benefits system as chancellor Rachel Reeves says she 'will not hesitate to act' to cut back on welfare spending.
Her comments come ahead of propsals which are set to outline how the government will overhaul sickness and disability benefits in the UK.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has said more details on the plans are coming in Spring when a green paper on the plans is released – but the chancellor has revealed that more detail will come as soon as this week.
Sharing her plans in the Sun on Sunday, Ms Reeves said she will 'expose how the Conservatives lost complete control of the benefits bill – with a project overspend of more than £8 billion and no action taken to address that.'
'That includes looking closely at the rising cost of health and disability benefits,' she adds. 'This is an urgent problem. It can't be ignored. We can't walk around it, as the Tories did. We've got to grip it, once and for all.'
The chancellor will be making a speech on Wednesday in Oxfordshire, sharing her plans to boost economic growth, with changes to pensions and news on the possible Heathrow airport expansion rumoured. Her latest comments may indicate that the much-anticipated detail on benefit changes will also make the agenda.
The planned changes are understood to focus largely on disability benefits with aims to bring down the number of people who are claiming them. There are now 3.7 million people of working age receiving health-related support – 1.2 million more than in February 2020.
Labour argues that these numbers are untenable, with £56.4 billion forecast to be spent on these benefits for working-age adults in 2024/25 according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has said his government will be 'ruthless' in cutting this expenditure if needed to balance spending.
Changes to the work capability assessment are understood to be central to these plans. This is the key way claimants are found fit or unfit for work, entitling them to benefits at different levels.
The Treasury has committed to match a target made by the previous Conservative government to save £1.3bn through the assesssment reforms. Under those plans, an estimated 450,000 fewer people would have qualifed for health-related benefits, although Labour has said it will re-consult on the detail of the changes.
Also rumoured are changes to the personal independence payment (PIP) and greater DWP powers to tackle benefit fraud.
Disability charities and campaigners have pushed back against Labour's stance on health-related benefits, with a recent report from Pro Bono Economics and anti-poverty charity Z2K finding that the economic value of disability benefits for those in need far outweighs the public cost.
Ayla Ozmen, Director of Policy and Campaigns at Z2K, said: "Removing or reducing hundreds of pounds of vital financial support for disabled people would have a devastating effect. Already over 88 per cent of low-income households on disability benefits can't afford the basics, including food, energy costs, prescriptions and transport to medical appointments. Further cuts will inevitably push people deeper into poverty and leave people in worse health.
"What we need is investment in our social security system, not further cuts to an already threadbare system."
The chancellor's recent comments come after a new review was launched by the DWP to explore how ill and disabled people can be helped to find employment. Led by former John Lewis boss Sir Charlie Mayfield, its findings will be published a few months after Labour shares its plans for disability benefits in the Spring.
Work and Pensions Secretary, Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP, said: 'Millions of people have been left without support to get into work and on at work, and completely held back from reaching their potential for far too long, and the record-high cost of long-term sickness benefits is evidence of that fact.
'That's why I am pleased to have Sir Charlie leading this review, bringing a wealth of experience and helping us to get people into work, and most importantly keep them in work, so we can boost living standards and get our economy growing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump clings to friendly Fox News as Tucker Carlson and the podcast ‘manosphere' sour on his Iran saber rattling
Donald Trump leaned on new media and the conservative-ish podcasting sphere during his 2024 run for the presidency, to great success. This week he may finally leave it behind. As the president continues to flirt openly with the prospect of directly involving the U.S. in war with Iran, an ideological and largely generational divide is emerging within his voting coalition. With traditional conservatives and full-throated supporters of the Israeli government on one side of the gap, many of Trump's other allies — especially younger ones — are siding with the likes of Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and others publicly pushing the president to back down from his saber-rattling. Though Trump has yet to issue the final order, his statements over the past week make it clear which way the president is leaning. On Monday, the president took a telling swipe at Carlson. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen,' said the president. Carlson is no mere Twitter troll. The right-wing podcaster maintains a massive audience on the social media platform where he now hosts his show directly, attracting millions of viewers per episode. But as Carlson and other podcasters increasingly warn that Trump is endangering his own agenda by plotting war, the president seems to be returning to the comparatively friendlier bubble of cable news, especially Fox, to soothe his feelings. The right-leaning network quickly transformed into a cheer squad crowing for war this week, with commentators like Mark Levin, Clay Travis and Kayleigh McEnany all beating the drum in favor of U.S. involvement in Israel's war. Greg Gutfeld, on Monday, battled against the label of 'neoconservative' now being applied to the president by despondent anti-interventionists. 'I think to say he's a 'neocon' is unfair. He wouldn't do this unless he thought it had to be done,' Gutfeld claimed on The Five. 'You kind of have to give him the benefit of the doubt.' Though much of Fox is likely to swing towards whatever decision Trump ends up making, Levin in particular has been vitriolic in his calls for U.S. strikes on Iran and has warred with Carlson on Twitter. Carlson, meanwhile, proved the power of his own brand on Tuesday when he released an excerpt of an interview with Sen. Ted Cruz, one of the loudest congressional voices in the pro-war camp. With rapid-fire questions about Iran's population and ethnic makeup, Carlson made the Foreign Relations committee member look uninformed as the host laughed in the senator's face. Commenters said that Carlson 'humiliated' the senator, who spent much of Wednesday afternoon tweeting angrily about the interview. Though Trump denied as much to reporters Wednesday, there are clear signs of cracks in his base and greater indications that the larger 'manosphere' podcasting community is skeptical of foreign military involvement. In one eyebrow-raising tweet Joe Rogan, who has yet to address the topic on his show, shared a song called 'F*ck a war' Monday evening. Theo Von is another podcaster whose interview with Trump in August of 2024 caused its own considerable amount of hand-wringing on the Harris campaign and broader left. Von regularly takes a skeptical tone towards the political influence of Israel's government in the U.S. and the brutality of its assault on Gaza on his show, including during an interview with Vice President J.D. Vance this month. This week, he was part of the chorus of online content creators calling out war with Iran who normally make up a significant segment of the Trump-friendly media sphere. 'I don't trust the Israeli leader [Benjamin Netanyahu] at all. I don't believe anything that guy says,' said a tense-sounding Von. 'I don't think that our soldiers should have to go and defend stuff that they start.' Congressional Republicans are not rallying (yet) behind a measure introduced by Thomas Massie and several Democrats this week aimed at restricting the president's ability to unilaterally declare war with Iran. But even on the Hill, where many fear a soured relationship with MAGA's overlord, Republicans continue to come out against their party's neoconservatives. 'I call them war pimps,' Tennessee Rep. Tim Burchett told CNN on Wednesday. 'You know, Lindsey Graham's a friend of mine. Ted Cruz is a friend of mine. I just— look, I got a daughter who just turned 18 last week, on the same day as the president did and the United States Army. I don't want to see her go to war.' The skeptics of military intervention on the right know that they are playing a dangerous game. Insulting the president or otherwise angering him could provoke a major and unwanted response, while pushing Trump to one side. At the same time, many are clear that they believe war poses a near-certain risk of throwing the president's agenda — explicitly including his mass deportation strategy — down the drain. Democrats are largely aligned on the issue, even if leadership has once again stayed largely silent on both the Massie resolution and the prospect of assisting Israel with strikes on Iran. John Fetterman found himself once again on an island and explaining himself to critics after telling an interviewer that the president and Israel should finally 'destroy the Iranians'. If Trump does decide to take that path and commit to military involvement, the worried predictions of his 'America First' allies on the far right could very well end up coming true. And the president could spend his final presidential term falling back into the warm, convenient embrace of the same Republicans he ridiculed in 2016, now standing beside him as his last remaining defenders.
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
In the City: Even a Reversal May Not Bring the Ultra-Rich Back
It's no secret the Labour government's policy to tax the UK's wealthiest as part of its effort to fix a budget crisis left by the Conservatives has caused Prime Minister Keir Starmer some headaches. The biggest exodus of wealth in the UK's recent history appears to be underway, and the data shows the departure is likely to be a drain on the economy. But is it enough for Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to change course? And should she? Bloomberg reporter Benjamin Stupples joins host Allegra Stratton to discuss.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves says 'it's not just pensioners who need help' as £150 off energy bills announced
Millions more families will get £150 off their energy bills this winter as Rachel Reeves says 'it's not just pensioners who need help'. More than 3m households on certain means-tested benefits already receive the warm homes discount but around half of those eligible do not get it. That's because the scheme is currently run on a first-come-first-served basis which means millions miss out. The government has announced that, from this winter, everyone eligible for the £150 one-off discount will be paid 'automatically'. READ MORE: Police called after body found in Greater Manchester town READ MORE: Live updates as firefighters called to Greater Manchester blaze and people told to keep doors and windows closed It means more than 6m families will now receive the payment with 280,000 households in North West set to get it for the first time. It comes after the government announced a U-turn on the winter fuel payment restoring it for 7.5m pensioners who lost it last year. Speaking to the Manchester Evening News, the Chancellor said this latest move will put more money in the pockets of families too. She said: "This is a recognition that it's not just pensioners who need help with their bills, absolutely. As a government, we are determined to make ordinary working people better off. "That's why in the spending review last week, we did free school meals for families whose parents or whoever's at home is on Universal Credit which lifts 100,000 children out of poverty. "This is recognising that those people, including many people on Universal Credit in work, struggle with the cost of living and this puts more money into their pockets and we're doing it this winter." The move, which is due to be announced on Wednesday (June 18), means that every billpayer on means-tested benefits will now qualify for the Warm Homes Discount, removing restrictions that previously excluded many families, benefiting 2.7m more households. This includes pensioners who receive Pension Credit and continued to receive the Winter Fuel Payment after it was cut last year. The expansion of the Warm Home Discount will be offset by new 'efficiency savings' across the energy system, including a cut by the energy regulator Ofgem in the operating cost allowance of the price cap for the average billpayer which will take money off bills. Ms Reeves told the M.E.N.: "This isn't going to be adding to anyone's bills and it's not going to be out of taxes. "We've worked with the regulator on reforming the regulation to be able to afford this warm homes discount. "No one will see a rise in their bills because of it and no one will see higher taxes because of it."
