'Ewww:' Is AOL yellow now? Users poke fun at new color scheme that ditched classic blue
AOL's recent transformation has not gone unnoticed.
AOL ditched its classic blue interface, opting for a bright yellow color scheme on its app. It's not immediately clear when the New York-based web portal and online service provider made the change, but it happened. And many who still use AOL aren't all that thrilled.
"I've been a loyal @AOL user since the 90s. Most of my jr high girl drama was carried out over AIM. I've stuck with them even when people give me a hard time about it," Ashlee Hightower wrote in a Monday X post. "But AOL changing the color scheme of their app to yellow might be my jumping off point."
Though the majority of AOL users who voiced their thoughts about the change on social media were anti-yellow, one AOL user does "love" the yellow.
Why? Why @AOL is your icon now bargin bin colored? Why the ultimate saver yellow? I use your service because I like a retro looking email address but now upon opening my phone I see the store brand color of an icon. Gross. Do better, please. pic.twitter.com/exl4IaHbef
— Annie Armywife (@JustLefttheLeft) March 21, 2025
"It seems as though 80% of my apps are blue - the new AOL logo sticks out like a sore thumb," Mike Clark wrote on X Tuesday. Well done. *and yes - I still have AOL."
Apollo Global Management, a private equity firm that purchased AOL from Verizon, did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment about the color scheme change on Friday.
Though the logic or motivation behind AOL's new look isn't clear, the move may have been a nod to the retired "yellow running man" that defined the AOL brand through the mid 2000s, online publication Distractify reported.
JoRoan Lazaro, then-creative director at The Martin Agency in New York and AOL's logo designer, told The Atlantic in 2014 that the inspiration behind the memorable "yellow running man" came from 1940s and '50s postwar American logos and trademarks.
"If you go back to '40s and '50s logos and trademarks, you'll see that there's actually quite a few men that were used − a silhouette that either had curved legs or angular legs and a round head, in addition to the ones that looked quite a bit more stylized or looked really, really human," Lazaro told the publication. "The running man was really inspired by those."
The "yellow running man" was officially retired in 2017.
Current AOL users do not seem to have noticed the connection between the old logo and the new color scheme. See what some AOL users have said about AOL's new look on social media.
Couldn't find my email, @AOL has changed the colour of the logo. pic.twitter.com/UHKXNegIZP
— •Mairead• 🇬🇧✝️🏴 🐸 🇻🇦 (@RayMairead) March 21, 2025
I know it's new, but I just can't with the new AOL color of their logo. Yes, AOL is still a thing. 😛
— Fernando Anguiano (@MyFavoriteVegan) March 21, 2025
They turned AOL app yellow I hate it sooo bad
— ✨Ms.Jay✨ (@Meciaaaaa22) March 19, 2025
Ewww….why did AOL make their app yellow instead of blue?! pic.twitter.com/KKrxEH697r
— Charmion (@Grungekid84) March 15, 2025
Why is aol yellow now @AOL explain
— Maybenoyesok (@mnyo_not_mayo) March 12, 2025
Ok, I am upset!! @AOL changed the color of their logo to yellow and black! Noooo it's blue and white!!! This. Can. Not. Stand. I've had this since the dial up days in 1995. Change it back!!!!
— Sarah Jane 🦄 (@pinktastic615) March 21, 2025
AOL, previously known as America Online, was a computer service company turned internet service provider that got its start in 1985, Time reported.
Eight years later, AOL introduced its own version of electronic mail services, email addresses, a Windows version and access to the rest of the Internet for its users. By 2000, it was the nation's biggest internet provider and worth $125 billion, later merging with Time Warner, according to reporting by Time.
AOL and Time Warner split by 2009 as a result of financial strain from slowing subscriber growth and declining ad revenue, Time reported.
"For me, watching AOL over the last ten years has been hard because in the 90s it really was the dominant company that helped define the internet for so many people, helped bring so many people online for the first time but it's been a struggle," AOL co-founder Steven Case said in a 2010 interview.
AOL continued to "chug along," making money off of its dial-up business and through the acquisition of media properties like the Huffington Post in 2011, Time reported. Verizon purchased both AOL and search engine Yahoo four years later.
AOL and Yahoo are now owned by private equity firm Apollo Global Management.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: The AOL app looks different now. Some users are not happy about it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With 77% ownership of the shares, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE:MTW) is heavily dominated by institutional owners
Institutions' substantial holdings in Manitowoc Company implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders Insiders have bought recently This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. If you want to know who really controls The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE:MTW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Manitowoc Company. Check out our latest analysis for Manitowoc Company Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Manitowoc Company already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Manitowoc Company, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Manitowoc Company. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 9.3% and 5.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Front Street Capital Management, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Aaron Ravenscroft, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name. A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can report that insiders do own shares in The Manitowoc Company, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$397m, and insiders have US$14m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Manitowoc Company. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Manitowoc Company better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Manitowoc Company you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) Ticks All The Boxes When It Comes To Earnings Growth
The excitement of investing in a company that can reverse its fortunes is a big draw for some speculators, so even companies that have no revenue, no profit, and a record of falling short, can manage to find investors. But the reality is that when a company loses money each year, for long enough, its investors will usually take their share of those losses. Loss-making companies are always racing against time to reach financial sustainability, so investors in these companies may be taking on more risk than they should. If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR). While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term, so you'd expect share price to follow earnings per share (EPS) outcomes eventually. So it makes sense that experienced investors pay close attention to company EPS when undertaking investment research. We can see that in the last three years Cullen/Frost Bankers grew its EPS by 12% per year. That growth rate is fairly good, assuming the company can keep it up. Top-line growth is a great indicator that growth is sustainable, and combined with a high earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margin, it's a great way for a company to maintain a competitive advantage in the market. Not all of Cullen/Frost Bankers' revenue this year is revenue from operations, so keep in mind the revenue and margin numbers used in this article might not be the best representation of the underlying business. While we note Cullen/Frost Bankers achieved similar EBIT margins to last year, revenue grew by a solid 5.4% to US$2.0b. That's encouraging news for the company! You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. Check out our latest analysis for Cullen/Frost Bankers Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for Cullen/Frost Bankers. Owing to the size of Cullen/Frost Bankers, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a significant proportion of the company. But we are reassured by the fact they have invested in the company. Indeed, they have a considerable amount of wealth invested in it, currently valued at US$193m. Investors will appreciate management having this amount of skin in the game as it shows their commitment to the company's future. It means a lot to see insiders invested in the business, but shareholders may be wondering if remuneration policies are in their best interest. Our quick analysis into CEO remuneration would seem to indicate they are. For companies with market capitalisations between US$4.0b and US$12b, like Cullen/Frost Bankers, the median CEO pay is around US$8.8m. Cullen/Frost Bankers offered total compensation worth US$6.7m to its CEO in the year to December 2024. That comes in below the average for similar sized companies and seems pretty reasonable. While the level of CEO compensation shouldn't be the biggest factor in how the company is viewed, modest remuneration is a positive, because it suggests that the board keeps shareholder interests in mind. It can also be a sign of a culture of integrity, in a broader sense. As previously touched on, Cullen/Frost Bankers is a growing business, which is encouraging. Earnings growth might be the main attraction for Cullen/Frost Bankers, but the fun does not stop there. With a meaningful level of insider ownership, and reasonable CEO pay, a reasonable mind might conclude that this is one stock worth watching. Now, you could try to make up your mind on Cullen/Frost Bankers by focusing on just these factors, or you could also consider how its price-to-earnings ratio compares to other companies in its industry. Although Cullen/Frost Bankers certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) Is Going Strong But Fundamentals Appear To Be Mixed : Is There A Clear Direction For The Stock?
Pfizer's (NYSE:PFE) stock is up by a considerable 7.5% over the past month. However, we decided to pay attention to the company's fundamentals which don't appear to give a clear sign about the company's financial health. Specifically, we decided to study Pfizer's ROE in this article. ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Pfizer is: 8.7% = US$7.9b ÷ US$91b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.09 in profit. Check out our latest analysis for Pfizer We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics. When you first look at it, Pfizer's ROE doesn't look that attractive. A quick further study shows that the company's ROE doesn't compare favorably to the industry average of 19% either. Therefore, it might not be wrong to say that the five year net income decline of 6.5% seen by Pfizer was probably the result of it having a lower ROE. We reckon that there could also be other factors at play here. For instance, the company has a very high payout ratio, or is faced with competitive pressures. However, when we compared Pfizer's growth with the industry we found that while the company's earnings have been shrinking, the industry has seen an earnings growth of 9.0% in the same period. This is quite worrisome. Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. Is Pfizer fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide. In spite of a normal three-year median payout ratio of 35% (that is, a retention ratio of 65%), the fact that Pfizer's earnings have shrunk is quite puzzling. So there might be other factors at play here which could potentially be hampering growth. For example, the business has faced some headwinds. Additionally, Pfizer has paid dividends over a period of at least ten years, which means that the company's management is determined to pay dividends even if it means little to no earnings growth. Looking at the current analyst consensus data, we can see that the company's future payout ratio is expected to rise to 58% over the next three years. However, Pfizer's future ROE is expected to rise to 17% despite the expected increase in the company's payout ratio. We infer that there could be other factors that could be driving the anticipated growth in the company's ROE. On the whole, we feel that the performance shown by Pfizer can be open to many interpretations. While the company does have a high rate of reinvestment, the low ROE means that all that reinvestment is not reaping any benefit to its investors, and moreover, its having a negative impact on the earnings growth. Having said that, looking at current analyst estimates, we found that the company's earnings growth rate is expected to see a huge improvement. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
