
BMW M5 review: a PHEV worth its weight
Well, until now. There's a lot to like about the newest M5, especially in its corner-carving competence and how it acts around town solely propelled by electrons. But in other areas, this $123,275 super sedan lacks some necessary traits to its class.
The latest BMW M5's exterior styling is bulky. It's common for new cars, especially of the enthusiast-geared variety, to be smaller in real life than they look in press photos. The M5 is one of the few that is actually larger. It looks muscular, and I dig it from the rear three-quarter perspective. But there's no hiding it: this thing is dimensionally massive in every sense of the word.
Inside, the G90 possesses BMW's latest screen and capacitive touch-focused interior design. Its air vents are now the latter, which I never thought would be a thing, but they function well nonetheless and help it stand apart from other high-end European fare. Its dash trim color is customizable, and switching between Road and Sport in its M Mode settings changes this trim to the BMW M colors, too. All controls are laid out in an organized manner, and their touch response is quite good. But first-time BMW drivers may find configuring performance settings and navigating through BMW's iDrive software a tad befuddling at first.
There's a reason for so much heft beneath this latest iteration of BMW's beloved executive express: it sports a 14.8kWh battery, fed by a 7.5kW onboard charger. It provides forward momentum by feeding into the M5's eight-speed automatic gearbox via AC motor and will return as many as 25 miles of range on electrons alone.
When its twin-turbo, 4.4-liter V8 and battery combine forces, acceleration is ferocious. Besides some jerkiness while shifting through gears with the pedal mashed, its acceleration is still ample for daily commuting. Like any PHEV, it's relaxing to cruise around town sans internal combustion, too.
BMW doesn't specifically outline this, but I suspect that the M5's massive weight helps with quicker-than-average energy recuperation. The massive 15.7-inch rotors and multi-piston calipers have their work cut out for them, but they surely send more energy to the relatively small battery pack because of the M5's weight. Tacking on five or even 10 miles was easy in everyday driving, but especially on some fun roads high atop California's San Gabriel Mountains.
With the M5's twin-turbo, 4.4-liter V8 and its AC electric motor attached to the transmission, combined output is rated at 717 horsepower and 738 pound-feet of torque. These specs should equate to a thrilling overall driving experience. It does, yet it also doesn't.
First, the good news: this thing is quite fast and a monster in the corners. It effortlessly pulled out of turns and down straightaways with confidence, and hitting 60 from a standstill takes just 3.4 seconds. It ripped down winding mountain roads with a surprising amount of agility for being on the wrong side of 2.5 tons, exhibiting little body roll and impressive cornering grip. Combine these together, and the M5 is probably one of a few new sedans that can properly give chase to any flavor of mid-engine supercar on a twisty road. Its steering ratio was quite good, albeit overall steering and chassis feel and communication were tremendously vague.
There's a lot to like about the newest M5, especially in its corner-carving competence.
Sadly, the whole experience wears off quickly. In the past, BMW has always been good at getting the sound right with its M cars; its performance-tuned inline-sixes have a quintessential angry howl, and its V8s make their presence known with a deep, bass-filled roar. No matter the exhaust setting (there's technically a quiet and a loud mode), the G90 M5 is simply too muffled, as if it's a subtle reminder that an engine is present, rather than being an active participant in the drama.
Not only that, but doing a burnout is way too difficult to pull off when set to rear-wheel drive. As childish as this may sound, it's a key indicator of any performance car's personality. The previous, F90-generation BMW M5 practically demanded drivers light up its tires — this new model seemingly cowers in fear over the idea of spinning its 295-wide meats faster than necessary in a straight line.
In light of these gripes, it may sound like the latest M5's overall tuning errs more on the side of comfort and restraint than ever before, but its ride quality tells a different story. Even in its most comfortable suspension mode, it's too rigid, and my tester produced some creaks over the Los Angeles Basin's worst stretches of urban blacktop. The F90 was far better in this department.
On the one hand, the 2025 BMW M5 is a fascinating proposition. It has a chill PHEV / muscular sedan demeanor and squabs on twisty roads like nobody's business. But due to its lack of personality and rough ride quality, it feels like a step in the wrong direction.
Then, there's the styling, which is questionable at best — like many other new BMWs, it's becoming harder and harder to chalk this up to acquired taste. The previous F90 generation was a masterclass in a big sedan that knows how to handle itself, always punching above its 4,300-lb curb weight. I was hoping for better in this latest model, but there's not enough for it to be a clear net positive.
Photography by Peter Nelson / The Verge
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing in Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) a year ago would have delivered you a 61% gain
These days it's easy to simply buy an index fund, and your returns should (roughly) match the market. But if you pick the right individual stocks, you could make more than that. For example, the Jupiter Fund Management Plc (LON:JUP) share price is up 50% in the last 1 year, clearly besting the market return of around 6.8% (not including dividends). So that should have shareholders smiling. Having said that, the longer term returns aren't so impressive, with stock gaining just 5.1% in three years. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS). Jupiter Fund Management went from making a loss to reporting a profit, in the last year. When a company is just on the edge of profitability it can be well worth considering other metrics in order to more precisely gauge growth (and therefore understand share price movements). Revenue was pretty stable on last year, so deeper research might be needed to explain the share price rise. The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail). We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. You can see what analysts are predicting for Jupiter Fund Management in this interactive graph of future profit estimates. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Jupiter Fund Management's TSR for the last 1 year was 61%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective It's nice to see that Jupiter Fund Management shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 61% over the last year. Of course, that includes the dividend. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 3% per year over five years. We generally put more weight on the long term performance over the short term, but the recent improvement could hint at a (positive) inflection point within the business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Jupiter Fund Management better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Jupiter Fund Management . If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series?
Electric vehicles promise a lot, including lower emissions, less maintenance and high-end tech. But for everyday drivers, the real question is simpler: How much does it actually cost to run one? Not the sticker price or tax incentives. The monthly cost to keep it moving. Consider the Tesla Model 3 and the gas-powered BMW 3 Series, two well-known sedans with similar performance. One charges up, the other fills up. And when you break down the costs, the gap between them gets surprisingly wide. Check Out: Read Next: Charging a Tesla The Tesla Model 3 rear-wheel drive (RWD) has an EPA-estimated range of 272 miles and a usable battery capacity of 57.5 kilowatt hours (kWh), according to Green Cars Compare. This translates to an efficiency of about 4.61 miles per kWh under ideal conditions. Assuming an average monthly driving distance of 1,200 miles, the Tesla would use roughly 260 kWh of electricity each month. At the current U.S. average residential electricity rate of 17.45 cents per kWh, according to Choose Energy, monthly charging costs come to about $45.37. Using Tesla Superchargers or other public fast chargers, which typically cost between 40 and 60 cents per kWh, will raise the monthly cost accordingly if relied upon frequently. Discover More: How Long Does Charging Take? Charging time depends on how and where it's done, according to the Department of Transportation. Level 1 (120V outlet): Two to five miles of range per hour. A full charge could take 40 to 50 hours — only useful for very light driving. Level 2 (240V home charger): 10 to 20 miles per hour. Fully recharges in about 4 to 10 hours. Tesla Supercharger: A charge to 80% typically takes 20 minutes to an hour, and adds 180 to 240 miles. Fuel Cost for a BMW 3 Series A 2025 BMW 330i averages around 31 miles per gallon combined, according to Edmunds. Driving 1,200 miles per month means buying about 38.7 gallons of gas. At $3.16 per gallon, the national average as of July 2025, that works out to $122.41 per month. Charging a Tesla Model 3 RWD at home costs about $45 per month, while fueling a BMW 3 Series averages around $122 per month. That's $77 in monthly savings, or $924 annually, just on energy expenses if you choose the Tesla over the BMW. Cost Per Mile Tesla: Uses about 0.22 kWh per mile, with a cost of $0.1745 per kWh. This comes out to roughly 3.8 cents per mile. BMW 3 Series: With gas prices around $3.16 per gallon and an average fuel economy of 31 miles per gallon, the cost comes to about 10 cents per mile. Other Cost Considerations Electric vehicles like the Tesla avoid many routine maintenance expenses common to gas cars, such as no oil changes, no spark plugs and no emissions tests. Regenerative braking also extends brake life, reducing replacement frequency. BMW owners typically face higher maintenance and repair costs, especially as the vehicle ages, along with fluctuating fuel prices that can spike unexpectedly. In contrast, electricity prices tend to be more stable and predictable. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series?
Electric vehicles promise a lot, including lower emissions, less maintenance and high-end tech. But for everyday drivers, the real question is simpler: How much does it actually cost to run one? Not the sticker price or tax incentives. The monthly cost to keep it moving. Consider the Tesla Model 3 and the gas-powered BMW 3 Series, two well-known sedans with similar performance. One charges up, the other fills up. And when you break down the costs, the gap between them gets surprisingly wide. Check Out: Read Next: Charging a Tesla The Tesla Model 3 rear-wheel drive (RWD) has an EPA-estimated range of 272 miles and a usable battery capacity of 57.5 kilowatt hours (kWh), according to Green Cars Compare. This translates to an efficiency of about 4.61 miles per kWh under ideal conditions. Assuming an average monthly driving distance of 1,200 miles, the Tesla would use roughly 260 kWh of electricity each month. At the current U.S. average residential electricity rate of 17.45 cents per kWh, according to Choose Energy, monthly charging costs come to about $45.37. Using Tesla Superchargers or other public fast chargers, which typically cost between 40 and 60 cents per kWh, will raise the monthly cost accordingly if relied upon frequently. Discover More: How Long Does Charging Take? Charging time depends on how and where it's done, according to the Department of Transportation. Level 1 (120V outlet): Two to five miles of range per hour. A full charge could take 40 to 50 hours — only useful for very light driving. Level 2 (240V home charger): 10 to 20 miles per hour. Fully recharges in about 4 to 10 hours. Tesla Supercharger: A charge to 80% typically takes 20 minutes to an hour, and adds 180 to 240 miles. Fuel Cost for a BMW 3 Series A 2025 BMW 330i averages around 31 miles per gallon combined, according to Edmunds. Driving 1,200 miles per month means buying about 38.7 gallons of gas. At $3.16 per gallon, the national average as of July 2025, that works out to $122.41 per month. Charging a Tesla Model 3 RWD at home costs about $45 per month, while fueling a BMW 3 Series averages around $122 per month. That's $77 in monthly savings, or $924 annually, just on energy expenses if you choose the Tesla over the BMW. Cost Per Mile Tesla: Uses about 0.22 kWh per mile, with a cost of $0.1745 per kWh. This comes out to roughly 3.8 cents per mile. BMW 3 Series: With gas prices around $3.16 per gallon and an average fuel economy of 31 miles per gallon, the cost comes to about 10 cents per mile. Other Cost Considerations Electric vehicles like the Tesla avoid many routine maintenance expenses common to gas cars, such as no oil changes, no spark plugs and no emissions tests. Regenerative braking also extends brake life, reducing replacement frequency. BMW owners typically face higher maintenance and repair costs, especially as the vehicle ages, along with fluctuating fuel prices that can spike unexpectedly. In contrast, electricity prices tend to be more stable and predictable. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data