Sharjah Police arrest 144 beggars, confiscate Dhs76,000 in Ramadan
As part of their efforts to enhance community security and combat the phenomenon of begging, Sharjah Police revealed the results of 'Begging is a Crime and Giving is a Responsibility' campaign aimed to raise awareness, which involved illegal exploitation of public funds.
Brigadier General Omar Al Ghazal, Director of Special Tasks Department at Sharjah Police, praised the efforts of field teams, which resulted in the arrest of 144 male and female beggars during the Holy Month of Ramadan and the confiscation of over Dhs76,000 found in their possession.
Al Ghazal also appreciated the vital role of the public in reporting beggars and their co-operation with the security authorities to curb this phenomenon by calling 901 or 80040 and identifying their locations, which contributed to the success of the campaign and achieving its desired goals.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
38 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
UAE Football Clubs Back FA Penalties on Khalid Al Dhanhani and Sultan Adil
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai The UAE Football Association has imposed substantial sanctions on Sharjah FC's Khalid Al Dhanhani and Shabab Al Ahli's Sultan Adil, levying fines of Dh500,000 each and domestic bans spanning five matches. Both clubs have expressed full support for the association's decision and announced plans to initiate internal reviews into the conduct of the players involved. The disciplinary measures follow an investigation into conduct deemed inappropriate during recent fixtures in the UAE Pro League. The Football Association's decision signals a firm stance on maintaining discipline and sportsmanship standards in the country's top-tier football competitions. Sharjah and Shabab Al Ahli, two of the UAE's most prominent clubs, have publicly committed to cooperation with the governing body's directives and have vowed to undertake rigorous internal probes aimed at preventing future breaches. ADVERTISEMENT Officials from Sharjah FC described the imposed sanctions as 'just and necessary,' underscoring the club's zero-tolerance policy towards behaviour that undermines the integrity of the sport. Similarly, Shabab Al Ahli representatives reiterated their support for the Football Association's rulings, stressing the importance of upholding the reputation of UAE football on domestic and regional stages. The cases against Al Dhanhani and Adil reportedly involved incidents that breached the association's code of conduct, though specific details about the nature of the violations have been withheld from public disclosure to protect all parties involved. Observers note that the magnitude of the fines and bans reflects the association's increased commitment to enforcing discipline and deterring misconduct in a league that continues to grow in regional prominence. This move aligns with broader efforts by the UAE Football Association to professionalise the sport locally and align with international standards of governance and fairness. The recent enforcement of hefty penalties on high-profile players sends a message to the football community that violations, irrespective of player status, will attract stringent consequences. Inside the clubs, internal investigations are expected to scrutinise not only the incidents leading to the penalties but also the systemic factors that may have contributed to the lapses in conduct. Sharjah and Shabab Al Ahli's initiatives aim to reinforce codes of behaviour, improve player education regarding sportsmanship, and implement monitoring mechanisms to prevent recurrence. The UAE Pro League, which features many international talents alongside local stars, has seen increased scrutiny over player behaviour and match officiating standards in recent seasons. The Football Association's disciplinary committee has stepped up its vigilance to safeguard the league's competitive integrity and enhance its appeal to sponsors and fans alike. ADVERTISEMENT Football experts within the region have welcomed the decisive action taken by the association, noting that maintaining discipline is crucial as UAE clubs seek to compete more effectively in continental competitions such as the AFC Champions League. The implementation of fair play principles is viewed as integral to sustaining the sport's development and nurturing young talent under professional frameworks. While the penalties levied are severe, they also serve as an opportunity for the players to reflect on their professional conduct and align with the expectations set by their clubs and governing bodies. Both Al Dhanhani and Adil remain key figures within their teams, and their return following suspension will likely come with an emphasis on exemplary behaviour. The financial fines represent a significant deterrent, especially in a league where clubs are increasingly investing in player welfare and development. The sanctions highlight the balance sought between disciplinary action and the need to foster a positive competitive environment that encourages respect among players, coaches, and officials. The Football Association's handling of this matter has been consistent with international best practices, reflecting a growing maturity in sports governance within the UAE. Clubs across the league are anticipated to reinforce internal policies and promote awareness to ensure alignment with the standards enforced by the governing body. The disciplinary episode involving Al Dhanhani and Adil has also drawn attention to the broader cultural and professional expectations within UAE football, emphasising accountability and ethical behaviour as non-negotiable elements of athlete performance. As clubs prepare for the next stages of the season, the message from the association and participating teams is clear: professionalism and discipline will be upheld at all costs.
Gulf Today
20 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Abu Dhabi court orders a man to pay Dhs10,000 to the woman he assaulted and robbed
Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative cases Court obligated a man to pay Dhs10,000 to a woman plus a compensation of Dhs3,000 after he had stolen electronic devices and a mobile phone from her, assaulted her and caused her injuries that prevented her from performing her work for no more than 20 days. The woman filed a lawsuit against the man for assaulting her and stealing her belongings. The defendant was convicted based on a lawsuit that was filed against him. In her lawsuit, the victim requested the court to obligate the defendant to pay her the price of the stolen items in addition to Dhs30,000 in compensation for the material and moral harms she sustained and the incurred charges, expenses and lawyer's fees. The court asked her to clarify the contents of the compensation claim and the value of the electronic devices. The plaintiff affirmed that the Dhs30,000 claim included Dhs11,000 as the price of the electronic devices and Dhs19,000 as a compensation for the material and moral harms she had suffered. The court explained that it was evident from the lawsuit in which he was convicted that the defendant had stolen the plaintiff's movable property, which was worth approximately Dhs10,000. The court estimated the price of the stolen goods at Dhs10,000 and ordered the defendant to pay the amount to the plaintiff plus a compensation of Dhs3,000 for the material and moral harms that the plaintiff suffered.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Employee collects Dhs353,000 from client for a property sale, didn't deposit it in firm's account in Abu Dhabi
An employee at a real estate brokerage firm embezzled D353,000 from a client, prompting the Abu Dhabi Family, Civil, and Administrative Claims Court to order him to repay the amount to the company. The employee had received the amount as an initial payment for a residential unit but failed to deposit it into the company's account, leading the company to reimburse the client from its own funds. The company filed a lawsuit demanding the repayment of Dhs353,000, along with 5% interest and legal fees. It explained that the former employee, who had been deported after facing multiple court judgments, had received the cash amount of D353,000 from a client but never remitted it to the company. The court, relying on an expert report confirming the employee's debt, ordered him to repay the amount. Despite being legally summoned, the employee did not appear in court, leading to the court's ruling in favour of the company.
