Sugar import to spike import bill by $280m
This was the consensus of an anecdotal survey carried out by this correspondent. According to market sources the government's import decision will only stabilise the price of the sweetener at the current level of Rs 195-200 per kg rather than decrease it because the landed cost of sugar is projected to cost Rs 155 per kg.
Chairman Cereal Association of Pakistan Muzzammil R Chappal contended that the price of sugar has been stable in the international market for the last 8-9 months and hovering in the range of $560-565 per metric tons and the only hit the government will take is in the shape of tax exemptions.
Sugar import: privatising the profits, socialising the losses
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has exempted Customs duty on the import of 500,000 metric tons of sugar, reduced sales tax rate from 18 percent to 0.25 percent and withholding tax to 0.25 percent on the import of the commodity by the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) and the private sector. The FBR has also exempted 3 percent minimum value added tax (VAT) on the import of sugar as well.
During the last meeting of the Economic Coordination Committee of the Cabinet the Finance Secretary had refused to waive off taxes or give subsidies. Credible reports suggest that the government did not bring the summary to the ECC and got it directly approved from the federal cabinet.
According to source in the Ministry of Finance there is no provision in the budget for this transaction and added that the Secretary Finance apprised the Cabinet that since the Government is under an IMF Programme, it has to apprise the IMF staff about this decision because it involves a large amount of tax exemptions and foreign exchange spending.
Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, overruled the decision of Ministry of Finance in the Cabinet meeting chaired by him. The cabinet subsequently vetted the summary moved by the Ministry of National Food Security, took the decision without discussing the matter as a regular agenda item and approved it through the circulation of the summary. The rules allow the disposal of cases through circulation.
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has raised serious questions about the government's planning and its handling of essential commodities. It noted that on October 11, 2024, the ECC permitted the export of 500,000 tons of 'surplus' sugar. The decision was ratified by the Federal Cabinet, with conditions that included a mandatory production start by November 21 and a strict 90-day window for export completion.
As a result, sugar exports took place between November 2024 and January 2025, during which retail prices hovered between Rs 150 to Rs 165 per kilogram. In this meeting, Ministry of Commerce expressed its concerns arguing that allowing export of sugar will increase its price substantially.
Domestic prices have steadily climbed since then, peaking at around Rs 200 per kg in recent months. The sharp increase has triggered public outrage, with many accusing the government of mismanagement. Critics argue that export of sugar created an artificial shortage in the local market, leading to escalation in price and necessitating costly imports—an economic double whammy for the country.
The CCP noted in its August 2021 order that it had already cautioned against such policy cycles driven by industry influence. The order investigated the conduct of the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) and its members, examining whether collusive practices influenced export decisions and domestic pricing.
The Commission highlighted a troubling pattern in Sugar Advisory Board (SAB) meetings, where PSMA representatives actively pushed for exports even during ongoing crushing seasons. One notable example from 2012 shows PSMA warning that delayed export decisions could reduce profitability due to international market competition—despite abundant domestic supply and falling prices.
The CCP's investigation further concluded that export permissions, while officially sanctioned by the government, were often lobbied for by the industry under the pretext of ensuring payments to farmers and clearing excess stock and noted that there was little evidence to support claims that exports did not impact on local supply or prices. In fact, retail prices remained high even during periods of zero exports — signalling that market manipulation could not be ruled out.
The Commission also ruled that the pricing structure in the sugar market lacks transparency, with significant gaps between ex-mill and retail prices and criticised the government for relying on industry-provided data without an independent verification mechanism, calling it a vulnerability that enables cartel-like behaviour and poor policy decisions.
Former chairman of Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) Iskander Khan while talking to Business Recorder said that the PSMA has nothing to do with Government's decision to import sugar. He said all the sugar mills are well stocked to meet the needs of its industrial and domestic consumers. 'We have stocks of around 0.5 million metric tons which are enough to meet the needs of the next 3-4 months and once the sugarcane crushing starts in November there will be surplus sugar available in the country,' he remarked.
'Sugar industry does not need subsidies or any other favours, it just needs the system of best global practice in place to do its business smoothly and professionally.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Balancing the books and the battlefield: Pakistan's fiscal strategy for FY2025–26—I
On June 10, 2025, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb unveiled Pakistan's federal budget for FY 2025–26, presenting a masterful exercise in fiscal restraint. Total expenditures have been trimmed by 7 percent to Rs 17.57 trillion (USD 62 billion), while defence spending has been augmented by a 20 percent, rising to Rs 2.55 trillion (USD 9 billion). This recalibration reflects the heightened military posture following recent India–Pakistan tensions and is widely perceived as a well-deserved recognition of the Pakistan Army's recent victory in the conflict. Their strategic acumen and operational excellence not only safeguarded national sovereignty but also elevated Pakistan's regional stature. Despite the defence surge, the budget maintains a tight rein on the deficit — targeting around 3.9 percent of GDP, with a forecasted primary surplus of 2.4 percent. Growth is projected at 4.2 percent, a significant recovery from prior stagnation. Inflation is expected to settle between 7–7.5 percent, supported by targeted subsidy removals, fiscal tightening, and administrative price controls. To meet its revenue objectives, the government has committed to robust tax reforms. These include phasing out the non-filer category, digitizing the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), and expanding the withholding tax regime. The goal is to enhance the tax-to-GDP ratio from its current 9.5 percent to a more sustainable 14 percent in the coming years. Muhammad Sheroz Khan Lodhi (Karachi) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
EPQL seeks PD's support for early gas supply from Badar field
ISLAMABAD: The Engro Powergen Qadirpur Limited (EPQL) has approached the Power Division for support in expediting the signing of a Supplementary Agreement (SA) to utilise low-BTU indigenous gas from the Badar-1 gas field. In a letter to the Power Division, EPQL CEO Adeel Qamar stated that the company operates a 225-MW power plant running primarily on permeate gas from the Qadirpur gas field under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) signed with the Central Power Purchasing Agency Guarantee Limited (CPPA-G) on October 26, 2007. Since the commencement of commercial operations in March 2010, the plant has maintained a high position in the Economic Merit Order (EMO) and supplied 18.9 billion units of electricity to the national grid with high gas-based utilisation. Engro Powergen plant: PD and CPPA-G at odds over gas pricing mechanism The EPQL claims that its operations have delivered substantial benefits to electricity consumers and the Government of Pakistan, including: (i) Rs 89 billion in savings through procurement of low-cost electricity;(ii) $1.6 billion in foreign exchange savings by using indigenous gas; and (iii) Rs 96 billion in revenue for fuel suppliers (SNGPL and OGDCL) from the sale of permeate gas that was previously being flared. 'These benefits were only possible due to the extensive cooperation and support from the Government of Pakistan and its departments, including PPIB, CPPA-G, and NTDC,' said Qamar. To address the declining gas supply from Qadirpur and to enhance the plant's utilization, EPQL, in collaboration with stakeholders such as PPIB and CPPA-G, explored alternative fuel sources. As a result, NEPRA, in its determination dated February 20, 2024, approved the use of low-BTU gas from the Badar-1 field as an additional fuel source for the EPQL's operations. Following NEPRA's approval, the EPQL entered into an agreement with Petroleum Exploration Limited (PEL) on August 5, 2024, for the supply of 8–13 mmscfd of low-BTU gas from Badar-1. Subsequently, the EPQL submitted a draft Supplementary Agreement to the PPA for CPPA-G's review on August 26, 2024, after detailed consultations. However, the company says the matter remains unresolved. 'We note with deep concern that, despite a lapse of 10 months, the matter is still pending with CPPA-G, delaying the opportunity for EPQL to generate additional electricity using low-BTU gas from Badar-1,' Qamar stated. EPQL says the infrastructure for gas supply from Badar-1 is fully operational, and off-take can begin immediately upon receiving the necessary approvals. The transaction is structured on a Take-and-Pay basis, meaning gas will only be used if it qualifies under the Economic Dispatch Merit Order. The company estimates that had the approval been granted by October 2024, it could have generated an additional 122 million units of electricity, resulting in:Rs 787 million in potential savings for power consumers, and$9 million in foreign exchange savings. 'We have consistently followed up with CPPA-G and responded promptly to all queries, but the approval remains pending. Given that we are currently in the peak summer season and relying on high-cost imported fuels for electricity generation, it is imperative to finalize the Supplementary Agreement without further delay,' Qamar added. The EPQL has urged the Power Division to facilitate the earliest possible approval to unlock the economic and operational benefits associated with the project. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Sec 21(s) of ITO: FBR yet to issue guidelines
KARACHI: A new provision - Section 21 (s) of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 introduced through the Finance Act 2025 is facing serious implementation challenges as the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has failed to issue necessary guidelines 11 days after the law came into effect (July 1, 2025), raising concerns among tax experts about its practical enforcement. The Finance Act 2025 has inserted Section 21(s) into the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to broaden the tax base and promote a documented economy. Tax experts; however, said that the provision wouldn't be implemented effectively, as the FBR has no mechanism to assess expenditure pertaining specifically to sales made through invoices exceeding Rs 200,000 with cash payments. FBR chief urges Senate body to abolish 7th Schedule of ITO, bring banks into normal tax regime applicable to companies They said the amendment specifically targets expenditure related to sales activities, including freight charges, carriage costs, commission payments, and other distribution-related expenses. The threshold-based system creates a clear distinction between acceptable and penalized transactions. Under the new framework, transactions remain unaffected when payments stay below Rs 200,000. For example, a taxpayer selling goods worth Rs 199,999 through a single invoice and receiving cash payment would face no disallowance since the amount does not exceed the prescribed threshold. However, the penalty mechanism activates when transactions cross the Rs 200,000 mark. In cases where a taxpayer sells goods worth Rs 200,001 through a single invoice and receives cash payment, 50 percent of the claimed expenditure related to that specific sale faces disallowance. If the taxpayer has claimed Rs 30,000 as expenditure directly attributable to such a sale, Rs 15,000 would be disallowed under the provision. 'This section disallows 50 percent of claimed expenditure related to sales where payments exceeding Rs 200,000 are received in cash or through non-banking channels for a single invoice, regardless of whether it covers single or multiple transactions. However, it provides no prescribed method, ratio, or formula to determine the portion of expenditure directly attributable to specific sales exceeding the threshold,' tax experts said. 'The ambiguity opens the door for taxpayers to argue that minimal directly attributable expenditure has been incurred for such sales, potentially undermining the amendment's objectives and leading to revenue loss,' they added. 'Without clear attribution guidelines, businesses may manipulate their expense allocation to minimize the impact of the disallowance provision,' they added. Moreover, they said individuals operate under no statutory obligation to have their accounts audited by certified auditors, while associations of persons with turnover below Rs 300 million are not legally required to undergo professional audits. Therefore, this regulatory gap may create significant practical difficulties in certifying and verifying expenditure attributable to specific sales transactions, they said. 'These enforcement challenges could render the provision ineffective and potentially counterproductive and may inadvertently incentivize businesses to conceal sales transactions rather than comply with documentation requirements, which may contribute to the expansion of the informal economy rather than achieving the intended goal of economic documentation,' tax experts said. Rehan Jafferi, former president of the Karachi Tax Bar Association, delivered sharp criticism of the FBR's approach, describing the introduction of Section 21(s) as constituting 'undue harassment' of existing taxpayers. He said the provision would fail to impact businesses operating outside the tax system, which exclusively deal in cash transactions and maintain no banking relationships. 'This section would not affect those who are out of tax ambit because they deal in cash and have nothing to do with banks,' Jafferi said, adding that the measure did not represent a positive step for the formal economy. He stressed upon systemic reforms rather than punitive measures, suggesting FBR to modernize its monitoring and tracking systems for sales transactions. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
