Uber drivers Are now more concerned about charging than EV cost
When it comes to convincing millions of drivers to get behind the wheel of electric vehicles, Uber Technologies Inc. has good news and bad news.
First, the positive: Prices are coming down to levels at which EV cost is no longer the top issue preventing drivers in the US and UK from going electric. This is a first in the four years Uber has been surveying drivers.
The challenge will be tackling the new No. 1 concern — charging difficulties — especially for a company that depends on drivers who typically lack access to home charging. Just over a third of Uber's current EV drivers in the US have a dedicated home charger. The share is even lower in Europe, at 27% in the UK and 13% in the Netherlands.
Uber does have an ace up its sleeve in mitigating this issue. Last year, the company hired Rebecca Tinucci, the former head of charging infrastructure at Tesla Inc., to oversee its electrification efforts. Nine months into the job, she's brokered a partnership the company expects will improve charging access for 55,000 drivers in London, Boston and Phoenix, and is rolling out a tool to help 40 cities decide on where to locate their next public plugs.
'We've got to get to work,' Tinucci said in an interview. 'As comfortable as I am in the charging space, I fully recognize how difficult it is to do charging well.'
Uber is partnering with London, Boston and Phoenix as part of C40 Cities, a group affiliated with Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent Bloomberg LP.
In addition to contributing technical support, research and policy advocacy to those three cities, the company is launching what it calls an Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Estimator tool that will project future demand for EV charging from Uber drivers. The company is rolling out the service to cities covering almost 60% of EV drivers on the Uber platform.
The tool is more than just in Uber's self-interest.
The name of the game for charging-station operators is driving high utilization. Drivers doing pickups and drop-offs around the clock are just the sort of customer operators are looking for.
'There's an incredible base of demand there that we at Uber should be able to rally in support of developing more infrastructure,' Tinucci said.
Uber already has seen this play out.
Three years ago, the company invested £5 million ($6.73 million) toward installing 700 EV chargers across north and east London. Its chargers in the borough of Newham are being used at more than twice the national average rate.
'The challenge at Tesla was kind of single-focused around Tesla vehicles,' Tinucci said of her previous role. 'What brought me to Uber was the potential for impact. We have the largest EV fleet in the world, and we're just getting started.'
Trudell and Lung write for Bloomberg.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's $4.20 Robotaxi Just Shook Wall Street -- $100 Billion Added Overnight
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) just gave Wall Street a new reason to believe in its AI-first future. On Sunday, the company quietly rolled out a limited fleet of robotaxis in Austin, Texas offering $4.20 flat-fee rides without human drivers. It's the first time real passengers have paid to ride fully autonomous Teslas, and on Monday, the market responded in kind: the stock jumped 10%, adding nearly $100 billion to Tesla's valuation. For Elon Musk, it's a critical pivot away from chasing mass EV adoption, and toward a bet-the-company push into autonomy and robotics. Early reactions? Mixed, but promising. Wedbush's Dan Ives took multiple rides and called the experience comfortable and safe, noting how the car handled narrow roads, traffic, and human unpredictability with striking caution. Influencers on X flooded the feed with real-world footage, showing Teslas navigating tight city blocks and reacting to opening car doors without panic. But it's still early. Just 10 cars, front-seat monitors still present, and a Texas law kicking in this September will require a state permit. Plus, Tesla's camera-and-AI-only approach (no lidar or radar) continues to raise red flags with safety advocates especially in fog, rain, or low sun. If the rally holds, Tesla inches back toward its $1 trillion crown. But the stock's still down 12% in 2024, as investors wrestle with slumping EV demand and the brand baggage of Musk's political takes. And at 149x forward earnings? It's priced more like a moonshot AI play than an automaker. Ford (NYSE:F) trades at 9.3x. Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) sits at 31.6x. That leaves Tesla with a simple but brutal test: can this robotaxi rollout scale fast enough and safe enough to justify the hype investors just bought into? This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's robotaxi: Analyst's two highlights from the launch
Tesla (TSLA) finally launched its highly anticipated robotaxi in Austin, Texas, over the weekend. TD Cowen equity analyst Itay Michaeli says there were two aspects to the launch that went better than expected. Find out what they are in the video above. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Day one does seem like it was successful. There were two aspects of the launch that were better than what we would have expected coming in. The first is where the vehicles actually operated or the operational design domain was larger than what we would have expected and some of the pick up and drop off activity looked pretty impressive for a first day in a robotaxi operation. While it's still premature to draw meaningful big picture conclusions from a single day, but so far a pretty impressive launch and we'll kind of have to monitor it in the weeks and months ahead. How how quickly and aggressively do you think Musk can expand this service across the country? I think their strategy of a measured approach is the right one. Safety is paramount. We've seen situations in the past where robo taxi networks had safety issues and some of them actually shut down as a result of it. It's we want to first and foremost monitor the safety record, rider and stakeholder feedback in the weeks and months ahead. Does the operational design domain expand from where they are currently? Does the fleet size expand from here? But going at it slow, particularly given Tesla's lead relative to other car companies in the autonomous vehicle space, does give them some breathing room to move slowly. And so execution around that is key. I think if all goes well, probably in the next few months, investors will be asking what the next city could be. And for us, we're also really watching what ends up happening to the consumer fleet. Whether maybe an overlooked opportunity frankly in the Tesla autonomous vehicle story to, you know, roll out eyes off FSD features that could both complement the robo taxi fleet and lead to new services and features for consumers that can drive up not only new revenue streams for Tesla, but also vehicle demand itself. In this space Musk has plenty of competition. He's got Waymo and Amazon Zoox is in there, and when your clients are asking you what what you think his competitive advantages are, what do you tell them? Sure. Cost is one of them. Speed is another and the talent they have at Tesla. This is a 1 and a half trillion dollar mobility market in the US. The ride share industry today is only about $60 billion. So we still have a lot more to go. We think Tesla's competitive advantage could really allow them to deploy AVs, both robo taxis and consumer AV features in less dense MSAs, where today the ride share market is not particularly highly penetrated, and because of Tesla's cost advantage because of things like shadow mode validation that they can use from their existing fleet. We think they have an opportunity to launch robo taxis in markets are today less penetrated and complement those with consumer vehicles, and also, of course, lead to new features and services as well. Think of the vehicle getting your deliveries in the middle of the night. Think of dropping you off at the movie theater and picking you up later on. Features that you could charge for and of course, could create an unprecedented proposition for consumer demand across Tesla's vehicles. We know, of course, demand has been more challenging recent quarters. So we look at the AV story is very complementary to the overall EV story and demand story at Tesla, but cost and speed really are key advantages they have today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
FICO to offer credit scores including buy-now, pay-later data
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up AUTOMOTIVE Advertisement Tesla robotaxi videos show speeding, driving into wrong lane A driverless Tesla robotaxi, a ride-booking service, moves through traffic on June 22 in Austin, Texas. Eric Gay/Associated Press Tesla Inc.'s self-driving taxis appeared to violate traffic laws during the company's first day offering paid rides, with one customer capturing footage of a left turn gone wrong and others traveling in cars that exceeded posted speed limits. In a video taken by Rob Maurer, an investor who used to host a Tesla podcast, the Model Y he's riding in enters an Austin intersection in a left-turn-only lane. The Tesla hesitates to make the turn, swerves right and proceeds into an unoccupied lane meant for traffic moving in the opposite direction. A honking horn can be heard as the Tesla re-enters the correct lane over a double-yellow line, which drivers aren't supposed to cross. In two other posts on X, initial riders in driverless Model Ys shared footage of Teslas speeding. A vehicle carrying Sawyer Merritt, a Tesla investor, reached 35 miles per hour shortly after passing a 30 miles per hour speed limit sign, a video he posted shows. In a separate live stream from Herbert Ong, a YouTuber with more than 123,000 subscribers, he commented that the vehicle was going faster than the posted limit of 35 miles per hour. 'It's going at 39 right now, which is perfect, right, because I don't want to drive at 35, and it's driving at the same flow of traffic,' Ong said. 'If everyone else is driving at this speed, you want to be at the same speed.' Representatives for Tesla, the Austin Police Department and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on the videos. The automaker recalled more than 362,000 vehicles in February 2023 after NHTSA said its driver-assistance system may allow cars to infringe on local traffic laws. Chief executive Elon Musk celebrated the start of Tesla's robotaxi operations on Sunday, congratulating employees for what he said was a successful launch. Tesla shares jumped as much as 11 percent on Monday, their biggest intraday jump since April 9. — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement REAL ESTATE Compass sues to stop 'Zillow ban' The Zillow website on a laptop computer. Tiffany Hagler-Geard/Bloomberg Compass, the real estate brokerage that sells more houses than any of its competitors in the United States, has sued Zillow, the country's largest real estate site — in a legal showdown that accuses Zillow of gatekeeping home listings and of breaking federal antitrust laws. In its suit that was filed in New York federal court Monday morning, Compass claims that Zillow is engaged in an anticompetitive conspiracy to maintain a monopoly over digital home listings. Online real estate portals have become an integral part of the homebuying process, with nearly 100 percent of buyers now reporting that they use the internet in their home searches. And Zillow, which has a database with about 160 million properties and receives about 227 million unique visitors every month, is the undisputed giant of digital real estate sites. The lawsuit between two industry heavyweights marks a significant escalation in an ever-raucous debate over who controls home listings. Brokerages like Compass have sought to find ways to make their listings stand out: Since November, the company has been heavily promoting its Private Exclusives, a marketing channel of about 7,000 home listings available only to Compass agents and the buyers working with them. But in April, Zillow announced that any home that was put on the market but not available for listing on Zillow within 24 hours would be forever banned from its site. Compass calls the action the 'Zillow ban.' 'To protect its market dominance, Zillow has retaliated against competitive threats by enacting an exclusionary policy,' Compass claims in its suit. Representatives from Zillow were not immediately available for comment on the lawsuit Monday morning. — NEW YORK TIMES Advertisement HEALTH CARE Lilly drug saves muscle when added to Wegovy weight-loss shot A Wegovy injection pen. Shelby Knowles/Bloomberg Patients who took an experimental drug from Eli Lilly & Co. together with Novo Nordisk A/S's Wegovy maintained muscle while losing weight, offering a potential solution to one of the key problems that's emerged with popular obesity shots. The closely watched study showed that patients on Wegovy combined with bimagrumab lost 22.1 percent of their body weight in 48 weeks, with 92.8 percent of that coming from the body's fat stores, according to results shared Monday at the American Diabetes Association conference in Chicago. Those on Wegovy alone lost 15.7 percent of their weight, with 71.8 percent coming from body fat — indicating more muscle was lost when the experimental drug wasn't included in the regimen. 'This is the result we were hoping for,' said study lead Louis Aronne, a physician who directs the Comprehensive Weight Control Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. The trial was funded by Lilly, which bought bimagrumab for about $2 billion in 2023 from startup Versanis Bio. Lilly is now running additional studies of bimagrumab in combination with its own obesity shot, Zepbound. — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement ENERGY GE Vernova to build service center for small reactors in Ontario A view of GE Vernova headquarters in Cambridge. John Tlumacki/Globe Staff Ontario will have the world's first service center for a new, smaller kind of nuclear plant, as the province embraces a technology that's been touted as a way to meet surging power demand from artificial intelligence. GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy has committed $51 million to build an engineering and service center outside Toronto for small modular reactors. The announcement comes less than two months after Ontario gave the green light to a $15.2 billion project to build such reactors. The service center will be based in the Durham Region east of Toronto, near the Darlington nuclear site where new BWRX-300 reactors will be located. It's expected to add about 300 jobs, according to a statement from the Ontario government. — BLOOMBERG NEWS FINANCE Investors rush to pour cash into $7.4 trillion US money-market fund industry The rush of cash into the US money-market funds is showing few signs of slowing as it secured a record $7.4 trillion in assets. Investors have poured more than $320 billion into the funds so far this year, according to Crane Data LLC, making it one of the biggest benefactors of the Federal Reserve's current monetary policy. That's something of a surprise for those on Wall Street who'd gone into 2025 assuming officials would lower interest rates and sap the attractive returns offered by the industry. The average simple seven-day yield is now 3.95 percent for government funds and 4.03 percent for prime, an 8 basis point spread, according to Bank of America Corp. It's a compelling backdrop as some 600 participants gather at the annual Crane's Money Fund Symposium, which kicks off Monday in Boston. Money funds have seen their coffers swell in recent years, notably in early 2020 for their haven appeal and again as the Fed's rate-hiking cycle boosted yields. Even as the Fed pivoted to cutting rates last year, assets continued to rise, with these funds typically slower to pass along the effects of lower rates when compared to banks. — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement
