Why we shouldn't cheer Earth's growing population
But while acknowledging that coercive measures to reduce population are a thing of the past, he does not mention that, even historically, the majority of these measures were voluntary and based on educating, empowering and providing contraceptive access to women and girls. This works because women choose lower fertility as soon as they are able to. Yet Kennedy ignores the millennia-old history of empires, churches and the military pushing for them to have more children.
He is correct that we should not fear the prospect of immigrants populating rich countries, but wrong that we need them to perform low-wage labour to save us from dire consequences. Alarmist fears of low birthrates are most often spread by the Elon Musks of the world, who have obvious reasons for cheering the cheap labour that comes with population growth. That they are being increasingly parroted by 'liberal' outlets shows that we have lost sight of the lowest- hanging fruit towards taking care of our citizens – taxes that make the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share rather than pressures that push women to have babies they don't want.
In a time of deepening climate change, species extinctions and pollution, and of soaring global inequality where people in high-fertility countries want, and deserve, materially secure lives, we should not be cheering the prospect of billions more humans to add to our already dire ecological and social predicaments. Kirsten StadePopulation Balance
An entire article about overpopulation and no mention of myriad other species that are being wiped out to accommodate us. I'm not sure that any other animals will be left alive when the population peaks 'at about 10.3 billion in the mid-2080s', or if the planet will still be inhabitable.Ron BinghamMuswell Hill, London
Jonathan Kennedy builds on Isaac Asimov's 'bathroom metaphor' to demonstrate the dangers of populist leaders' hostility to immigration. Figuratively speaking, he says they want to keep one bathroom for themselves and force everyone else to share the other one, but that this comes with risks: 'Perhaps the other toilet becomes blocked and the whole flat is inundated with raw sewage.' Right. But this is also what inevitably happens when a limited number of bathrooms are shared with an ever-increasing number of people, even if they are shared equally.
We must absolutely become better at sharing resources, but this won't enable infinite growth on a finite planet. There is nothing 'alarmist' about acknowledging that the Earth has limits. In fact, at our current population size, we've already breached close to seven out of nine critical planetary boundaries.
It's good to see Kennedy acknowledge that today's population movement focuses on women's empowerment: 'Educating women and giving them control over their lives has proved remarkably effective at reducing fertility rates.' Precisely, not to mention that empowering women is morally essential in its own right. So if we can improve lives and at the same time ensure that there are enough 'bathrooms' for everyone to be comfortable and to avoid disasters, why wouldn't we?
Small changes in fertility rates have major impacts on future population sizes. While we are on track for a peak of over 10 billion, the UN's projections also show that if every other woman had one more child than currently expected, our global population would soar to 14.4 billion by 2100, while if every other woman had one fewer child than expected, our global population would decline to 7 billion by 2100. One of these is a lot more compatible with a happy, healthy planet than the other.Olivia NaterPopulation Connection
Jonathan Kennedy acknowledges that current concerns about overpopulation relate to 'climate change, resource depletion and biodiversity loss', but then bewilderingly fails to address any of these issues. An implied cornucopian perspective is taken – these issues do not need to be addressed as either humankind's ingenuity will sort them out or humankind at least will not suffer too much from their effects (with no regard paid to the non-human species that we inhabit the planet with). With humankind currently transgressing at least six of nine planetary boundaries, the cornucopian perspective is a dangerous one and needs to be challenged wherever encountered. Overpopulation needs to be acknowledged as a major challenge to bringing human impacts on our world back within sustainable boundaries.Shane DelphineMelbourne, Australia
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
White House denies Stephen Miller's alleged ‘arrest targets' for ICE agents exist
White House attorneys have denied that the Department of Homeland Security gave ICE agents specific targets for immigrant arrests, despite previous statements from senior advisor Stephen Miller. In a court filing last week, reported by The Guardian, lawyers said that although an advisor may have made the remarks, that 'no such goal has been set as a matter of policy, and no such directive has been issued to or by DHS or ICE.' Miller told Fox News in June that agents had been set a target of a 'minimum' of 3,000 arrests a day, as well as reportedly advising officials to target community hubs, Home Depot parking lots and 7-Eleven convenience stores to find suspects, according to The Wall Street Journal. A report in Axios also detailed a 'tense' meeting attended by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Miller in late May, in which they told senior ICE agents to supercharge arrests in order to hit the 3,000 target. 'DHS has confirmed that neither ICE leadership nor its field offices have been directed to meet any numerical quota or target for arrests, detentions, removals, field encounters, or any other operational activities that ICE or its components undertake in the course of enforcing federal immigration law,' the court filing read. '[The] allegation that the government maintains a policy mandating 3,000 arrests per day appears to originate from media reports quoting a White House advisor who described that figure as a 'goal' that the Administration was 'looking to set.' 'That quotation may have been accurate, but no such goal has been set as a matter of policy, and no such directive has been issued to or by DHS or ICE.' The filing added that, while enforcement of federal immigration law was 'top priority for DHS, ICE, and the Administration,' that all government enforcement activities were based on 'individualized assessments, available resources, and evolving operational priorities – not volume metrics.' Despite this claim, the WSJ previously reported that Miller had asked top ICE officials in June if they believed it was possible to reach one million deportations by the end of the year, citing people with knowledge of the meeting. To achieve this, he told law enforcement to 'just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,' the outlet reported. However, such a hardline stance has been defended previously by the Trump administration, including Donald Trump 's 'border czar' Tom Homan. Last month Homan said that although public safety threats were a priority, those who were in the country illegally were 'not off the table,' in regards to deportation. 'We're gonna enforce immigration law,' he said.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?
Up to one in 20 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who moved here last year, new analysis suggests. It comes after Government statistics last week revealed that the total population of the two nations shot up by 700,000 in 2023/24. Immigration fuelled the surge – the second largest since WW2. The Daily Mail can reveal that net international migration – defined as the difference between the number of people entering the country and leaving – was positive in all but one of 318 councils. Newham, home to roughly 374,000 people, saw an influx of 17,200 immigrants in the year to mid-2024. That suggests new migrants arriving from abroad in the last year now account for 4.6 per cent of the London borough's total population – roughly one in 20 people. Luton (4.3 per cent) and Coventry (4.2 per cent) had similarly high figures, according to estimates published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Experts say current immigration levels, which have hit all-time highs, are piling even greater pressure upon on housing, schools and the NHS. Our postcode search tool - available to use below - shows how the situation in your area has changed over the last 12 months, tracking births and deaths as well as net international migration. Robert Bates, research director at the Centre for Migration Control, said mass migration is 'changing the very fabric of Britain'. He said: 'Assimilation has been made impossible by the sheer scale of mass migration and our national culture is damaged as a result. 'Stretched public services - from the NHS and GP surgeries to public transport and schools - are being further eroded by a low wage, low-skill immigration system. 'Politicians have ignored the concerns of voters due to a misguided belief that open borders benefit the economy. 'We fast need a government which rejects this dogma and starts work to scrap a whole raft of failed visa routes, end foreign nationals' access to the welfare system, and invests in skills for the British workforce.' There were an estimated 61.8m people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up from 61.1m in mid-2023, according to the ONS' estimates. That increase, of 706,881 people, was eclipsed only by the 821,210 population rise in the 12 months to mid-2023, with growth in both years driven almost wholly by record rises in the number of migrants. Some 1.1m people are thought to have immigrated in the last 12 months, countered by the 450,000 believed to have emigrated. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage yesterday claimed the figures were' disastrous for the quality of life for everyone in the country'. There were slightly more births (596,012) than deaths (566,030) in the year to mid-2024, which added just 29,982 to the population. In terms of raw numbers, the biggest local authorities, such as Birmingham (38,700) had the most international migrants arriving. Given the West Midlands city has a population of 1.2million, however, the effects of international migration aren't as stark as they are in Newham. The City of London technically had the highest share of its current population down to international migration in 2024 (10.8 per cent) – although it is home to only 15,000 people. Only one local authority, South Holland in Lincolnshire, experienced a negative sum, due to more international migrants leaving than arriving. The ONS said it had 557 arrivals from abroad last year, but 695 people emigrated. Movement around the UK – known as internal migration – is recorded separately. Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: 'The latest ONS figures are another eye-opener. 'While there is no breakdown of migration into nationality, sex, age or immigration status - as the ONS should do in the future - overall, the population of England and Wales increased by over 700,000 (the equivalent of Newcastle.) 'Just 30,000 of this was from births exceeding deaths.' Mr Mehmet also branded the government's response to the rising rates as 'complacent'. He said: 'Most worrying, these latest figures show that the speed with which the nature of our society is changing has not let up, and that the ethnic minority proportion of our population will become the majority in 30-35 years. 'The government must take decisive action to stem the immigration tsunami if we are not to become the island of strangers the Prime Minister referred to a few months ago.' The ONS cautions there might be some overlap in the data, although it is unclear by how much because of the difficulties in examining population flow. For example, the same person could be classed as both an international immigrant and internal emigrant. They could also die, further confusing the picture. Tory shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said the data showed the population is rising at 'an unsustainable pace'. She said: 'This isn't about numbers on a spreadsheet, it's about pressure on housing, NHS waiting lists, school places, wages and it's about community and our culture. 'Britain simply cannot plan or build fast enough to keep up. 'We must secure our borders and deliver a fair and sustainable immigration system that works for the British people.' However Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said yesterday the figures 'confirm the truth of the Tory legacy on immigration'. She added: 'Their failed open borders experiment resulted in net migration quadrupling to a peak of almost a million per year in 2023 even as they promised it would fall. 'Since the election, net migration has come steeply down, and as part of the Government's Plan for Change we have set out new measures in the Immigration White Paper and have already changed immigration rules to bring net migration down further. 'To be successful, effective and fair, our immigration system must be properly controlled and managed. Out of the chaos and failure of the Tory past, that is what this Government will deliver.' Keir Starmer unveiled a crackdown on immigration in May, warning that failure to control the system risked turning Britain into an 'island of strangers'. Downing Street was forced to deny angry comparisons from MPs that it was an echo of Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Scrambling to blunt the threat of Reform, Sir Keir has vowed to give voters what they had 'asked for time and time again' as he announced a package to 'take back control of our borders'. However, the month after the speech Sir Keir went on to say he 'deeply regretted' it, despite polling showing most Brits had no problem with the language used. His package of long-awaited policies to curb immigration involved a hiking of the skills threshold for immigrants and a toughening of the rules on fluency in English. Migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes. Policymakers estimate the Government's package will bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. It comes after Sir Keir signed a deal with French president Emmanuel Macron in a desperate attempt to solve the small boat Channel crisis. The Prime Minister and his French equivalent announced a 'one in, one out' migrant swap deal, although it was far less ambitious than expected.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Daughter of priest, 20, is arrested by ICE for overstaying her religious visa for two years
A Purdue University student and the daughter of a pioneering Episcopal priest has been arrested and placed in expedited deportation proceedings after attending what was supposed to be a routine immigration court hearing. Yeonsoo Go, 20, who arrived in the US from South Korea in 2021 on an R-2 visa, was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on July 31 outside the federal courthouse at Federal Plaza in Manhattan. The move has ignited fury across faith communities, civil rights groups, and Korean American advocacy organizations. Go's attorney insists her visa is active and valid through the end of this year, while the Department of Homeland Security says it expired more than two years ago. 'She was with her mother. She was heartbroken. And when she called me at night, later that day, she was breaking down,' said her boyfriend, Leo Chu to Fox 5. 'She was terrified. She didn't know what would happen next.' Go, a graduate of Scarsdale High School in Westchester County, moved to America when she accompanied her mother, the Rev. Kyrie Kim, a trailblazing Episcopal priest and first woman ordained in the Seoul Diocese of the Anglican Church of Korea, to New York under a dependent visa. Her attorney and family say her stay was legally extended in 2023 and that she is lawfully enrolled at Purdue University. Her next court date had already been scheduled for October, but ICE agents were waiting outside the courtroom. According to advocacy groups and church leaders, five plainclothes officers surrounded Go and detained her immediately after the judge adjourned her hearing. No warrant was presented at the scene, and she was not given the opportunity to speak further with her attorney before being taken away. 'This is simply an incomprehensible situation,' her mother, Rev. Kim, told Yonhap News Agency. 'I've been active in protecting the rights of Korean immigrants through the New Sanctuary Coalition, but I never imagined that my own family would become a target.' 'She was supposed to return to school,' said boyfriend, Chu. 'Now we don't know what's going to happen.' The family have set up a GoFundMe to help with expenses. Officials with the Department of Homeland Security offered a starkly different version of events. 'Yeonsoo Go, an illegal alien from South Korea, overstayed her visa that expired more than two years ago,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. 'President Trump and Secretary Noem are committed to restoring integrity to the visa program and ensuring it is not abused to allow aliens a permanent one-way ticket to remain in the US. ICE arrested her on July 31 and placed her in expedited removal proceedings.' But her attorney and supporters say that assertion is false. No warrant was presented at the scene, and Go was not given the opportunity to speak further with her attorney before being taken away 'She has a valid visa that expires in December 2025, and she has a pending application for extension,' said a legal representative for Go. 'The judge was satisfied enough to continue the case until October. There was no indication that she was to be taken into custody.' Since her arrest, Go has been held in an ICE holding facility at 26 Federal Plaza, a building that clergy say is unfit for human confinement. 'Her mother receives regular calls from Yeonsoo, and she's being held at 26 Federal Plaza, which, as we know, is not a facility with showers, beds or hot meals,' said Rt. Rev. Matthew Heyd, bishop coadjutor of the Episcopal Diocese of New York. 'These detentions are not only illegal - they're immoral.' Go's mother, devastated and unable to visit her daughter, said ICE told her Yeonsoo may be transferred to a separate detention facility, but refused to disclose when or where. The incident has triggered an immediate wave of protests and condemnation from across the religious and immigrant rights landscape. On Saturday, faith leaders, elected officials, and immigration advocates stood shoulder-to-shoulder outside the ICE building in lower Manhattan to demand her release. 'We call for the end of weaponization in our courts,' Bishop Heyd declared to a crowd of supporters and reporters. 'We stand up for a New York and a country that respects the dignity of every person.' The New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC) joined the Episcopal Diocese of New York and the Interfaith Center of New York to organize the press conference. Posters demanding Go's release were plastered on the courthouse fence, alongside flowers and handwritten notes of support from local high school classmates. 'Her fears have come true,' said Gabriella Lopez, a friend of Go's. 'She's been nervous about this, especially given the climate. And now this is happening - to her, to her family. It's terrifying.' Murad Awawdeh, president and CEO of NYIC, warned others with pending hearings to be vigilant. 'I think it's critically important that anyone who needs to go to an immigration court hearing call the New York State Office of New Americans and their hotline,' Awawdeh said. 'Make a family preparedness plan. If possible, work with a lawyer to set up a virtual hearing.' Korean American community leaders say the episode is part of a disturbing trend of rising enforcement actions targeting Korean nationals regardless of their legal status. Lee Myung-seok, president of the Korean American Association of Greater New York, called the arrest 'a clear violation of human rights' and vowed to file a formal letter requesting Go's immediate release. South Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has also stepped in, stating that its diplomatic missions in the U.S. are providing consular support to Go. 'We are engaging in necessary communication with the US side regarding this issue,' a ministry official told The Korea Times. The case echoes the recent detention of Tae Heung Will Kim, a Korean green card holder and Texas resident who was taken into custody at San Francisco International Airport last month. Kim, a Ph.D. student, was held at the airport for more than a week before being transferred to an ICE facility in Arizona. His family has not received information about his condition or location. As outrage builds, activists are demanding urgent federal oversight and accountability for what they say is a pattern of unjustified enforcement.
