'We have to take advantage of this the best way we can': Barnaby moves on
As the dust settled on the May 3 election, it was perhaps the divorce many saw coming: The Nationals walking away from their Coalition partner, the Liberals.
Member for New England Barnaby Joyce sees this as an opportunity for The Nationals - a time to focus on policy development as the Nats bide their time until the next federal election.
Mr Joyce confirmed he took part in the meeting, which ultimately resulted in The National's call to walk away from their Coalition partnership, but would not be drawn on how he voted on the issue.
"I will not say whether I did or did not support the move because once people start doing that, you take away the rights of other people to keep their position confidential - and that is so important," he said.
Mr Joyce indicated The Nationals now had a great capacity to articulate an independent message away from party-room constraints, where seats in urban capital cities had to also be appeased.
"We have to take advantage of this the best way we can," he said.
"Rather than say I've got to start working out how to get closer to Bellevue Hill, I have to get closer to Moonbi Hill."
Mr Joyce said this meant focusing on the issues which were more important to "the people of Tamworth, Emmaville, Weabonga or Muswellbrook".
"In the short term we are in opposition, so I don't think [the split] has much effect to be honest - I think it is more good for the development of policy," he said.
"We are in opposition, and solidly in opposition, and have to work with the reality there is a Labor government.
"I have already started reaching out to key people in the Labor Party to congratulate them on their win and to build bridges so we don't get left behind, that [New England] gets looked after as best as we can in the political circumstances we find ourselves in."
Mr Joyce said the political circumstances were "none of [The Nationals] doing, we all did a pretty good job".
"In New England, we went well - we went from a very good position to an even better position," he said.
"I hope people reflect on why that is the case in a time when we are both running our own show in trying to rebuild in such a form as we can regain the confidence of the Australian people."
Mr Joyce underwent surgery for prostate cancer on May 5, and while he's still under doctor's orders not to travel, he has returned to work.
He said the operation was "a complete success", and he was gradually getting back into the swing of things.
On Monday, May 19, Mr Joyce was spotted attending a sale in Tamworth and a funeral in town, before heading to the office.
Doctors have advised Mr Joyce not to fly yet, and as he's not keen on sitting in a car for the 800-kilometre trip to Canberra, his constituents across the New England can expect to see much more of their federal member in the coming weeks.
While speaking with the Leader, Mr Joyce also addressed some comments which had been circulating since news of his surgery broke, indicating he should have mentioned the cancer surgery before the election.
"I absolutely would have if the doctor had said this is really serious and there is a possibility you could die," he said.
"I would have resigned."
As the dust settled on the May 3 election, it was perhaps the divorce many saw coming: The Nationals walking away from their Coalition partner, the Liberals.
Member for New England Barnaby Joyce sees this as an opportunity for The Nationals - a time to focus on policy development as the Nats bide their time until the next federal election.
Mr Joyce confirmed he took part in the meeting, which ultimately resulted in The National's call to walk away from their Coalition partnership, but would not be drawn on how he voted on the issue.
"I will not say whether I did or did not support the move because once people start doing that, you take away the rights of other people to keep their position confidential - and that is so important," he said.
Mr Joyce indicated The Nationals now had a great capacity to articulate an independent message away from party-room constraints, where seats in urban capital cities had to also be appeased.
"We have to take advantage of this the best way we can," he said.
"Rather than say I've got to start working out how to get closer to Bellevue Hill, I have to get closer to Moonbi Hill."
Mr Joyce said this meant focusing on the issues which were more important to "the people of Tamworth, Emmaville, Weabonga or Muswellbrook".
"In the short term we are in opposition, so I don't think [the split] has much effect to be honest - I think it is more good for the development of policy," he said.
"We are in opposition, and solidly in opposition, and have to work with the reality there is a Labor government.
"I have already started reaching out to key people in the Labor Party to congratulate them on their win and to build bridges so we don't get left behind, that [New England] gets looked after as best as we can in the political circumstances we find ourselves in."
Mr Joyce said the political circumstances were "none of [The Nationals] doing, we all did a pretty good job".
"In New England, we went well - we went from a very good position to an even better position," he said.
"I hope people reflect on why that is the case in a time when we are both running our own show in trying to rebuild in such a form as we can regain the confidence of the Australian people."
Mr Joyce underwent surgery for prostate cancer on May 5, and while he's still under doctor's orders not to travel, he has returned to work.
He said the operation was "a complete success", and he was gradually getting back into the swing of things.
On Monday, May 19, Mr Joyce was spotted attending a sale in Tamworth and a funeral in town, before heading to the office.
Doctors have advised Mr Joyce not to fly yet, and as he's not keen on sitting in a car for the 800-kilometre trip to Canberra, his constituents across the New England can expect to see much more of their federal member in the coming weeks.
While speaking with the Leader, Mr Joyce also addressed some comments which had been circulating since news of his surgery broke, indicating he should have mentioned the cancer surgery before the election.
"I absolutely would have if the doctor had said this is really serious and there is a possibility you could die," he said.
"I would have resigned."
As the dust settled on the May 3 election, it was perhaps the divorce many saw coming: The Nationals walking away from their Coalition partner, the Liberals.
Member for New England Barnaby Joyce sees this as an opportunity for The Nationals - a time to focus on policy development as the Nats bide their time until the next federal election.
Mr Joyce confirmed he took part in the meeting, which ultimately resulted in The National's call to walk away from their Coalition partnership, but would not be drawn on how he voted on the issue.
"I will not say whether I did or did not support the move because once people start doing that, you take away the rights of other people to keep their position confidential - and that is so important," he said.
Mr Joyce indicated The Nationals now had a great capacity to articulate an independent message away from party-room constraints, where seats in urban capital cities had to also be appeased.
"We have to take advantage of this the best way we can," he said.
"Rather than say I've got to start working out how to get closer to Bellevue Hill, I have to get closer to Moonbi Hill."
Mr Joyce said this meant focusing on the issues which were more important to "the people of Tamworth, Emmaville, Weabonga or Muswellbrook".
"In the short term we are in opposition, so I don't think [the split] has much effect to be honest - I think it is more good for the development of policy," he said.
"We are in opposition, and solidly in opposition, and have to work with the reality there is a Labor government.
"I have already started reaching out to key people in the Labor Party to congratulate them on their win and to build bridges so we don't get left behind, that [New England] gets looked after as best as we can in the political circumstances we find ourselves in."
Mr Joyce said the political circumstances were "none of [The Nationals] doing, we all did a pretty good job".
"In New England, we went well - we went from a very good position to an even better position," he said.
"I hope people reflect on why that is the case in a time when we are both running our own show in trying to rebuild in such a form as we can regain the confidence of the Australian people."
Mr Joyce underwent surgery for prostate cancer on May 5, and while he's still under doctor's orders not to travel, he has returned to work.
He said the operation was "a complete success", and he was gradually getting back into the swing of things.
On Monday, May 19, Mr Joyce was spotted attending a sale in Tamworth and a funeral in town, before heading to the office.
Doctors have advised Mr Joyce not to fly yet, and as he's not keen on sitting in a car for the 800-kilometre trip to Canberra, his constituents across the New England can expect to see much more of their federal member in the coming weeks.
While speaking with the Leader, Mr Joyce also addressed some comments which had been circulating since news of his surgery broke, indicating he should have mentioned the cancer surgery before the election.
"I absolutely would have if the doctor had said this is really serious and there is a possibility you could die," he said.
"I would have resigned."
As the dust settled on the May 3 election, it was perhaps the divorce many saw coming: The Nationals walking away from their Coalition partner, the Liberals.
Member for New England Barnaby Joyce sees this as an opportunity for The Nationals - a time to focus on policy development as the Nats bide their time until the next federal election.
Mr Joyce confirmed he took part in the meeting, which ultimately resulted in The National's call to walk away from their Coalition partnership, but would not be drawn on how he voted on the issue.
"I will not say whether I did or did not support the move because once people start doing that, you take away the rights of other people to keep their position confidential - and that is so important," he said.
Mr Joyce indicated The Nationals now had a great capacity to articulate an independent message away from party-room constraints, where seats in urban capital cities had to also be appeased.
"We have to take advantage of this the best way we can," he said.
"Rather than say I've got to start working out how to get closer to Bellevue Hill, I have to get closer to Moonbi Hill."
Mr Joyce said this meant focusing on the issues which were more important to "the people of Tamworth, Emmaville, Weabonga or Muswellbrook".
"In the short term we are in opposition, so I don't think [the split] has much effect to be honest - I think it is more good for the development of policy," he said.
"We are in opposition, and solidly in opposition, and have to work with the reality there is a Labor government.
"I have already started reaching out to key people in the Labor Party to congratulate them on their win and to build bridges so we don't get left behind, that [New England] gets looked after as best as we can in the political circumstances we find ourselves in."
Mr Joyce said the political circumstances were "none of [The Nationals] doing, we all did a pretty good job".
"In New England, we went well - we went from a very good position to an even better position," he said.
"I hope people reflect on why that is the case in a time when we are both running our own show in trying to rebuild in such a form as we can regain the confidence of the Australian people."
Mr Joyce underwent surgery for prostate cancer on May 5, and while he's still under doctor's orders not to travel, he has returned to work.
He said the operation was "a complete success", and he was gradually getting back into the swing of things.
On Monday, May 19, Mr Joyce was spotted attending a sale in Tamworth and a funeral in town, before heading to the office.
Doctors have advised Mr Joyce not to fly yet, and as he's not keen on sitting in a car for the 800-kilometre trip to Canberra, his constituents across the New England can expect to see much more of their federal member in the coming weeks.
While speaking with the Leader, Mr Joyce also addressed some comments which had been circulating since news of his surgery broke, indicating he should have mentioned the cancer surgery before the election.
"I absolutely would have if the doctor had said this is really serious and there is a possibility you could die," he said.
"I would have resigned."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
China shows coast guard capability to Pacific nations
China is taking further steps towards high seas boarding of fishing boats in the Pacific for the first time, risking tensions with Taiwanese fleets and US Coast Guard vessels that ply the region, Pacific Islands officials say. The Chinese Coast Guard demonstrated the capabilities of one of its largest ships, used to enforce maritime law in the Taiwan Strait, to Pacific Island ministers last week. It is also actively involved in debates on the rules of high seas boarding, according to documents and interviews with Pacific fisheries officials. The fisheries officials said it was anticipated China will soon begin patrols in a "crowded" fisheries surveillance space. "Hosting the leaders, demonstrating their capabilities in terms of maritime operations, those kind of things are indications they want to step into that space," said Allan Rahari, director of fisheries operations for the Forum Fisheries Agency, told Reuters. The agency runs enforcement against illegal fishing for a group of 18 Pacific Island countries, with assistance from navy and air force patrols by Australia, the United States, France and New Zealand. The biggest fishing fleets in the Pacific, attracting the most infringement notices by inspectors, are Chinese and Taiwanese. But China is also the largest fisheries partner to some Pacific Island countries, and Rahari said agreements for Chinese coast guard patrols in coastal waters could be struck under security deals with these countries. China registered 26 coast guard vessels with the Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in 2024 for high seas boarding and inspections in a vast region where the US and Australia have the biggest inspection fleets. The commission has not received a notification from China that it has conducted any inspection, but Chinese officials have become active in debate over the rules on boardings, WCPFC executive director Rhea Moss-Christian told Reuters. China last year called for a review of the guidelines, and in March, Chinese officials attended a video meeting about an Australian-led effort to strengthen voluntary rules, she said. WCPFC inspectors in international waters need to gain permission for each inspection from the suspected vessel's flag state before boarding. Rahari said it could be "very complicated" diplomatically if a Chinese coast guard vessel sought to board a Taiwanese fishing boat. Beijing does not recognise Taiwan as a separate country. Chinese officials and the Chinese Coast Guard did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Australia declined to comment, while Taiwan and the US Coast Guard did not respond to requests for comment. Papua New Guinea (PNG) foreign minister Justin Tkatchenko said 10 Pacific Island ministers saw the Chinese coast guard demonstrate a maritime emergency drill, but told Reuters they did not discuss Pacific patrols. PNG is negotiating a new defence treaty with Australia, and struck a 2023 security deal with the United States allowing the US Coast Guard to patrol PNG's 2.7 million square kilometre exclusive economic zone. Fiji said it had approved a new maritime security agreement with Australia this week. Under a security treaty struck in December, Nauru must notify Australia before the Chinese navy comes to port. The US Coast Guard has maritime law enforcement agreements with a dozen Pacific Island nations allowing it to enter nations' exclusive economic zones, and increased its patrols last year. "The key considerations for China is stepping into that space without stepping on other partners toes, because that will then create conflicts within the region and that is something we don't want," Rahari said. China is taking further steps towards high seas boarding of fishing boats in the Pacific for the first time, risking tensions with Taiwanese fleets and US Coast Guard vessels that ply the region, Pacific Islands officials say. The Chinese Coast Guard demonstrated the capabilities of one of its largest ships, used to enforce maritime law in the Taiwan Strait, to Pacific Island ministers last week. It is also actively involved in debates on the rules of high seas boarding, according to documents and interviews with Pacific fisheries officials. The fisheries officials said it was anticipated China will soon begin patrols in a "crowded" fisheries surveillance space. "Hosting the leaders, demonstrating their capabilities in terms of maritime operations, those kind of things are indications they want to step into that space," said Allan Rahari, director of fisheries operations for the Forum Fisheries Agency, told Reuters. The agency runs enforcement against illegal fishing for a group of 18 Pacific Island countries, with assistance from navy and air force patrols by Australia, the United States, France and New Zealand. The biggest fishing fleets in the Pacific, attracting the most infringement notices by inspectors, are Chinese and Taiwanese. But China is also the largest fisheries partner to some Pacific Island countries, and Rahari said agreements for Chinese coast guard patrols in coastal waters could be struck under security deals with these countries. China registered 26 coast guard vessels with the Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in 2024 for high seas boarding and inspections in a vast region where the US and Australia have the biggest inspection fleets. The commission has not received a notification from China that it has conducted any inspection, but Chinese officials have become active in debate over the rules on boardings, WCPFC executive director Rhea Moss-Christian told Reuters. China last year called for a review of the guidelines, and in March, Chinese officials attended a video meeting about an Australian-led effort to strengthen voluntary rules, she said. WCPFC inspectors in international waters need to gain permission for each inspection from the suspected vessel's flag state before boarding. Rahari said it could be "very complicated" diplomatically if a Chinese coast guard vessel sought to board a Taiwanese fishing boat. Beijing does not recognise Taiwan as a separate country. Chinese officials and the Chinese Coast Guard did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Australia declined to comment, while Taiwan and the US Coast Guard did not respond to requests for comment. Papua New Guinea (PNG) foreign minister Justin Tkatchenko said 10 Pacific Island ministers saw the Chinese coast guard demonstrate a maritime emergency drill, but told Reuters they did not discuss Pacific patrols. PNG is negotiating a new defence treaty with Australia, and struck a 2023 security deal with the United States allowing the US Coast Guard to patrol PNG's 2.7 million square kilometre exclusive economic zone. Fiji said it had approved a new maritime security agreement with Australia this week. Under a security treaty struck in December, Nauru must notify Australia before the Chinese navy comes to port. The US Coast Guard has maritime law enforcement agreements with a dozen Pacific Island nations allowing it to enter nations' exclusive economic zones, and increased its patrols last year. "The key considerations for China is stepping into that space without stepping on other partners toes, because that will then create conflicts within the region and that is something we don't want," Rahari said. China is taking further steps towards high seas boarding of fishing boats in the Pacific for the first time, risking tensions with Taiwanese fleets and US Coast Guard vessels that ply the region, Pacific Islands officials say. The Chinese Coast Guard demonstrated the capabilities of one of its largest ships, used to enforce maritime law in the Taiwan Strait, to Pacific Island ministers last week. It is also actively involved in debates on the rules of high seas boarding, according to documents and interviews with Pacific fisheries officials. The fisheries officials said it was anticipated China will soon begin patrols in a "crowded" fisheries surveillance space. "Hosting the leaders, demonstrating their capabilities in terms of maritime operations, those kind of things are indications they want to step into that space," said Allan Rahari, director of fisheries operations for the Forum Fisheries Agency, told Reuters. The agency runs enforcement against illegal fishing for a group of 18 Pacific Island countries, with assistance from navy and air force patrols by Australia, the United States, France and New Zealand. The biggest fishing fleets in the Pacific, attracting the most infringement notices by inspectors, are Chinese and Taiwanese. But China is also the largest fisheries partner to some Pacific Island countries, and Rahari said agreements for Chinese coast guard patrols in coastal waters could be struck under security deals with these countries. China registered 26 coast guard vessels with the Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in 2024 for high seas boarding and inspections in a vast region where the US and Australia have the biggest inspection fleets. The commission has not received a notification from China that it has conducted any inspection, but Chinese officials have become active in debate over the rules on boardings, WCPFC executive director Rhea Moss-Christian told Reuters. China last year called for a review of the guidelines, and in March, Chinese officials attended a video meeting about an Australian-led effort to strengthen voluntary rules, she said. WCPFC inspectors in international waters need to gain permission for each inspection from the suspected vessel's flag state before boarding. Rahari said it could be "very complicated" diplomatically if a Chinese coast guard vessel sought to board a Taiwanese fishing boat. Beijing does not recognise Taiwan as a separate country. Chinese officials and the Chinese Coast Guard did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Australia declined to comment, while Taiwan and the US Coast Guard did not respond to requests for comment. Papua New Guinea (PNG) foreign minister Justin Tkatchenko said 10 Pacific Island ministers saw the Chinese coast guard demonstrate a maritime emergency drill, but told Reuters they did not discuss Pacific patrols. PNG is negotiating a new defence treaty with Australia, and struck a 2023 security deal with the United States allowing the US Coast Guard to patrol PNG's 2.7 million square kilometre exclusive economic zone. Fiji said it had approved a new maritime security agreement with Australia this week. Under a security treaty struck in December, Nauru must notify Australia before the Chinese navy comes to port. The US Coast Guard has maritime law enforcement agreements with a dozen Pacific Island nations allowing it to enter nations' exclusive economic zones, and increased its patrols last year. "The key considerations for China is stepping into that space without stepping on other partners toes, because that will then create conflicts within the region and that is something we don't want," Rahari said. China is taking further steps towards high seas boarding of fishing boats in the Pacific for the first time, risking tensions with Taiwanese fleets and US Coast Guard vessels that ply the region, Pacific Islands officials say. The Chinese Coast Guard demonstrated the capabilities of one of its largest ships, used to enforce maritime law in the Taiwan Strait, to Pacific Island ministers last week. It is also actively involved in debates on the rules of high seas boarding, according to documents and interviews with Pacific fisheries officials. The fisheries officials said it was anticipated China will soon begin patrols in a "crowded" fisheries surveillance space. "Hosting the leaders, demonstrating their capabilities in terms of maritime operations, those kind of things are indications they want to step into that space," said Allan Rahari, director of fisheries operations for the Forum Fisheries Agency, told Reuters. The agency runs enforcement against illegal fishing for a group of 18 Pacific Island countries, with assistance from navy and air force patrols by Australia, the United States, France and New Zealand. The biggest fishing fleets in the Pacific, attracting the most infringement notices by inspectors, are Chinese and Taiwanese. But China is also the largest fisheries partner to some Pacific Island countries, and Rahari said agreements for Chinese coast guard patrols in coastal waters could be struck under security deals with these countries. China registered 26 coast guard vessels with the Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in 2024 for high seas boarding and inspections in a vast region where the US and Australia have the biggest inspection fleets. The commission has not received a notification from China that it has conducted any inspection, but Chinese officials have become active in debate over the rules on boardings, WCPFC executive director Rhea Moss-Christian told Reuters. China last year called for a review of the guidelines, and in March, Chinese officials attended a video meeting about an Australian-led effort to strengthen voluntary rules, she said. WCPFC inspectors in international waters need to gain permission for each inspection from the suspected vessel's flag state before boarding. Rahari said it could be "very complicated" diplomatically if a Chinese coast guard vessel sought to board a Taiwanese fishing boat. Beijing does not recognise Taiwan as a separate country. Chinese officials and the Chinese Coast Guard did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Australia declined to comment, while Taiwan and the US Coast Guard did not respond to requests for comment. Papua New Guinea (PNG) foreign minister Justin Tkatchenko said 10 Pacific Island ministers saw the Chinese coast guard demonstrate a maritime emergency drill, but told Reuters they did not discuss Pacific patrols. PNG is negotiating a new defence treaty with Australia, and struck a 2023 security deal with the United States allowing the US Coast Guard to patrol PNG's 2.7 million square kilometre exclusive economic zone. Fiji said it had approved a new maritime security agreement with Australia this week. Under a security treaty struck in December, Nauru must notify Australia before the Chinese navy comes to port. The US Coast Guard has maritime law enforcement agreements with a dozen Pacific Island nations allowing it to enter nations' exclusive economic zones, and increased its patrols last year. "The key considerations for China is stepping into that space without stepping on other partners toes, because that will then create conflicts within the region and that is something we don't want," Rahari said.
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘When there's smoke there's fire': US beef imports from external countries must be ‘ruled out'
Nationals Leader David Littleproud says the potential of US imports of beef from places like Mexico and Canada needs to be ruled out 'immediately' by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. 'He needs to make sure that he is very clear with Australian producers that our biosecurity standards will not be reduced,' Mr Littleproud told Sky News Australia. 'I don't think Australian producers are asking for anything unfair here.'
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Australia should not ‘relinquish' biosecurity standards for US
Nationals Leader David Littleproud claims Australia does not 'fear competition' amid the trade talks on beef with US President Donald Trump. 'We don't fear the fact of us competing with the US beef that's already coming into Australian markets,' Mr Littleproud told Sky News Australia. 'What we do fear is a drop in biosecurity standards that would pose a biosecurity risk that could damage our herd, cost Australian farmers billions. 'We have the best biosecurity in the world … we shouldn't relinquish that to anybody.'
