
Teen behind hit-and-run death to be deported
The New Zealand-born man was 17 when he failed to give way at a Melbourne intersection in a stolen BMW he was driving and collided with a motorcycle.
The bike and its rider, Keith Stevens, became trapped under the vehicle but the then-teenager continued to drive, dragging them for 85m.
The friction caused the motorcycle to burst into flames, engulfing Stevens and causing burns to 80% of his body.
When the driver, who had lived in Australia since he was 1, finally stopped, he reversed off the motorcycle and Stevens then drove off at speed, leaving the 33-year-old father for dead.
Australian media reported the teen only paused to dislodge Stevens when his three teenage passengers begged him to do so.
Stevens died in hospital the next day after his life support was turned off. Inhumane and cowardly
After the November 2017 fatal crash in Mitcham, Melbourne, the car driver, who has not been named because of Australian laws around reporting youth offender matters, was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria to six years' imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole period of four years.
In sentencing him, Judge Irene Lawson was brought to tears and needed a moment to compose herself when describing the void left by Stevens' death, according to Australian media.
She described the actions of the teenager as inhumane and cowardly.
As a result of his offending, his visa was cancelled in 2020 under section 501 of Australia's Migration Act.
His plea to have that decision revoked was declined and he then applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal of Australia for a review.
The review hearing for the now 25-year-old, who is currently detained in immigration detention, was held last month. Frequent and repeated youth offending
According to the decision, he moved to Australia as a 1-year-old with his family in 2001.
It stated he had a "difficult upbringing" that had, in part, influenced his offending.
He began smoking marijuana at 12, drinking alcohol around 14 and progressed to methamphetamine use at 16.
The decision reported he had displayed "anti-social behaviours" that had manifested into violence since he was young.
His conviction history showed frequent and repeated offending and that he was on youth parole for offences including burglary when he fatally hit Stevens.
Immediately after that collision, the teen ditched the stolen BMW and he and his associates ran up an embankment and jumped over a fence into a property.
They tried to kick down a door at the house but a female resident threw her weight against it so they couldn't get in.
They gave up but moved on to another home in the street, breaking in and stealing a car, a cellphone and a wallet.
That car was later found abandoned and destroyed by fire.
At his sentencing, the court heard the teen was egocentric, addicted to meth and had limited capacity for remorse at the time.
Australian media reported that he had called a friend in juvenile detention after the crash and said: "Even after the accident, bro, I didn't feel anything. Like, I didn't feel no pain, no emotions about it."
His friend then asked him if he cared about the life he had taken.
"Yeah, bro, I f***in' murdered a f***in' innocent 33-year-old man," he responded.
At the recent appeal, he told the tribunal he had not been remorseful for killing Stevens at the time but now accepted full responsibility and made no attempt to excuse his behaviour or to attribute blame to anyone else.
The tribunal accepted that he had matured and was truly remorseful. 'Grave fears' if deported
The man attributed several factors to his youth offending, including parental neglect, poor mental health, anti-social peers and drug use, including meth, cannabis and ecstasy.
He has family support, is currently abstinent from drugs and alcohol, and has completed some educational and rehabilitative programmes while locked up.
But his mental health and emotional and psychological issues have not been professionally addressed and he remains a risk of reoffending.
In his plea to remain in Australia, the man said he had no family support in New Zealand and was unfamiliar with the country.
His mother had "grave fears" that if deported, and without his Australian support network, he would fall into gang life and drugs and be at risk of serious physical, emotional and mental harm.
The tribunal accepted that, because of being incarcerated since he was a teen, he has no experience as an adult in the community and would face difficulties in adjusting to life in New Zealand without family support.
But the decision stated he was not unfamiliar with New Zealand, as movement records showed he had travelled to New Zealand 15 times during 2001 and 2015, and had a relative in Wellington.
While the tribunal accepted the man has strong and enduring ties to Australia, they were diminished by his extensive criminal record and his "very limited" positive contribution to the community.
In declining to revoke the cancellation of the man's visa, the tribunal stated the nature of the offending had raised serious character concerns about the man.
"The nature of the applicant's offending and the harm that would result if it were repeated are so serious that the countervailing considerations are insufficient to outweigh considerations of the protection of the Australian community and the expectations of the Australian community so as to justify revoking the cancellation of the applicant's visa."
- Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tenancy Tribunal orders landlord's widow to pay ex-tenant $6500 over unlawful eviction
By Catherine Hutton, Open Justice reporter Wellington of A tenant has been awarded $6500 after the Tenancy Tribunal found he had been unlawfully evicted from a substandard home (file photo). Photo: Supplied/ Unsplash -Sandy Millar A tenancy that soured over accusations of unpaid rent escalated into a legal battle between the former tenant and the landlord, with one firing claims of drug abuse and the other of squalid living conditions. The conflict, which began more than two years ago, has now been examined by the Tenancy Tribunal and a ruling has been made that the landlord, Ben Po Ching, rented the man a leaky, substandard home. Before the ruling was made, Po Ching died and his widow has been left to cough up the thousands of dollars the tribunal ordered must be paid to the former tenant. According to the tribunal's recent decision, matters came to a head in April 2023, when Po Ching told the tenant, whose name is suppressed, he owed rent on the Wellington property. Po Ching followed up with a text saying he'd consulted with the tribunal, and the man had 10 days to pay the rent arrears and 48 hours to leave the house, if the money wasn't paid. Later that month, Po Ching served the tenant with a trespass notice, refusing to let him back into the house, because of rent arrears. The tenant said he only became aware of the notice after receiving a text from another tenant, saying his belongings would be boxed and left on the street for him to collect. Five days later, Po Ching again texted the tenant, telling him he wasn't allowed back into the house. The tenant then turned to the tribunal, applying for compensation and exemplary damages, claiming the house wasn't in a reasonable condition, there were no grounds to end the tenancy and his belongings had disappeared at the end of the tenancy. The landlord counterclaimed for rent arrears, compensation and exemplary damages, alleging the tenant had used drugs at the house. To support his claim of illegal drug use at the house, Po Ching provided photos of the tenant's room. The photo showed syringes, drug utensils, marijuana, pills and "a bag of white powder" sitting on top of a dressing table, beside the bed in the tenant's room. The decision said Po Ching called the police. However, charges were not laid, because "the tenant was not there when the drugs were found and because it was a shared house", the decision said. Po Ching also claimed he had the room tested for meth, which he said reported "high results". He then discarded the tenant's belongings, claiming it was for "everyone's safety", but the tenant said the drugs and utensils were not his, and he did not use drugs while at the house. He also said he was suspicious of the timing of the photos, saying the drugs "appeared" in his room, when Po Ching was trying to get him to move out. The tribunal found there was no supporting documentation that the tenant's room was contaminated with methamphetamine. "What is most surprising is that the police did not charge any of the tenants, even though there was a dressing table full of what appear to be illegal drugs," the decision said. It dismissed the landlord's claims that the tenant used the premises for an unlawful purpose and the associated claim for compensation. In turn, the tenant argued the landlord failed to meet his obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act by renting a house that wasn't in a reasonable state of cleanliness or repair, and it failed to meet Healthy Homes standards. To support his claim, the tenant provided photos and a video showing water dripping through a light fitting in the living room when it rained, leaving the lounge carpet wet and smelly. There was a hole in the door to his bedroom, the shower was mouldy and broken, there were issues with the toilet and there were no smoke alarms. The tribunal found there was insufficient evidence to support the tenant's claim of uncleanliness when he moved in, but agreed the house was not in a reasonable state of repair. It also found the home failed to meet Healthy Homes Standards, noting from the photos that it seemed most likely the house was "draughty". The tribunal found there were also issues relating to stormwater, surface water, groundwater and ventilation, and there were no extractor fans in the bathroom or kitchen. The tenant said Po Ching was well aware of the state of the house, which he visited frequently. In response, Po Ching maintained that the house was "liveable". Po Ching's lawyer told the tribunal the house was only meant to be "transitional accommodation" for the tenant. He submitted it was reasonable to stay in for a short period and because it was an informal arrangement, no tenancy agreement was signed. The lawyer said Po Ching always intended to renovate the house and that was done after the tenant moved out, but the tenant denied it was explained to him that the tenancy was intended to be short-term and he'd lived there almost six months, paying $170 a week. The tribunal found the Residential Tenancies Act applied to the tenancy, noting that even if they accepted the landlord's submissions in full, there are no exclusions under the act that allowed Po Ching to charge rent for a substandard house because it was only short-term. Po Ching most likely knew the condition of the house, and breached his duty to repair and maintain the house, it found. "The decision to charge rent and take a bond from a tenant in exchange for a house that leaked and did not meet Healthy Homes standards requirements must have been intentional. It seems unlikely to me that Mr Po Ching, who was in the building trade, did not know about the Healthy Homes standards. "The effect for the tenant was that he felt trapped, because the house was a depressing place to live." The decision also found the landlord had ended the tenancy without grounds, noting he had acted intentionally, and caused the tenant stress and panic, because he was no longer able to access his belongings. Finally, the tribunal found Po Ching had prevented the tenant from collecting his belongings, because of his belief the tenant owed him rent. The tenant told the tribunal the loss of his items had been devastating. He said he lost tools and personal items, and had only managed to retrieve his television, which he collected three days before the trespass notice was issued. However, because the tenant was unable to provide evidence of the $16,300 he claimed in losses, he was only awarded $1000 for exemplary damages in regard to this claim. The tribunal ordered Po Ching to pay the tenant $6500, less $971 for rent arrears. This included $2000 each in exemplary damages for the lack of maintenance and terminating the tenancy early, as well as the $1000 for his belongings. Because Po Ching died last year, the tribunal ruled the order could be enforced against his widow. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald . Photo: Open Justice

RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Violence and riots now common in New Zealand prisons, staff union says
Prison guards and staff now face more and more violent incidents and riots, with prisoners more concentrated, their union says a day after a riot at Waikato's Spring Hill facility. Photo: Corrections / Chai Patel Violence and riots in prisons are now increasingly common as a result of higher prison populations, a group representing Corrections staff says, a day after a fiery prison riot in Waikato. On Saturday afternoon a group of prisoners refused to leave an exercise yard at Spring Hill Corrections Facility south of Meremere, damaging property and lighting fires, resulting in the prison going into lockdown. Firefighters and ambulance crews were sent to the facility and a specialist Advanced Control and Restraint team was dispatched. President of the Corrections Association, the union for Corrections workers, Floyd du Plessis told RNZ their staff were facing more and more violent incidents, and outdated staffing levels were compounding the problem. "It's a very dangerous situation. Anytime when you've got a number of prisoners threatening harm, reports of potential weapons, it's definitely a dangerous situation for staff, and it's only through the training and fast thinking of staff that [they are] able to bring it to a close relatively quickly and safely." The events on Saturday had been isolated to the yard and contained by staff, he said: "There was no risk of it spreading further in the way that the staff managed to deal with it and bring it to a close." Riots were not uncommon in New Zealand prisons, du Plessis said, and they were increasing. "We have events like this that happen on a regular basis across the country. There's just some of them that tend to become public knowledge and shared wider. But it's actually more common than people realise. "Spring Hill itself is one of those prisons that do hold quite a number of high profile prisoners, volatile prisoners. And so you do have these incidents that do tend to come at that higher level. "The reality is these situations are getting more common, they are becoming more violent, and the reality is it's something that we do need to urgently address." The association had been campaigning for improved security measures to help shut down disorder quicker and more safely, he said. "We have been lobbying for that. We need better safety equipment. And that's something that we are going to continue to push. "The other factor is we need more staff. Our prisons are staffed based on a ratio that was developed many, many years ago ... [the] problem is prisons have become far more violent than they used to be. And so those calculations just aren't fit for purpose. "So in places like Spring Hill, for high security prisoners, you're talking about two staff managing up to 30 prisoners. That's just not safe. These are the most violent people in our country and we expect two staff to manage them without incident. That's just not realistic. "We need to re-look at it and we need more staff in the prisons and we need to give them tools to safely operate." Du Plessis said more prisoners were being packed into the same spaces, there were not enough beds to manage the situation and staffing levels were too low. "What we're doing then is we're condensing more and more of these people into tight spots. We have a serious problem with available beds. So across the country, we're jam packing everyone in as tightly as we can. "And what that means is it ... doesn't give us room to move people around or to manage the people better. And so unfortunately that does create tension, which leads to violence. We urgently need more beds across the country and staff to staff them." Staff also want access to other safety measures, du Plessis said, such as PepperBall ranged weapons which are promoted as non-lethal. "That's something that we can use at a distance that can quickly bring these things to a close. But we need the government to work with us to change legislation and put them in place." RNZ has contacted Corrections and the Minister of Corrections for comment. On Saturday, Custodial Services Commissioner Leigh Marsh praised Corrections staff who contained the Spring Hill riot without any injury to staff or prisoners. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Two arrested after armed threats in Christchurch
Police - with armed officers in attendance - cordoned off an address on Marshland Road and two people were taken into custody. File picture. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Two people are facing charges following reports of threatening behaviour with a firearm in Christchurch overnight. Emergency services were called to a group of people holding a firearm and making threats from a vehicle in Shirley around 1.20am. Police - with armed officers in attendance - cordoned off an address on Marshland Road and two people were taken into custody. A 32-year-old man will appear in Christchurch District Court on Monday facing multiple charges, including unlawful possession of a firearm, ammunition and possession of cannabis plant for supply. A 28-year-old man was also charged with obstructing police, and will appear the following week. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.