In election post, SPS board member questions display of Iran flag, blames board makeup
"The flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran hangs in the cafeteria of Rountree Elementary," she wrote April 7 on the Facebook page for her campaign committee, Parents for Mohammadkhani. "Under the guise of inclusivity, well meaning staff accepted this gift from a (Missouri State University) professor."
Officials with the district and board said Mohammadkhani did not raise concerns about the flag with the school, district officials or the board prior to the post on the eve of the election.
Mohammadkhani pinned the responsibility for the displayed flag in the school on the elected governing body that she has been part of since 2021.
In the post, she wrote: "Question: Who is responsible? Answer: The Board of Education."
She added: "Your vote has consequences."
Rountree is one of three Springfield elementary schools that offer the International Baccalaureate's Primary Years Programme. It features an interdisciplinary academic approach that aims to teach students effective communication, critical thinking, problem-solving and belonging, locally and globally.
"There are IB schools in almost 160 countries," Mohammadkani wrote. "Why display this flag?"
The News-Leader asked that question of the Springfield district.
"It is a long-standing tradition for some International Baccalaureate schools to represent students from a variety of backgrounds by displaying flags from the various countries where they were born. The flags signify that a student from that particular country either currently attends, or has attended, that school," wrote Stephen Hall, chief communications officer, in the district response.
"In alignment with IB traditions, this is a visual way to represent varied cultures and is not an endorsement of any government or ideology. Neither the school nor our district has heard from Dr. Mohammadkhani regarding any concern related to this matter."
Mohammadkhani, a retired pathologist, was born in Iran and has lived in Springfield for more than 20 years.
Her post about the flag displayed at Rountree generated more than 90 comments and shares on her campaign page on Facebook. Some of the commenters called for the flag to be removed or argued only the American flag should be displayed. Others questioned the timing and appropriateness of the post.
"As a teacher at Rountree who teaches multiple students who speak languages from the areas in and around Iran, when I see the flags, I see the people, their culture, their humanity," wrote Rountree teacher Michelle Garrison, in a comment on the post.
"We can celebrate a variety of cultures without being swallowed up by politics affronted by the false efforts at 'diversity' and the like. And we can still encourage a sense of American pride while teaching about a variety of cultures. You don't have to agree with the politics or religion in order to care for the people, especially the students, whose heritage for which the flag might be the closest representation."
In the comment, Garrison wrote that of all the issues teachers and students face, flags take up "very little" attention. "We hope the school board focuses on what is most important, caring for kids, and the real problems teachers face in the trenches every day."
Mohammadkhani, elected to a second term in 2024, has been vocal in the school board election, publicly supporting incumbent Kelly Byrne and first-time candidate David Myers.
Byrne and Myers are among the four candidates, including first-time candidates Sarah Hough and Gail Smart, vying for two open seats. The two with the most votes will be sworn in April 15.
Other board members have also been vocal in support of candidates and Susan Provance, elected in 2024, was in a TV campaign ad for Hough.
Asked about the post, board president Danielle Kincaid said there is an "appropriate process for sharing concerns with fellow board members, the superintendent and the district we're elected to represent."
"That process provides board members with an opportunity to seek clarity on issues and resolve potential misunderstandings. In this circumstance, Dr. Mohammadkhani chose not to follow that process. She did not engage with the board, administration, or other district representative before posting her comments directly to a campaign page on the eve of an election," Kincaid wrote.
Mohammadkhani was also featured in a TV campaign ad paid for by Back on Track America, a conservative political action committee, that supported Byrne and Myers.
Kincaid said Mohammadkhani's post about the flag does "not speak for the Board of Education."
"In recent years, SPS staff have expressed concern about perceived surveillance from board members during campus visits. Dr. Mohammadkhani's posting of photos on social media without appropriate context fuels ongoing concerns and diminishes trust with Team SPS," Kincaid wrote, in a statement. "It is disappointing that the board and entire SPS team learned of Dr. Mohammadkhani's concerns through unconventional channels."
The News-Leader left a message seeking comment from Mohammadkhani about the timing of the post, if she had previously raised concerns about the flag with the district or board, and what outcome she is seeking.
This story will be updated if she responds.
This article originally appeared on Springfield News-Leader: SPS board member questions display of Iran flag, blames board makeup
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump complains 'woke' Smithsonian is too focused on 'how bad slavery was'
Trump's remarks came after he launched a review of the Smithsonian Institution to remove "divisive or partisan" elements from its museums. WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump said the Smithsonian museums in Washington are too fixated on "how bad slavery was" and other negative aspects of United States history as he promised to take aim at the "WOKE" elements inside them. Trump's remarks, made in an Aug. 19 social media post on Truth Social, came after he last week launched a review of the Smithsonian Institution and its 21 museums to remove "divisive or partisan" elements and determine whether its materials conformed to the Trump administration's views on teaching history. "The Museums throughout Washington, but all over the Country are, essentially, the last remaining segment of 'WOKE,' " Trump said in his post. "The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been." More: Trump administration launches Smithsonian review to remove 'divisive' materials Trump added that the Smithsonian museums contain "Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future." "We are not going to allow this to happen," he said, comparing his review of the Smithsonian Institution to his administration's work to root out diversity, equity and inclusions initiatives from colleges and universities. "This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums." Federal funds make up about 62% of the annual budget of the Smithsonian, which is a public-private partnership established by Congress. The National Museum of African American History and Culture, which the Smithsonian opened in 2016, has comprehensive exhibits on the history of slavery in the United States beginning with the transatlantic slave trade. Trump's review is set to intially focus on eight Smithsonian museums. The list includes the National Museum of African American History and Culture, as well as the National Museum of American History; National Museum of Natural History; National Museum of the American Indian; National Air and Space Museum; Smithsonian American Art Museum; the National Portrait Gallery; and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. More: Civil rights leaders rally around National Museum of African American History White House officials announced the review in an Aug. 12 letter to Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch III, writing that the initiative aims to "ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." The letter stated that within 120 days, the Smithsonian is expected to begin making "content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions." More: Trump's Smithsonian review will start with 8 out of 21 museums. Which ones? The review will focus on Smithsonian exhibits, along with the process for creating them. It is expected to be completed early next year, which is the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding. In a statement last week on the White House review, the Smithsonian said it would "continue to collaborate constructively with the White House." "The Smithsonian's work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history. We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind," the statement reads. Contributing: Zac Anderson
Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Veterans' voices shape a report on the Afghanistan War's lessons and impact
Advertisement 'What can we learn from the Afghanistan War?' asked an Aug. 12 discussion session with four of the commission's 16 members. What they got was two straight hours of dozens of veterans' personal stories — not one glowingly positive, and most saturated in frustration and disappointment. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I think the best way to describe that experience was awful,' said Marine veteran Brittany Dymond, who served in Afghanistan in 2012. Navy veteran Florence Welch said the 2021 withdrawal made her ashamed she ever served there. 'It turned us into a Vietnam, a Vietnam that none of us worked for,' she said. Members of Congress, some driven by having served in the war, created the independent commission several months after the withdrawal, after an assessment by the Democratic administration of then-president Joe Biden faulted the actions of President Donald Trump's first administration for constraining US options. A Republican review, in turn, blamed Biden. Views of the events remain divided, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered yet another review this spring. Advertisement The commission wants to understand the bigger picture of a conflict that spanned four presidential administrations and cost more than 2,400 American lives, said cochair Dr. Colin Jackson. 'So we're interested in looking hard at the end of US engagement in Afghanistan, but we're equally interested in understanding the beginning, the middle, and the end,' he said in an interview in Columbus. Cochair Shamila Chaudhary said the panel is also exploring more sweeping questions. 'So our work is not just about what the US did in Afghanistan but what the US should be doing in any country where it deems it has a national security interest,' she said. 'And not just should it be there, but how it should behave, what values does it guide itself by, and how does it engage with individuals who are very different from themselves.' Jackson said one of the commission's priorities is making sure the final report, due in August 2026, isn't 'unrecognizable to any veteran of the Afghanistan conflict.' 'The nature of the report should be representative of every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine experience,' he said. Dymond told commissioners a big problem was the mission. 'You cannot exert a democratic agenda, which is our foreign policy, you cannot do that on a culture of people who are not bought into your ideology,' she said. 'What else do we expect the outcome to be? And so we had two decades of service members lost and maimed because we're trying to change an ideology that they didn't ask for.' Advertisement The experience left eight-year Army veteran Steve Orf demoralized. He said he didn't go there 'to beat a bad guy.' 'Those of us who served generally wanted to believe that we were helping to improve the world, and we carried with us the hopes, values, and principles of the United States — values and principles that also seem to have been casualties of this war," he told commissioners. 'For many of us, faith with our leaders is broken and trust in our country is broken.' Tuesday's report identifies emerging themes of the review to include strategic drift, interagency incoherence, and whether the war inside Afghanistan and the counterterrorism war beyond were pursuing the same aims or at cross purposes. It also details difficulties the commission has encountered getting key documents. According to the report, the Biden administration initially denied the commission's requests for White House materials on the implementation of the February 2020 peace agreement Trump signed with the Taliban, called the Doha Agreement, and on the handling of the withdrawal, citing executive confidentiality concerns. The transition to Trump's second term brought further delays and complications, but since the commission has pressed the urgency of its mission with the new administration, critical intelligence and documents have now begun to flow, the report says.
Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Wu stands up for cities, not just for Boston
In what was barely distinguishable from a campaign rally, Wu — backed by dozens of supporters — eloquently insisted that Boston will never back down from supporting all its residents. She added that it is the federal government, not the city, that is trampling on the law. 'The US attorney general asked for a response by today, so here it is. Stop attacking our cities to hide your administration's failures,' Wu said. Advertisement For Wu, it was an opportunity to revisit her 'We may have said this in D.C. nearly six months ago, and I'll say it again today: You are wrong on the law and you are wrong on safety,' Wu declared. 'Most of all, you are wrong on cities. 'The cities that live in your minds are totally foreign to the residents living in our cities, and we are picking up the pieces of your failures to deliver on your promises under the Trump administration.' Advertisement In typically authoritarian fashion, the White House threatened withholding of federal funds to the city if it doesn't cooperate, and even hinted at criminal charges for officials who won't toe the line. 'You are hereby notified that your jurisdiction has been identified as one that engages in sanctuary policies that thwart federal immigration enforcement to the detriment of the interests of the United States,' Bondi wrote. 'That ends now.' Resisting Trump's immigration crackdown is, of course, a proven winner for Wu. By a wide margin, Bostonians rightly Bondi's saber-rattling takes place against the backdrop of President Trump's attempted Some see these maneuvers as an attempt to distract everyone from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, and that may well be a consideration. But Trump's dystopian view of American cities has long been a matter of record. At 'Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system, flush with cash, but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of knowledge; and the crime and gangs and drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential. This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.' Advertisement Carnage is not a word that remotely applies to Boston. For a native New Yorker, Trump's contempt for the kind of places that spawned him is palpable. I asked Wu if she worried that mayors could actually face prosecution for resisting the administration. 'I try not to think about it,' she said. 'We're trying to do the next right thing, and it's a cloud or a storm of new headlines and attacks coming at Boston and cities everywhere, every single day. We know what our residents need, and we've been working really hard, making really important progress, getting it done. We're going to continue to do that.' The Trump's contempt for Boston has been a huge campaign-season gift to Wu, and the rally Tuesday was another example of that. But it reflected something darker too: an administration determined to rewrite the laws to its liking, and ruthless in enforcing its will. Boston — and Mayor Wu — are right to resist that with everything it has. Adrian Walker is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at
