logo
IAEA chief 'encouraged' by Iran decision to re-engage

IAEA chief 'encouraged' by Iran decision to re-engage

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi said Friday he was "encouraged" that Iran had agreed for a delegation from the U.N. nuclear watchdog to visit the country "within weeks".
Grossi said the visit by the technical team could pave the way for U.N. inspectors to return to Iran, potentially within this year.
"If we do not return soon, there would be a serious problem, because this is an international obligation of Iran," Grossi told reporters during a visit to Singapore.
"I am encouraged by what I have been hearing from Tehran in the sense that they want to re-engage with us," he added.
A date for the visit was yet to be determined, but Grossi confirmed it will be "within weeks".
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi had told the United Nations in New York a day earlier that an IAEA delegation would visit Iran within two to three weeks.
The group will not have access to nuclear sites, Gharibabadi said, adding that the visit would focus on establishing new relations with the U.N. nuclear watchdog.
The Iranian official spoke ahead of negotiations on Friday in Istanbul with France, Britain and Germany, which are threatening to sanction Iran over its alleged failure to adhere to its nuclear commitments.
If the European countries impose sanctions, "we will respond, we will react," Gharibabadi said.
Grossi said the team will not include nuclear inspectors yet.
"We need to listen to Iran in terms of what they consider should be the precautions to be taken. Some places (...) were destroyed. We should also check on this situation and then decide on a precise day to start the process of inspection, as we normally should."
An IAEA team left Iran in early July to return to the organisation's headquarters in Vienna after Tehran suspended cooperation with the agency.
Iran has blamed the IAEA in part for attacks on its nuclear facilities in June, which Israel says it launched to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon — an ambition Tehran has repeatedly denied.
The United States carried out its own strikes on June 22, targeting Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said this week that Tehran has no plans to abandon its nuclear programme, including uranium enrichment, despite the "severe" damage to its facilities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Voluntary return of around 100 Syrian refugees from the Bekaa to Syria
Voluntary return of around 100 Syrian refugees from the Bekaa to Syria

L'Orient-Le Jour

time3 hours ago

  • L'Orient-Le Jour

Voluntary return of around 100 Syrian refugees from the Bekaa to Syria

More than a hundred Syrian refugees who were in Lebanon returned to their country on Tuesday, as part of a voluntary return coordinated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the U.N. migration agency (IOM), and the General Security Directorate, L'Orient-Le Jour's correspondent in the region reported. Logistical preparations began as early as 5 a.m. at the secondary school and the al-Nahda club in Bar Elias. After a thorough inspection of their luggage, the refugees boarded buses to travel to the Lebanese-Syrian border. More than six million Syrians have fled their country since the conflict began in 2011, mainly to Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. Lebanon, which hosts about 1.5 million Syrians for a population of around four million Lebanese, is the country with the highest number of refugees per capita in the world. At the beginning of July, nearly 11,000 people had already registered to return to Syria, while the Lebanese government is aiming for "between 200,000 and 400,000 returns" by the end of the year, according to Social Affairs Minister Hanine Sayyed. Until recently, U.N. agencies said that Syria did not offer safe conditions for mass returns, particularly because of the risk of persecution under the former Assad regime, which systematically imprisoned men who had not performed their military service. But since coming to power, the new Syrian government, led by an Islamist coalition, claims that all Syrians can return to their country.

Iraq's prime minister seeks closer US ties while keeping armed groups at bay
Iraq's prime minister seeks closer US ties while keeping armed groups at bay

Nahar Net

time3 hours ago

  • Nahar Net

Iraq's prime minister seeks closer US ties while keeping armed groups at bay

by Naharnet Newsdesk 29 July 2025, 15:29 The prime minister of Iraq has kept his country on the sidelines as military conflicts raged nearby for almost two years. This required balancing Iraq's relations with two countries vital to his power and enemies with each other: the U.S. and Iran. The feat became especially difficult last month when war broke out between Israel, a U.S. ally, and Iran — and the U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites. Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said he used a mix of political and military pressure to stop armed groups aligned with Iran from entering the fray. In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Al-Sudani explains how he did this, how he plans to keep these groups in check going forward and — as he seeks a second term — why he wants to get closer to the Trump administration, even as he maintains strong ties to Iran-backed political parties that helped propel him to power in 2022. Staying on the sidelines as Israel and Iran traded blows After Israel launched airstrikes on Iran and it responded by firing missiles at Tel Aviv, armed groups in Iraq attempted to launch missiles and drones toward Israel and at bases in Iraq housing U.S. troops, al-Sudani said. But they were thwarted 29 times by Iraqi government "security operations" that he did not detail. "We know that the (Israeli) government had a policy — and still does — of expanding the war in the region," al-Sudani said. "Therefore, we made sure not to give any justification to any party to target Iraq." Al-Sudani said his government also reached out to leaders in Iran "to urge them toward calm and to make room for dialogue and a return to negotiations." The future of the US presence in Iraq is in flux The U.S. and Iraq last year announced an agreement to wrap up the mission of an American-led coalition in Iraq fighting the Islamic State — and in March al-Sudani announced that the head of IS in Iraq and Syria had been killed in a joint Iraqi-U.S. operation. The first phase of the coalition's drawdown was supposed to be completed by September 2025, but there has been little sign of it happening. Al-Sudani said the U.S. and Iraq will meet by the end of the year to "arrange the bilateral security relationship" between the two countries. He also hopes to secure U.S. economic investment — in oil and gas, and also artificial intelligence — which he said would contribute to regional security and make "the two countries great together." A variety of militias sprung up in Iraq in the years after the 2003 U.S. invasion that toppled former autocratic leader Saddam Hussein. And since the war between Israel and Hamas began in October 2023, sparking regionwide conflicts, an array of pro-Iran armed factions have periodically launched strikes on bases housing U.S. troops. Al-Sudani said the presence of the coalition forces had provided a "justification" for Iraqi groups to arm themselves, but that once the coalition withdrawal is complete, "there will be no need or no justification for any group to carry weapons outside the scope of the state." The fate of Iran-backed militias in Iraq is unclear One of the most complicated issues for al-Sudani is how to handle the Popular Mobilization Forces, a coalition of mostly Shiite, Iran-backed militias that formed to fight IS. This coalition was formally placed under the control of the Iraqi military in 2016, although in practice it still operates with significant autonomy. The Iraqi parliament is discussing legislation that would solidify the relationship between the military and the PMF, drawing objections from Washington. The State Department said in a statement last week that the legislation "would institutionalize Iranian influence and armed terrorist groups undermining Iraq's sovereignty." Al-Sudani defended the proposed legislation, saying it's part of an effort to ensure that arms are controlled by the state. "Security agencies must operate under laws and be subject to them and be held accountable," he said. Indications of weak state authority In recent weeks, a series of drone attacks have targeted oil facilities in northern Iraq's semiautonomous Kurdish region. Kurdish regional authorities accused groups in the PMF of carrying out the attacks. Authorities in Baghdad disputed this, but haven't assigned blame. Al-Sudani called the attacks a "terrorist act" and said his government is working with Kurdish authorities and coalition forces to identify those responsible and hold them accountable. Just as the drone attacks have called into question Baghdad's control over armed groups, so has the case of Israeli-Russian researcher Elizabeth Tsurkov, who went missing in Iraq in 2023. Her family believes she is being held by the Iraqi militia Kataib Hezbollah, and there have reportedly been U.S.-mediated negotiations to negotiate her release. Al-Sudani did not name the group responsible for Tsurkov's kidnapping, but he pushed back against the idea that his government has not made serious efforts to free her. He said his government has a team dedicated to finding her. "We do not negotiate with gangs and kidnappers," he said, but the team has been in discussions with political factions that might be able to help locate her. Rebuilding relations with Damascus Relations between Iraq and the new government in Syria have been tenuous since the fall of former President Bashar Assad in December, after a lightning offensive led by Sunni Islamist insurgents. Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa was formerly known by the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Golani. He once joined the ranks of al-Qaida insurgents battling U.S. forces in Iraq after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Al-Sharaa still faces a warrant for his arrest on terrorism charges in Iraq. Al-Sharaa has since broken with al-Qaida and has fought against the Islamic State. Al-Sudani said his government is coordinating with the new Syrian government, particularly on security matters. "We and the administration in Syria certainly have a common enemy, ISIS, which is clearly and openly present inside Syria," he said. Al-Sudani said his government has warned the Syrians against the mistakes that occurred in Iraq after Saddam's fall, when the ensuing security vacuum spawned years of sectarian violence and the rise of armed extremist groups. In recent weeks, sectarian violence in Syria has shaken the country's fragile postwar recovery. Al-Sudani called for Syria's current leadership to pursue a "comprehensive political process that includes all components and communities." "We do not want Syria to be divided," he said. "This is unacceptable and we certainly do not want any foreign presence on Syrian soil," apparently alluding to Israel's incursions into southern Syria.

Reaction to the European Union's trade agreement with the Trump administration
Reaction to the European Union's trade agreement with the Trump administration

Nahar Net

time7 hours ago

  • Nahar Net

Reaction to the European Union's trade agreement with the Trump administration

by Naharnet Newsdesk 29 July 2025, 12:22 The European Union's trade agreement with the Trump administration is getting mixed reviews. EU officials say they warded off a total economic disaster. But French officials in particular say the EU punched below its weight while economists say the deal is dangerously vague. The deal leaves Europe with a 15% tariff on most goods imported into the U.S., with some goods categories tariff-free, but no agreement on rates for key areas such as pharmaceuticals and steel. Here is what they're saying: European Commission Failing to reach a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline would have meant a 30% tariff threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump, EU chief trade negotiator Maroš Šefčovič said. The main aim of European officials was a negotiated agreement, rather than a tit-for-tat escalation that could have included retaliatory EU tariffs on 93 billion euros ($108 billion) worth of goods, including U.S. agricultural products, steel and chemicals. "A trade war may seem appealing to some, but it comes with serious consequences, with at least a 30% tariff," Šefčovič said. "Our trans-Atlantic trade would effectively come to a halt, putting close to 5 million jobs, including those in SMEs (small- and medium-sized enterprises) in Europe, at grave risk. "Our businesses have sent us a unanimous message: avoid escalation and work towards a solution that delivers immediate relief," he said. France: 'A dark day' Major exports to the U.S.: Aircraft, pharmaceuticals, luxury perfumes and leather goods, wine and spirits. Senior French officials on Monday criticized the accord, with Foreign Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin urging a European response in the services sector, and Strategy Commissioner Clément Beaune warning it underplayed the 27-nation bloc's economic strength. "The good news is that there is an agreement — our companies now have visibility and stability in the trans-Atlantic trade relationship," Saint-Martin said on France Inter radio. "But this agreement is not balanced, and we will need to keep working." He pointed to digital services as a key front in the trade imbalance. "Donald Trump spent months saying he wanted to rebalance a trade relationship that disadvantages the United States, but he was only talking about goods. If we look at services, it's the opposite. So it's up to us now to carry out the work of force and rebalancing," he said. "The United States decided to use force to impose a new law of the jungle that no longer respects the rules of international trade that we had for decades," Saint-Martin said. Beaune, France's high commissioner for strategy and planning, said on franceinfo radio that "this is an unequal and unbalanced agreement." He warned that "Europe did not wield its strength. We are the world's leading trading power." "When you look at it, the glass is a quarter full and three-quarters empty," Beaune said. Prime Minister François Bayrou was even more scathing, posting on X: "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to uphold their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission." Germany: 'Avoided unnecessary escalation' Major exports to the U.S.: Motor vehicles, pharmaceuticals and industrial machinery. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that the deal would give companies a more predictable environment to plan and invest — a key EU goal after weeks of back-and-forth threats in tense talks with Trump administration officials. "It is good that Europe and the USA have agreed and thus avoided an unnecessary escalation in trans-Atlantic trade relations," he said. "We have been able to preserve our core interests, even if I would have very much wished for further relief in trans-Atlantic trade." Asked about negative reactions to the deal from German business, Merz countered that it was met with relief by some companies and sectors. However, "it is completely clear to me that the tariffs that now remain — in particular the 15% against 0% for imports to the European Union — constitute a significant burden for the export-oriented economy of the Federal Republic of Germany," Merz said, noting that he had said repeatedly before the agreement that "there will be an asymmetric deal, if there is one at all." Italy: 'Positive outcome' Major exports to the U.S.: Industrial machinery, cars and agricultural products. Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, who has positioned herself as a "bridge" between the Trump administration and Europe, welcomed news of the tariff agreement as a "positive" outcome that avoided an "unpredictable and potentially devastating" trade war. But in comments to reporters on the sidelines of a U.N. food security conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, she said that details still needed to be worked out and that she's still unclear what exemptions are carved out for particular industries. "I always thought, I continue to think that a trade escalation between Europe and the United States would have unpredictable, potentially devastating consequences," she said. Meloni said that she needed to understand what the exemptions might be, including on agricultural products, which are of concern to Italy, given its wine exports in particular. "So there are a number of elements that are missing as well, as I don't know exactly what we are referring to when we talk about investments, gas purchases." She noted that the deal in its current form is legally nonbinding in principle, "so there is still, let's say, room to fight." Hungary: Trump 'ate EU for breakfast' Major exports to the U.S.: Packaged medicines and batteries. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, an ally of Trump who has gained a following within the MAGA movement, blasted the agreement on Monday as a failure on the part of Europe's leadership. "Even at first glance, it is obvious to me that this is not an agreement," Orbán said in a video discussion with his party's spokesman. "Donald Trump ate (European Commission President) Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast, that's what happened." Orbán, a frequent EU critic, has been careful not to criticize Trump's administration for its trade policy, instead faulting the bloc for being unable to conclude a comprehensive tariff agreement with Washington. Orbán said that a U.S.-U.K. trade deal, which imposed a blanket 10% tariff on British exports, was more favorable than the one concluded with the EU. "The American president is a heavyweight negotiator, and (von der Leyen) is a featherweight," Orbán said. "The European agreement is worse than the British one, so portraying it as a success will be difficult." Economists: Less growth, many blank spots Jon Harrison at TS Lombard: "It is no surprise to find that trade deals agreed under duress in weeks rather than the usual years of careful negotiation leave a mass of detail incomplete and open to interpretation." Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief eurozone economist at Capital Economics: "We think this will reduce EU GDP (gross domestic product) by about 0.5%, which is worse than we had previously assumed." "While the deal has avoided a much worse outcome for now, it remains to be seen whether it will last." Julian Hinz, trade expert at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy: "The deal agreed yesterday is not a good deal — it is appeasement. "While the EU may avert a trade war in the short term, it is paying a high price in the long term by abandoning the principles of the multilateral, rules-based world trade system of the World Trade Organization."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store