logo
Trump saying ‘Ukraine may not survive' is a dire warning

Trump saying ‘Ukraine may not survive' is a dire warning

Independent10-03-2025

Donald Trump is a unique political phenomenon. Certainly, no-one does peace-making like the 47th president of the United States. A showman as much as a businessman before he entered politics, Trump treats diplomacy as a spectacle.
When his predecessor in the White House, the 28th president Woodrow Wilson, denounced 'secret diplomacy ' as the cause of the First World War and called for 'open covenants of peace openly arrived at', he could not have imagined how Trump would seize the 24-hour news cycle to promote his 'plan' to end the war in Ukraine.
Fox News is the US president's favoured outlet for updates on the negotiations. In one interview, he warns menacingly, 'Ukraine may not survive' unless… only to follow up with impromptu remarks on Air Force One to the same channel that 'Ukraine's going to do well, Russia's going to do well. Some very big things could happen this week'.
Talks are happening in Jeddah in Saudi Arabia tomorrow between Trump's emissaries and Putin's men, with a Ukrainian team down the corridor – and President Zelensky offstage elsewhere in Riyadh.
That the world's three major oil producers might find something to talk about and make deals over, apart from what America and Russia might agree on regarding Ukraine, is not irrelevant to its fate.
President Trump has made clear that Ukraine's potential in rare earth minerals is a price which Kyiv will have to pawn for peace, but actual energy prices can be decided now by the Big Three producers.
While backdoor deals may be being made in Riyadh, Ukraine looks set to effectively receive a Russo-American ultimatum: keep the rump of your country for the price of disarmament and neutrality.
Ukrainians dislike the traditional English name for their country, 'The Ukraine', which translated its meaning as 'The Borderland'. Soon, it could become a buffer state.
Maybe the least bad outcome for Ukraine today would be a peace rather like the one that Stalin granted Finland 85 years ago.
Everyone remembers the Winter War between Finland and the USSR – or thinks they do.
Stalin invaded at the end of November 1939, intending to replace Finland's government with a puppet one led by a Soviet Communist of Finnish origin, but the Red Army got a bloody nose – rather as Putin's troops did in 2022.
But people forget Russia's numbers broke the Finnish resistance and Stalin took chunks of the country. However, the Kremlin left the Finns alone and free at home after 1945, so long as they were neutral.
'Finlandisation' was a term of contempt in Nato for decades before the Russian attack on Ukraine and the country's decision to renounce non-aligned status.
Yet that robust Finland – democratic and defensible – could show the way for a viable post-war Ukraine.
Today's occupant of Stalin's office in the Kremlin may not be so forgiving as his predecessor. Putin could well calculate that a peace deal rammed down Zelensky's throat could choke Ukrainian patriotic solidarity.
Even if the public could accept the amputation of Crimea and the south-eastern regions for peace, could the hardline nationalist militias integrated into the Ukrainian Army stage a coup to stop it? Civil conflict would delight Putin but would kill chances of US and EU support for a post-war Ukraine.
Ukraine played such a big role in his impeachments that Trump has a personal motive to end the war at any cost to Ukraine, regardless of future risks to it or even to Nato allies in Eastern Europe's 'tough region', as he calls it. But Team Trump is also on board for what would be a rewriting of the global order, not just a redrawing of the Russo-Ukrainian border. As Trump said, 'Some very big things could happen this week.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties
Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties

Leader Live

time35 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties

Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, appeared together at the Old Bailey on Friday. Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, 34, refused to attend the hearing. Two of the fires took place in Kentish Town, north London – one in the early hours of May 12 at the home where Sir Keir lived before he became Prime Minister and moved into Downing Street. The entrance to Sir Keir Starmer's house in Kentish Town (James Manning/PA) A car was set alight in the same street four days earlier on May 8. The other fire was on May 11 at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington. Lavrynovych, of Lewisham, south-east London, has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life on May 8, May 11 and May 12. Carpiuc, from Romford, east London, and Pochynok, of Islington, north London, are each accused of one count of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between April 17 and May 13. Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared at the hearing via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, and spoke only to confirm their identities and dates of birth via an interpreter. Ms Justice Cheema Grubb told the court that Pochynok had refused to leave his cell for the preliminary hearing. All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on October 17. A provisional trial date was set for April 27 next year in front of a High Court judge. A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted Airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents. The Metropolitan Police said he had been released on bail until next month.

9 insane moments as Donald Trump's beef with Elon Musk implodes spectacularly
9 insane moments as Donald Trump's beef with Elon Musk implodes spectacularly

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

9 insane moments as Donald Trump's beef with Elon Musk implodes spectacularly

The history books are filled with breakups and beef. There's Jen and Brad, Drake and Kendrick, Oscar Wilde and Lord Alfred Douglas. Henry VIII had a few pretty prominent fallings out. And many have compared Donald Trump to Nero, the Ancient Roman emperor whose second marriage to Poppaea Sabina ended with murder. Today, the gradual then sudden implosion of Donald Trump's bromance with Elon Musk surely joins the canon of history's most epic breakups. Beeves so operatic and consequential there can surely be no reconciliation. And a ruckus which will genuinely have an impact on world events for years to come. Here's how it went down - and what happens next. The signs had been there for a while - but the first visible cracks in Trump and Musk's bromance started to appear the morning after the Wisconsin Supreme Court election in April. After winning the state by around 30,000 votes in the Presidential election last year, Trump thought his pick jn the race - Brad Schmiel - had a decent shot. Especially after Musk - whose bottomless wallet helped swing the election for him - decided to pump millions of dollars into the race. In the end, Schmiel suffered a thumping defeat to liberal judge Susan Crawford. The state voted for Crawford by 55% to 45% - the first indication that Trump's magic - and Elon's cash - were not infallible. The electoral shine was starting to rub off. In the days that followed there was chatter that Trump wasn't all that happy about sharing the limelight with Musk if he wasn't going to see results. It was quietly agreed Musk would step back a bit and spend more time with his failing car business. Fast forward to last Friday, and the 130 days Musk was allowed to be a "special government employee" without having to make transparency declarations were up. There was a deeply weird press conference cum exit interview in the oval, where Musk, sporting a mean looking shiner, got extremely upset about a newspaper that accused him of being high on Ketamine during the campaign. And then he was gone, Donald probably thought. Until a few days later, when Elon started tweeting - Or X-ing, or whatever it's called these days - about Trump's budget bill. The infamous "Big Beautiful Bill" - or as Musk described it - a "disgusting abomination". The details aren't important, but the gist of his beef with the bill are that he was brought in to cut government spending, and in order to get them to vote the bill through, Trump had to let congress attach quite a lot of government spending to it. On Thursday, he escalated matters even further by going right after Trump's beloved trade war. "The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year," Musk wrote. Speaking in the Oval Office last night, Trump said he was "disappointed" in Musk's response to the Big Beautiful Bill. Of course, he went further on Truth Social later, saying: "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Regular readers will recall Trump was kind of fine with hawking electric cars a month or do ago, when he turned the South Lawn into a Tesla dealership. In one of the most unexpected escalations since Will Smith got out of his seat at the Oscars, Elon decided now was time to play the Epstein card. In remarks that we should note are entirely unsubstantiated, he tweeted: "Time to drop the really big bomb: "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. "Have a nice day, DJT!" It's not a secret that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein used to hang out at New York Society events. There are pictures and video. Any suggestion of anything other than this is entirely unsubstantiated. Trump followed that up with an entirely unveiled threat - and a brutal assessment of Musk's work with Doge... "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Musk then reminded the President that a huge chunk of America's space travel capabilities are tied up in his companies. He tweeted: "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." NASA relies on the Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station. In fact, there's a launch scheduled for next Tuesday. "I don't mind Elon turning against me," Trump said. "But he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Since then, Trump's Truth Social posts have mostly been promoting a Newsmax story about "strong" polls for the President. All four polls in the story give him sub 50% approval. Trump's poll average 46.5%, the second worst polling for a president 133 days into his term. The only president who polled worse at this point in his presidency was himself, eight years ago. Mum and Dad went off to seethe at this point, so the kids started to pick sides. Former Trump aide turned far-right revolutionary Steve Bannon picked his side - unsurprisingly backing his old boss. He urged Trump to immediately seize SpaceX from Musk. And he said: "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately. "Elon Musk is illegal, and he's got to go." On the other hand, Ian Miles Cheong, who is somehow a major figure in the MAGA movement despite being some kid who lives in Malaysia, is going hard Team Musk. "President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon," he tweeted last night. "Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him." As tension between the White House and Europe heats up, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is , select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our . Tennessee. He was visiting Nashville last night as a featured guest of a Republican National Committee fundraiser. As the public fallout picked up steam, he tweeted this picture of him with comedian podcaster Theo Von: He, of course, remains Team Trump - and posted: "President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him." Well, when Elon wakes up, he'll probably do some more tweeting. That's literally the only thing we can solidly predict with this guy. And Trump is scheduled to hold an Executive Order signing in the Oval Office at 6.30pm UK time - followed by a ceremony to swear in the new Secretary of the Navy. There will be cameras, there will be questions. It will be worth tuning in. Later, Trump is going to a UFC fight in New Jersey. Get some popcorn, clear your schedule. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.

Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties
Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties

Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, appeared together at the Old Bailey on Friday. Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, 34, refused to attend the hearing. Two of the fires took place in Kentish Town, north London – one in the early hours of May 12 at the home where Sir Keir lived before he became Prime Minister and moved into Downing Street. A car was set alight in the same street four days earlier on May 8. The other fire was on May 11 at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington. Lavrynovych, of Lewisham, south-east London, has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life on May 8, May 11 and May 12. Carpiuc, from Romford, east London, and Pochynok, of Islington, north London, are each accused of one count of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between April 17 and May 13. Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared at the hearing via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, and spoke only to confirm their identities and dates of birth via an interpreter. Ms Justice Cheema Grubb told the court that Pochynok had refused to leave his cell for the preliminary hearing. All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on October 17. A provisional trial date was set for April 27 next year in front of a High Court judge. A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted Airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents. The Metropolitan Police said he had been released on bail until next month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store